journal article·2022-04-18Open access

Tunning self-assembled phases of bovine serum albumin via hydrothermal process to synthesize novel functional hydrogel for skin protection against UVB

Kanchan Yadav, Megha Das, Nitesh Kumar Mishra, Anuj Chhabra, Archana Mishra, Sunita Srivastava, Poonam Sharma, Sanjeev Kumar Yadav, Avanish Singh Parmar

Nanotechnology Reviews· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Ultraviolet rays – B (UVB) can be efficiently absorbed by the cellular molecules of skin inducing damage within skin cells and a major cause of melanoma cancer. In recent years, several studies have reported the adverse effects of traditionally used organic and inorganic material-based sunscreens and UVB blockers. In this study, bovine serum albumin (BSA) has been used as a precursor to synthesize temperature- and pressure-dependent phase transition from sol (globular aggregates) – gel (hydrogels) – sol (carbon quantum dots) using a single-step hydrothermal method with an objective to develop an efficient and effective UVB blocker. The synthesized hydrogels exhibit UV – attenuation, self-fluorescence, and high biocompatibility properties that make them a suitable candidate for UV-blocker or sunscreen material. The biological efficacy of the hydrogels was studied through cyto-toxicity studies. Also, UVB blocking efficiency of developed hydrogel in primary mice skin cell culture as well as in vivo in mice model was studied. In vivo study on mice further demonstrated prominent thickening of stratum corneum and epidermis with perivascular edema in the dermis after 5 days of UVB exposure. Hence, this suggesting that hydrogel could be a potential candidate for protecting the skin from UVB exposure and reducing the threat of skin cancer.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Skin Protection and Aging · Ocular Surface and Contact Lens · Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU) , Varanasi , India

Department of Zoology, Institute of Science, BHU , Varanasi , India

Centre for Research in Nanotechnology and Science, Indian Institute of Technology , Bombay , India

Nuclear Agriculture and Biotechnology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre , Mumbai , India

Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology , Bombay , India

Department of Dravyagun, Faculty of Ayurveda, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University , Varanasi , India

Centre for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU) , Varanasi , India

