Modeling of supramolecular biopolymers: Leading the in silico revolution of tissue engineering and nanomedicine
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The field of tissue engineering is poised to be positively influenced by the advent of supramolecular biopolymers, because of their promising tailorability coming from the bottom-up approach used for their development, absence of toxic byproducts from their gelation reaction and intrinsic better mimicry of extracellular matrix nanotopography and mechanical properties. However, a deep understanding of the phenomena ruling their properties at the meso- and macroscales is still missing. In silico approaches are increasingly helping to shine a light on questions still of out of reach for almost all empirical methods. In this review, we will present the most significant and updated efforts on molecular modeling of SBP properties, and their interactions with the living counterparts, at all scales. In detail, the currently available molecular mechanic approaches will be discussed, paying attention to the pros and cons related to their representability and transferability. We will also give detailed insights for choosing different biomolecular modeling strategies at various scales. This is a systematic overview of tools and approaches yielding to advances at atomistic, molecular, and supramolecular levels, with a holistic perspective demonstrating the urgent need for theories and models connecting biomaterial design and their biological effect in vivo .
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials · Connective tissue disorders research · Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Nanomedicine and Tissue Engineering (CNTE), A.S.S.T. Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda , Piazza dell Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 , Milan , Italy
Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Unità Ingegneria Tissutale , Viale Cappuccini 1, San Giovanni Rotondo, 71013 , Foggia , Italy
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Whitesides GM. Self-assembly at all scales. Science. 2002;295:2418.10.1126/science.1070821 ↗
2. Zhang S. Fabrication of novel biomaterials through molecular self-assembly. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21:1171.10.1038/nbt874 ↗
3. Woodson SA. RNA folding pathways and the self-assembly of ribosomes. Acc Chem Res. 2011;44:1312.10.1021/ar2000474 ↗
4. Kim JH, Jin HM, Yang GG, Han KH, Yun T, Shin JY, et al. Smart nanostructured materials based on self-assembly of block co-polymers. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30:1902049.10.1002/adfm.201902049 ↗
5. Kokkoli E, Mardilovich A, Wedekind A, Rexeisen EL, Garg A, Craig JA. Self-assembly and applications of biomimetic and bioactive peptide-amphiphiles. Soft Matter. 2006;2:1015.10.1039/b608929a ↗
6. Serag MF, Aikeremu A, Tsukamoto R, Piwon´ski H, Abadi M, Kaji N, et al. Geometry-based self-assembly of histone–DNA nanostructures at single-nucleotide resolution. ACS Nano. 2019;13:8155.10.1021/acsnano.9b03259 ↗
7. Subramani K, Ahmed W. Self-assembly of proteins and peptides and their applications in bionanotechnology and dentistry. Emerg Nanotechnol Dent. 2018;231:209–24.10.1016/B978-0-12-812291-4.00012-1 ↗
8. Lee EJ, Kasper FK, Mikos AG. Biomaterials for tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014;42:323.10.1007/s10439-013-0859-6 ↗
9. Pérez-Pedroza R, Ávila-Ramírez A, Khan Z, Moretti M, Hauser CAE. Supramolecular biopolymers for tissue engineering. Adv Polym Technol. 2021;2021:8815006.10.1155/2021/8815006 ↗
10. Saracino GAA, Cigognini D, Silva D, Caprini A, Gelain F. Nano-materials design and tests for neural tissue engineering. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:225.10.1039/C2CS35065C ↗
11. Kyle S, Aggeli A, Ingham E, McPherson MJ. Production of self-assembling biomaterials for tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2009;27:423.10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.04.002 ↗
