Magnesium-reinforced PMMA composite scaffolds: Synthesis, characterization, and 3D printing via stereolithography
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Metal particle-reinforced polymer resin scaffolds are becoming increasingly prominent in biomedical applications due to their potential to support tissue regeneration and healing. These scaffolds are designed to serve as temporary frameworks that support affected tissues and gradually degrade during healing. The primary focus of these research efforts has been on determining the optimal materials and methods for creating these scaffolds, ensuring that they are biocompatible, capable of withstanding structural strains, and can support cellular proliferation, tissue growth, and vascularization. Despite the growing interest in polymers and their metal composites, a notable gap exists in leveraging the benefits of fabricating these composites through additive manufacturing techniques, particularly stereolithography (SLA). Magnesium (Mg), in particular, is a biocompatible and osteoconductive material known for its remarkable mechanical properties and biodegradability, making it highly suitable for bone implants. Additionally, Mg can potentially regenerate skin tissues and inhibit bacterial infections. Mg ions are crucial for wound healing because they repair the skin barrier and facilitate blood coagulation. This research focuses on finding optimal conditions for manufacturing magnesium-induced poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) resin scaffolds using SLA. To evaluate their printability and the effect of different material compositions on the 3D-printed structures, PMMA resin was mixed with high-weight percentages (wt%) of Mg alloy WE43. This mixture was then used to 3D-print test coupons and scaffolds via SLA. The impact of Mg incorporation on the scaffold’s structural integrity, thermal degradation, and biological response was assessed through physicochemical and thermal characterization and biocompatibility experiments. Notably, pure PMMA exhibited the highest tensile strength, 26.23 ± 0.14 MPa and an elastic modulus of 707.81 MPa, while PMMA resin/1% Mg showed the lowest strength (19.46 ± 0.25 MPa) and modulus (392.88 MPa), indicating a decrease in mechanical integrity with higher Mg content. However, the thermal stability was enhanced with the addition of Mg as the thermal degradation onset improved from ∼310 to 335°C. The challenges encountered in manufacturing PMMA resin/Mg composites and their potential applications were discussed, highlighting the future directions and promising avenues for further research and development.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Sustainable Development, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation , Doha , 34110 , Qatar
Qatar Biomedical Research Institute, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation , Doha , 34110 , Qatar
References (73)
Show source-provided references
1. Kashirina A, Yao Y, Liu Y, Leng J. Biopolymers as bone substitutes: a review. Biomater Sci. 2019;7:3961–83. 10.1039/C9BM00664H.10.1039/C9BM00664H ↗
2. Sharma SK, Saxena KK, Malik V, Mohammed KA, Prakash C, Buddhi D, et al. Significance of alloying elements on the mechanical characteristics of Mg-based materials for biomedical applications. Crystals. 2022;12(8):1138. 10.3390/cryst12081138.10.3390/cryst12081138 ↗
3. Zhang T, Wang W, Liu J, Wang L, Tang Y, Wang K. A review on magnesium alloys for biomedical applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:953344. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.953344.10.3389/fbioe.2022.953344 ↗
4. Lee S-J, Kang H-W, Park JK, Rhie J-W, Hahn SK, Cho D-W. Application of microstereolithography in the development of three-dimensional cartilage regeneration scaffolds. Biomed Microdevices. 2008;10:233–41. 10.1007/s10544-007-9129-4.10.1007/s10544-007-9129-4 ↗
5. Cooke MN, Fisher JP, Dean D, Rimnac C, Mikos AG. Use of stereolithography to manufacture critical-sized 3D biodegradable scaffolds for bone ingrowth. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003;64B:65–9. 10.1002/jbm.b.10485.10.1002/jbm.b.10485 ↗
6. Milovanović J, Stojković M, Trifunović M, Vitković N. Review of bone scaffold design concepts and design methods. Facta Univ, Ser: Mech Eng. 2023;21:151–73.10.22190/FUME200328038M ↗
7. Koumentakou I, Michopoulou A, Noordam MJ, Terzopoulou Z, Bikiaris DN. 3D-printed scaffolds for tissue engineering applications using thermosensitive hydrogels based on biopolymer blends. J Mater Sci. 2024;59(20):9021–41. 10.1007/s10853-024-09707-0.10.1007/s10853-024-09707-0 ↗
8. Seck TM, Melchels FPW, Feijen J, Grijpma DW. Designed biodegradable hydrogel structures prepared by stereolithography using poly(ethylene glycol)/poly(d,l-lactide)-based resins. J Controlled Release. 2010;148:34–41. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.07.111.10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.07.111 ↗
