Fly ash and nano-graphene enhanced stabilization of engine oil-contaminated soils
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Due to urbanization and population growth, the redevelopment of contaminated areas has become popular. Engine oil, used for lubricating various engines, absorbs additional components from wear. Although used oils can be recycled if collected properly, they are often dumped, leading to groundwater and soil contamination. When incorporated into natural soils, these materials deteriorate environmental quality and adversely impact the geotechnical performance of the soil. This study investigates the impact of waste engine oil (EO)-contaminated kaolin (0, 3, 5, and 9%) on its physical and engineering behavior and evaluates the effectiveness of stabilization using fly ash at 0, 10, 25, and 45%, as well as nano-graphene at 0.04, 0.08, and 0.12%. The influence of contamination duration on these properties was thoroughly examined, and the optimal proportions of mineral additives and nanoparticle materials were identified through Gray Relational Analysis, ensuring enhanced precision in performance optimization. The results show that EO contamination increases the liquid limit due to the reduced water absorption capacity and increases the plastic limit to a greater extent, leading to a decrease in the plasticity index. The addition of fly ash (FA) and nano-graphene affects the physical properties differently based on the contamination levels. The water content of the contaminated kaolin decreased, while the dry unit weight increased. EO contamination reduces the unconfined compressive strength (UCS), and higher contamination degrees result in greater reduction. The inclusion of fly ash (FA) significantly enhances the UCS, with pronounced improvements observed at higher replacement ratios. The peak UCS enhancement occurred with the incorporation of 0.08% nanographene. However, both the degree of contamination and the addition of nanographene contributed to the increased brittleness of the soil matrix. The optimal gradation for maximum UCS was found to be 0.12% nanographene with 25% FA at 5% waste engine oil contamination. For the brittleness index, 10% FA and 0.04% nanographene are recommended for 3% engine oil contamination. The study concludes that the addition of mineral additives and nanoparticle materials can improve the geotechnical properties of contaminated soils, with fly ash and nano-graphene being effective additives.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques · Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal · Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Technology Faculty, Civil Engineering Department, Firat University , Elazig , Turkey
References (74)
Show source-provided references
1. Ramadass K, Megharaj M, Venkateswarlu K, Naidu R. Ecological implications of motor oil pollution: Earthworm survival and soil health. Soil Biol Biochem. 2015;85:72–81. 10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2015.02.026.10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.026 ↗
2. Mojtahed Sistani SV, Negahdar H, Bamoharram FF, Shakeri MR. Geotechnical properties and microstructure of clay contaminated with urban wastewater and remediated with α-Aluminum oxide/α-Iron oxide nanohybrid. Soil Sediment Contam. 2023;32:812–42. 10.1080/15320383.2022.2143479.10.1080/15320383.2022.2143479 ↗
3. Baah DS, Foli G, Gikunoo E, Gidigasu SSR. Spatial distribution and potential ecological risk assessment of trace metals in reclaimed mine soils in Abuakwa South Municipal, Ghana. Soil Sediment Contam. 2023;32:692–712. 10.1080/15320383.2022.2128301.10.1080/15320383.2022.2128301 ↗
4. Nasiri M, Hajiazizi M, Jongpradist P, Mazaheri AR. Time-dependent behavior of crude oil-contaminated sands under static and dynamic states. Soil Sediment Contam Int J. 2024;33:353–74. 10.1080/15320383.2023.2204981.10.1080/15320383.2023.2204981 ↗
