Space elevator: out of order?
Source abstract
Abstract
Classical theories of the strength of solids, such as fracture mechanics or those based on the maximum stress, assume a continuum. Even if such a continuum hypothesis can be shown to work at the nanoscale for elastic calculations, it has to be revised for computing the strength of nanostructures or nanostructured materials. Accordingly, quantized strength theories have recently been developed and validated by atomistic and quantum-mechanical calculations or nanotensile tests. As an example, the implications for the predicted strength, today erroneously formulated, of a carbon-nanotube-based space elevator megacable are discussed. In particular, the first ab initio statistical prediction for megacable strength is derived here. Our findings suggest that a megacable would have a strength lower than ~45 GPa.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Energetic Materials and Combustion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Komsomol-skaya Pravda, July 31, 1960; described in Lvov, V.
2. Pearson · Acta Astronautica · 1975 · 2 · 78510.1016/0094-5765(75)90021-1 ↗
3. Pugno · J. Physics: Condens. Matter · 2007 · 19 · 39500110.1088/0953-8984/19/39/395001 ↗
4. Iijima · Nature · 1991 · 354 · 5610.1038/354056a0 ↗
5. Edwards · Acta Astronautica · 2000 · 10 · 73510.1016/S0094-5765(00)00111-9 ↗
6. Edwards · 2003
7. Yu · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 555210.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5552 ↗
8. Yu · Science · 2000 · 287 · 63710.1126/science.287.5453.637 ↗
9. Pugno · J. Physics: Condens. Matter · 2006 · 18 · S197110.1088/0953-8984/18/33/S14 ↗
10. Pugno · Acta Mater. · 2007 · 55 · 526910.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.052 ↗
11. The space elevator: going down?10.1038/news060522-1 ↗
12. Novozhilov · Prik. Mat. Mek. · 1968 · 33 · 212
13. Ippolito · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 10411110.1103/PhysRevB.73.104111 ↗
14. Ippolito · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 22411010.1103/PhysRevB.75.224110 ↗
15. Taylor · Eng. Fracture Mech. · 2005 · 72 · 102110.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.07.001 ↗
16. Pugno · Philos. Mag. · 2004 · 84 · 282910.1080/14786430412331280382 ↗
17. Pugno · Int. J. Fracture · 2006 · 140 · 15910.1007/s10704-006-0098-z ↗
18. Pugno · Int. J. Fracture · 2006 · 141 · 31110.1007/s10704-006-0082-7 ↗
19. Griffith · Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A · 1920 · 221 · 16310.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
20. Murakami · 1986
21. Ding · Exp. Mech. · 2006 · 47 · 2510.1007/s11340-006-9344-6 ↗
22. Carpinteri · Nat. Mater. · 2005 · 4 · 42110.1038/nmat1408 ↗
23. Pugno · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2006 · 54 · 133310.1016/j.jmps.2006.01.007 ↗
24. Pugno · Eng. Fracture Mech. · 2007 · 74 · 59510.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.07.009 ↗
25. Paris · Trans. ASME J Basic Eng. · 1963 · 52810.1115/1.3656900 ↗
26. Wöhler · Z. Bauwesen · 1860 · 10
27. Rice · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1968 · 16 · 110.1016/0022-5096(68)90013-6 ↗
28. Carpinteri · Eng. Fracture Mech. · 2005 · 72 · 125410.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.09.008 ↗
29. Bhadeshia · Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 21 · 129310.1179/174328405X63999 ↗
30. Fan · Nat. Mater. · 2005 · 4 · 90610.1038/nmat1516 ↗
31. Beale · Phys. Rev. B · 1988 · 37 · 550010.1103/PhysRevB.37.5500 ↗
32. Carpinteri · Int. J. Solids Struct. · 1994 · 31 · 29110.1016/0020-7683(94)90107-4 ↗