journal article·2025-02-07Open access

Multicriteria-based optimization and multi-variable non-linear regression analysis of concrete containing blends of nano date palm ash and eggshell powder as cementitious materials

Musa Adamu, Yasser E. Ibrahim, Anuja U. Charpe, Ashwin Narendra Raut

Nanotechnology Reviews· Volume 14· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract The persistence of global concerns regarding the environmental effects of cement production, particularly its significant contribution to CO 2 emissions, led to the search for different supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). Hence, this research utilized date palm ash (DPA) as an SCM to produce concrete. Nano eggshell powder (NESP) was also incorporated as an additive to binder materials in the concrete to hasten the pozzolanic reaction in the concrete. DPA was used to replace between 0 and 40% of the cement by volume, and the NESP was added in dosage between 0 and 4% by weight of binders. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) technique was adopted by employing different methods that include MOORA and VIKOR to select the optimal mix proportions containing DPA and NESP. Furthermore, multi-variable non-linear regression (MNLR) analysis was used to develop mathematical models for predicting the concrete’s properties using the proportions of DPA and NESP as the variables. The findings from the MCDM showed that Mix M8 consistently ranked highest across both MOORA and VIKOR analyses, demonstrating superior performance due to optimal incorporation of 40% DPA and 2% NESP. The developed MNLR models attained high accuracy in predicting with good-to-excellent R ² values ranging between 0.79 and 0.94 for most properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Engineering Management Department, College of Engineering, Prince Sultan University , 11586 , Riyadh , Saudi Arabia

Structures and Materials Research Laboratory, College of Engineering, Prince Sultan University , 11586 , Riyadh , Saudi Arabia

Civil Engineering Department, Velagapudi Ramakrishna Siddhartha Engineering College, Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education, Deemed to be University , Vijayawada , Andhra Pradesh 520010 , India

Department of Civil Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation , Vaddeswaram, Guntur (Dt.) , 522502, AP , India

References (86)

Show source-provided references
1. Sohu S, Bheel N, Jhatial AA, Ansari AA, Shar IA. Sustainability and mechanical property assessment of concrete incorporating eggshell powder and silica fume as binary and ternary cementitious materials. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29(39):58685–97.10.1007/s11356-022-19894-5 ↗
2. Alkhrissat T. Impact of adding waste polyethylene (PE) and silica fume (SF) on the engineering properties of cement mortar. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng. 2024;9:100731.10.1016/j.cscee.2024.100731 ↗
3. Alsaif A. Utilization of ceramic waste as partially cement substitute–A review. Constr Build Mater. 2021;300:124009.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124009 ↗
4. Elemam WE, Agwa IS, Tahwia AM. Reusing ceramic waste as a fine aggregate and supplemental cementitious material in the manufacture of sustainable concrete. Buildings. 2023;13(11):2726.10.3390/buildings13112726 ↗
5. Elemam WE, Abdelraheem AH, Mahdy MG, Tahwia AM. Optimizing fresh properties and compressive strength of self-consolidating concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2020;249:118781.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118781 ↗
6. Mokal MP, Mandal R, Nayak S, Panda SK. Efficacy of high-volume fly ash and slag on the physicomechanical, durability, and analytical characteristics of high-strength mass concrete. J Build Eng. 2023;76:107295.10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107295 ↗
7. Orozco C, Babel S, Tangtermsirikul S, Sugiyama T. Comparison of environmental impacts of fly ash and slag as cement replacement materials for mass concrete and the impact of transportation. Sustain Mater Technol. 2024;39:e00796.10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00796 ↗
