journal article·2023-11-21Open access

Fabrication and physicochemical characterization of copper oxide–pyrrhotite nanocomposites for the cytotoxic effects on HepG2 cells and the mechanism

Yun He, Hua Huang, Minyu Fan, Zhaojiong Wang, Xiongwei Liu, Jiege Huo

Nanotechnology Reviews· Volume 12· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Novel CuO–FeS nanocomposites were synthesized to exert anticancer effects on HepG2 cells. The formation was initially demonstrated using UV–Visible spectrophotometry analysis, which indicated two peaks at 335 and 370 nm. Characteristic Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy peaks for Cu–O and Fe–S bonds were observed at 516, 577 and 619 cm −1 in addition to other notable peaks. The Miller indices correspond to the lattice spacing of monoclinic CuO and FeS as observed by selected area diffraction rings concurrent with the X-ray diffraction observations. The morphology was interpreted by scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy, indicating a particle size of 110 nm. As per energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis, strong peaks for Cu (0.9, 8 and 9 keV), Fe (6–7 keV), O (0.5 keV) and S (2.5 keV) indicated the formation of CuO–FeS blend with no impurities. A mean particle size of 121.9 nm and polydispersity index of 0.150 were displayed by dynamic light scattering analysis and the zeta potential was −29.2 mV. The composites were not toxic to normal 3T3-L1 cells and were not haemolytic even at higher doses. In addition, the stable composites exerted cytotoxic effects on HepG2 cells (IC 50 = 250 ± 5.7 μg/mL) and induced cell death by creating a loss in mitochondrial membrane potential and induction of mitochondrial apoptosis in a ROS-independent manner.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Iron oxide chemistry and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine , Nanjing 210028 , China

Department of Oncology, Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine , Changshu 215500 , China

Department of Anorectal, Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine , Changshu 215500 , China

Department of Oncology, Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Medical College, Southeast University , Jiangyin 214400 , China

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Boakye H, Atabila A, Hinneh T, Ackah M, Ojo-Benys F, Bello AI. The prevalence and determinants of non-communicable diseases among Ghanaian adults: a survey at a secondary healthcare level. PLoS One. 2023;18:e0281310.10.1371/journal.pone.0281310 ↗
2. Nethan S, Sinha D, Mehrotra R. Non communicable disease risk factors and their trends in India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18:2005–10.
3. Khaltaev N, Axelrod S. Global lung cancer mortality trends and lifestyle modifications: preliminary analysis. Chin Med J. 2020;133:1526–32.10.1097/CM9.0000000000000918 ↗
4. Ramesh S, Kosalram K. The burden of non-communicable diseases: a scoping review focus on the context of India. J Educ Health Promot. 2023;12:41.10.4103/jehp.jehp_1113_22 ↗
5. Bennett JE, Stevens GA, Mathers CD, Bonita R, Rehm J, Kruk ME, et al. NCD Countdown 2030 collaborators NCD Countdown 2030: worldwide trends in non-communicable disease mortality and progress towards sustainable development goal target 3.4. Lancet (London, Engl). 2018;392:1072–88.10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31992-5 ↗
6. Mirabelli P, Coppola L, Salvatore M. Cancer cell lines are useful model systems for medical research. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11:1098.10.3390/cancers11081098 ↗
7. Idrisova KF, Simon HU, Gomzikova MO. Role of patient-derived models of cancer in translational oncology. Cancers. 2022;15(1):139.10.3390/cancers15010139 ↗
8. Arzumanian VA, Kiseleva OI, Poverennaya EV. The curious case of the HepG2 cell line: 40 years of expertise. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:13135.10.3390/ijms222313135 ↗
9. Mathur P, Sathishkumar K, Chaturvedi M, Das P, Sudarshan KL, Santhappan S, et al. Cancer statistics, 2020: report from national cancer registry programme, India. JCO Glob Oncol. 2020;6:1063–75.10.1200/GO.20.00122 ↗
10. Singh D, Vignat J, Lorenzoni V, Eslahi M, Ginsburg O, Lauby-Secretan B, et al. Global estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2020: a baseline analysis of the WHO global cervical cancer elimination initiative. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11:e197–206.10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00501-0 ↗
11. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:7–33.10.3322/caac.21708 ↗
12. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73:17–48.10.3322/caac.21763 ↗
13. Xia C, Dong X, Li H, Cao M, Sun D, He S, et al. Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants. Chin Med J (Engl). 2022;135:584–90.10.1097/CM9.0000000000002108 ↗
14. Pandey G, Jain P. Assessing the nanotechnology on the grounds of costs, benefits, and risks. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci. 2020;9:63.10.1186/s43088-020-00085-5 ↗
15. Morigi V, Tocchio A, Bellavite Pellegrini C, Sakamoto JH, Arnone M, Tasciotti E. Nanotechnology in medicine: from inception to market domination. J Drug Deliv. 2012;2012:389485.10.1155/2012/389485 ↗