5. Chen S, Hou X, Luo T, Yu Y, Jin L. Effects of MgO nanoparticles on dynamic shear modulus of loess subjected to freeze-thaw cycles. J Mater Res Technol. 2022;18:5019–31. 10.1016/J.JMRT.2022.05.013.10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.05.013 ↗
6. Xia WY, Du YJ, Li FS, Li CP, Yan XL, Arulrajah A, et al. In-situ solidification/stabilization of heavy metals contaminated site soil using a dry jet mixing method and new hydroxyapatite based binder. J Hazard Mater. 2019;369:353–61. 10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2019.02.031.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.02.031 ↗
7. Benaouag N, Sardin M, Arrar J, Bentahar F. Migration of naphthalene through low organic content sandy soil columns: comparison of unsaturated and saturated conditions. Soil Sediment Contam. 2018;27:408–25. 10.1080/15320383.2018.1465889.10.1080/15320383.2018.1465889 ↗
8. Moghal AAB, Lateef MA, Mohammed SAS, Lemboye K, Chittoori BCS, Almajed A. Efficacy of enzymatically ınduced calcium carbonate precipitation in the retention of heavy metal ions. Sustainability. 2020;12:7019. 10.3390/SU12177019.10.3390/su12177019 ↗
9. Husaini A, Roslan HA, Hii KSY, Ang CH. Biodegradation of aliphatic hydrocarbon by indigenous fungi isolated from used motor oil contaminated sites. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;24:2789–97. 10.1007/S11274-008-9806-3.10.1007/s11274-008-9806-3 ↗
10. Zhou Y, Liu Y. China’s fight against soil pollution. Science (80). 2018;362:298. 10.1126/SCIENCE.AAV4061.10.1126/science.aav4061 ↗
11. Elsaigh WAH, Oluremi JR. Assessment of geotechnical properties of oil contaminated subgrade soil: Review. Soil Sediment Contam Int J. 2022;31:586–610. 10.1080/15320383.2021.1985079.10.1080/15320383.2021.1985079 ↗
12. Ostovar M, Ghiassi R, Mehdizadeh MJ, Shariatmadari N. Effects of crude oil on geotechnical specification of sandy soils. Soil Sediment Contam. 2020;30:58–73. 10.1080/15320383.2020.1792410.10.1080/15320383.2020.1792410 ↗
13. Ma Q, Xiang JC, Yang YC, Xiao HL, Wan J. Study on the mechanical properties of flax fiber-reinforced silty clay contaminated by zinc-ion solution. Environ Technol (United Kingdom). 2021;42:1071–83. 10.1080/09593330.2019.1652697.10.1080/09593330.2019.1652697 ↗
14. Mir B, Amin F, Majid B. Some studies on physical and mechanical behaviour of dredged soil from flood spill channel of Jhelum River, Srinagar. Acta Ing Civ. 2016;1:1–7.
15. Firoozi AA, Guney Olgun C, Firoozi AA, Baghini MS. Fundamentals of soil stabilization. Int J Geo-Eng. 2017;8:1–16. 10.1186/S40703-017-0064-9.10.1186/s40703-017-0064-9 ↗
16. Ghosh D, Bhattacharyya KG. Adsorption of methylene blue on kaolinite. Appl Clay Sci. 2002;20:295–300. 10.1016/S0169-1317(01)00081-3.10.1016/S0169-1317(01)00081-3 ↗
17. Salimi M, Ghorbani A. Mechanical and compressibility characteristics of a soft clay stabilized by slag-based mixtures and geopolymers. Appl Clay Sci. 2020;184:105390. 10.1016/J.CLAY.2019.105390.10.1016/j.clay.2019.105390 ↗
18. Rasool Haji T, Ahmed Mir B. Effect of nano-gypsum on mechanical properties cement admixed marginal silty soil. Constr Build Mater. 2023;408:133639. 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2023.133639.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133639 ↗
19. Wani KMNS, Mir BA. A laboratory-scale study on the bio-cementation potential of distinct river sediments ınfused with microbes. Transp Infrastruct Geotechnol. 2021;8:162–85. 10.1007/S40515-020-00131-W/FIGURES/14.10.1007/s40515-020-00131-w ↗
20. Essienubong I, Okechukwu E, Ejuvwedia S. Effects of waste dumpsites on geotechnical properties of the underlying soils in wet season. Environ Eng Res. 2019;2:289–97. 10.4491/eer.2018.162.10.4491/eer.2018.162 ↗
