Structural characterization and nanoscale strain field analysis of α/β interface layer of a near α titanium alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this article, the structural and nanoscale strain field of the α/β phase interface layer in Ti80 alloy were studied by using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and geometric phase analysis (GPA). The α/β interface layer was observed in forged and different annealed Ti80 alloys, which is mainly composed of lamellar face-centered cubic (FCC) phase region and α′ + β region. The FCC phases between α and β phases show a twin relationship, and the twinning plane is (1\bar{1}1) . The orientation relationship of the β phase, the α phase, and the FCC phase is (110) β //(0001) α // (1\bar{1}1) FCC and [ \bar{1}11 ] β //[ 2\bar{1}\bar{1}0 ] α //[011] FCC . The nanoscale strain field of FCC + α and β + α′ regions was analyzed by using the GPA technology. The FCC + α region shows more significant strain gradient than the α′ + β region, and ε FCC > ε α , ε α′ > ε β . The influence of element addition on the formation mechanism of the FCC phase was discussed. The addition of Zr promotes the formation of the FCC phase by inducing lattice distortion and reducing the stacking fault energy of the α phase. In addition, the Al element forms an obvious concentration gradient around the interface layer during the cooling process of the alloy, which provides a driving force for the formation of the FCC phase.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology , Luoyang 471023 , China
Provincial and Ministerial Co-construction Collaborative Innovation Center of Nonferrous New Materials and Advanced Processing Technology , Luoyang 471023 , China
Henan Province Key Laboratory of Nonferrous Materials Science and Processing Technology , Luoyang 471023 , China
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang ZX, Fan JK, Tang B, Kou HC, Wang J, Wang X, et al. Microstructural evolution and FCC twinning behavior during hot deformation of high temperature titanium alloy Ti65. J Mater Sci Technol. 2020;49:56–69.10.1016/j.jmst.2020.02.026 ↗
2. Grishkov V, Kopylov V, Lotkov A, Latushkina S, Baturin A, Girsova N, et al. Effect of warm equal channel angular pressing on the structure and mechanical properties of Ti0.16Pd0.14Fe (wt%) alloy. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2019;58:22–31.10.1515/rams-2019-0005 ↗
3. Jonas JJ, Aranas JC, Fall A, Jahazi M. Transformation softening in three titanium alloys. Mater Des. 2017;113:305–10.10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.039 ↗
4. Lin NM, Xie RZ, Zou JJ, Qin JF, Wang YT, Yuan S. Surface damage mitigation of titanium and its alloys via thermal oxidation: a brief review. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2019;58:132–46.10.1515/rams-2019-0012 ↗
5. Wang Q, Ren JQ, Wu YK, Jiang P, Li JQ, Sun ZJ, et al. Comparative study of crack growth behaviors of fully-lamellar and bi-lamellar Ti–6Al–3Nb–2Zr–1Mo alloy. J Alloys Compd. 2019;789:249–55.10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.02.302 ↗
6. Chen W, Lv YP, Zhang XY, Chen C, Lin YC, Zhou KC. Comparing the evolution and deformation mechanisms of lamellar and equiaxed microstructures in near β-Ti alloys during hot deformation. Mater Sci Eng A. 2019;758:71–8.10.1016/j.msea.2019.05.015 ↗
7. Zheng X, Gong MY, Xiong T, Ge HL, Yang LX, Zhou YT, et al. Deformation induced FCC lamellae and their interaction in commercial pure Ti. Scr Mater. 2019;162:326–30.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.11.037 ↗
8. Liu YG, Li MQ, Liu HJ. Deformation induced face-centered cubic titanium and its twinning behavior in Ti–6Al–4V. Scr Mater. 2016;119:5–8.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.03.018 ↗
9. Banerjee D, Williams JC. The effect of foil preparation technique on interface phase formation in Ti alloys. Scr Mater. 1983;17(9):1125–8.10.1016/0036-9748(83)90467-2 ↗
10. Banerjee D, Shelton CG, Ralph B, Williams JC. A resolution of the interface phase problem in titanium alloys. Acta Metall. 1988;36(1):125–41.10.1016/0001-6160(88)90033-8 ↗
11. Aguayo A, Murrieta G, Coss de R. Elastic stability and electronic structure of fcc Ti, Zr, and Hf: a first-principles study. Phys Rev B. 2002;65:092106.10.1103/PhysRevB.65.092106 ↗