16. Ventola CL. Progress in nanomedicine: approved and investigational nanodrugs. Pharm Therapeut. 2017;42:742–55.
17. Zhang Y, Li M, Gao X, Chen Y, Liu T. Nanotechnology in cancer diagnosis: progress, challenges and opportunities. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12:137.10.1186/s13045-019-0833-3 ↗
18. Mu Q, Wang H, Zhang M. Nanoparticles for imaging and treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2017;14:123–36.10.1080/17425247.2016.1208650 ↗
19. Avula LR, Grodzinski P. Nanotechnology-aided advancement in the combating of cancer metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2022;41:383–404.10.1007/s10555-022-10025-7 ↗
20. Makada H, Habib S, Singh M. Bimetallic nanoparticles as suitable nanocarriers in cancer therapy. Sci Afr. 2023;20:e01700.10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01700 ↗
21. Talebian S, Shahnavaz B, Nejabat M, Abolhassani Y, Rassouli FB. Bacterial-mediated synthesis and characterization of copper oxide nanoparticles with antibacterial, antioxidant, and anticancer potentials. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1140010.10.3389/fbioe.2023.1140010 ↗
22. Balaji T, Manushankar CM, Al-Ghanim KA, Kamaraj C, Thirumurugan D, Thanigaivel S, et al. Padina boergesenii-mediated copper oxide nanoparticles synthesis, with their antibacterial and anticancer potential. Biomedicines. 2023;11:2285.10.3390/biomedicines11082285 ↗
23. Karthika S, Kanchana P, Prabha Devi B, Shanmuga, Sundari S. Antibacterial and anticancer activity (PANC-1) of green synthesized copper oxide nanoparticles from Catharanthus roseus. Inorg Nano-Metal Chem. 2023;1–9.10.1080/24701556.2023.2228777 ↗
24. Mahmood RI, Kadhim AA, Ibraheem S, Albukhaty S, Mohammed-Salih HS, Abbas RH, et al. Biosynthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles mediated Annona muricata as cytotoxic and apoptosis inducer factor in breast cancer cell lines. Sci Rep. 2022;12:16165.10.1038/s41598-022-20360-y ↗
25. Fu X-Z, Wu J, Li J, Ding J, Cui S, Wang X-M, et al. Heavy-metal resistant bio-hybrid with biogenic ferrous sulfide nanoparticles: pH-regulated self-assembly and wastewater treatment application. J Hazard Mater. 2023;446:130667.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130667 ↗
26. Wang J, Sun Z, Wang S, Zhao C, Xu J, Gao S, et al. Biodegradable ferrous sulfide-based nanocomposites for tumor theranostics through specific intratumoral acidosis-induced metabolic symbiosis disruption. J Am Chem Soc. 2022;144:19884–95.10.1021/jacs.2c07669 ↗
27. Varalakshmi GS, Pawar CS, Selvam R, Pearl WG, Manikantan V, Pillai AS, et al. Magnetic and photothermally active iron sulfide nanocarriers: enhanced in vitro activity of dysprosium-doped material. Inorg Chem Commun. 2023;111159:156.10.1016/j.inoche.2023.111159 ↗
28. Sarfraz MH, Zubair M, Aslam B, Ashraf A, Siddique MH, Hayat S, et al. Comparative analysis of phyto-fabricated chitosan, copper oxide, and chitosan-based CuO nanoparticles: antibacterial potential against Acinetobacter baumannii isolates and anticancer activity against HepG2 cell lines. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1188743.10.3389/fmicb.2023.1188743 ↗
