journal article·2025-10-15Open access

Research on mechanical properties and sulfate erosion resistance of nano-reinforced coal gangue based geopolymer concrete

Yilun Chen, Zhong Xu, Ge Chen, Yijie Chen, Changjiang Liu, Xiaofang Long, Jun Yin

Nanotechnology Reviews· Volume 14· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract To enhance the engineering applicability of coal gangue-based geopolymer concrete (CGGC), nano-silica (NS) was used to modify CGGC, the influence of different NS dosage (0–2.5 wt%) on mechanical properties and durability of CGGC was studied. The compressive, flexural, and splitting tensile strengths were tested, the mass and strength loss of samples were analyzed under different sulfate attack ages with different NS dosages. With the increase in the dosage of NS, the mechanical strength and sulfate resistance of CGGC first increase and then decrease. When the dosage is 1%, the mechanical properties are improved most significantly, and when the dosage is 1.5%, the sulfate resistance is the strongest. Combined with scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and pore image analysis tests, it was revealed that NS optimized the pore defects in the matrix, generated more cementitious materials, and made the microstructure of the matrix more uniform and denser, both porosity and total pore number had a good linear correlation with compressive strength and sulfate resistance. The smaller the porosity and the fewer the total pore number, the better the engineering applicability of the sample.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Geomechanics and Mining Engineering · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection & College of Environment and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology , Chengdu , 610059 , China

The Seventh Construction Engineering Co., Ltd of Chengdu Construction Engineering Group , Chengdu , 610000 , China

School of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University , Guangzhou , 510006 , China