9. Turudija R, Stojković M, Stojković JR, Aranđelović J, Marinković D. Stiffness of anatomically shaped lattice scaffolds made by direct metal laser sintering of Ti-6Al-4V powder: A comparison of two different design variants. Metals. 2024;14:219.10.3390/met14020219 ↗
10. Stojković JR, Stojković M, Turudija R, Aranđelović J, Marinkovic D. Adjustable elasticity of anatomically shaped lattice bone scaffold built by electron beam melting Ti6Al4V powder. Metals. 2023;13:1522.10.3390/met13091522 ↗
11. Badali V, Checa S, Zehn MM, Marinkovic D, Mohammadkhah M. Computational design and evaluation of the mechanical and electrical behavior of a piezoelectric scaffold: a preclinical study. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024;11:1261108. 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1261108.10.3389/fbioe.2023.1261108 ↗
12. Muley SV, Vidvans AN, Chaudhari GP, Udainiya S. An assessment of ultra fine grained 316L stainless steel for implant applications. Acta Biomater. 2016;30:408–19. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.043.10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.043 ↗
13. Rezaee A, Kermanpur A, Najafizadeh A, Moallemi M. Production of nano/ultrafine grained AISI 201L stainless steel through advanced thermo-mechanical treatment. Mater Sci Eng, A. 2011;528:5025–9. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.093.10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.093 ↗
14. Xiang DD, Wang P, Tan XP, Chandra S, Wang C, Nai MLS, et al. Anisotropic microstructure and mechanical properties of additively manufactured Co–Cr–Mo alloy using selective electron beam melting for orthopedic implants. Mater Sci Eng, A. 2019;765:138270. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.138270.10.1016/j.msea.2019.138270 ↗
15. Kalva SN, Ali F, Velasquez CA, Koç M. 3D-Printable PLA/Mg composite filaments for potential bone tissue engineering applications. Polymer. 2023;15:2572. 10.3390/polym15112572.10.3390/polym15112572 ↗
16. Singh G, Singh S, Prakash C, Ramakrishna S. On investigating the soda-lime shot blasting of AZ31 alloy: Effects on surface roughness, material removal rate, corrosion resistance, and bioactivity. J Magnesium Alloys. 2021;9:1272–84. 10.1016/j.jma.2020.11.017.10.1016/j.jma.2020.11.017 ↗
17. Bommala VK, Krishna MG, Rao CT. Magnesium matrix composites for biomedical applications: A review. J Magnesium Alloys. 2019;7:72–9. 10.1016/j.jma.2018.11.001.10.1016/j.jma.2018.11.001 ↗
18. Agarwal S, Curtin J, Duffy B, Jaiswal S. Biodegradable magnesium alloys for orthopaedic applications: A review on corrosion, biocompatibility and surface modifications. Mater Sci Eng, C. 2016;68:948–63. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.020.10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.020 ↗
19. Feng J, Gao C, Safaei B, Qin Z, Wu H, Chu F, et al. Exceptional damping of CFRPs: Unveiling the impact of carbon fiber surface treatments. Composites, Part B. 2025;290:111973. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111973.10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111973 ↗
20. Feng J, Li A, Safaei B, Qin Z, Chu F. Revolutionary coatings: Unlocking the full potential of energy dissipation and mechanical properties in nickel foam. Chem Eng J. 2025;505:159461. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.159461.10.1016/j.cej.2025.159461 ↗
21. Francis A, Yang Y, Virtanen S, Boccaccini AR. Iron and iron-based alloys for temporary cardiovascular applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2015;26:138. 10.1007/s10856-015-5473-8.10.1007/s10856-015-5473-8 ↗
22. Wen P, Voshage M, Jauer L, Chen Y, Qin Y, Poprawe R, et al. Laser additive manufacturing of Zn metal parts for biodegradable applications: Processing, formation quality and mechanical properties. Mater Des. 2018;155:36–45. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.057.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.057 ↗
23. Xue D, Yun Y, Tan Z, Dong Z, Schulz MJ. In Vivo and In Vitro degradation behavior of magnesium alloys as biomaterials. J Mater Sci Technol. 2012;28:261–7. 10.1016/S1005-0302(12)60051-6.10.1016/S1005-0302(12)60051-6 ↗
24. Chen Z, Zhang W, Wang M, Backman LJ, Chen J. Effects of zinc, magnesium, and iron ions on bone tissue engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022;8:2321–35. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00368.10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00368 ↗
25. Ali Mohammad A, Mohammadali M, Mahmod K, Khadijeh S. A study of the effect of magnesium hydroxide on the wound healing process in rats. Med J Islamic World Acad Sci. 2006;16:165–70.