12. Klein S, Vykoukal J, Felthaus O, Dienstknecht T, Prantl L. Collagen type I conduits for the regeneration of nerve defects. Materials. 2016;9:219.10.3390/ma9040219 ↗
13. Yeh J-Z, Wang D-H, Cherng J-H, Wang Y-W, Fan G-Y, Liou N-H, et al. A collagen-based scaffold for promoting neural plasticity in a rat model of spinal cord injury. Polymers. 2020;12:2245.10.3390/polym12102245 ↗
14. Copes F, Pien N, van Vlierberghe S, Boccafoschi F, Mantovani D. Collagen-based tissue engineering strategies for vascular medicine. Front Bio-Eng Biotechnol. 2019;7:00166.10.3389/fbioe.2019.00166 ↗
15. Majid QA, Fricker ATR, Gregory DA, Davidenko N, Hernandez Cruz O, Jabbour RJ, et al. Natural biomaterials for cardiac tissue engineering: A highly biocompatible solution. Front Cardiovascular Med. 2020;7:55459.10.3389/fcvm.2020.554597 ↗
16. Lee SJ, Wang H-J, Kim T-H, Choi JS, Kulkarni G, Jackson JD, et al. In situ tissue regeneration of renal tissue induced by collagen hydrogel injection. Stem Cell Transl Med. 2018;7:241–50.10.1002/sctm.16-0361 ↗
17. Chen S, Nakamoto T, Kawazoe N, Chen G. Engineering multi-layered skeletal muscle tissue by using 3D microgrooved collagen scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2015;73:23–31.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.010 ↗
18. Jha BS, Ayres CE, Bowman JR, Telemeco TA, Sell SA, Bowlin GL, et al. Electrospun collagen: A tissue engineering scaffold with unique functional properties in a wide variety of applications. J Nanomater. 2011;2011:348268.10.1155/2011/348268 ↗
19. Han CM, Zhang LP, Sun JZ, Shi HF, Zhou J, Gao CY. Application of collagen-chitosan/fibrin glue asymmetric scaffolds in skin tissue engineering. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2010;11(7):524–30.10.1631/jzus.B0900400 ↗
20. Ucar B, Humpel, C. Collagen for brain repair: Therapeutic perspectives. Neural Regenerat Res. 2018;13:595–8.10.4103/1673-5374.230273 ↗
21. Russo L, Sgambato A, Lecchi M, Pastori V, Raspanti M, Natalello A, et al. Neoglucosylated collagen matrices drive neuronal cells to differentiate. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2014;5:261.10.1021/cn400222s ↗
22. Figuereido I, Paiotta A, Dal Magro R, Tinelli F, Corti R, Re F, et al. A new approach for glyco-functionalization of collagen-based biomaterials. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:1747.10.3390/ijms20071747 ↗
23. Wang X, He J, Wang Y, Cui F-Z. Hyaluronic acid-based scaffold for central neural tissue engineering. Interface Focus. 2012;2:278–91.10.1098/rsfs.2012.0016 ↗
24. Jang Y, Park Y, Kim J. Engineering biomaterials to guide heart cells for matured cardiac tissue. Coatings. 2020;10:925.10.3390/coatings10100925 ↗
25. Bonafè F, Govoni M, Giordano E, Caldarera CM, Guarnieri C, Muscari C. Hyaluronan and cardiac regeneration. J Biomed Sci. 2014;21:100.10.1186/s12929-014-0100-4 ↗
26. Hemshekhar M, Thushara RM, Chandranayaka S, Sherman LS, Kem-paraju K, Girish KS. Emerging roles of hyaluronic acid bioscaffolds in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;86:917–28.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.02.032 ↗
27. Zakhem E, Raghavan S, Gilmont RR, Bitar KN. Chitosan-based scaffolds for the support of smooth muscle constructs in intestinal tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2012;33:4810–7.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.051 ↗
28. Hajiabbas M, Mashayekhan S, Nazaripouya A, Naji M, Hunkeler D, Rajabi Zeleti S, et al. Chitosan-gelatin sheets as scaffolds for muscle tissue engineering, artificial cells. Nanomed Biotechnol. 2015;43(2):124–32, 10.3109/21691401.2013.852101.10.3109/21691401.2013.852101 ↗
29. Gnavi S, Barwig C, Freier T, Haastert-Talini K, Grothe C, Geuna S. The use of chitosan-based scaffolds to enhance regeneration in the nervous system. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2013;109:1–62.10.1016/B978-0-12-420045-6.00001-8 ↗
30. Ojeda-Hernández DD, Canales-Aguirre AA, Matias-Guiu J, Gomez-Pinedo U, Mateos-Díaz JC. Potential of chitosan and its derivatives for biomedical applications in the central nervous system. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:389.10.3389/fbioe.2020.00389 ↗