29. Yi J, Luo X, Xing J, Gedanken A, Lin X, Zhang C, et al. Micelle encapsulation zinc‐doped copper oxide nanocomposites reverse Olaparib resistance in ovarian cancer by disrupting homologous recombination repair. Bioeng Transl Med. 2023;8:e10507.10.1002/btm2.10507 ↗
30. Attia NF, Abd El-Monaem EM, El-Aqapa HG, Elashery SE, Eltaweil AS, El Kady M, et al. Iron oxide nanoparticles and their pharmaceutical applications. Appl Surf Sci Adv. 2022;11:100284.10.1016/j.apsadv.2022.100284 ↗
31. Huynh KH, Pham XH, Kim J, Lee SH, Chang H, Rho WY, et al. Synthesis, properties, and biological applications of metallic alloy nanoparticles. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(14):5174. 10.3390/ijms21145174.10.3390/ijms21145174 ↗
32. Wang X, Cheng L. Multifunctional two-dimensional nanocomposites for photothermal-based combined cancer therapy. Nanoscale. 2019;11:15685–708.10.1039/C9NR04044G ↗
33. Sen M. Nanocomposite materials. Nanotechnol Environ. 2020;1–12. 10.5772/intechopen.93047.10.5772/intechopen.93047 ↗
34. Widiarti N, Sae J, Wahyuni S. Synthesis CuO–ZnO nanocomposite and its application as an antibacterial agent. IOP Conference Series: materials science and engineering. IOP Publishing; 2017. p. 012036.10.1088/1757-899X/172/1/012036 ↗
35. Bandekar SS, Hosamane SN, Patil C, Yaragatti A, Hukerikar A, Patil S, et al. ZnO–CuO nanocomposites: synthesis, characterization and antibacterial activity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing; 2020. p. 012018.10.1088/1742-6596/1706/1/012018 ↗
36. Govindasamy GA, Mydin RBSMN, Sreekantan S, Harun NH. Compositions and antimicrobial properties of binary ZnO–CuO nanocomposites encapsulated calcium and carbon from Calotropis gigantea targeted for skin pathogens. Sci Rep. 2021;11:99.10.1038/s41598-020-79547-w ↗
37. Al Baroot A, Alheshibri M, Drmosh QA, Akhtar S, Kotb E, Elsayed KA. A novel approach for fabrication ZnO/CuO nanocomposite via laser ablation in liquid and its antibacterial activity. Arab J Chem. 2022;15:103606.10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103606 ↗
38. Cao Y, Dhahad HA, El-Shorbagy MA, Alijani HQ, Zakeri M, Heydari A, et al. Green synthesis of bimetallic ZnO–CuO nanoparticles and their cytotoxicity properties. Sci Rep. 2021;11:23479.10.1038/s41598-021-02937-1 ↗
39. Adeyemi JO, Onwudiwe DC, Oyedeji AO. Biogenic synthesis of CuO, ZnO, and CuO–ZnO nanoparticles using leaf extracts of dovyalis caffra and their biological properties. Molecules. 2022;27:3206.10.3390/molecules27103206 ↗
40. Ganesan K, Jothi VK, Natarajan A, Rajaram A, Ravichandran S, Ramalingam S. Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles decorated with graphene oxide for anticancer activity and catalytic applications. Arab J Chem. 2020;13:6802–14.10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.06.033 ↗
41. Xian G, Niu L, Zhang G, Zhou N, Long Z, Zhi R. An efficient CuO–γFe2O3 composite activates persulfate for organic pollutants removal: performance, advantages and mechanism. Chemosphere. 2020;242:125191.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125191 ↗
42. Rahmah MI. Novel triple hydrothermal method for preparation of CuO/Fe2O3/Ag2O nanocomposite with antimicrobial application. Inorg Nano-Metal Chem. 2023;1–6. 10.1080/24701556.2023.2165680.
