Braided composite stent for peripheral vascular applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Braided composite stent (BCS), woven with nitinol wires and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) strips, provides a hybrid design of stent. The mechanical performance of this novel stent has not been fully investigated yet. In this work, the influence of five main design factors (number of nitinol wires, braiding angle, diameter of nitinol wire, thickness and stiffness of the PET strip) on the surface coverage, radial strength, and flexibility of the BCS were systematically studied using computational models. The orthogonal experimental design was adopted to quantitatively analyze the sensitivity of multiple factors using the minimal number of study cases. Results have shown that the nitinol wire diameter and the braiding angle are two most important factors determining the mechanical performance of the BCS. A larger nitinol wire diameter led to a larger radial strength and less flexibility of the BCS. A larger braiding angle could provide a larger radial strength and better flexibility. In addition, the impact of the braiding angle decreased when the stent underwent a large deformation. At the same time, the impact of the PET strips increased due to the interaction with nitinol wires. Moreover, the number of PET strips played an important role in the surface coverage. This study could help understand the mechanical performance of BCS stent and provides guidance on the optimal design of the stent targeting less complications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Peripheral Artery Disease Management · Vascular Procedures and Complications · Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology , Taiyuan , 030024 , China
Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering and Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology , Melbourne , FL, 32901 , United States of America
Institute of Applied Mechanics, College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering Taiyuan University of Technology , Taiyuan , 030024 , China
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Fowkes FGR, Aboyans V, Fowkes FJI, McDermott MM, Sampson UKA, Criqui MH. Peripheral artery disease: epidemiology and global perspectives. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017;14:156–70.10.1038/nrcardio.2016.179 ↗
2. Rooke TW, Hirsch AT, Misra S, Sidawy AN, Beckman JA, Findeiss LK, et al. ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guideline for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease (Updating the 2005 Guideline) A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Developed in Collaboration With the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Catheter Cardio Inte. 2011;2012(79):501–31.
3. Rundback JH, Herman KC, Patel A. Superficial femoral artery intervention: creating an algorithmic approach for the use of old and novel (endovascular) technologies. Curr Treat Opt Cardiovasc Med. 2015;17:42–2.10.1007/s11936-015-0400-3 ↗
4. Schillinger M, Minar E. Percutaneous treatment of peripheral artery disease: novel techniques. Circulation. 2012;126:2433–40.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.036574 ↗
5. Yang X, Lu X, Ye K, Li X, Qin J, Jiang M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of balloon angioplasty versus primary stenting in the infrapopliteal disease. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48:18–26.10.1177/1538574413510626 ↗
6. Biondi-Zoccai G, Sangiorgi G, Lotrionte M, Feiring A, Commeau P, Fusaro M, et al. Infragenicular stent implantation for below-the-knee atherosclerotic disease: clinical evidence from an international collaborative meta-analysis on 640 patients. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16:251–60.10.1583/09-2691.1 ↗
7. Wang X, Liu P, Liang H, Zhang M, Li L, Yue Z. Analysis of the whole implementation process and optimization of a Nitinol superelastic stent. Materialwissenschaft Werkstofftechnik. 2019;50:44–51.10.1002/mawe.201800066 ↗
8. Dottori S, Flamini V, Vairo G. Mechanical behavior of peripheral stents and stent-vessel interaction: a computational study. Int J Comput Meth Eng Sci Mech. 2016;17:196–210.10.1080/15502287.2016.1188530 ↗
9. Shen X, Deng Y, Ji S, Zhu H, Jiang J, Gu L. Bending analysis of stented coronary artery: the interaction between stent and vessel. J Mech. 2019;35:455–63.10.1017/jmech.2018.23 ↗
10. Welch T, Eberhart R, Banerjee S, Chuong C-J. Mechanical interaction of an expanding coiled stent with a plaque-containing arterial wall: a finite element analysis. Cardiovasc Eng Techn. 2016;7:58–68.10.1007/s13239-015-0249-3 ↗
11. Qi Y, Qi H, He Y, Lin W, Li P-Z, Qin L, et al. Strategy of metal-polymer composite stent to accelerate biodegradation of iron-based biomaterials. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;10:182–92.10.1021/acsami.7b15206 ↗
12. Zhao S, Liu X, Gu L. The impact of wire stent fabrication technique on the performance of stent placement. J Med Devices. 2012;6:011007.10.1115/1.4005788 ↗
13. Matsumoto T, Inoue K, Tanaka S, Aoyagi Y, Matsubara Y, Matsuda D. Radial forces of stents used in thoracic endovascular aortic repair and bare self-expanding nitinol stents measured ex vivo – rapid rescue for obstruction of the innominate artery using bare self-expanding nitinol stents. Vascular. 2017;25:36–41.10.1177/1708538116640131 ↗
14. Zhao G, Chen G, Li X, Yuan Z, Ma L, Zhang B. Finite element studies on radial supporting performance of trans-structure Ni–Ti alloy vascular stent. Mat Rep. 2019;33:3050–6.