26. Gupta S, Dutta P, Acharya V, Prasad P, Roy A, Bit A. Accelerating skin barrier repair using novel bioactive magnesium-doped nanofibers of non-mulberry silk fibroin during wound healing. J Bioact Compat Polym. 2021;37:38–52. 10.1177/08839115211061737.10.1177/08839115211061737 ↗
27. Graça A, Bom S, Martins AM, Ribeiro HM, Marto J. Vat-based photopolymerization 3D printing: from materials to topical and transdermal applications. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2024;19(4):100940. 10.1016/j.ajps.2024.100940.10.1016/j.ajps.2024.100940 ↗
28. Goyanes A, Det-Amornrat U, Wang J, Basit AW, Gaisford S. 3D scanning and 3D printing as innovative technologies for fabricating personalized topical drug delivery systems. J Controlled Release. 2016;234:41–8. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.05.034.10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.05.034 ↗
29. Chen G, Xu Y, Chi Lip Kwok P, Kang L. Pharmaceutical applications of 3D printing. Addit Manuf. 2020;34:101209. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101209.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101209 ↗
30. Bom S, Martins AM, Ribeiro HM, Marto J. Diving into 3D (bio)printing: A revolutionary tool to customize the production of drug and cell-based systems for skin delivery. Int J Pharm. 2021;605:120794. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120794.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120794 ↗
31. Moulton SE, Wallace GG. 3-dimensional (3D) fabricated polymer based drug delivery systems. J Controlled Release. 2014;193:27–34. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.07.005.10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.07.005 ↗
32. Perez-Valle A, Del Amo C, Andia I. Overview of current advances in extrusion bioprinting for skin applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:6679. 10.3390/ijms21186679.10.3390/ijms21186679 ↗
33. He P, Zhao J, Zhang J, Li B, Gou Z, Gou M, et al. Bioprinting of skin constructs for wound healing. Burn Trauma. 2018;6:5. 10.1186/s41038-017-0104-x.10.1186/s41038-017-0104-x ↗
34. Bom S, Martins AM, Ribeiro HM, Marto J. Diving into 3D (bio)printing: A revolutionary tool to customize the production of drug and cell-based systems for skin delivery. Int J Pharm. 2021;605:120794. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120794.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120794 ↗
35. Bird D, Ravindra NM. Transdermal drug delivery and patches—An overview. Med Devices Sens. 2020;3:e10069. 10.1002/mds3.10069.10.1002/mds3.10069 ↗
36. Lee V, Singh G, Trasatti JP, Bjornsson C, Xu X, Tran TN, et al. Design and fabrication of human skin by three-dimensional bioprinting. Tissue Eng, Part C. 2013;20:473–84. 10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0335.10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0335 ↗
37. Al-Nimry SS, Daghmash RM. Three dimensional printing and its applications focusing on microneedles for drug delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:1597. 10.3390/pharmaceutics15061597.10.3390/pharmaceutics15061597 ↗
38. Bártolo P. Stereolithography: materials, processes and applications. Springer Science & Business Media; 2011. p. 1–36. 10.1007/978-0-387-92904-0.10.1007/978-0-387-92904-0_1 ↗
39. Huang J, Qin Q, Wang J. A review of stereolithography: processes and systems. Processes. 2020;8:1138. 10.3390/pr8091138.10.3390/pr8091138 ↗
40. Oliaei SNB. Stereolithography and its applications. Addit Subtract Manuf. 2020;1:229–50.10.1515/9783110549775-006 ↗
41. Afridi A, Al Rashid A, Koç M. Recent advances in the development of stereolithography-based additive manufacturing processes: A review of applications and challenges. Bioprinting. 2024;43:e00360. 10.1016/j.bprint.2024.e00360.10.1016/j.bprint.2024.e00360 ↗
42. Schmidleithner C, Kalaskar DM. Stereolithography. In: Cvetković D, editor. 3D Printing. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2018. 10.5772/intechopen.78147.10.5772/intechopen.78147 ↗