43. Nandhakumar E, Priya P, Selvakumar P, Vaishnavi E, Sasikumar A, Senthilkumar N. One step hydrothermal green approach of CuO/Ag nanocomposites: analysis of structural, biological activities. Mater Res Express. 2019;6:095036.10.1088/2053-1591/ab2eb9 ↗
44. Abdulnabi G, Juda AM. Characterization and synthesis of α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles and α-Fe2O3/CuO nanocomposite by hydrothermal method and application them in a solar cell. J Surv Fish Sci. 2023;10:4224–34.10.36329/jkcm/2023/v2.i10.10699 ↗
45. Florento L, Matias R, Tuaño E, Santiago K, dela Cruz F, Tuazon A. Comparison of cytotoxic activity of anticancer drugs against various human tumor cell lines using in vitro cell-based approach. Int J Biomed Sci. 2012;8:76.10.59566/IJBS.2012.8076 ↗
46. Jiang W, Xie Z, Huang S, Huang Q, Chen L, Gao X, et al. Targeting cariogenic pathogens and promoting competitiveness of commensal bacteria with a novel pH-responsive antimicrobial peptide. J Oral Microbiol. 2023;15:2159375.10.1080/20002297.2022.2159375 ↗
47. Biswas R, Mondal A, Chatterjee S, Ahn J. Evaluation of synergistic effects of sulforaphene with photodynamic therapy in human cervical cancer cell line. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;31:1675–82.10.1007/s10103-016-2037-1 ↗
48. Jakic B, Buszko M, Cappellano G, Wick G. Elevated sodium leads to the increased expression of HSP60 and induces apoptosis in HUVECs. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0179383.10.1371/journal.pone.0179383 ↗
49. Ling L, Tan K, Lin H, Chiu G. The role of reactive oxygen species and autophagy in safingol-induced cell death. Cell Death Dis. 2011;2:e129.10.1038/cddis.2011.12 ↗
50. Lalitha P, Veena V, Vidhyapriya P, Lakshmi P, Krishna R, Sakthivel N. Anticancer potential of pyrrole (1, 2, a) pyrazine 1, 4, dione, hexahydro 3-(2-methyl propyl)(PPDHMP) extracted from a new marine bacterium, Staphylococcus sp. strain MB30. Apoptosis. 2016;21:566–77.10.1007/s10495-016-1221-x ↗
51. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.10.1006/meth.2001.1262 ↗
52. Jacob JA, Shanmugam A. Silver nanoparticles provoke apoptosis of Dalton’s ascites lymphoma in vivo by mitochondria dependent and independent pathways. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces. 2015;136:1011–6.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.11.004 ↗
53. Jiang Z, Liu J, Chen B, Mani R, Pugazhendhi A, Shanmuganathan R, et al. Cytotoxic effects of a sesquiterpene β-elemene on THP-1 leukemia cells is mediated via crosstalk between beclin-1 mediated autophagy and caspase-dependent apoptosis. Process Biochem. 2019;87:174–8.10.1016/j.procbio.2019.09.006 ↗
54. Keabadile OP, Aremu AO, Elugoke SE, Fayemi OE. Green and traditional synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles—comparative study. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:2502.10.3390/nano10122502 ↗
55. Naika HR, Lingaraju K, Manjunath K, Kumar D, Nagaraju G, Suresh D, et al. Green synthesis of CuO nanoparticles using Gloriosa superba L. extract and their antibacterial activity. J Taibah Univ Sci. 2015;9:7–12.10.1016/j.jtusci.2014.04.006 ↗
56. Manasa D, Chandrashekar K, Kumar DM, Niranjana M, Navada KM. Mussaenda frondosa L. mediated facile green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles – characterization, photocatalytic and their biological investigations. Arab J Chem. 2021;14:103184.10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103184 ↗
57. Turali‐Emre ES, Emre AE, Vecchio DA, Kadiyala U, VanEpps JS, Kotov NA. Self‐organization of iron sulfide nanoparticles into complex multicompartment supraparticles. Adv Mater. 2023;35:2211244.10.1002/adma.202211244 ↗