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Feng Z, Zhang P, Guo J, Zheng Y, Hu S. Single and synergistic effects of nano-SiO2 and hybrid fiber on rheological property and compressive strength of geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2025;472:140945.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140945 ↗
2. AL-Tam SM, Riad A, Mohammed N, Al-Otaibi A, Youssf O. Advancement of eco-friendly slag-based high-strength geopolymer concrete. J Mater Res Technol. 2025;34:1636–53.10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.12.146 ↗
3. Kansal CM, Goyal R. Analysing mechanical properties of concrete with nano silica, silica fume and steel slag. Mater Today: Proc. 2021;45:4520–5.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.1032 ↗
4. Tammam Y, Uysal M, Canpolat O, Kuranlı ÖF. Effect of waste filler materials and recycled waste aggregates on the production of geopolymer composites. Arab J Sci Eng. 2023;48:4823–40.10.1007/s13369-022-07230-5 ↗
5. Lao J-C, Huang B-T, Fang Y, Xu LY, Dai JG, Shah SP. Strain-hardening alkali-activated fly ash/slag composites with ultra-high compressive strength and ultra-high tensile ductility. Cem Concr Res. 2023;165:107075.10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.107075 ↗
6. Cai R, Ye H. Clinkerless ultra-high strength concrete based on alkali-activated slag at high temperatures. Cem Concr Res. 2021;145:106465.10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106465 ↗
7. Eki̇ Z, Bariş K, Tanaçan L. Natural pozzolan-based green geopolymer foam for thermal insulation. J Sustain Constr Mater Technol. 2022;7:128–44.10.47481/jscmt.1142100 ↗
8. Gezer T, Akarken G, Cengi̇ ZU. Production and characterization of heat retardant fiber-reinforced geopolymer plates. J Sustain Constr Mater Technol. 2022;7:282–90.10.47481/jscmt.1197471 ↗
9. Deb PS, Sarker PK, Barbhuiya S. Sorptivity and acid resistance of ambient-cured geopolymer mortars containing nano-silica. Cem Concr Compos. 2016;72:235–45.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.06.017 ↗
10. Ngui F, Muhammed N, Mutunga FM, Marangu J, Kinoti IK. A review on selected durability parameters on performance of geopolymers containing industrial by-products, agro- wastes and natural pozzolan. J Sustain Constr Mater Technol. 2022;7:375–400.10.47481/jscmt.1190244 ↗
11. Li H, Zhang Z, Deng Y, Xu F, Hu J, Zhu D, et al. Geopolymer composites for marine application: Structural properties and durability. Cem Concr Compos. 2024;152:105647.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.105647 ↗
12. Saafi M, Andrew K, Tang PL, McGhon D, Taylor S, Rahman M, et al. Multifunctional properties of carbon nanotube/fly ash geopolymeric nanocomposites. Constr Build Mater. 2013;49:46–55.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.007 ↗
13. Guo G, Li H, Zha J. An approach to protect cultivated land from subsidence and mitigate contamination from colliery gangue heaps. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2019;124:336–44.10.1016/j.psep.2019.03.004 ↗
14. Lazorenko G, Kasprzhitskii A, Yatsenko EA, Wensheng L, Chaudhary S. Towards coal mining waste valorization: Gangue as resource for the production of geopolymer and related alkali-activated materials. Green Technol Sustain. 2025;3:100205.10.1016/j.grets.2025.100205 ↗
15. Sui S, He G, Jiang C, Wang H, Kong X, Li S, et al. Investigation on the activation of various coal gangues and the reaction mechanism with portlandite. Constr Build Mater. 2025;463:140120.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140120 ↗
16. Geng J, Zhou M, Li Y, Chen Y, Han Y, Wan S, et al. Comparison of red mud and coal gangue blended geopolymers synthesized through thermal activation and mechanical grinding preactivation. Constr Build Mater. 2017;153:185–92.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.045 ↗
17. Huang G, Ji Y, Li J, Hou Z, Dong Z. Improving strength of calcinated coal gangue geopolymer mortars via increasing calcium content. Constr Build Mater. 2018;166:760–8.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.005 ↗
18. Aldawsari S. Durability of fly ash/slag geopolymers: Role of OPC and silica under sulfate attack. Constr Build Mater. 2025;465:139855.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.139855 ↗
19. Duan K. Flowability and in-situ phase evolution of Na2CO3-carbide slag-activated blast furnace slag and fly ash. Constr Build Mater. 2025;466:140341.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140341 ↗
20. Yang D. Effects of red mud, desert sand, and ground granulated blast furnace slag on the mechanical properties and microstructure of fly ash-based geopolymer. Constr Build Mater. 2025;468:140471.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140471 ↗
21. Balapanov B, Montayev S, Aygün BF, Uysal M. Accelerated microwave curing of hybrid geopolymers with nano-silica for enhanced physico-mechanical properties. J Sustain Constr Mater Technol. 2024;9:346–54.10.47481/jscmt.1606833 ↗
22. Rao BNM, Durga CSS, Venkatesh C, Rao TM. Sustainable geopolymer concrete for pavements: performance evaluation of recycled concrete aggregates in fly ash-based mixtures. J Sustain Constr Mater Technol. 2024;9:211–20.10.47481/jscmt.1554284 ↗
23. Adebayo IW, Long G, Tang Z, Ghone MO, Zaland S, Garba MJ, et al. Effect of crumb rubber and polyethylene fiber on the strength and toughness of fly ash/slag-based geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2024;455:139133.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139133 ↗
24. Siang Ng D, Paul SC, Anggraini V, Kong SY, Qureshi TS, Rodriguez CR, et al. Influence of SiO2, TiO2 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles on the properties of fly ash blended cement mortars. Constr Build Mater. 2020;258:119627.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119627 ↗
25. Qin L, Xu Z, Liu Q, Bai Z, Wang C, Luo Q, et al. Experimental study on mechanical properties of coal gangue base geopolymer recycled aggregate concrete reinforced by steel fiber and nano-Al2O3. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2023;62:20230343.10.1515/rams-2023-0343 ↗