15. Carroccio A, Faries P, Morrissey N, Teodorescu V, Burks J, Gravereaux E, et al. Predicting iliac limb occlusions after bifurcated aortic stent grafting: anatomic and device-related causes. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36:679–84.10.1016/S0741-5214(02)00117-9 ↗
16. Armstrong E, Bishu K. Supera self-expanding stents for endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease: a review of the clinical evidence. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015;11:387–95.10.2147/VHRM.S70229 ↗
17. Duerig TW, Tolomeo DE, Wholey M. An overview of superelastic stent design. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol. 2000;9:235–46.10.1080/13645700009169654 ↗
18. Maleckis K, Deegan P, Poulson W, Sievers C, Kamenskiy A. Comparison of femoropopliteal artery stents under axial and radial compression, axial tension, bending, and torsion deformations. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;75:160–8.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.017 ↗
19. Goltz JP, Ritter CO, Kellersmann R, Klein D, Hahn D, Kickuth R. Endovascular treatment of popliteal artery segments P1 and P2 in patients with critical limb ischemia: initial experience using a helical nitinol stent with increased radial force. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19:450–6.10.1583/11-3591MR.1 ↗
20. Waidmann O, Trojan J, Friedrich-Rust M, Sarrazin C, Bechstein WO, Ulrich F, et al. SEMS vs cSEMS in duodenal and small bowel obstruction: high risk of migration in the covered stent group. World J Gastroentero. 2013;19:6199–206.10.3748/wjg.v19.i37.6199 ↗
21. Al-Mukhaini M, Panduranga P, Sulaiman K, Riyami A, Deeb M, Riyami M. Coronary perforation and covered stents: an update and review. Heart Views. 2011;12:63–70.10.4103/1995-705X.86017 ↗
22. Mwipatayi B, Thomas S, Wong J, Temple S, Vijayan V, Jackson M, et al. A comparison of covered versus bare expandable for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:1561–70.10.1016/j.jvs.2011.06.097 ↗
23. Weale A, Balasubramaniam K, Hardman J, Horrocks M. Use of the AorfixTM stent graft in patients with tortuous iliac anatomy. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;51:461–6.
24. Wang Y, Dong P, Ke J, Shen X, Li Z, Ren K, et al. Experimental evaluation of self-expandable metallic tracheobronchial stents. Nanotechnol Rev. 2019;8:136–42.10.1515/ntrev-2019-0013 ↗
25. Zheng Q, Dong P, Li Z, Han X, Zhou C, An M, et al. Mechanical characterizations of braided composite stents made of helical polyethylene terephthalate strips and NiTi wires. Nanotechnol Rev. 2019;8:168–74.10.1515/ntrev-2019-0016 ↗
26. Jaziri H, Mokhtar S, Chakf N, Heim F, Abdessalem S. Elastic recovery of polymeric braided stents under cyclic loading: preliminary assessment. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019;98:131–6.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.06.018 ↗
27. Maleckis K, Anttila E, Aylward P, Poulson W, Desyatova A, Mactaggart J, et al. Nitinol stents in the femoropopliteal artery: a mechanical perspective on material, design, and performance. Ann Biomed Eng. 2018;46:484–704.10.1007/s10439-018-1990-1 ↗
28. Sharma P. NiTi shape memory alloy: physical and tribological characterization. JMBM. 2018;27:250–69.10.1515/jmbm-2018-0009 ↗
29. Isayama H, Nakai Y, Toyokawa Y, Togawa O, Gon C, Ito Y, et al. Measurement of radial and axial forces of biliary self-expandable metallic stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:37–44.10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.032 ↗
30. Zou Q, Xue W, Lin J, Fu Y, Guan G, Wang F, et al. Mechanical characteristics of novel polyester/NiTi wires braided composite stent for the medical application. Res Phys. 2016;6:440–6.10.1016/j.rinp.2016.07.007 ↗
31. Jedwab MR, Clerc CO. A study of the geometrical and mechanical properties of a self-expanding metallic stent – theory and experiment. J Appl BiomaterI. 1993;4:77–85.10.1002/jab.770040111 ↗
32. Rebelo N, Gong X, Hall A, Pelton A, Duerig T. Finite element analysis on the cyclic properties of superelastic nitinol. Proceedings of the International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies. Baden, Germany, 2004.
33. Puskas JE, Chen Y. Biomedical application of commercial polymers and novel polyisobutylene-based thermoplastic elastomers for soft tissue replacement. Biomacromolecules. 2004;5:1141–54.10.1021/bm034513k ↗
34. Zhao F, Xue W, Wang F, Sun J, Lin J, Laijun L, et al. Braided bioresorbable cardiovascular stents mechanically reinforced by axial runners. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019;89:19–32.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.09.003 ↗
35. Zheng Q, Mozafari H, Li Z, Gu L. Mechanical characterization of braided self-expanding stents: impact of design parameters. J Mech Med Biol. 2019;19:108–13.10.1142/S0219519419500386 ↗
36. Balasubramaniam K, Hardman J, Horrocks M, Bulbulia R. The advantages of Aorfixâ„¢ for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;50:139–43.
37. Kim J, Kang T, Yu W-R. Mechanical modeling of self-expandable stent fabricated using braiding technology. J Biomech. 2008;41:3202–12.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.08.005 ↗
38. Taguchi G. The System of Experimental Design Engineering Methods to Optimize Quality and Minimize Cost. White Plains: NY: UNIPUB/Kraus International Publications; 1987.
39. Ansari F, Pack L, Brooks S, Morrison T. Design considerations for studies of the biomechanical environment of the femoropopliteal arteries. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:804–13.10.1016/j.jvs.2013.03.052 ↗
40. Jia F, Li G, Yang B, Yu B, Shen Y, Cong H. Investigation of rare earth upconversion fluorescent nanoparticles in biomedical field. Nanotechnol Rev. 2019;8:1–17.10.1515/ntrev-2019-0001 ↗
41. Smouse HB, Nikanorov A, LaFlash D. Biomechanical forces in the femoropopliteal arterial segment. Endovasc Today. 2005;4:60–6.
42. Ni Ghriallais R, Heraty K, Smouse B, Burke M, Gilson P, Bruzzi M. Deformation of the femoropopliteal segment. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23:1526602816669135.10.1177/1526602816669135 ↗