8. Awoyera P, Adesina A, Olalusi OB, Viloria A. Reinforced concrete deterioration caused by contaminated construction water: An overview. Eng Fail Anal. 2020;116:104715.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104715 ↗
9. Tahir F, Alzahrani S, Noori Y, Al-Ghamdi SG. Environmental impacts and the future prospects of waste utilization in the concrete production. Mater Today: Proc. 2024. 10.1016/j.matpr.2024.05.150.10.1016/j.matpr.2024.05.150 ↗
10. Dhandapani Y, Santhanam M, Kaladharan G, Ramanathan S. Towards ternary binders involving limestone additions—A review. Cem Concr Res. 2021;143:106396.10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106396 ↗
11. Khankhaje E, Kim T, Jang H, Kim C-S, Kim J, Rafieizonooz M. A review of utilization of industrial waste materials as cement replacement in pervious concrete: An alternative approach to sustainable pervious concrete production. Heliyon. 2024;29(39):58685–97.10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26188 ↗
12. Miller SA, Juenger M, Kurtis KE, Weiss J. Cement and Alternatives in the Anthropocene. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2024;49:15.1–15.27.10.1146/annurev-environ-112621-070104 ↗
13. Li M, Zhang M, Du C, Chen Y. Study on the spatial spillover effects of cement production on air pollution in China. Sci Total Environ. 2020;748:141421.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141421 ↗
14. Yang Y, Liu Y, Liu L, Liu Z, Wu H. Monitoring global cement plants from space. Remote Sens Environ. 2024;302:113954.10.1016/j.rse.2023.113954 ↗
15. Feng Z, Shen D, Huang Q, Zhang T. Effect of fly ash on early-age properties and viscoelastic behaviors of supersulfated cement concrete under different degrees of restraint. Constr Build Mater. 2023;401:132895.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132895 ↗
16. Juenger M, Winnefeld F, Provis JL, Ideker J. Advances in alternative cementitious binders. Cem Concr Res. 2011;41(12):1232–43.10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.11.012 ↗
17. Sun Z, Nie S, Zhou J, Li H, Chen Z, Xu M, et al. Hydration mechanism of calcium sulfoaluminate-activated supersulfated cement. J Clean Prod. 2022;333:130094.10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130094 ↗
18. Friedlingstein P, O'sullivan M, Jones MW, Andrew RM, Bakker DC, Hauck J, et al. Global carbon budget 2023. Earth Syst Sci Data. 2023;15(12):5301–69.10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023 ↗
19. Andrew RM. Global CO2 emissions from cement production. Earth Syst Sci Data. 2018;10(1):195–217.10.5194/essd-10-195-2018 ↗
20. Al-Nawasir R, Al-Humeidawi B, Khan MI, Khahro SH, Memon ZA. Effect of glass waste powder and date palm seed ash based sustainable cementitious grouts on the performance of semi-flexible pavement. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2024;21:e03453.10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03453 ↗
21. Wu K, Shi H, Guo X. Utilization of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash for sulfoaluminate cement clinker production. Waste Manag. 2011;31(9-10):2001–8.10.1016/j.wasman.2011.04.022 ↗
22. Raheem AA, Ikotun BD. Incorporation of agricultural residues as partial substitution for cement in concrete and mortar–A review. J Build Eng. 2020;31:101428.10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101428 ↗
23. Mydin MAO, Sor NH, Althoey F, Özkılıç YO, Abdullah MM, Isleem HF, et al. Performance of lightweight foamed concrete partially replacing cement with industrial and agricultural wastes: Microstructure characteristics, thermal conductivity, and hardened properties. Ain Shams Eng J. 2023;14(11):102546.10.1016/j.asej.2023.102546 ↗
24. Adamu M, Ibrahim YE, Alanazi H. Optimization of sustainable concrete properties modified with blends of date palm ash and eggshell powder using response surface methodology. Dev Built Environ. 2024;17:100359.10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100359 ↗
25. A. News. Buraidah date festival in full swing. Arab News. https://www.arabnews.com/node/2350511/saudi-arabia (accessed 13/9/2023).