31. Han Y, Li Y, Zeng Q, Li H, Peng J, Xu Y, et al. Injectable bioactive akermanite/alginate composite hydrogels for in situ skin tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B. 2017;5:3315–26.10.1039/C7TB00571G ↗
32. Liu J, Zhou H, Weir MD, Xu HHK, Chen Q, Trotman CA. Fast-degradable microbeads encapsulating human umbilical cord stem cells in alginate for muscle tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012;18:2303–14.10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0658 ↗
33. Baniasadi H, Mashayekhan S, Fadaoddini S, Haghirsharifzamini Y. Design, fabrication and characterization of oxidized alginate–gelatin hydrogels for muscle tissue engineering applications. J Biomater Appl. 2016;31:152–61.10.1177/0885328216634057 ↗
34. Jansen K, Schuurmans CCL, Jansen J, Masereeuw R, Vermonden T. Hydrogel-based cell therapies for kidney regeneration: current trends in biofabrication and in vivo repair. Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23:3845–57.10.2174/1381612823666170710155726 ↗
35. Amirian J, Van TTT, Bae S-H, Jung H-I, Choi H-J, Cho H-D, et al. Examination of in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility of alginate-hyaluronic acid microbeads as a promising method in cell delivery for kidney regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;105:143–53.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.07.019 ↗
36. Tamimi M, Rajabi S, Pezeshki-Modaress M. Cardiac ECM/chitosan/alginate ternary scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering application. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;164:389–402.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.134 ↗
37. Pawar K, Prang P, Müller R, Caioni M, Bogdahn U, Kunz W, et al. Intrinsic and extrinsic determinants of central nervous system axon outgrowth into alginate-based anisotropic hydrogels. Acta Biomater. 2015;27:131–9.10.1016/j.actbio.2015.08.032 ↗
38. Grijalvo S, Nieto-Díaz M, Maza RM, Eritja R, Díaz DD. Alginate hydrogels as scaffolds and delivery systems to repair the damaged spinal cord. Biotechnol J. 2019;14:e190027.10.1002/biot.201900275 ↗
39. Moran JM, Pazzano D, Bonassar, LJ. Characterization of polylactic acid–polyglycolic acid composites for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 2003;9:63–70.10.1089/107632703762687546 ↗
40. Santoro M, Shah SR, Walker JL, Mikos AG. Poly (Lactic Acid) nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2016;107:206–12.10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.019 ↗
41. Sotoudeh A, Darbemamieh G, Goodarzi V, Shojaei S, Asefnejad A. Tissue engineering needs new biomaterials: Poly (Xylitol-Dodecanedioic Acid)–Co-Polylactic Acid (PXDDA-Co-PLA) and its nanocomposites. Eur Polym J. 2021;152:110469.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110469 ↗
42. Liu R, Zhang S, Zhao C, Yang D, Cui T, Liu Y, et al. Regulated surface morphology of polyaniline/polylactic acid composite nanofibers via various inorganic acids doping for enhancing biocompatibility in tissue engineering. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2021;16:4.10.1186/s11671-020-03457-z ↗
43. Baolin G, Ma PX. Synthetic biodegradable functional polymers for tissue engineering: A brief review. Sci China Chem. 2014;57(4):490–500.10.1007/s11426-014-5086-y ↗
44. Bolívar-Monsalve EJ, Alvarez MM, Hosseini S, Espinosa-Hernandez MA, Ceballos-González CF, Sanchez-Dominguez M, et al. Engineering bioactive synthetic polymers for biomedical applications: A review with emphasis on tissue engineering and controlled release. Mater Adv. 2021;2:4447.10.1039/D1MA00092F ↗
45. Campa-Siqueiros PI, Madera-Santana TJ, Castillo-Ortega MM, López-Cervantes J, Ayala-Zavala JF, Ortiz-Vazquez EL. Electrospun and co-electrospun biopolymer nanofibers for skin wounds on diabetic patients: An overview. RSC Adv. 2021;11(25):15340–50.10.1039/D1RA02986J ↗
46. Ciarfaglia N, Laezza A, Lods L, Lonjon A, Dandurand J, Pepe A, et al. Thermal and dynamic mechanical behavior of poly (Lactic Acid) (PLA)-based electrospun scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Appl Polym Sci. 2021;138:51313.10.1002/app.51313 ↗