21. Shimobe S, Spagnoli G. Relationships between strength properties and Atterberg limits of fine-grained soils. Geomech Geoeng. 2022;17:1443–57. 10.1080/17486025.2021.1940317.10.1080/17486025.2021.1940317 ↗
22. Ahmed SM, Agaiby SS. Strength and stiffness characterization of clays using Atterberg limits. Transp Geotech. 2020;25:100420. 10.1016/J.TRGEO.2020.100420.10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100420 ↗
23. Chen Z, Ge S, Zhang Z, Du Y, Yao B, Xie H, et al. Soil moisture but not warming dominates nitrous oxide emissions during freeze–thaw cycles in a qinghai–tibetan plateau alpine meadow with discontinuous permafrost. Front Ecol Evol. 2021;9:1–12. 10.3389/fevo.2021.676027.10.3389/fevo.2021.676027 ↗
24. Wang G, Bian X, Wang YJ, Cui YJ, Zeng LL. Effect of organic matter content on Atterberg limits and undrained shear strength of river sediment. Mar Georesour Geotechnol. 2022;40:1060–72. 10.1080/1064119X.2021.1961955.10.1080/1064119X.2021.1961955 ↗
25. Singh SK, Srivastava RK, John S. Studies on soil contamination due to used motor oil and its remediation. Can Geotech J. 2009;46:1077–83. 10.1139/T09-047.10.1139/T09-047 ↗
26. Mir BA, Wani AR, Wani KMNS. Influence of municipal solid waste leachate on the geotechnical properties of soil. Indian Geotech J. 2025;1–20. 10.1007/S40098-025-01175-W.10.1007/s40098-025-01175-w ↗
27. Izdebska-Mucha D, Trzciński J. Clay soil behaviour due to long-term contamination by liquid petroleum fuels: microstructure and geotechnical properties. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 2021;80:3193–206. 10.1007/S10064-020-02084-3.10.1007/s10064-020-02084-3 ↗
28. Liu ZB, Liu SY, Cai Y. Engineering property test of kaolin clay contaminated by diesel oil. J Cent South Univ. 2015;22:4837–43. 10.1007/S11771-015-3035-3.10.1007/s11771-015-3035-3 ↗
29. Raja K, Venkatachalam S, Vishnuvardhan K, Siva Rama Krishnan R, Tamil Selvan V, Vetriselvan N. A review on soil stabilization using rice husk ash and lime sludge. Mater Today Proc. 2022;65:1205–12. 10.1016/J.MATPR.2022.04.178.10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.178 ↗
30. Karami H, Pooni J, Robert D, Costa S, Li J, Setunge S. Use of secondary additives in fly ash based soil stabilization for soft subgrades. Transp Geotech. 2021;29:100585. 10.1016/J.TRGEO.2021.100585.10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100585 ↗
31. Reiterman P, Mondschein P, Doušová B, Davidová V, Keppert M. Utilization of concrete slurry waste for soil stabilization. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2022;16:e00900. 10.1016/J.CSCM.2022.E00900.10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00900 ↗
32. Harianto T, Utami WD. Effect of mineral additives on the strength characteristics of a laterite soil. Lect Notes Civ Eng. 2021;144 LNCE:423–31. 10.1007/978-981-16-0077-7_37.10.1007/978-981-16-0077-7_37 ↗
33. Gul N, Mir BA. Influence of glass fiber and cement kiln dust on physicochemical and geomechanical properties of fine-grained soil. Innov Infrastruct Solut. 2022;7:1–15. 10.1007/S41062-022-00943-4.10.1007/s41062-022-00943-4 ↗
34. Wani KMNS, Mir BA. Stabilization of weak dredged soils by employing waste boulder crusher dust: a laboratory study. Geotech Geol Eng. 2020;38:6827–42. 10.1007/S10706-020-01472-6.10.1007/s10706-020-01472-6 ↗
35. Nachtegaal M, Marcus MA, Sonke JE, Vangronsveld J, Livi KJT, van Der Lelie D, et al. Effects of in situ remediation on the speciation and bioavailability of zinc in a smelter contaminated soil. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2005;69:4649–64. 10.1016/J.GCA.2005.05.019.10.1016/j.gca.2005.05.019 ↗
36. Oprčkal P, Mladenovič A, Zupančič N, Ščančar J, Milačič R, Zalar Serjun V. Remediation of contaminated soil by red mud and paper ash. J Clean Prod. 2020;256:120440. 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.120440.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120440 ↗