58. Agoro MA, Meyer EL. FeS/FeS2 nanoscale structures synthesized in one step from Fe(ll) dithiocarbamate complexes as a single source precursor. Front Chem. 2022;10:1035594.10.3389/fchem.2022.1035594 ↗
59. Elhalawany N, Abdel-karim AM, Saleeb MM. Preparation and evaluation of some nanocarbon (NC) based composites for optoelectronic applications. Sci Rep. 2023;13:8987.10.1038/s41598-023-35754-9 ↗
60. Ahmad M, Nadeem S, Hassan S, Jamil S, Javed M, Mohyuddin A, et al. UV/VIS absorption properties of metal sulphate polymer nanocomposites. Dig J Nanomater Biostruct. 2021;16:15.10.15251/DJNB.2021.164.1557 ↗
61. Mujahid A, Dickert FL. Chapter 6 – Molecularly imprinted polymers for sensors: comparison of optical and mass-sensitive detection. In: Li S, Ge Y, Piletsky SA, Lunec J, editors. Molecularly imprinted sensors. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2012. p. 125–59.10.1016/B978-0-444-56331-6.00006-2 ↗
62. Ahmad MA, Aslam S, Mustafa F, Arshad U. Synergistic antibacterial activity of surfactant free Ag-GO nanocomposites. Sci Rep. 2021;11:196.10.1038/s41598-020-80013-w ↗
63. Elango M, Deepa M, Subramanian R, Mohamed Musthafa A. Synthesis, characterization, and antibacterial activity of polyindole/Ag–Cuo nanocomposites by reflux condensation method. Polym Technol Eng. 2018;57:1440–51.10.1080/03602559.2017.1410832 ↗
64. Yin L, Mi N, Yao Y-R, Li J, Zhang Y, Yang S-G, et al. Efficient removal of Cr(VI) by tannic acid-modified FeS nanoparticles: performance and mechanisms. Water Sci Eng. 2021;14:210–8.10.1016/j.wse.2021.08.006 ↗
65. Middya S, Layek A, Dey A, Ray PP. Synthesis of nanocrystalline FeS2 with increased band gap for solar energy harvesting. J Mater Sci Technol. 2014;30:770–5.10.1016/j.jmst.2014.01.005 ↗
66. Radoń A, Łukowiec D. The structure and formation mechanism of FeS2/Fe3S4/S8 nanocomposite synthesized using spherical shaped Fe3O4 nanoparticles as the precursor. Int J Mater Res. 2019;110:75–81.10.3139/146.111670 ↗
67. Bhavyasree PG, Xavier TS. Green synthesis of copper oxide/carbon nanocomposites using the leaf extract of Adhatoda vasica Nees, their characterization and antimicrobial activity. Heliyon. 2020;6:e03323.10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03323 ↗
68. Umoren PS, Kavaz D, Nzila A, Sankaran SS, Umoren SA. Biogenic synthesis and characterization of chitosan–CuO nanocomposite and evaluation of antibacterial activity against gram-positive and -negative bacteria. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14:1832.10.3390/polym14091832 ↗
69. Paca AM, Ajibade PA. Synthesis, optical, and structural studies of iron sulphide nanoparticles and iron sulphide hydroxyethyl cellulose nanocomposites from bis-(dithiocarbamato) iron(ii) single-source precursors. Nanomaterials. 2018;8:187.10.3390/nano8040187 ↗
70. Bhattacharjee S, Habib F, Darwish N, Shanableh A. Iron sulfide nanoparticles prepared using date seed extract: green synthesis, characterization and potential application for removal of ciprofloxacin and chromium. Powder Technol. 2021;380:219–28.10.1016/j.powtec.2020.11.055 ↗
71. Roberts DM, Landin AR, Ritter TG, Eaves JD, Stoldt CR. Nanocrystalline iron monosulfides near stoichiometry. Sci Rep. 2018;8:6591.10.1038/s41598-018-24739-8 ↗
72. Kassim A, Min HSS, Yee LY, Nagalingam S. Structural and morphological characterization of chemical bath deposition of FeS thin films in the presence of sodium tartrate as a complexing agent. Sci Eng Health Stud. 2010;4:36–42.
