Nanopore-based disease diagnosis using pathogen-derived tryptic peptides from serum
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanopore sensors have shown great utility in nucleic acid detection and sequencing approaches. Recent studies also indicate that current signatures produced by peptide-nanopore interactions can distinguish high purity peptide mixtures, but the utility of nanopore sensors in clinical applications still needs to be explored due to the inherent complexity of clinical specimens. To fill this gap between research and clinical nanopore applications, we describe a methodology to select peptide biomarkers suitable for use in an immunoprecipitation-coupled nanopore (IP-NP) assay, based on their pathogen specificity, antigenicity, charge, water solubility and ability to produce a characteristic nanopore interaction signature. Using tuberculosis as a proof-of-principle example in a disease that can be challenging to diagnose, we demonstrate that a peptide identified by this approach produced high-affinity antibodies and yielded a characteristic peptide signature that was detectable over a broad linear range, to detect and quantify a pathogen-derived peptide from digested human serum samples with high sensitivity and specificity. This nanopore signal distinguished serum from a TB case, non-disease controls, and from a TB-case after extended anti-TB treatment. We believe this assay approach should be readily adaptable to other infectious and chronic diseases that can be diagnosed by peptide biomarkers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Caveolin-1 and cellular processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Whiting · Ann. Intern. Med. · 2010 · 152 · 45610.7326/0003-4819-152-7-201004060-00010 ↗
2. Gomara · Curr. Med. Chem. · 2007 · 14 · 53110.2174/092986707780059698 ↗
3. Stathopoulou · Clin. Exp. Immunol. · 2005 · 141 · 14810.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02812.x ↗
4. Sauna · Nat. Rev. Genet. · 2011 · 12 · 68310.1038/nrg3051 ↗
5. Sylvester · Gut · 2014 · 63 · 128410.1136/gutjnl-2013-305130 ↗
6. Muller · Nat. Cell Biol. · 2013 · 15 · 210.1038/ncb2641 ↗
7. Yadav · Nature · 2014 · 515 · 57210.1038/nature14001 ↗
8. Chen · Science · 1998 · 279 · 85110.1126/science.279.5352.851 ↗
9. Gombart · Clin. Infect. Dis. · 2009 · 48 · 41810.1086/596314 ↗
10. Santagata · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA · 2014 · 111 · 1112110.1073/pnas.1404724111 ↗
11. Giesen · Nat. Methods · 2014 · 11 · 41710.1038/nmeth.2869 ↗
12. Sela-Culang · Curr. Opin. Virol. · 2015 · 11 · 9810.1016/j.coviro.2015.03.012 ↗
13. Medzihradszky · Mass Spectrom. Rev. · 2015 · 34 · 4310.1002/mas.21406 ↗
14. Gillette · Nat. Methods · 2013 · 10 · 2810.1038/nmeth.2309 ↗
15. Liebler · Biochemistry · 2013 · 52 · 379710.1021/bi400110b ↗
16. Howorka · Nat. Biotechnol. · 2020 · 38 · 15910.1038/s41587-019-0401-y ↗
17. Shi · Anal. Chem. · 2017 · 89 · 15710.1021/acs.analchem.6b04260 ↗
18. Deamer · Nat. Biotechnol. · 2016 · 34 · 51810.1038/nbt.3423 ↗
19. Maitra · Electrophoresis · 2012 · 33 · 341810.1002/elps.201200272 ↗
20. Leggett · J. Exp. Bot. · 2017 · 68 · 541910.1093/jxb/erx289 ↗
21. Varongchayakul · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2018 · 47 · 851210.1039/C8CS00106E ↗
22. Piguet · Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 110.1038/s41467-018-03418-2 ↗
23. Zhao · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2009 · 113 · 357210.1021/jp809842g ↗
24. Kennedy · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2016 · 11 · 96810.1038/nnano.2016.120 ↗
25. Ren · Small Methods · 2020 · 4
26. Sze · Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 110.1038/s41467-017-01584-3 ↗
27. Waduge · ACS Nano · 2017 · 11 · 570610.1021/acsnano.7b01212 ↗
28. Rosen · Nat. Biotechnol. · 2014 · 32 · 17910.1038/nbt.2799 ↗
29. Rotem · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 278110.1021/ja2105653 ↗
30. Wei · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2020 · 8 · 679210.1039/D0TB00895H ↗
31. Thakur · Nat. Biotechnol. · 2019 · 37 · 9610.1038/nbt.4316 ↗
32. Liu · Clin. Chem. · 2018 · 64 · 79110.1373/clinchem.2017.273698 ↗
33. Harding · Lancet Respir. Med. · 2020 · 8 · 1910.1016/S2213-2600(19)30418-7 ↗
34. Garrido-Cardenas · Tuberculosis · 2020
35. Renshaw · J. Biol. Chem. · 2002 · 277 · 2159810.1074/jbc.M201625200 ↗
36. Liu · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA · 2017 · 114 · 396910.1073/pnas.1621360114 ↗
37. Sigal · J. Clin. Microbiol. · 2018 · 5610.1128/JCM.01338-18 ↗
38. Sutherland · Nano Lett. · 2004 · 4 · 127310.1021/nl049413e ↗
39. Chavis · ACS Sens. · 2017 · 2 · 131910.1021/acssensors.7b00362 ↗
40. Boukhet · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 1835210.1039/C6NR06936C ↗
41. Huang · Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 1
42. Wang · Anal. Chem. · 2017 · 89 · 1303910.1021/acs.analchem.7b03979 ↗
43. Piguet · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2014 · 5 · 436210.1021/jz502360c ↗