journal article·2024-01Open access

High‐rate electrochemical H2O2 production over multimetallic atom catalysts under acidic–neutral conditions

Yueyu Tong, Jiaxin Liu, Bing‐Jian Su, Jenh‐Yih Juang, Feng Hou, Lichang Yin, Shi Xue Dou, Ji Liang

Carbon Energy· Volume 6· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production by the electrochemical 2‐electron oxygen reduction reaction (2e− ORR) is a promising alternative to the energy‐intensive anthraquinone process, and single‐atom electrocatalysts show the unique capability of high selectivity toward 2e− ORR against the 4e− one. The extremely low surface density of the single‐atom sites and the inflexibility in manipulating their geometric/electronic configurations, however, compromise the H2O2 yield and impede further performance enhancement. Herein, we construct a family of multiatom catalysts (MACs), on which two or three single atoms are closely coordinated to form high‐density active sites that are versatile in their atomic configurations for optimal adsorption of essential *OOH species. Among them, the Cox–Ni MAC presents excellent electrocatalytic performance for 2e− ORR, in terms of its exceptionally high H2O2 yield in acidic electrolytes (28.96 mol L−1 gcat.−1 h−1) and high selectivity under acidic to neutral conditions in a wide potential region (>80%, 0–0.7 V). Operando X‐ray absorption and density functional theory analyses jointly unveil its unique trimetallic Co2NiN8 configuration, which efficiently induces an appropriate Ni–d orbital filling and modulates the *OOH adsorption, together boosting the electrocatalytic 2e− ORR capability. This work thus provides a new MAC strategy for tuning the geometric/electronic structure of active sites for 2e− ORR and other potential electrochemical processes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory for Advanced Ceramics and Machining Technology of Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering Tianjin University Tianjin China

Institute for Superconducting and Electronic Materials University of Wollongong, Innovation Campus North Wollongong New South Wales Australia

Department of Electrophysics National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu Taiwan China

Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenyang Liaoning China

Institute of Energy Materials Science University of Shanghai for Science and Technology Shanghai China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Australian Research Council · Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province

References (86)