73. Chand Mali S, Raj S, Trivedi R. Biosynthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using Enicostemma axillare (Lam.) leaf extract. Biochem Biophysics Rep. 2019;20:100699.10.1016/j.bbrep.2019.100699 ↗
74. Bin Mobarak M, Hossain MS, Chowdhury F, Ahmed S. Synthesis and characterization of CuO nanoparticles utilizing waste fish scale and exploitation of XRD peak profile analysis for approximating the structural parameters. Arab J Chem. 2022;15:104117.10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.104117 ↗
75. Mashentseva AA, Barsbay M, Zdorovets MV, Zheltov DA, Güven O. Cu/cuo composite track-etched membranes for catalytic decomposition of nitrophenols and removal of as (III). Nanomaterials. 2020;10:1552.10.3390/nano10081552 ↗
76. Shehab MA, Sharma N, Valsesia A, Karacs G, Kristály F, Koós T, et al. Preparation and photocatalytic performance of TiO2 nanowire-based self-supported hybrid membranes. Molecules. 2022;27:2951.10.3390/molecules27092951 ↗
77. Mohamed EA. Green synthesis of copper & copper oxide nanoparticles using the extract of seedless dates. Heliyon. 2020;6:e03123.10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03123 ↗
78. Kacziba B, Szierer Á, Mészáros E, Rónavári A, Kónya Z, Feigl G. Exploration the homeostasis of signaling molecules in monocotyledonous crops with different CuO nanoparticle tolerance. Plant Stress. 2023;7:100145.10.1016/j.stress.2023.100145 ↗
79. Al-Hossainy AF, Zoromba MS, Hassanien R. Eco-friendly method to synthesize and characterize 2D nanostructured (1, 2-bis (diphenyl-phosphino) ethyl) tungsten tetracarbonyl methyl red/copper oxide di-layer thin films. Bull Mater Sci. 2018;41:1–9.10.1007/s12034-018-1594-2 ↗
80. Dhara K, Ramachandran T, Nair BG, Babu TS. Single step synthesis of Au–CuO nanoparticles decorated reduced graphene oxide for high performance disposable nonenzymatic glucose sensor. J Electroanal Chem. 2015;743:1–9.10.1016/j.jelechem.2015.02.005 ↗
81. Desalegn T, Murthy H, Ravikumar C, Nagaswarupa H. Green synthesis of CuO nanostructures using Syzygium guineense (Willd.) DC plant leaf extract and their applications. J Nanostruct. 2021;11:81–94.10.1007/s13204-020-01620-7 ↗
82. Zhao D, Tu C-M, Hu X-J, Zhang N. Notable in situ surface transformation of Cu2O nanomaterials leads to dramatic activity enhancement for CO oxidation. RSC Adv. 2017;7:37596–603.10.1039/C7RA05950G ↗
83. Moreno Flores EA. Precipitation and transformation of iron-sulfide nanoparticles in low-temperature aqueous environment: effects of reactant iron and sulfide sources. Open Access Thesis & Dissertations, University of Texas at El Paso, 123, 2019.