26. Nasser RA, Salem MZ, Hiziroglu S, Al-Mefarrej HA, Mohareb AS, Alam M, et al. Chemical analysis of different parts of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) using ultimate, proximate and thermo-gravimetric techniques for energy production. Energies. 2016;9(5):374.10.3390/en9050374 ↗
27. Adamu M, Alanazi H, Ibrahim YE, Abdellatief M. Mechanical, microstructural characteristics and sustainability analysis of concrete incorporating date palm ash and eggshell powder as ternary blends cementitious materials. Constr Build Mater. 2024;411:134753.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134753 ↗
28. Adamu M, Ibrahim YE. Environmental sustainability and cost-benefit analysis of concrete containing date palm ash and eggshell powder: A response surface methodology approach. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng. 2024;9:100636.10.1016/j.cscee.2024.100636 ↗
29. Yahya SA, Iqbal T, Omar MM, Ahmad M. Techno-economic analysis of fast pyrolysis of date palm waste for adoption in Saudi Arabia. Energies. 2021;14(19):6048.10.3390/en14196048 ↗
30. Faiad A, Alsmari M, Ahmed MM, Bouazizi ML, Alzahrani B, Alrobei H. Date palm tree waste recycling: Treatment and processing for potential engineering applications. Sustainability. 2022;14(3):1134.10.3390/su14031134 ↗
31. Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. ASTM C618, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2022.
32. Al-Kutti W, Nasir M, Johari MAM, Islam AS, Manda AA, Blaisi NI. An overview and experimental study on hybrid binders containing date palm ash, fly ash, OPC and activator composites. Constr Build Mater. 2018;159:567–77.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.017 ↗
33. Thomas BS, Yang J, Mo KH, Abdalla JA, Hawileh RA, Ariyachandra E. Biomass ashes from agricultural wastes as supplementary cementitious materials or aggregate replacement in cement/geopolymer concrete: A comprehensive review. J Build Eng. 2021;40:102332.10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102332 ↗
34. Al-Kutti W, Islam AS, Nasir M. Potential use of date palm ash in cement-based materials. J King Saud Univ-Eng Sci. 2019;31(1):26–31.10.1016/j.jksues.2017.01.004 ↗
35. Nasir M, Al-Kutti W. Performance of date palm ash as a cementitious material by evaluating strength, durability, and characterization. Buildings. 2018;9(1):6.10.3390/buildings9010006 ↗
36. Blaisi NI. Environmental assessment of utilizing date palm ash as partial replacement of cement in mortar. J Hazard Mater. 2018;357:175–9.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.06.013 ↗
37. Nandhini K, Karthikeyan J. Sustainable and greener concrete production by utilizing waste eggshell powder as cementitious material–A review. Constr Build Mater. 2022;335:127482.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127482 ↗
38. Sathiparan N. Utilization prospects of eggshell powder in sustainable construction material–A review. Constr Build Mater. 2021;293:123465.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123465 ↗
39. Teara A, Ing DS. Mechanical properties of high strength concrete that replace cement partly by using fly ash and eggshell powder. Phys Chem EarthParts a/b/c. 2020;120:102942.10.1016/j.pce.2020.102942 ↗
40. Zaid O, Hashmi SRZ, El Ouni MH, Martínez-García R, de Prado-Gil J, Yousef SEA. Experimental and analytical study of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete modified with egg shell powder and nano-silica. J Mater Res Technol. 2023;24:7162–88.10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.240 ↗
41. Pan S, Feng J, Safaei B, Qin Z, Chu F, Hui D. A comparative experimental study on damping properties of epoxy nanocomposite beams reinforced with carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets. Nanotechnol Rev. 2022;11(1):1658–69.10.1515/ntrev-2022-0107 ↗
42. Feng J, Safaei B, Qin Z, Chu F. Nature-inspired energy dissipation sandwich composites reinforced with high-friction graphene. Compos Sci Technol. 2023;233:109925.10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.109925 ↗
43. Amin M, Attia MM, Agwa IS, Elsakhawy Y, Abu El-hassan K, Abdelsalam BA. Effects of sugarcane bagasse ash and nano eggshell powder on high-strength concrete properties. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2022;17:e01528.10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01528 ↗
44. Hamada H, Tayeh B, Yahaya F, Muthusamy K, Al-Attar A. Effects of nano-palm oil fuel ash and nano-eggshell powder on concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2020;261:119790.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119790 ↗