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. D’Orazio J, Jarrett S, Amaro-Ortiz A, Scott T. UV radiation and the skin. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(6):12222–48. 10.3390/ijms140612222.10.3390/ijms140612222 ↗
2. Sanford JA, Gallo RL. Functions of the skin microbiota in health and disease. Semin Immunol. 2013;25(5):370. 10.1016/J.SMIM.2013.09.005.10.1016/j.smim.2013.09.005 ↗
3. Med CC. Ultraviolet radiation exposure and its impact on skin cancer risk. 2015;40(4):1291–6. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823da96d.Hydrogen.
4. Teresa M, Petersen S, Prakash G. UV light effects on proteins: from photochemistry to nanomedicine. Mol Photochem – Var Asp. 2012;37947:1–36. 10.5772/37947.10.5772/37947 ↗
5. Harrison SC, Bergfeld WF. Ultraviolet light and skin cancer in athletes. Sports Health. 2009;1(4):335–40. 10.1177/1941738109338923.10.1177/1941738109338923 ↗
6. Craig S, Earnshaw CH, Virós A. Ultraviolet light and melanoma. J Pathol. 2018;244(5):578–85. 10.1002/path.5039.10.1002/path.5039 ↗
7. Fontanillas P, Alipanahi B, Furlotte NA, Johnson M, Wilson CH, Pitts SJ, et al. Disease risk scores for skin cancers. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1–13. 10.1038/s41467-020-20246-5.10.1038/s41467-020-20246-5 ↗
8. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7–33. 10.3322/CAAC.21654.10.3322/caac.21654 ↗
9. Nehal KS, Bichakjian CK. Update on keratinocyte carcinomas. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(4):363–74. 10.1056/NEJMRA1708701/SUPPL_FILE/NEJMRA1708701_DISCLOSURES.PDF.10.1056/NEJMra1708701 ↗
10. Diepgen TL, Mahler V. The epidemiology of skin cancer. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146(s61):1–6. 10.1046/J.1365-2133.146.S61.2.X.10.1046/j.1365-2133.146.s61.2.x ↗
11. Xu L, Wu D, Zhou B, Xu Y, Wang W, Yu D, et al. Microencapsulated sunblock nanoparticles based on zeolitic imidazole frameworks for safe and effective UV protection. RSC Adv. 2018;8(22):12315–21. 10.1039/c8ra00632f.10.1039/C8RA00632F ↗
12. Pristovnik M, Maver U, Orthaber K, Skok K, Perić B. Skin cancer and its treatment: novel treatment approaches with emphasis on nanotechnology. J Nanomater. 2017;2017:1–20. 10.1155/2017/2606271.10.1155/2017/2606271 ↗
13. Jose J, Netto G. Role of solid lipid nanoparticles as photoprotective agents in cosmetics. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;18(1):315–21. 10.1111/jocd.12504.10.1111/jocd.12504 ↗
14. Lu PJ, Fang SW, Cheng WL, Huang SC, Huang MC, Cheng HF. Characterization of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in sunscreen powder by comparing different measurement methods. J Food Drug Anal. 2018;26(3):1192–200. 10.1016/J.JFDA.2018.01.010.10.1016/j.jfda.2018.01.010 ↗
15. Singh P, Nanda A. Enhanced sun protection of nano-sized metal oxide particles over conventional metal oxide particles: an in vitro comparative study. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2014;36(3):273–83. 10.1111/ICS.12124.10.1111/ics.12124 ↗
16. Vitiello G, Zanfardino A, Tammaro O, Di Napoli M, Caso MF, Pezzella A, et al. Bioinspired hybrid eumelanin-TiO2 antimicrobial nanostructures: the key role of organo-inorganic frameworks in tuning eumelanin’s biocide action mechanism through membrane interaction. RSC Adv. 2018;8(50):28275–83. 10.1039/c8ra04315a.10.1039/C8RA04315A ↗
17. Wu MS, Sun DS, Lin YC, Cheng CL, Hung SC, Chen PK, et al. Nanodiamonds protect skin from ultraviolet B-induced damage in mice. J Nanobiotechnol. 2015;13(1):1–12. 10.1186/s12951-015-0094-4.10.1186/s12951-015-0094-4 ↗
18. Vishnubhakthula S, Elupula R, Durán-Lara EF. Recent advances in hydrogel-based drug delivery for melanoma cancer therapy: a mini review. J Drug Deliv. 2017;2017:1–9. 10.1155/2017/7275985.10.1155/2017/7275985 ↗
19. Rigon RB, Oyafuso MH, Fujimura AT, Gonçalez ML, Prado AH, Gremião MP, et al. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems for melanoma antitumoral therapy: a review. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:16–20. 10.1155/2015/841817.10.1155/2015/841817 ↗
20. Tang JQ, Hou XY, Yang CS, Li YX, Xin Y, Guo WW, et al. Recent developments in nanomedicine for melanoma treatment. Int J Cancer. 2017;141(4):646–53. 10.1002/ijc.30708.10.1002/ijc.30708 ↗
21. Vyas A, Das SK, Singh D, Sonker A, Gidwani B, Jain V, et al. Recent nanoparticuulate approches of drug delivery for skin cancer. Trends Appl Sci Res. 2012;7:620–35.10.3923/tasr.2012.620.635 ↗