84. Liu X, Shan K, Shao X, Shi X, He Y, Liu Z, et al. Nanotoxic effects of silver nanoparticles on normal HEK-293 cells in comparison to cancerous HeLa cell line. Int J Nanomed. 2021;16:753.10.2147/IJN.S289008 ↗
85. Salem SS. A mini review on green nanotechnology and its development in biological effects. Arch Microbiol. 2023;205:128.10.1007/s00203-023-03467-2 ↗
86. Sarkar J, Chakraborty N, Chatterjee A, Bhattacharjee A, Dasgupta D, Acharya K. Green synthesized copper oxide nanoparticles ameliorate defence and antioxidant enzymes in Lens culinaris. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020;10:312.10.3390/nano10020312 ↗
87. Khan A, Rashid A, Younas R, Chong R. A chemical reduction approach to the synthesis of copper nanoparticles. Int Nano Lett. 2016;6:21–6.10.1007/s40089-015-0163-6 ↗
88. Nassar A-RA, Atta HM, Abdel-Rahman MA, El Naghy WS, Fouda A. Myco-synthesized copper oxide nanoparticles using harnessing metabolites of endophytic fungal strain Aspergillus terreus: an insight into antibacterial, anti-Candida, biocompatibility, anticancer, and antioxidant activities. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2023;23:261.10.1186/s12906-023-04056-y ↗
89. Malek TJ, Chaki SH, Deshpande M. Structural, morphological, optical, thermal and magnetic study of mackinawite FeS nanoparticles synthesized by wet chemical reduction technique. Phys B: Condens Matter. 2018;546:59–66.10.1016/j.physb.2018.07.024 ↗
90. Kim Y, Lee Y, Roh Y. Microbial synthesis of iron sulfide (FeS) and iron carbonate (FeCO3) nanoparticles. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2015;15:5794–7.10.1166/jnn.2015.10457 ↗
91. Danaei M, Dehghankhold M, Ataei S, Hasanzadeh Davarani F, Javanmard R, Dokhani A, et al. Impact of particle size and polydispersity index on the clinical applications of lipidic nanocarrier systems. Pharmaceutics. 2018;10:57.10.3390/pharmaceutics10020057 ↗
92. Takechi-Haraya Y, Ohgita T, Demizu Y, Saito H, Izutsu K-I, Sakai-Kato K. Current status and challenges of analytical methods for evaluation of size and surface modification of nanoparticle-based drug formulations. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2022;23:150.10.1208/s12249-022-02303-y ↗
93. Ardani H, Imawan C, Handayani W, Djuhana D, Harmoko A, Fauzia V. Enhancement of the stability of silver nanoparticles synthesized using aqueous extract of Diospyros discolor Willd. leaves using polyvinyl alcohol. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing; 2017. p. 012056.10.1088/1757-899X/188/1/012056 ↗
94. Maguire CM, Rösslein M, Wick P, Prina-Mello A. Characterisation of particles in solution – a perspective on light scattering and comparative technologies. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2018;19:732–45.10.1080/14686996.2018.1517587 ↗
95. Elamawi RM, Al-Harbi RE, Hendi AA. Biosynthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles using Trichoderma longibrachiatum and their effect on phytopathogenic fungi. Egypt J Biol Pest Control. 2018;28:28.10.1186/s41938-018-0028-1 ↗
96. Erdogan O, Abbak M, Demirbolat GM, Birtekocak F, Aksel M, Pasa S, et al. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles via Cynara scolymus leaf extracts: the characterization, anticancer potential with photodynamic therapy in MCF7 cells. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0216496.10.1371/journal.pone.0216496 ↗
97. Wen X, Wang Q, Dai T, Shao J, Wu X, Jiang Z, et al. Identification of possible reductants in the aqueous leaf extract of mangrove plant Rhizophora apiculata for the fabrication and cytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles against human osteosarcoma MG-63 cells. Mater Sci Eng C. 2020;116:111252.10.1016/j.msec.2020.111252 ↗
98. Sangwan S, Seth R. Nanotechnology: a boon in cancer therapy. Int J Nanomater Nanotechnol Nanomed. 2021;7:1–6.
99. Lo Presti E, Pizzolato G, Corsale AM, Caccamo N, Sireci G, Dieli F, , et al. γδ T cells and tumor microenvironment: from immunosurveillance to tumor evasion. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1395.10.3389/fimmu.2018.01395 ↗
100. Deshpande PP, Biswas S, Torchilin VP. Current trends in the use of liposomes for tumor targeting. Nanomedicine (London). 2013;8:1509–28.10.2217/nnm.13.118 ↗