45. Rasid NNA, Khalid NHA, Mohamed A, Sam ARM, Majid ZA, Huseien GF. Ground palm oil fuel ash and calcined eggshell powder as SiO2–CaO based accelerator in green concrete. J Build Eng. 2023;65:105617.10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105617 ↗
46. Jhatial AA, Goh WI, Mo KH, Sohu S, Bhatti IA. Green and sustainable concrete–the potential utilization of rice husk ash and egg shells. Civ Eng J. 2019;5(1):74–81.10.28991/cej-2019-03091226 ↗
47. Hakeem IY, Amin M, Agwa IS, Abd-Elrahman MH, Ibrahim OMO, Samy M. Ultra-high-performance concrete properties containing rice straw ash and nano eggshell powder. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2023;19:e02291.10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02291 ↗
48. Ahmed M, Qureshi M, Mallick J, Ben Kahla N. Selection of sustainable supplementary concrete materials using OSM‐AHP‐TOPSIS approach. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2019;2019(1):2850480.10.1155/2019/2850480 ↗
49. Moro C. Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making and life cycle assessment methods for sustainable evaluation of concrete mixtures. Sustainability. 2023;15(17):12746.10.3390/su151712746 ↗
50. Chilukuri SK, Raut AN, Kumar S, Singh RJ, Sakhare V. Enhancing thermal performance and energy Efficiency: Optimal selection of steel slag crumb rubber blocks through Multi-Criteria decision Making. Constr Build Mater. 2023;409:134094.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134094 ↗
51. Janga S, Raut AN, Murmu AL. Assessment of thermal and mechanical properties of fly ash based geopolymer blocks with a sustainability perspective using multi-criteria decision-making approach. J Build Eng. 2024;88:109261.10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109261 ↗
52. Adamu M, Raut AN, Ibrahim YE, Janga S, Khed VC. Multicriteria-based optimization of roller compacted concrete pavement containing crumb rubber and nano-silica. Nanotechnol Rev. 2024;13(1):20240046.10.1515/ntrev-2024-0046 ↗
53. De Angelis A, Cheche N, De Masi R, Pecce M, Vanoli G. Multi-criteria analysis for sustainable buildings. In Proceedings of Italian Concrete Days 2016. Springer; 2018. p. 3–16.10.1007/978-3-319-78936-1_1 ↗
54. Petrović G, Pavlović J, Madić M, Marinković D. Optimal synthesis of loader drive mechanisms: a group robust decision-making rule generation approach. Machines. 2022;10(5):329.10.3390/machines10050329 ↗
55. Madić M, Petrović G, Petković D, Antucheviciene J, Marinković D. Application of a robust decision-making rule for comprehensive assessment of laser cutting conditions and performance. Machines. 2022;10(2):153.10.3390/machines10020153 ↗
56. Božanić D, Epler I, Puška A, Biswas S, Marinković D, Koprivica S. Application of the DIBR II–rough MABAC decision-making model for ranking methods and techniques of lean organization systems management in the process of technical maintenance. Facta Univ Ser: Mech Eng. 2024;22(1):101–23.10.22190/FUME230614026B ↗
57. Amin M, Zeyad AM, Tayeh BA, Agwa IS. Effects of nano cotton stalk and palm leaf ashes on ultrahigh-performance concrete properties incorporating recycled concrete aggregates. Constr Build Mater. 2021;302:124196.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124196 ↗
58. Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. ASTM C618, West Conshohocken, PA, United States, 2015.
59. Standard specification for concrete aggregates. ASTM C33/C33M, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2023.
60. Standard practice for selecting proportions for normal, heavyweight, and mass concrete. ACI 211.1R, Michigan, USA, 2002.
61. Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. John wiley & sons; 2017.
62. Standard practice for making and curing concrete test specimens in the laboratory. ASTM C192, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018.
63. Standard test method for slump of hydraulic-cement concrete. ASTM C143/C143M, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2012.
64. Standard test method for density (unit weight), yield, and air content (gravimetric) of concrete. ASTM C138/C138M, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017.
65. Testing hardened concrete. Compressive strength of test specimens. BS EN 12390-3, London, United Kingdom, 2009.
66. Testing hardened concrete - Tensile splitting strength of test specimens, BS EN 12390-6, London, United Kingdom, 2009.
67. Standard test method for flexural strength of concrete (using simple beam with third-point loading). ASTM C78/C78M, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2015.
68. Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of concrete in compression. ASTM C469, West Conshohocken, PA, United States, 2022.