37. Mamindy-Pajany Y, Geret F, Roméo M, Hurel C, Marmier N. Ex situ remediation of contaminated sediments using mineral additives: Assessment of pollutant bioavailability with the Microtox solid phase test. Chemosphere. 2012;86:1112–6. 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2011.12.001.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.12.001 ↗
38. Ali A, Mir BA, Gul N, Malik FZ. Strength and microstructural behavior of soft soil treated with zeolite nanoparticles. Transp Infrastruct Geotechnol. 2023;10:1239–54. 10.1007/S40515-022-00261-3.10.1007/s40515-022-00261-3 ↗
39. Scrivener KL. Nanotechnology and cementitious materials. Nanotechnol Constr. 2009;3:37–42. 10.1007/978-3-642-00980-8_4.10.1007/978-3-642-00980-8_4 ↗
40. Mir BA, Reddy SH. Mechanical behaviour of nano-material (Al2O3) stabilized soft soil. Int J Eng. 2021;34:636–43. 10.5829/IJE.2021.34.03C.07.10.5829/ije.2021.34.03c.07 ↗
41. Wang Z, Sun J, Wang Y, Guo H, Aryana SA. Optimum concentration of fly ash nanoparticles to stabilize CO2 foams for aquifer and soil remediation. J Contam Hydrol. 2021;242:103853. 10.1016/J.JCONHYD.2021.103853.10.1016/j.jconhyd.2021.103853 ↗
42. Alazaiza MYD, Albahnasawi A, Ali GAM, Bashir MJK, Copty NK, Amr SSA, et al. Recent advances of nanoremediation technologies for soil and groundwater remediation: A Review. 2021;13:2186. 10.3390/W13162186.10.3390/w13162186 ↗
43. Mir BA, Hariprasad Reddy S. Enhancement in shear strength characteristics of soft soil by using nanomaterials. Lect Notes Civ Eng. 2021;90:421–35. 10.1007/978-3-030-51354-2_39.10.1007/978-3-030-51354-2_39 ↗
44. Mohammed SAS, Moghal AAB. Efficacy of nano calcium silicate (NCS) treatment on tropical soils in encapsulating heavy metal ions: leaching studies validation. Innov Infrastruct Solut. 2016;1:1–12. 10.1007/S41062-016-0024-9.10.1007/s41062-016-0024-9 ↗
45. Kumari N, Mohan C. Basic of clay minerals and their characteristic properties. In: Nascimento G, editor. Clay and clay minerals. United Kingdom: IntechOpen; 2021. p. 15–45.10.5772/intechopen.97672 ↗
46. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration (GDMRE). Clay deposits map of Turkey. Ankara, Turkey: GDMRE, 2022.
47. ASTM International. ASTM D854-02, Standard test method for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. USA: West Conshohocken, PA; 2017.
48. ASTM International. ASTM D4318-10e1, Standard test methods for liquid limit. Plastic limit. and plasticity index of soils. USA: West Conshohocken, PA; 2017.
49. ASTM International. ASTM D698-00ae1, Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort (12.400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)). USA: West Conshohocken, PA; 2017.
50. Srivastava L, Paramkusam BR, Prasad A. Indian Geotechnical Conference-2010. Stabilisation Engine Oil Contam. Soil Using Cem. Kiln Dust, IGS Mumbai Chapter & IIT Bombay; 2010. p. 389–92.
51. Zhongjiang H, Shouxi C, Min L, Zhongjiang H, Shouxi C, Min L. Effect of wetting and drying cycles on the compressive strength of oil-contaminated soil treated with lime and fly ash. J Eng Geol. 2018;26:438–44. 10.13544/J.CNKI.JEG.2017-043.
52. Li M, Ma C, Sun ZM, Yao XY. Mechanical properties distribution of lime-fly ash solidified oil contaminated soil in a coastal environment. Eur J Environ Civ Eng. 2022;26:3027–42. 10.1080/19648189.2020.1781695.10.1080/19648189.2020.1781695 ↗
53. CJM, Shetty SS, Venkat Reddy D, Istijono B. Experimental study on lateritic soil stabilization with waste engine oil and lime. Turk J Comput Math Educ. 2021;12:102–10.
54. Mir BA, Sridharan A. Physical and compaction behaviour of clay soil-fly ash mixtures. Geotech Geol Eng. 2013;1059–72. 10.1007/s10706-013-9632-8.10.1007/s10706-013-9632-8 ↗