22. Chang Z, Zhang S, Li F, Wang Z, Li J, Xia C, et al. Self-healable and biodegradable soy protein-based protective functional film with low cytotoxicity and high mechanical strength. Chem Eng J. 2021;404:126505. 10.1016/J.CEJ.2020.126505.10.1016/j.cej.2020.126505 ↗
23. Kumar M, Sanford KJ, Cuevas WP, Du M, Collier KD, Chow N. Designer protein-based performance materials. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7(9):2543–51. 10.1021/BM060464A.10.1021/bm060464a ↗
24. Debele TA, Su WP. Polysaccharide and protein-based functional wound dressing materials and applications. 2020;71:87–108. 10.1080/00914037.2020.1809403.10.1080/00914037.2020.1809403 ↗
25. Zhang D, Wang Y. Functional protein-based bioinspired nanomaterials: from coupled proteins, synthetic approaches, nanostructures to applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(12):3054. 10.3390/IJMS20123054.10.3390/ijms20123054 ↗
26. Mahler A, Reches M, Rechter M, Cohen S, Gazit E. Rigid, Self-assembled hydrogel composed of a modified aromatic dipeptide. Adv Mater. 2006;18(11):1365–70. 10.1002/ADMA.200501765.10.1002/adma.200501765 ↗
27. Nagarajan S, Radhakrishnan S, Kalkura S, Balme S, Miele P, Bechelany M. Overview of protein-based biopolymers for biomedical application. Macromol Chem Phys. 2019;220(14):1900126. 10.1002/MACP.201900126.10.1002/macp.201900126 ↗
28. Xing Y, Cheng E, Yang Y, Chen P, Zhang T, Sun Y, et al. Self-assembled dna hydrogels with designable thermal and enzymatic responsiveness. Adv Mater. 2011;23(9):1117–21. 10.1002/adma.201003343.10.1002/adma.201003343 ↗
29. Arabi SH, Aghelnejad B, Schwieger C, Meister A, Kerth A, Hinderberger D. Biomaterials science rsc.li/biomaterials-science serum albumin hydrogels in broad pH and temperature ranges: characterization of their self-assembled structures and nanoscopic and macroscopic properties. Biomater Sci. 2018;6:478. 10.1039/c7bm00820a.10.1039/C7BM00820A ↗
30. Su TJ, Lu JR, Thomas RK, Cui ZF, Penfold J. The conformational structure of bovine serum albumin layers adsorbed at the silica−water interface. J Phys Chem B. 1998;102(41):8100–8. 10.1021/JP981239T.10.1021/jp981239t ↗
31. Jayabharathi J, Thanikachalam V, Venkatesh Perumal M. Mechanistic investigation on binding interaction of bioactive imidazole with protein bovine serum albumin—a biophysical study. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2011;79(3):502–7. 10.1016/J.SAA.2011.03.020.10.1016/j.saa.2011.03.020 ↗
32. Wu X, Lv L, Han X, Li C. Bovine serum albumin fibrous biofilm template synthesis of metallic nanomeshes for surface-enhanced Raman scattering and electrocatalytic detection. Mater Des. 2020;192:108777. 10.1016/J.MATDES.2020.108777.10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108777 ↗
33. Yuan H, Zheng X, Liu W, Zhang H, Shao J, Yao J, et al. A novel bovine serum albumin and sodium alginate hydrogel scaffold doped with hydroxyapatite nanowires for cartilage defects repair. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2020;192:111041. 10.1016/J.COLSURFB.2020.111041.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111041 ↗
34. Zewde B, Atoyebi O, Gugssa A, Gaskell KJ, Raghavan D. An investigation of the interaction between bovine serum albumin-conjugated silver nanoparticles and the hydrogel in hydrogel nanocomposites. ACS Omega. 2021;6(17):11614–27. 10.1021/ACSOMEGA.1C00834/SUPPL_FILE/AO1C00834_SI_001.PDF.10.1021/acsomega.1c00834 ↗
35. Upadhyay A, Narula A, Rao CP. Copper-based metallogel of bovine serum albumin and its derived hybrid biomaterials as aerogel and sheet: comparative study of the adsorption and reduction of dyes and nitroaromatics. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2020;3(12):8619–26. 10.1021/ACSABM.0C01028/SUPPL_FILE/MT0C01028_SI_001.PDF.10.1021/acsabm.0c01028 ↗
36. Phan VHG, Le TMD, Janarthanan G, Ngo PKT, Lee DS, Thambi T. Development of bioresorbable smart injectable hydrogels based on thermo-responsive copolymer integrated bovine serum albumin bioconjugates for accelerated healing of excisional wounds. J Ind Eng Chem. 2021;96:345–55. 10.1016/J.JIEC.2021.01.041.10.1016/j.jiec.2021.01.041 ↗
37. Henrot P, Laurent P, Levionnois E, Leleu D, Pain C, Truchetet ME, et al. A method for isolating and culturing skin cells: application to endothelial cells, fibroblasts, keratinocytes, and melanocytes from punch biopsies in systemic sclerosis skin. Front Immunol. 2020;11:2408. 10.3389/FIMMU.2020.566607.10.3389/fimmu.2020.566607 ↗