47. Ng DYW, Wu Y, Kuan SL, Weil T. Programming supramolecular biohybrids as precision therapeutics. Acc Chem Res. 2014;47:3471–80.10.1021/ar5002445 ↗
48. Lai J, Jiang P, Gaddes ER, Zhao N, Abune L, Wang Y. Aptamer-functionalized hydrogel for self-programmed protein release via sequential photo-reaction and hybridization. Chem Mater. 2017;29:5850–7.10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00875 ↗
49. Sur S, Newcomb CJ, Webber MJ, Stupp SI. Tuning supramolecular mechanics to guide neuron development. Biomaterials. 2013;34:4749.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.025 ↗
50. Freeman R, Han M, Álvarez Z, Lewis JA, Wester JR, Stephanopou-los N, et al. , Reversible self-assembly of superstructured networks. Science. 2018;362:808.10.1126/science.aat6141 ↗
51. Sato Y, Sakamoto T, Takinoue M. Sequence-based engineering of dynamic functions of micrometer-sized DNA droplets. Appl Sci Eng. 2020;6(23):eaba3471.10.1126/sciadv.aba3471 ↗
52. Nam K, Im BI, Kim T, Kim YM, Roh YH. Anisotropically functionalized aptamer-DNA nanostructures for enhanced cell proliferation and target-specific adhesion in 3D cell cultures. Biomacromolecules. 2021;22(7):3138–47.10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00619 ↗
53. He J-Y, Shang X, Yang C-L, Zuo S-Y, Yuan R, Xu W-J. Antibody-responsive ratiometric fluorescence biosensing of biemissive silver nanoclusters wrapped in switchable DNA tweezers. Anal Chem. 2021;93:11634.10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02444 ↗
54. Li S, Jiang Q, Liu S, Zhang Y, Tian Y, Song C, et al. A DNA nanorobot functions as a cancer therapeutic in response to a molecular trigger in vivo. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:258.10.1038/nbt.4071 ↗
55. Hong F, Zhang F, Liu Y, Yan H. DNA origami: Scaffolds for creating higher order structures. Chem Rev. 2017;117:12584.10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00825 ↗
56. Morya V, Walia S, Mandal BB, Ghoroi C, Bhatia D. Functional DNA based hydrogels: Development, properties and biological applications. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6(11):6021–35.10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01125 ↗
57. Freeman R, Stephanopoulos N, Álvarez Z, Lewis JA, Sur S, Serrano CM, et al. Instructing cells with programmable peptide DNA hybrids. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15982.10.1038/ncomms15982 ↗
58. Freeman R, Boekhoven J, Dickerson MB, Naik RR, Stupp SI. Biopolymers and supramolecular polymers as biomaterials for biomedical applications. MRS Bull. 2015;40:1089–101.10.1557/mrs.2015.270 ↗
59. Silva D, Natalello A, Sanii B, Vasita R, Saracino G, Zuckermann RN, et al. Synthesis and characterization of designed BMHP1-derived self-assembling peptides for tissue engineering applications. Nanoscale. 2013;5:704–18.10.1039/C2NR32656F ↗
60. Marchini A, Favoino C, Gelain F. Multi-functionalized self-assembling peptides as reproducible 3D cell culture systems enabling differentiation and survival of various human neural stem cell lines. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:00413.10.3389/fnins.2020.00413 ↗
61. Gelain F, Cigognini D, Caprini A, Silva D, Colleoni B, Donegá M, et al. New bioactive motifs and their use in functionalized self-assembling peptides for NSC differentiation and neural tissue engineering. Nanoscale. 2012;4:2946.10.1039/c2nr30220a ↗
62. Karavasili C, Fatouros DG. Self-assembling peptides as vectors for local drug delivery and tissue engineering applications. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2021;174:387–405.10.1016/j.addr.2021.04.024 ↗
63. Guo H, Cui G, Yang J, Wang C, Zhu J, Zhang L, et al. Sustained delivery of VEGF from designer self-assembling peptides improves cardiac function after myocardial infarction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;424:105–11.10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.06.080 ↗
64. Hsu BB, Conway W, Tschabrunn CM, Mehta M, Perez-Cuevas MB, Zhang S, et al. Clotting mimicry from robust hemostatic bandages based on self-assembling peptides. ACS Nano. 2015;9:9394–406.10.1021/acsnano.5b02374 ↗