12. Zhu W, Kou WJ, Tan CS, Zhang BY, Chen W, Sun QY, et al. Face centered cubic substructure and improved tensile property in a novel β titanium alloy Ti–5Al–4Zr–10Mo–3Cr. Mater Sci Eng A. 2020;771:138611.10.1016/j.msea.2019.138611 ↗
13. Hong DH, Lee TW, Lim SH, Kim WY, Hwang SK. Stress-induced hexagonal close-packed to face-centered cubic phase transformation in commercial-purity titanium under cryogenic plane-strain compression. Scr Mater. 2013;69(5):405–8.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.05.038 ↗
14. Kou W, Sun Q, Xiao L, Sun J. Plastic deformation-induced HCP-to-FCC phase transformation in submicron-scale pure titanium pillars. J Mater Sci. 2020;55(5):2193–201.10.1007/s10853-019-04043-0 ↗
15. Zhao Z, Chen J, Guo S, Tan H, Lin X, Huang W. Influence of α/β interface phase on the tensile properties of laser cladding deposited Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy. J Mater Sci Technol. 2017;33(7):675–81.10.1016/j.jmst.2016.09.026 ↗
16. Bai FM, Yin LB, Zhao W, Zhou HW, Song M, Liu YC, et al. Deformational behavior of face-centered cubic (FCC) phase in high-pure titanium. Mater Sci Eng A. 2021;800:140287.10.1016/j.msea.2020.140287 ↗
17. Sahara R, Emura S, Tsuchiya K. Theoretical investigation of effect of alloying elements on phase stability in body-centered cubic Ti–X alloys (X = V, Cr, Fe, Co, Nb, and Mo). J Alloys Compd. 2015;634:193–9.10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.02.005 ↗
18. Lu JW, Ge P, Zhao YQ, Niu HZ. Structure and mechanical properties of Ti–6Al based alloys with Mo addition. Mater Sci Eng A. 2013;584:41–6.10.1016/j.msea.2013.07.013 ↗
19. Jiang J, Zhao YW, Wang XX. Effects of Zr addition on the deformation behavior, microstructure and mechanical properties of dental Ti alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2020;794:139808.10.1016/j.msea.2020.139808 ↗
20. Guo K, Meng K, Miao D, Wang Q, Zhang C, Wang T. Effect of annealing on microstructure and tensile properties of skew hot rolled Ti–6Al–3Nb–2Zr–1Mo alloy tube. Mater Sci Eng A. 2019;766:138346.10.1016/j.msea.2019.138346 ↗
21. Zhou DD, Zeng WD, Xu JW, Chen W, Wang SM. Characterization of hot workability for a near alpha titanium alloy by integrating processing maps and constitutive relationship. Adv Eng Mater. 2019;21(7):1801232.10.1002/adem.201801232 ↗
22. Su BX, Luo LS, Wang BB, Su YQ, Wang L, Ritchie RO, et al. Annealed microstructure dependent corrosion behavior of Ti–6Al–3Nb–2Zr–1Mo alloy. J Mater Sci Technol. 2021;62:234–48.10.1016/j.jmst.2020.05.058 ↗
23. Guo Q, Wang Q, Han XL, Lu XK, Sun DL, Wu GH. Precipitation behavior of α phase and mechanical properties in severely plastic deformed Ti–15–3 alloy. Rare Met Mater Eng. 2011;40(3):377–83.10.1016/S1875-5372(11)60019-2 ↗
24. Xu YQ, Fu Y, Li J, Xiao WL, Zhao XQ, Ma CL. Effects of tungsten addition on the microstructural stability and properties of Ti–6.5Al-2Sn-4Hf-2Nb-based high temperature titanium alloys. J Mater Sci Technol. 2021;93:147–56.10.1016/j.jmst.2021.02.057 ↗
25. Chen YF, Yang B, Zhou YT, Wu Y, Zhu HH. Evaluation of pitting corrosion in duplex stainless steel Fe20Cr9Ni for nuclear power application. Acta Mater. 2020;197:172–83.10.1016/j.actamat.2020.07.046 ↗
26. Chung J, Rabenberg L. A geometric phase analysis method dedicated to nanomaterials orienting along high-index zone axis. Micron. 2018;113:20–3.10.1016/j.micron.2018.06.010 ↗
27. Ji PF, Li B, Liu SG, Zhang X, Chen BH, Zhang XY, et al. Controlling the corrosion behavior of Ti–Zr alloy by tuning the α/β phase volume fraction and morphology of β phase. J Alloys Compd. 2020;825:154153.10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154153 ↗
28. Ji PF, Chen BH, Li B, Tang YH, Zhang GF, Zhang XY, et al. Influence of Nb addition on microstructural evolution and compression mechanical properties of Ti–Zr alloys. J Mater Sci Technol. 2021;69:7–14.10.1016/j.jmst.2020.03.092 ↗
29. Katzarov I, Malinov S, Sha W. Finite element modeling of the morphology of β to α phase transformation in Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Metall Trans A. 2002;33(4):1027–40.10.1007/s11661-002-0204-4 ↗
30. Huang C, Dean TA, Loretto MH. Interface phase in α2 and B2 boundaries in Ti–25Al–10Nb–3V–1Mo alloy. Mater Sci Technol. 1995;11(2):143–9.10.1179/mst.1995.11.2.143 ↗