journal article·2023-10-18Open access

Investigating effects of Lorentz forces and convective heating on ternary hybrid nanofluid flow over a curved surface using homotopy analysis method

Showkat Ahmad Lone, F. M. Allehiany, Sadia Anwar, Sana Shahab, Anwar Saeed, Sayed M. Eldin

Nanotechnology Reviews· Volume 12· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract This work investigates the ternary hybrid nanofluid flow over an extending curved surface. The surface is impermeable and convective with hot working fluid water. Additionally, {\text{TiO}}_{\text{2}} , {\text{CoFe}}_{\text{2}}{\text{O}}_{\text{4}} , and \text{MgO} nanoparticles are suspended with water to form a tri-hybrid nanofluid. The modeled equations are presented in the partial differential equation form and are then converted to ordinary differential equations with appropriate similarity variables. The semi-analytical solution is determined by homotopy analysis method. The impacts of magnetic field, Joule heating, chemical reaction, Brownian motion, and thermophoresis on flow profiles, Nusselt number, and Sherwood number are determined using tables and figures. The findings of this study demonstrated that as the magnetic parameter upsurges, the velocity distribution shrinkages, while the temperature distribution escalates. The greater curvature factor boots the velocity, thermal, and volumetric fraction distribution. The thermal and volumetric fraction distributions are the increasing functions of thermophoresis factor. The higher magnetic factor, Eckert number, and thermal Biot number increase the Nusselt number, while they reduce the higher Brownian and thermophoretic factors. The higher thermophoresis and Brownian motion factors heighten the Sherwood number. Furthermore, it has been noted that using nanofluid (TiO 2 -water) and hybrid nanoliquid (TiO 2 -CoFe 2 O 4 /water), the transfer of energy rate increases by up to 17.31 and 31.72% as the nanoparticle parameter increases from 0.01 to 0.04, respectively. However, the energy transference rate in case of ternary hybrid nanoliquid (TiO 2 -MgO-CoFe 2 O 4 /water) is 47.972%.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer · Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films · Fractional Differential Equations Solutions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Basic Sciences, College of Science and Theoretical Studies, Saudi Electronic University, (Jeddah-M) , Riyadh 11673 , Saudi Arabia

Mathematics Department, Faculty of Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University , Mecca , Saudi Arabia

Department of Mathematics, College of Arts and Sciences, Wadi Ad Dawasir (11991), Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University , Al-Kharj , Saudi Arabia

Department of Business Administration, College of Business Administration, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University , P.O. Box 84428 , Riyadh 11671 , Saudi Arabia

Department of Mathematics, Abdul Wali Khan University , Mardan, 23200 , Khyber Pakhtunkhwa , Pakistan

Center of Research, Faculty of Engineering, Future University in Egypt New Cairo , New Cairo , Egypt