Show source-provided references
1. LiuS LiuM LiX et al. Metal organic polymers with dual catalytic sites for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution reactions.Carbon Energy.2023;5(5):e303.10.1002/cey2.303 ↗
2. FanM WangZ ZhaoY et al. Porous heterostructure of graphene/hexagonal boron nitride as an efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen peroxide generation.Carbon Energy.2023;5(5):e309.10.1002/cey2.309 ↗
3. 10.1002/cey2.3310.1002/cey2.33 ↗
4. KimD SurendranS JeongY et al. Electrosynthesis of low Pt‐loaded high entropy catalysts for effective hydrogen evolution with improved acidic durability.Adv Mater Technol.2023;8(20):2200882.10.1002/admt.202200882 ↗
5. 10.1002/admt.20220057210.1002/admt.202200572 ↗
6. 10.1002/cey2.20710.1002/cey2.207 ↗
7. 10.1002/anie.20050377910.1002/anie.200503779 ↗
8. 10.1039/C5CY01567G10.1039/C5CY01567G ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cattod.2014.03.01110.1016/j.cattod.2014.03.011 ↗
10. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0021710.1021/acscatal.8b00217 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.12.00810.1016/j.chempr.2019.12.008 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41563-019-0571-510.1038/s41563-019-0571-5 ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.20220654410.1002/anie.202206544 ↗
14. 10.1002/adfm.20211022410.1002/adfm.202110224 ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20190157510.1002/anie.201901575 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41565-021-01022-y10.1038/s41565-021-01022-y ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20200438210.1002/adma.202004382 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.474206310.1063/1.4742063 ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20170080210.1002/adfm.201700802 ↗
20. 10.1021/jacs.1c0313510.1021/jacs.1c03135 ↗
21. 10.1002/aenm.20210356410.1002/aenm.202103564 ↗
22. 10.1039/C9EE04040D10.1039/C9EE04040D ↗
23. 10.1038/s41565-018-0089-z10.1038/s41565-018-0089-z ↗
24. 10.1039/C9EE01722D10.1039/C9EE01722D ↗
25. 10.1021/jacs.9b0836210.1021/jacs.9b08362 ↗
26. 10.1002/cey2.25310.1002/cey2.253 ↗
27. ZhangW GuoX LiC et al. Ultralong nitrogen/sulfur co‐doped carbon nano‐hollow‐sphere chains with encapsulated cobalt nanoparticles for highly efficient oxygen electrocatalysis.Carbon Energy.2023:e317.10.1002/cey2.317 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20210471810.1002/adma.202104718 ↗
29. 10.1002/adma.20210257610.1002/adma.202102576 ↗
30. 10.1021/jacs.9b1334910.1021/jacs.9b13349 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.12.01110.1016/j.chempr.2018.12.011 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.07.02010.1016/j.chempr.2019.07.020 ↗
33. 10.1021/jacs.7b1038510.1021/jacs.7b10385 ↗
34. 10.1238/Physica.Topical.115a0100710.1238/Physica.Topical.115a01007 ↗
35. 10.1038/s41929-017-0017-x10.1038/s41929-017-0017-x ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
41. 10.1002/jcc.2175910.1002/jcc.21759 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
43. 10.1002/adfm.20220565410.1002/adfm.202205654 ↗
44. 10.1039/b914462e10.1039/b914462e ↗
45. 10.1002/adfm.20190846710.1002/adfm.201908467 ↗
46. 10.1039/C8TA11400E10.1039/C8TA11400E ↗
47. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.12.03910.1016/j.apsusc.2015.12.039 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.01410.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.014 ↗
49. 10.1002/smll.20180042310.1002/smll.201800423 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.12.00610.1016/j.ensm.2020.12.006 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.est.2020.10153910.1016/j.est.2020.101539 ↗
52. 10.1039/D0EE03947K10.1039/D0EE03947K ↗
53. 10.1126/science.aad499810.1126/science.aad4998 ↗
54. 10.1002/smll.20190284510.1002/smll.201902845 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.04210.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.042 ↗
56. 10.1002/adma.20190166610.1002/adma.201901666 ↗
57. 10.1149/1.139362410.1149/1.1393624 ↗
58. 10.1002/anie.20090728910.1002/anie.200907289 ↗
59. 10.1021/ja108039j10.1021/ja108039j ↗
60. 10.1038/s41467-020-17782-510.1038/s41467-020-17782-5 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.12131210.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121312 ↗
62. 10.1021/jacs.9b0557610.1021/jacs.9b05576 ↗
63. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0254610.1021/acscatal.9b02546 ↗
64. 10.1039/D0TA12008A10.1039/D0TA12008A ↗
65. 10.1038/s41467-022-30337-010.1038/s41467-022-30337-0 ↗
66. 10.1007/s41918-022-00163-510.1007/s41918-022-00163-5 ↗
67. 10.1038/s41929-018-0044-210.1038/s41929-018-0044-2 ↗
68. 10.1002/adma.20220541410.1002/adma.202205414 ↗
69. 10.1002/aenm.20190014910.1002/aenm.201900149 ↗
70. 10.1021/jacs.1c0575410.1021/jacs.1c05754 ↗
71. 10.1002/aenm.20200247310.1002/aenm.202002473 ↗
72. 10.1038/s41563-019-0571-510.1038/s41563-019-0571-5 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.02.02510.1016/j.nanoen.2018.02.025 ↗
74. 10.1038/srep0928610.1038/srep09286 ↗
75. 10.1021/jacsau.1c0038410.1021/jacsau.1c00384 ↗
76. 10.1002/adfm.20200805610.1002/adfm.202008056 ↗
77. 10.1002/anie.20160431110.1002/anie.201604311 ↗
78. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0054210.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00542 ↗
79. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c0018910.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00189 ↗
80. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.01610510.1103/PhysRevLett.99.016105 ↗
81. 10.1038/nmat379510.1038/nmat3795 ↗
82. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0292410.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02924 ↗
83. 10.1021/jacs.9b0557610.1021/jacs.9b05576 ↗
84. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0506110.1021/acscatal.8b05061 ↗
85. 10.1021/jacs.9b0381110.1021/jacs.9b03811 ↗
86. 10.1002/adma.20210471810.1002/adma.202104718 ↗