65. Alshehri S, Susapto HH, Hauser CAE. Scaffolds from self-assembling tetrapeptides support 3D spreading, osteogenic differentiation, and angiogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. Biomacromolecules. 2021;22:2094–106.10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00205 ↗
66. Xu H, Wang C, Liu C, Li J, Peng Z, Guo J, et al. Stem cell-seeded 3D-printed scaffolds combined with self-assembling peptides for bone defect repair. Tissue Eng Part A. 2021;111:111–24.10.1089/ten.tea.2021.0055 ↗
67. Cui H, Webber MJ, Stupp SI. Self-Assembly of Peptide Am-phiphiles: From molecules to nanostructures to biomaterials. Biopolymers. 2010;94:1.10.1002/bip.21328 ↗
68. Raspa A, Saracino GAA, Pugliese R, Silva D, Cigognini D, Vescovi A, et al. Complementary co-assembling peptides: from in silico studies to in vivo application. Adv Funct Mater. 2014;24:6317.10.1002/adfm.201400956 ↗
69. Zhang S, Lockshin C, Herbert A, Winter E, Rich, A. Zuotin, a putative Z-DNA binding protein in saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1992;11:3787.10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05464.x ↗
70. Gelain F, Bottai D, Vescovi A, Zhang S. Designer self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffolds for adult mouse neural stem cell 3-dimensional cultures. PLoS One. 2006;1:e119.10.1371/journal.pone.0000119 ↗
71. Horii A, Wang X, Gelain F, Zhang S. Biological designer self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffolds significantly enhance osteoblast proliferation, differentiation and 3-D migration. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e190.10.1371/journal.pone.0000190 ↗
72. Saracino GAA, Fontana F, Jekhmane S, Silva JM, Weingarth M, Gelain F. Elucidating self-assembling peptide aggregation via morphoscanner: A new tool for protein-peptide structural characterization. Adv Sci. 2018;5:1800471.10.1002/advs.201800471 ↗
73. Zhao X, Zhang S. Molecular designer self-assembling peptides. Chem Soc Rev. 2006;35:1105.10.1039/b511336a ↗
74. Caprini A, Silva D, Zanoni I, Cunha C, Volontè C, Vescovi A, et al. A novel bioactive peptide: Assessing its activity over murine neural stem cells and its potential for neural tissue engineering. N Biotechnol. 2013;30:552.10.1016/j.nbt.2013.03.005 ↗
75. Cigognini D, Satta A, Colleoni B, Silva D, Donegà M, Antonini S, et al. Evaluation of early and late effects into the acute spinal cord injury of an injectable functionalized self-assembling scaffold. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e19782.10.1371/journal.pone.0019782 ↗
76. Clark TD, Buehler LK, Ghadiri MR. Self-assembling cyclic β3-peptide nanotubes as artificial transmembrane ion channels. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:651.10.1021/ja972786f ↗
77. Rodriguez-Vazquez N, Ozores H, Guerra A, Gonzalez-Freire E, Fuertes A, Panciera M, et al. Membrane-targeted self-assembling cyclic peptide nanotubes. Curr Top Medicinal Chem. 2015;14:2647.10.2174/1568026614666141215143431 ↗
78. Bystrov VS, Zelenovskiy PS, Nuraeva AS, Kopyl S, Zhulyabina OA, Tverdislov VA. Molecular modeling and computational study of the chiral-dependent structures and properties of self-assembling diphenylalanine peptide nan-otubes. J Mol Modeling. 2019;25:199.10.1007/s00894-019-4080-x ↗
79. Taraballi F. Glycine-spacers influence functional motifs exposure and self-assembling propensity of functionalized substrates tailored for neural stem cell cultures. Front Neuroeng. 2010;3:1–9.10.3389/neuro.16.001.2010 ↗
80. Macedo-da-Silva J, Santiago VF, Rosa-Fernandes L, Marinho CRF, Palmisano G. Protein glycosylation in extracellular vesicles: Structural characterization and biological functions. Mol Immunology. 2021;135:226–46.10.1016/j.molimm.2021.04.017 ↗
81. Moradi SV, Hussein WM, Varamini P, Simerska P, Toth I. Glycosylation, an effective synthetic strategy to improve the bioavailability of therapeutic peptides. Chem Sci. 2016;7:2492.10.1039/C5SC04392A ↗