55. ASTM International. ASTM D2166, Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2010.
56. Jalal FE, Mulk S, Memon SA, Jamhiri B, Naseem A. Strength, hydraulic, and microstructural characteristics of expansive soils ıncorporating marble dust and rice husk ash. Adv Civ Eng. 2021;2021:9918757. 10.1155/2021/9918757.10.1155/2021/9918757 ↗
57. Zhang Y, Guo S, Yin X, Han SL, Shao S. Evolution of the anti-weathering characteristics of clay at earthen sites treated with K2SiO3 solutions: Micromechanism analysis based on SEM tests. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 2022;81:1–13. 10.1007/S10064-022-02926-2/FIGURES/13.10.1007/s10064-022-02926-2 ↗
58. Li L, Zhang J, Xiao H, Hu Z, Wang Z. Experimental investigation of mechanical behaviors of fiber-reinforced fly ash-soil mixture. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2019;2019:1050536. 10.1155/2019/1050536.10.1155/2019/1050536 ↗
59. Zabielska-Adamska K. Characteristics of compacted fly ash as a transitional soil. Materials. 2020;13:1387. 10.3390/MA13061387.10.3390/ma13061387 ↗
60. Li LH, Yu CD, Xiao HL, Feng WQ, Ma Q, Yin JH. Experimental study on the reinforced fly ash and sand retaining wall under static load. Constr Build Mater. 2020;248:118678. 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.118678.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118678 ↗
61. Ahmed AGA. Fly ash utilization in soil stabilization. Int Conf Civil Biol Environ Eng. 2014. p. 76–8. 10.15242/IICBE.C514601.
62. Bose B. Geo-Engineering properties of expansive soil stabilized with fly ash. Electron J Geotech Eng. 2012;17:1339–53.
63. Mir BA. Some studies on the effect of fly ash and lime on physical and mechanical properties of expansive clay. Trans B Geotech Eng. 2015;13(3):203–12.
64. Nazir AK. Effect of motor oil contamination on geotechnical properties of over consolidated clay. Alex Eng J. 2011;50:331–5. 10.1016/J.AEJ.2011.05.002.10.1016/j.aej.2011.05.002 ↗
65. Dindar E, Topaç Şağban FO, Başkaya HS. Variations of soil enzyme activities in petroleum-hydrocarbon contaminated soil. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2015;105:268–75. 10.1016/J.IBIOD.2015.09.011.10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.09.011 ↗
66. Gautam P, Bajagain R, Jeong SW. Combined effects of soil particle size with washing time and soil-to-water ratio on removal of total petroleum hydrocarbon from fuel contaminated soil. Chemosphere. 2020;250:126206. 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2020.126206.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126206 ↗
67. Consoli NC, Lopes LdaS, Prietto PDM, Festugato L, Cruz RC. Variables controlling stiffness and strength of lime-stabilized soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 2011;137:628–32. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000470.10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000470 ↗
68. Moghal Baig AA, Sivapullaiah PV. Effect of pozzolanic reactivity on compressibility characteristics of stabilised low lime fly ashes compressibility of low lime fly ashes. Geotech Geol Eng. 2011;29:665–73. 10.1007/s10706-011-9408-y.10.1007/s10706-011-9408-y ↗
69. Jahandari S, Mojtahedi SF, Zivari F, Jafari M, Mahmoudi MR, Shokrgozar A, et al. The impact of long-term curing period on the mechanical features of lime-geogrid treated soils. Geomech Geoeng. 2022;17:269–81. 10.1080/17486025.2020.1739753.10.1080/17486025.2020.1739753 ↗
70. Venkata Vydehi K, Moghal AAB. Effect of biopolymer ınclusion and curing conditions on the failure strain and elastic modulus of cohesive soil. Lect Notes Civ Eng. 2023;297:257–64. 10.1007/978-981-19-6727-6_23.10.1007/978-981-19-6727-6_23 ↗
71. Zhou N, Ouyang S, Cheng Q, Ju F. Experimental study on mechanical behavior of a new backfilling material: Cement-treated marine clay. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2019;2019:1261694. 10.1155/2019/1261694.10.1155/2019/1261694 ↗
72. Oluwatuyi OE, Ojuri OO, Khoshghalb A. Cement-lime stabilization of crude oil contaminated kaolin clay. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. 2020;12:160–7. 10.1016/J.JRMGE.2019.07.010.10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.07.010 ↗
73. Saberian M, Jahandari S, Li J, Zivari F. Effect of curing, capillary action, and groundwater level increment on geotechnical properties of lime concrete: Experimental and prediction studies. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. 2017;9:638–47. 10.1016/J.JRMGE.2017.01.004.10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.01.004 ↗
74. Singh T, Patnaik A, Chauhan R. Optimization of tribological properties of cement kiln dust-filled brake pad using grey relation analysis. Mater Des. 2016;89:1335–42. 10.1016/J.MATDES.2015.10.045.10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.045 ↗