26. Chakkor O, Altan MF, Canpolat O. Elevated temperature, freezing–thawing and mechanical properties of limestone, marble, and basalt powders reinforced metakaolin–red mud-based geopolymer mortars. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng. 2022;46:3241–58.10.1007/s40996-021-00797-3 ↗
27. Oh T, Chun B, Lee SK, Kim GW, Banthia N, Yoo DY. Effect of high-volume substituted nanosilica on the hydration and mechanical properties of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC). Cem Concr Res. 2024;175:107379.10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107379 ↗
28. Guo J, Xia X, Zhang P, Wang K. Reinforcement mechanism of nano-SiO2 and polypropylene fibers on concrete abrasion resistance subject to dynamic sandy water. J Mater Res Technol. 2023;27:1630–50.10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.321 ↗
29. Mustafa Mohamed A, Tayeh BA, Ahmed TI, Bashir MO, Tobbala DE. Influence of nano-silica and nano-ferrite particles on mechanical and durability of sustainable concrete: A review. Nanotechnol Rev. 2025;14:20250151.10.1515/ntrev-2025-0151 ↗
30. Ababneh A, Al-shouha A, Al-Akhras N, Matalkah F. Nano-silica for enhancing corrosion resistance of kaolin-based geopolymer concrete. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2025;22:e04210.10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04210 ↗
31. Gong S, Wang T, Hasan MM, Mei X, Tan Z, Su T, et al. Effect of polypropylene fiber and nano-silica on the compressive strength and frost resistance of recycled brick aggregate concrete. Nanotechnol Rev. 2023;12:20230174.10.1515/ntrev-2023-0174 ↗
32. Ban CC, Khalaf MA, Ramli M, Ahmed NM, Abunahel BM, Dawood ET, et al. Effect of nano-silica slurry on engineering, X-ray, and γ-ray attenuation characteristics of steel slag high-strength heavyweight concrete. Nanotechnol Rev. 2020;9:1245–64.10.1515/ntrev-2020-0098 ↗
33. Zhan P, Xu J, Wang J, Zuo J, He Z. A review of recycled aggregate concrete modified by nanosilica and graphene oxide: Materials, performances and mechanism. J Clean Prod. 2022;375:134116.10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134116 ↗
34. Zhang P, Sun Y, Wu J, Hong J, Gao Z. Mechanical properties and microstructure of nano-modified geopolymer concrete containing hybrid fibers after exposure to elevated temperature. Constr Build Mater. 2023;409:134044.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134044 ↗
35. Xu Z, Yu H, Sun X, Zhao M, Hui D. Research on mechanical properties and microscopic mechanism of multi-based geopolymer concrete under combined action of pre-curing and nano-silica. J Build Eng. 2024;97:110930.10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110930 ↗
36. Deng F, Cao C, Chi Y, Xu L. Effect of cellulose nanofiber addition on the microstructure characterization and nano-mechanical behavior of interfacial transition zones in recycled concrete. J Mater Res Technol. 2024;33:7572–85.10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.11.040 ↗
37. ArabMohamed, MAES, Mohamed AS, Taha MK, Nasr A. Microstructure, durability and mechanical properties of high strength geopolymer concrete containing calcinated nano-silica fume/nano-alumina blend. Constr Build Mater. 2025;472:140903.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140903 ↗
38. Zhang P, Wang W, Guo J, Zheng Y. Abrasion resistance and damage mechanism of hybrid fiber-reinforced geopolymer concrete containing nano-SiO2. J Clean Prod. 2025;494:144971.10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144971 ↗
39. Xu Z, Liu Q, Long H, Deng H, Chen Z, Hui D. Influence of nano-SiO2 and steel fiber on mechanical and microstructural properties of red mud-based geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2023;364:129990.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129990 ↗
40. Lin Y, Alengaram UJ, Ibrahim Z. Effect of treated and untreated rice husk ash, palm oil fuel ash, and sugarcane bagasse ash on the mechanical, durability, and microstructure characteristics of blended concrete – A comprehensive review. J Build Eng. 2023;78:107500.10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107500 ↗
41. Lu B, Zhang Z, Zhu H, Liu K, Zhang Y, Chen W. Optimization design of recycled powder mortar mix ratio based on orthogonal test. Constr Build Mater. 2025;474:141145.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141145 ↗
42. Wu Z, Khayat KH, Shi C. Effect of nano-SiO2 particles and curing time on development of fiber-matrix bond properties and microstructure of ultra-high strength concrete. Cem Concr Res. 2017;95:247–56.10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.02.031 ↗
43. Chen P. Effect of nano-silica on mechanical properties and shrinkage of alkali-activated slag cementitious material. Dev Built Environ. 2024;19:100525.10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100525 ↗
44. Dong B. Effect of nano-silica on mechanical properties and microstructure of engineered geopolymer composites. Cem Concr Compos. 2025;156:105849.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.105849 ↗
45. Raveendran N. Synergistic effect of nano silica and metakaolin on mechanical and microstructural properties of concrete: An approach of response surface methodology. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2024;20:e03196.10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03196 ↗
46. Xu Z, Long H, Liu Q, Yu H, Zhang X, Hui D. Mechanical properties and durability of geopolymer concrete based on fly ash and coal gangue under different dosage and particle size of nano silica. Constr Build Mater. 2023;387:131622.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131622 ↗
47. Liu Z, Deng D, De Schutter G. Does concrete suffer sulfate salt weathering? Constr Build Mater. 2014;66:692–701.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.011 ↗
48. Zhang W, Zhao F, Feng B, Mei X. Study on the advancement process of alkali loss and deterioration of concrete under MgSO4 erosion. J Mater Res Technol. 2025;36:2849–62.10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.04.029 ↗
49. Zak D, Hupfer M, Cabezas A, Jurasinski G, Audet J, Kleeberg A, et al. Sulphate in freshwater ecosystems: A review of sources, biogeochemical cycles, ecotoxicological effects and bioremediation. Earth-Sci Rev. 2021;212:103446.10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103446 ↗