82. Restuccia A, Seroski DT, Kelley KL, O’Bryan CS, Kurian JJ, Knox KR, et al. Hierarchical self-assembly and emergent function of densely glycosylated peptide nanofibers. Commun Chem. 2019;2:53.10.1038/s42004-019-0154-z ↗
83. Hendrikse SIS, Su L, Hogervorst TP, Lafleur RPM, Lou X, van der Marel GA, et al. Elucidating the ordering in self-assembled glycocalyx mimicking supramolecular copolymers in water. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141:13877–86.10.1021/jacs.9b06607 ↗
84. Yuan D, Shi J, Du X, Zhou N, Xu B. Supramolecular glycosylation accelerates proteolytic degradation of peptide nanofibrils. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:10092–5.10.1021/jacs.5b05888 ↗
85. Pugliese R, Maleki M, Zuckermann RN, Gelain F. Self-assembling peptides cross-linked with genipin: resilient hydrogels and self-standing electrospun scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Biomater Sci. 2019;7:76.10.1039/C8BM00825F ↗
86. Kitayama Y, Harada A. Interfacial photo-cross-linking: simple but powerful approach for fabricating capsule polymer particles with tunable PH-responsive controlled release capability. ACS Appl Mater & Interfaces. 2021;13.10.1021/acsami.0c20152 ↗
87. Epstein-Barash H, Stefanescu CF, Kohane DS. An in situ cross-linking hybrid hydrogel for controlled release of proteins. Acta Biomaterialia. 2012;8:1703–9.10.1016/j.actbio.2012.01.028 ↗
88. Hussain Md R, Devi RR, Maji TK. Controlled release of urea from chitosan microspheres prepared by emulsification and cross-linking method. Iran Polym J. 2012;21:473–9.10.1007/s13726-012-0051-0 ↗
89. Radvar E, Azevedo HS. Supramolecular peptide/polymer hybrid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Macromol Biosci. 2019;19(1):1800221.10.1002/mabi.201800221 ↗
90. Chhabra R, Sharma J, Liu Y, Rinker S, Yan H. DNA Self-assembly for nanomedicine. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2010;62(6):617–25.10.1016/j.addr.2010.03.005 ↗
91. Pugliese R, Fontana F, Marchini A, Gelain F. Branched peptides integrate into self-assembled nanostructures and enhance biomechanics of peptidic hydrogels. Acta Biomaterialia. 2018;66:258.10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.026 ↗
92. Saracino GAA, Gelain F. Modelling and analysis of early aggregation events of BMHP1-derived self-assembling peptides. J Biomolecular Structure Dyn. 2014;32:759.10.1080/07391102.2013.790848 ↗
93. Pugliese R, Marchini A, Saracino GAA, Zuckermann RN, Gelain F. Cross-linked self-assembling peptide scaffolds. Nano Res. 2018;11:586.10.1007/s12274-017-1834-6 ↗
94. Gustafsson C, Linares M, Norman P. Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics density functional theory simulations of the optical properties finger-printing the ligand-binding of pentameric formyl thiophene acetic acid in amyloid-β (1–42). J Phys Chem A. 2020;124:875.10.1021/acs.jpca.9b09779 ↗
95. Platts JA. Quantum chemical molecular dynamics and metadynamics simulation of aluminium binding to amyloid-β and related peptides. R Soc Open Sci. 2020;7:191562.10.1098/rsos.191562 ↗
96. Kamel M, Raissi H, Hashemzadeh H, Mohammadifard, K. Theoretical elucidation of the amino acid interaction with graphene and functionalized graphene nanosheets: Insights from DFT calculation and MD simulation. Amino Acids. 2020;52:1465–78.10.1007/s00726-020-02905-5 ↗
97. Georgoulia PS, Glykos NM. On the foldability of tryptophan-containing tetra- and pentapeptides: An exhaustive molecular dynamics study. J Phys Chem B. 2013;117:5522.10.1021/jp401239v ↗
98. Wymore T, Wong TC. Molecular dynamics study of substance P peptides in a biphasic membrane mimic. Biophys J. 1999;76:1199.10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77284-X ↗
99. He X, Lin M, Lu T, Qu Z, Xu F. Molecular analysis of interactions between a PAMAM dendrimer–paclitaxel conjugate and a biomembrane. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17:29507–17.10.1039/C5CP02242H ↗
100. Marrink SJ, Risselada HJ, Yefimov S, Tieleman DP, de Vries AH. The MARTINI force field: Coarse grained model for biomolecular simulations. J Phys Chem B. 2007;111:7812.10.1021/jp071097f ↗