43. Manapat JZ, Chen Q, Ye P, Advincula RC. 3D printing of polymer nanocomposites via stereolithography. Macromol Mater Eng. 2017;302:1600553. 10.1002/MAME.201600553.10.1002/mame.201600553 ↗
44. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen KTQ, Hui D. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites, Part B. 2018;143:172–96. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012.10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
45. Robles Martinez P, Basit A, Gaisford S. The history, developments and opportunities of stereolithography. In: Basit AW, Gaisford S. editors. 3D Printing of Pharmaceuticals. 1st edn Cham: Springer; 2018. pp. 55–79. 10.1007/978-3-319-90755-0_4.10.1007/978-3-319-90755-0_4 ↗
46. Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou Z, Gou J, Hui D. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective. Composites, Part B. 2017;110:442–58. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034.10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 ↗
47. Melchels FPW, Feijen J, Grijpma DW. A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering. Biomaterials. 2010;31:6121–30. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050 ↗
48. Wang J, Goyanes A, Gaisford S, Basit AW. Stereolithographic (SLA) 3D printing of oral modified-release dosage forms. Int J Pharm. 2016;503:207–12. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.03.016.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.03.016 ↗
49. Wildemann B, Sander A, Schwabe P, Lucke M, Stöckle U, Raschke M, et al. Short term in vivo biocompatibility testing of biodegradable poly(D,L-lactide)—growth factor coating for orthopaedic implants. Biomaterials. 2005;26:4035–40. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.004.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.004 ↗
50. Rahman M, Li Y, Wen C. Realization and characterization of double-layer Ca-P coating on WE43 Mg alloy for biomedical applications. Surf Coat Technol. 2020;398:126091. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126091.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126091 ↗
51. Ali F, Kalva SN, Koç M. Additive manufacturing of polymer/Mg-based composites for porous tissue scaffolds. Polymers. 2022;14(24):5460. 10.3390/polym14245460.10.3390/polym14245460 ↗
52. Ali F, Al Rashid A, Kalva SN, Koç M. Mg-doped PLA composite as a potential material for tissue engineering—synthesis, characterization, and additive manufacturing. Materials. 2023;16:6506. 10.3390/ma16196506.10.3390/ma16196506 ↗
53. Farag MM, Yun H. Effect of gelatin addition on fabrication of magnesium phosphate-based scaffolds prepared by additive manufacturing system. Mater Lett. 2014;132:111–5. 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.06.055.10.1016/j.matlet.2014.06.055 ↗
54. Tsai K-Y, Lin H-Y, Chen Y-W, Lin C-Y, Hsu T-T, Kao C-T. Laser sintered magnesium-calcium silicate/poly-ε-caprolactone scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Materials. 2017;10:65. 10.3390/ma10010065.10.3390/ma10010065 ↗
55. Dong J, Li Y, Lin P, Leeflang MA, van Asperen S, Yu K, et al. Solvent-cast 3D printing of magnesium scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2020;114:497–514. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.08.002.10.1016/j.actbio.2020.08.002 ↗
56. Lin T, Wang X, Jin L, Li W, Zhang Y, Wang A, et al. Manufacturing of porous magnesium scaffolds for bone tissue engineering by 3D gel-printing. Mater Des. 2021;209:109948. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109948.10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109948 ↗
57. He L, Liu X, Rudd C. Additive-manufactured gyroid scaffolds of magnesium oxide, phosphate glass fiber and polylactic acid composite for bone tissue engineering. Polymers. 2021;13(2):270. 10.3390/polym13020270.10.3390/polym13020270 ↗
58. Ramanathan S, Lin Y-C, Thirumurugan S, Hu C-C, Duann Y-F, Chung R-J. Poly(methyl methacrylate) in orthopedics: strategies, challenges, and prospects in bone tissue engineering. Polymer. 2024;16(3):367. 10.3390/polym16030367.10.3390/polym16030367 ↗
