journal article·2021-08-27

Cadmium-Containing Quantum Dots Used in Electronic Displays: Implications for Toxicity and Environmental Transformations

Aude Bechu, Jeffrey Liao, Chang Huang, Chany Ahn, Maureen McKeague, Subhasis Ghoshal, Audrey Moores

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 4· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Cadmium-containing quantum dot (QD) nanoparticles are integrated into electronic displays because of their ability to efficiently convert colors. There are conflicting accounts as to whether these particles present a hazard to the environment, as they have been studied either as (1) embedded QDs in display screen films or (2) as model QDs with small, hydrophilic ligands. Both approaches have limitations that we addressed by synthesizing QDs featuring the core–shell structure and the thick polymer coating present in commercial devices to probe the dissolution of QDs in response to two environmental factors (pH and dissolved oxygen) over 1 day and 6 months. Results show that QDs were chemically stable at circumneutral pH (0% Cd dissolution after 6 months), but low pH initiated rapid dissolution under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions (up to 100% Cd dissolution after 6 months). In addition to the presence of a capping polymer, the QD shell structure led to more chemically stable nanoparticles compared to nonshelled QDs, as the presence of ZnS shells decreased Cd dissolution by 75%. The dense aggregation of QDs into structures of ∼100 nm diameter over time was observed as well, which could lead to decreased bioavailability. To test this, we used liver cells to compare the toxicity of pristine QDs to those subjected to acid dissolution. Our results reveal that low-pH-exposed QDs separated from dissolved ions are less toxic than pristine QDs (half maximal inhibitory concentration, IC50, of 290 and 150 mg/L, respectively) and suggest a key role of dissolved ions and capping polymers for QD toxicity. These findings highlight the use of a commercially relevant nanoparticle structure to demonstrate fate and toxicity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0B8, Canada

Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1Y6, Canada

Department of Civil Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0C3, Canada

Centre for Green Chemistry and Catalysis, Department of Chemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0B8, Canada

Department of Materials Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0C5, Canada

Funding

Canada Foundation for Innovation · McGill University · Fonds de Recherche du Qu??bec - Nature et Technologies · Canada Research Chairs · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C8CS00431E10.1039/C8CS00431E ↗
2. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.07.01310.1016/j.tibtech.2019.07.013 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.aat380310.1126/science.aat3803 ↗
4. McCoy, M. A Quantum Leap In Display Quality From Quantum Dots. https://cen.acs.org/articles/odsmeter.html (accessed Aug 28, 2019).
5. Nanosys. Nanosys on track for record shipments of Quantum Dots for displays in 2019. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/nanosys-on-track-for-record-shipments-of-quantum-dots-for-displays-in-2019-300937397.html (accessed Jan 29, 2020).
6. 10.1364/OE.23.02368010.1364/OE.23.023680 ↗
7. Bodnarchuk M. I. · 2013 · 1
8. 10.1016/j.taap.2009.04.01010.1016/j.taap.2009.04.010 ↗
9. Dubrow, R. S.; Freeman, W. P.; Lee, E.; Furuta, P. Quantum Dot Films, Lighting Devices, and Lighting Methods. US9,199,842B2, Dec 1, 2015.
10. 10.1021/nl060993k10.1021/nl060993k ↗
11. 10.1021/jp010548810.1021/jp0105488 ↗
12. 10.1021/ja067742y10.1021/ja067742y ↗
13. Balde, C. P.; Forti, V.; Gray, V.; Kuehr, R.; Stegmann, P. The Global E-Waste Monitor—2017 ; United Nations University (UNU), International Telecommunication Union (ITU) & International Solid Waste Association (ISWA): Bonn/Geneva/Vienne, 2017; pp 1–116.
14. Fawell, J. Cadmium in Drinking-Water; Background Document for Development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality ; WHO/SDE/WSH/03.04/80/Rev/1; World Health Organization: Geneva, 2011; pp 1–16.
15. 10.1016/j.impact.2017.12.00110.1016/j.impact.2017.12.001 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jes.2019.11.01110.1016/j.jes.2019.11.011 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41598-020-59206-w10.1038/s41598-020-59206-w ↗
18. 10.1021/es304987r10.1021/es304987r ↗
19. 10.1021/es802338510.1021/es8023385 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.est.6b0447510.1021/acs.est.6b04475 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12686810.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126868 ↗
22. 10.1021/es204430f10.1021/es204430f ↗
23. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0170510.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01705 ↗
24. 10.1038/nnano.2015.33810.1038/nnano.2015.338 ↗
25. 10.1021/jp046481g10.1021/jp046481g ↗
26. 10.1021/jacs.7b0743410.1021/jacs.7b07434 ↗
27. 10.1021/ja042939g10.1021/ja042939g ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.est.8b0409610.1021/acs.est.8b04096 ↗
29. 10.1021/nn203272p10.1021/nn203272p ↗
30. 10.1021/cm020040x10.1021/cm020040x ↗
31. 10.1016/j.optmat.2018.05.06010.1016/j.optmat.2018.05.060 ↗
32. 10.1039/C9EN00603F10.1039/C9EN00603F ↗
33. 10.1002/1521-3773(20020703)41:13<2368::AID-ANIE2368>3.0.CO;2-G10.1002/1521-3773(20020703)41:13<2368::AID-ANIE2368>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
34. U.S. EPA. SW-846 Test Method 1311: Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure. https://www.epa.gov/hw-sw846/sw-846-test-method-1311-toxicity-characteristic-leaching-procedure (accessed July 12, 2019).
35. 10.1021/acs.est.8b0258510.1021/acs.est.8b02585 ↗
36. 10.1021/bm400462810.1021/bm4004628 ↗
37. 10.1021/ja016424q10.1021/ja016424q ↗
38. 10.1016/j.envpol.2012.01.04710.1016/j.envpol.2012.01.047 ↗
39. 10.1016/0166-6622(91)80142-B10.1016/0166-6622(91)80142-B ↗
40. Schippers A. · 2004
41. Wilmot P. D. · J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. · 1988 · 60 · 1264
42. 10.1021/acs.est.7b0434310.1021/acs.est.7b04343 ↗
43. 10.1007/s11051-020-05080-610.1007/s11051-020-05080-6 ↗
44. 10.1039/C0JM00007H10.1039/C0JM00007H ↗
45. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.11604910.1016/j.envpol.2020.116049 ↗
46. 10.1039/C8EN01073K10.1039/C8EN01073K ↗
47. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.01.05910.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.01.059 ↗
48. 10.1021/es802217y10.1021/es802217y ↗
49. 10.1016/j.impact.2019.10016810.1016/j.impact.2019.100168 ↗
50. 10.1093/clinchem/43.8.151210.1093/clinchem/43.8.1512 ↗
51. 10.1039/C2CS35392J10.1039/C2CS35392J ↗
52. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.07.00110.1016/j.toxlet.2005.07.001 ↗
53. 10.2131/jts.35.46510.2131/jts.35.465 ↗
54. 10.1039/c3mt20234h10.1039/c3mt20234h ↗
55. 10.3390/ijms1303370310.3390/ijms13033703 ↗
56. 10.1166/jbn.2013.156110.1166/jbn.2013.1561 ↗
57. 10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60015-110.1016/S1001-0742(12)60015-1 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.03810.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.038 ↗