38. Yadav K, Das M, Hassan N, Mishra A, Lahiri J, Dubey A, et al. Synthesis and characterization of novel protein nanodots as drug delivery carriers with an enhanced biological efficacy of melatonin in breast cancer cells. RSC Adv. 2021;11(16):9076–85. 10.1039/D0RA08959A.10.1039/D0RA08959A ↗
39. Shukla D, Das M, Kasade D, Pandey M, Dubey AK, Yadav SK, et al. Sandalwood-derived carbon quantum dots as bioimaging tools to investigate the toxicological effects of malachite green in model organisms. Chemosphere. 2020;248:125998. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.125998.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.125998 ↗
40. Jiang B, Jain A, Lu Y, Hoag SW. Probing thermal stability of proteins with temperature scanning viscometer. Mol Pharm. 2019;16(8):3687–93. 10.1021/ACS.MOLPHARMACEUT.9B00598.10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b00598 ↗
41. Michnik A, Michalik K, Drzazga Z. Stability of bovine serum albumin at different pH. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2005;80(2):399–406. 10.1007/S10973-005-0667-9.10.1007/s10973-005-0667-9 ↗
42. Molodenskiy D, Shirshin E, Tikhonova T, Gruzinov A, Peters G, Spinozzi F. Thermally induced conformational changes and protein–protein interactions of bovine serum albumin in aqueous solution under different pH and ionic strengths as revealed by SAXS measurements. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2017;19(26):17143–55. 10.1039/C6CP08809K.10.1039/C6CP08809K ↗
43. Ma X, Sun X, Hargrove D, Chen J, Song D, Dong Q, et al. A biocompatible and biodegradable protein hydrogel with green and red autofluorescence: preparation, characterization and in vivo biodegradation tracking and modeling. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):1–12. 10.1038/srep19370.10.1038/srep19370 ↗
44. Arabi SH, Aghelnejad B, Schwieger C, Meister A, Kerth A, Hinderberger D. Serum albumin hydrogels in broad pH and temperature ranges: characterization of their self-assembled structures and nanoscopic and macroscopic properties. Biomater Sci. 2018;6(3):478–92. 10.1039/C7BM00820A.10.1039/C7BM00820A ↗
45. Shibayama M, Tanaka T, Han CC. Small angle neutron scattering study on poly(N‐isopropyl acrylamide) gels near their volume‐phase transition temperature. J Chem Phys. 1998;97(9):6829. 10.1063/1.463636.10.1063/1.463636 ↗
46. Hule RA, Nagarkar RP, Altunbas A, Ramay HR, Branco MC, Schneider JP, et al. Correlations between structure, material properties and bioproperties in self-assembled β-hairpin peptide hydrogels. Faraday Discuss. 2008;139:251. 10.1039/B717616C.10.1039/b717616c ↗
47. Surita S, Lackey MA, Griffin DM, Kishore S, Tew GN, Bhatia SR. SANS study of highly resilient poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels. Soft Matter. 2014;10(12):1905–16. 10.1039/C3SM52395K.10.1039/c3sm52395k ↗
48. Amdursky N, Mazo MM, Thomas MR, Humphrey EJ, Puetzer JL, St-Pierre JP, et al. Elastic serum-albumin based hydrogels: mechanism of formation and application in cardiac tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6(35):5604–12. 10.1039/C8TB01014E.10.1039/C8TB01014E ↗
49. Bodenberger N, Kubiczek D, Abrosimova I, Scharm A, Kipper F, Walther P, et al. Evaluation of methods for pore generation and their influence on physio-chemical properties of a protein based hydrogel. Biotechnol Rep. 2016;12:6–12. 10.1016/J.BTRE.2016.09.001.10.1016/j.btre.2016.09.001 ↗
50. De Maria S, Ferrari G, Maresca P. Rheological characterization bovine serum albumin gels induced by high hydrostatic pressure. Food Nutr Sci. 2015;6(9):770–9. 10.4236/FNS.2015.69080.10.4236/fns.2015.69080 ↗
51. Chen J, Ma X, Dong Q, Song D, Hargrove D, Vora SR, et al. Self-healing of thermally-induced, biocompatible and biodegradable protein hydrogel. RSC Adv. 2016;6(61):56183–92. 10.1039/C6RA11239K.10.1039/C6RA11239K ↗
52. Allen M. Post hoc tests: tukey honestly significant difference test. SAGE Encycl Commun Res Methods. 2017;4:1–4. 10.4135/9781483381411.N452.
53. Notara M, Behboudifard S, Kluth MA, Maßlo C, Ganss C, Frank MH, et al. UV light-blocking contact lenses protect against short-term UVB-induced limbal stem cell niche damage and inflammation. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–12. 10.1038/S41598-018-30021-8.10.1038/s41598-018-30021-8 ↗