59. Chen N. Embedded 3D printing and pressurized thermo-curing of PMMA for medical implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023;146:106083. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106083.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106083 ↗
60. Amirabad LM, Tahriri M, Zarrintaj P, Ghaffari R, Tayebi L. Preparation and characterization of TiO2-coated polymerization of methyl methacrylate (PMMA) for biomedical applications: In vitro study. Asia-Pac J Chem Eng. 2022;17:e2761. 10.1002/apj.2761.10.1002/apj.2761 ↗
61. Marin E, Mukai M, Boschetto F, Sunthar TPM, Adachi T, Zhu W, et al. Production of antibacterial PMMA-based composites through stereolithography. Mater Today Commun. 2022;32:103943. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103943.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103943 ↗
62. Feuser PE, Gaspar PC, Ricci-Júnior E, da Silva MCS, Nele M, Sayer C, et al. Synthesis and characterization of poly(Methyl Methacrylate) PMMA and evaluation of cytotoxicity for biomedical application. Macromol Symp. 2014;343:65–9. 10.1002/masy.201300194.10.1002/masy.201300194 ↗
63. Saxena P, Shukla P. A comparative analysis of the basic properties and applications of poly (vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) and poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Polym Bull. 2022;79:5635–65. 10.1007/s00289-021-03790-y.10.1007/s00289-021-03790-y ↗
64. Shen C, Aguey-Zinsou K-F. Can γ-MgH2 improve the hydrogen storage properties of magnesium? J Mater Chem A. 2017;5:8644–52. 10.1039/C7TA01724C.10.1039/C7TA01724C ↗
65. Sun Y, Shen C, Lai Q, Liu W, Wang D-W, Aguey-Zinsou K-F. Tailoring magnesium based materials for hydrogen storage through synthesis: Current state of the art. Energy Storage Mater. 2018;10:168–98. 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.01.010.10.1016/j.ensm.2017.01.010 ↗
66. Hemraj-Benny T, Pigza JA, Budhoo S, Condon L, Depner SW, Dennis RV, et al. Synthesis of novel single-walled carbon nanotube—magnesium nanoparticle composites by a solution reduction method. Mater Lett. 2014;117:305–8. 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.12.032.10.1016/j.matlet.2013.12.032 ↗
67. Grubbs RB. Roles of polymer ligands in nanoparticle stabilization. Polym Rev. 2007;47:197–215. 10.1080/15583720701271245.10.1080/15583720701271245 ↗
68. Darman Singho N, Johan M, Che Lah N. Temperature-dependent properties of silver-poly(methylmethacrylate) nanocomposites synthesized by in-situ technique. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2014;9:42. 10.1186/1556-276X-9-42.10.1186/1556-276X-9-42 ↗
69. Sun Y, Shen C, Lai Q, Liu W, Wang D-W, Aguey-Zinsou F. Tailoring magnesium based materials for hydrogen storage through synthesis: Current state of the art. Energy Storage Mater. 2018;10:168–98. 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.01.010.10.1016/j.ensm.2017.01.010 ↗
70. Hafizah NN, Mamat MH, Said CMS, Abidin MH, Rusop M. Thermal degradation of nanocomposited PMMA/TiO2 nanocomposites. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng. 2013;46:012045. 10.1088/1757-899X/46/1/012045.10.1088/1757-899X/46/1/012045 ↗
71. Saladino ML, Motaung TE, Luyt AS, Spinella A, Nasillo G, Caponetti E. The effect of silica nanoparticles on the morphology, mechanical properties and thermal degradation kinetics of PMMA. Polym Degrad Stab. 2012;97:452–9. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.11.006.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.11.006 ↗
72. Motaung TE, Luyt AS, Bondioli F, Messori M, Saladino ML, Spinella A, et al. PMMA–titania nanocomposites: Properties and thermal degradation behaviour. Polym Degrad Stab. 2012;97:1325–33. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.05.022.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.05.022 ↗
73. Liang H, Chen D, Chen M, Li W, Snyders R. Study of the synthesis of PMMA-Mg nanocomposite for hydrogen storage application. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2020;45:4743–53. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.039.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.039 ↗