journal article·2015-04Open access

Agricultural Nanotechnologies: What are the current possibilities?

Claudia Parisi, Mauro Vigani, Emilio Rodríguez-Cerezo

Nano Today· Volume 10· Issue 2

Abstract

Nanotechnology is recognised by the European Commission as one of its six “Key Enabling Technologies” that contribute to sustainable competitiveness and growth in several industrial sectors. The current challenges of sustainability, food security and climate change are engaging researchers in exploring the field of nanotechnology as new source of key improvements for the agricultural sector. However, concrete contributions are still uncertain. Despite the numerous potential advantages of nanotechnology and the growing trends in publications and patents, agricultural applications have not yet made it to the market. Several factors could explain the scarcity of commercial applications. On the one hand, industry experts stress that agricultural nanotechnology does not demonstrate a sufficient economic return to counterbalance the high initial production investments. On the other hand, new nanotech regulation in the EU might create regulatory uncertainty for products already on the market and affect public perception. However, recent studies demonstrate that public opinion is not negative towards nanotechnology and that the introduction on the market of nanotech products with clear benefits will likely drive consumer acceptance of more sensitive applications. The rapid progress of nanotechnology in other key industries may over time be transferred to agricultural applications as well, and facilitate their development.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (12)

Show source-provided references
1. EC, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. ‘A European strategy for Key Enabling Technologies - A bridge to growth and jobs’. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM: 2012:0341:FIN:EN:PDF (2012).
2. ObservatoryNANO FP7, European nanotechnology landscape report, 2011. http://www.scor.com/en/sgrc/pac/motor/item/1327-european-nanotechnology-landscape-report.html.
3. Sastry · J. Intellect. Prop. Rights · 2010 · 15 · 197
4. Gogos · J. Agric. Food Chem. · 2012 · 60 · 978110.1021/jf302154y ↗
5. ObservatoryNANO, Briefing No. 20. Statistical Patent Analysis. Patents: an indicator of nanotechnology innovation, 2011. http://www.nanopinion.eu/sites/default/files/briefing_no.20_patents_-_an_indicator_of_nanotechnology_innovation.pdf.
6. Torney · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2007 · 2 · 29510.1038/nnano.2007.108 ↗
7. Alemdar · Bioresour. Technol. · 2008 · 99 · 166410.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.029 ↗
8. FAO/WHO, State of the art on the initiatives and activities relevant to risk assessment and risk management of nanotechnologies in the food and agriculture sectors. FAO/WHO technical paper, 2013. http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3281e/i3281e.pdf.
9. EC, Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency. Official Journal of the European Union, 396 (2006) 1-849.
10. EC, Commission Recommendation of 18 October 2011 on the definition of nanomaterial. Official Journal of the European Union, L 275 (2011) 38-40. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:275:0038:0040:EN:PDF.
11. Gupta · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2013 · 15 · 1
12. Chen · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2013 · 15