69. Standard test method for density, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete. ASTM C642, West Conshohocken, PA, United States, 2013.
70. Standard test method for determining pore volume distribution of catalysts and catalyst carriers by mercury intrusion porosimetry. ASTM D4284, West Conshohocken, PA, United States, 2012.
71. Chakraborty S, Datta HN, Kalita K, Chakraborty S. A narrative review of multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method in decision making. Opsearch. 2023;60(4):1844–87.10.1007/s12597-023-00676-7 ↗
72. George J, Tembhare SK, Jain P. Comparative study of Mcdm techniques: Topsis, vikor, and moora methods integrated with ewm method for vendor selection for manufacturing industry. In decision-making models and applications in manufacturing environments. Florida, USA: Apple Academic Press; 2024. p. 127–46.10.1201/9781003394723-6 ↗
73. Yadav R, Singh M, Meena A, Lee S-Y, Park S-J. Selection and ranking of dental restorative composite materials using hybrid Entropy-VIKOR method: An application of MCDM technique. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023;147:106103.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106103 ↗
74. Isabels R, Vinodhini AF, Viswanathan A. Evaluating and ranking metaverse platforms using intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy vikor MCDM: Incorporating score and accuracy functions for comprehensive assessment. Decis Making: Appl Manag Eng. 2024;7(1):54–78.10.31181/dmame712024858 ↗
75. Bene K, Lapina A, Birida A, Ekore JO, Adan S. A comparative study of self-regulation levels and academic performance among STEM and non-STEM university students using multivariate analysis of variance. J Turkish Sci Educ. 2021;18(3):320–37.10.36681/tused.2021.76 ↗
76. Abdelhadi A, Ibrahim Y, Nurunnabi M. Investigating engineering student learning style trends by using multivariate statistical analysis. Educ Sci. 2019;9(1):58.10.3390/educsci9010058 ↗
77. Wood DA. Dataset insight and variable influences established using correlations, regressions, and transparent customized formula optimization. In Sustainable geoscience for natural gas subsurface systems. Houston, Texas, USA: Elsevier; 2022. p. 383–408.10.1016/B978-0-323-85465-8.00002-9 ↗
78. Baty F, Ritz C, Charles S, Brutsche M, Flandrois J-P, Delignette-Muller M-L. A toolbox for nonlinear regression in R: the package nlstools. J Stat Softw. 2015;66:1–21.10.18637/jss.v066.i05 ↗
79. Mehta PK, Monteiro P. Concrete: microstructure, properties, and materials. New York, USA: Mc Graw Hill; 2006.
80. Neville AM. Properties of concrete. 5th edn. England: Longman; 2011.
81. Motlagh SAT, Naghizadehrokni M. An extended multi-model regression approach for compressive strength prediction and optimization of a concrete mixture. Constr Build Mater. 2022;327:126828.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126828 ↗
82. Liu B, Shi J, Zhou F, Shen S, Ding Y, Qin J. Effects of steam curing regimes on the capillary water absorption of concrete: Prediction using multivariable regression models. Constr Build Mater. 2020;256:119426.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119426 ↗
83. Adamu M, Ibrahim YE, Ahmed OS, Drmosh QA. Mechanical performance of date palm fiber-reinforced concrete modified with nano-activated carbon. Nanotechnol Rev. 2023;12(1):20220564.10.1515/ntrev-2022-0564 ↗
84. Maqsoom A, Aslam B, Gul ME, Ullah F, Kouzani AZ, Mahmud MP, et al. Using multivariate regression and ANN models to predict properties of concrete cured under hot weather. Sustainability. 2021;13(18):10164.10.3390/su131810164 ↗
85. Asuero AG, Sayago A, González A. The correlation coefficient: An overview. Crit Rev Anal Chem. 2006;36(1):41–59.10.1080/10408340500526766 ↗
86. Adamu M, Trabanpruek P, Jongvivatsakul P, Likitlersuang S, Iwanami M. Mechanical performance and optimization of high-volume fly ash concrete containing plastic wastes and graphene nanoplatelets using response surface methodology. Constr Build Mater. 2021;308:125085.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125085 ↗