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Choi SUS, Eastman JA. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. Int. Mech. Eng. Congr. Exhib. San Fr. CA (United States): 1995. p. 12–7. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc671104/ (accessed October 2, 2021).
2. Mourad A, Abderrahmane A, Younis O, Marzouki R, Alazzam A. Numerical simulations of magnetohydrodynamics natural convection and entropy production in a porous annulus bounded by wavy cylinder and Koch snowflake loaded with Cu–Water nanofluid. Micromachines. 2022;13:182.10.3390/mi13020182 ↗
3. Acharya N, Mabood F, Shahzad SA, Badruddin IA. Hydrothermal variations of radiative nanofluid flow by the influence of nanoparticles diameter and nanolayer. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2022;130:105781. 10.1016/J.ICHEATMASSTRANSFER.2021.105781.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105781 ↗
4. Shahid A, Bhatti MM, Ellahi R, Mekheimer KS. Numerical experiment to examine activation energy and bi-convection Carreau nanofluid flow on an upper paraboloid porous surface: Application in solar energy. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments. 2022;52:102029.10.1016/j.seta.2022.102029 ↗
5. Bhatti MM, Arain MB, Zeeshan A, Ellahi R, Doranehgard MH. Swimming of Gyrotactic Microorganism in MHD Williamson nanofluid flow between rotating circular plates embedded in porous medium: Application of thermal energy storage. J Energy Storage. 2022;45:103511.10.1016/j.est.2021.103511 ↗
6. Wijayanta AT. Numerical solution strategy for natural convection problems in a triangular cavity using a direct meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method combined with an implicit artificial-compressibility model. Eng Anal Bound Elem. 2021;126:13–29.10.1016/j.enganabound.2021.02.006 ↗
7. Wijayanta AT. A localized meshless approach using radial basis functions for conjugate heat transfer problems in a heat exchanger. Int J Refrig. 2020;110:38–46.10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2019.10.025 ↗
8. Makarim DA, Suami A, Wijayanta AT, Kobayashi N, Itaya Y. Marangoni convection within thermosolute and absorptive aqueous LiBr solution. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2022;188:122621.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122621 ↗
9. Kumar RSV, Dhananjaya PG, Kumar RN, Gowda RJP, Prasannakumara BC. Modeling and theoretical investigation on Casson nanofluid flow over a curved stretching surface with the influence of magnetic field and chemical reaction. Int J Comput Methods Eng Sci Mech. 2022;23:12–9.10.1080/15502287.2021.1900451 ↗
10. Zhang L, Bhatti MM, Michaelides MM, Marin M, Ellahi R. Hybrid nanofluid flow towards an elastic surface with tantalum and nickel nanoparticles, under the influence of an induced magnetic field. Eur Phys J Spec Top. 2022;231:521–33.10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00409-1 ↗
11. Khan A, Saeed A, Tassaddiq A, Gul T, Mukhtar S, Kumam P, et al. Bio-convective micropolar nanofluid flow over thin moving needle subject to Arrhenius activation energy, viscous dissipation and binary chemical reaction. Case Stud. Therm Eng. 2021;25:100989.10.1016/j.csite.2021.100989 ↗
12. Chu Y, Bashir S, Ramzan M, Malik MY. Model‐based comparative study of magnetohydrodynamics unsteady hybrid nanofluid flow between two infinite parallel plates with particle shape effects. Math Methods Appl Sci. 2023 Jul 15;46(10):11568–82.10.1002/mma.8234 ↗
13. Ojjela O. Numerical investigation of heat transport in Alumina–Silica hybrid nanofluid flow with modeling and simulation. Math Comput Simul. 2022;193:100–22.10.1016/j.matcom.2021.09.022 ↗
14. Gumber P, Yaseen M, Rawat SK, Kumar M. Heat transfer in micropolar hybrid nanofluid flow past a vertical plate in the presence of thermal radiation and suction/injection effects. Partial Differ Equations Appl Math. 2022;5:100240.10.1016/j.padiff.2021.100240 ↗
15. Slimani R, Aissa A, Oudina FM, Khan U, Sahnoun M, Chamkha AJ, et al. Natural convection analysis flow of Al2O3-Cu/water hybrid nanofluid in a porous conical enclosure subjected to the magnetic field. Eur Phys J Appl Phys. 2020;92:10904. 10.1051/EPJAP/2020200260.10.1051/epjap/2020200260 ↗
16. Arif M, Persio LD, Kumam P, Watthayu W, Akgül A. Heat transfer analysis of fractional model of couple stress Casson tri-hybrid nanofluid using dissimilar shape nanoparticles in blood with biomedical applications. Sci Rep. 2023;13:4596.10.1038/s41598-022-25127-z ↗
17. Shahzad F, Jamshed W, Eid MR, Ibrahim RW, Aslam F, Isa SSPM, et al. The effect of pressure gradient on MHD flow of a tri-hybrid Newtonian nanofluid in a circular channel. J Magn Magn Mater. 2023;568:170320.10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.170320 ↗
18. Sudharani M, Prakasha DG, Kumar KG, Chamkha AJ. Computational assessment of hybrid and tri hybrid nanofluid influenced by slip flow and linear radiation. Eur Phys J Plus. 2023;138:257.10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03852-2 ↗
19. Guedri K, Khan A, Sene N, Raizah Z, Saeed A, Galal AM. Thermal flow for radiative ternary hybrid nanofluid over nonlinear stretching sheet subject to Darcy–Forchheimer phenomenon. Math. Probl. Eng. 2022;2022:3429439.10.1155/2022/3429439 ↗
20. Shevchuk IV. An improved asymptotic expansion method for fluid flow and convective heat transfer in cone-and-disk geometries with rotating cone. Phys Fluids. 2023;35:43603.10.1063/5.0146556 ↗
21. Olayemi OA, Khaled AF, Temitope OJ, Victor OO, Odetunde CB, Adegun IK. Parametric study of natural convection heat transfer from an inclined rectangular cylinder embedded in a square enclosure. Aust J Mech Eng. 2023;21:668–81.10.1080/14484846.2021.1913853 ↗
22. Manna NK, Biswas N, Mandal DK, Sarkar UK, Öztop HF, Hamdeh NH. Impacts of heater-cooler position and Lorentz force on heat transfer and entropy generation of hybrid nanofluid convection in quarter-circular cavity. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow. 2023;33:1249–86.10.1108/HFF-07-2022-0402 ↗
23. Wang SR, Wang CA. Numerical simulation of convective heat transfer in packed bed using open-source computational fluid dynamics. Powder Technol. 2023;422:118452.10.1016/j.powtec.2023.118452 ↗
24. Shi L, Zhu X, Du Z. Study on convective heat transfer characteristics of inclined jet impinging cylindrical target surface in the confined space. Appl Therm Eng. 2023;218:119316.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119316 ↗
25. Abbas A, Jeelani MB, Alharthi NH. Darcy–Forchheimer relation influence on MHD dissipative third-grade fluid flow and heat transfer in porous medium with joule heating effects: A numerical approach. Processes. 2022;10:906.10.3390/pr10050906 ↗
26. Naseem T, Fatima U, Munir M, Shahzad A, Kausar N, Nisar KS, et al. Joule heating and viscous dissipation effects in hydromagnetized boundary layer flow with variable temperature, Case Stud. Therm Eng. 2022;35:102083.10.1016/j.csite.2022.102083 ↗
27. Rasheed HU, Islam S, Zeeshan, Abbas T, Khan J. Analytical treatment of MHD flow and chemically reactive Casson fluid with Joule heating and variable viscosity effect. Waves Random Complex Media. 2022;1–17. 10.1080/17455030.2022.2042622.10.1080/17455030.2022.2042622 ↗
28. Mahdy AMS, Babatin MM, Khader MM. Numerical treatment for processing the effect of convective thermal condition and Joule heating on Casson fluid flow past a stretching sheet. Int J Mod Phys C. 2022;33:2250108.10.1142/S012918312250108X ↗
29. Waqas H, Sadiq MA, Bahaidarah HMS. Gyrotactic bioconvection stratified flow of magnetized micropolar nanoliquid configured by stretchable radiating surface with Joule heating and viscous dissipation. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2022;138:106229.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.106229 ↗
30. Mahanthesh B, Reddy CS, Srikantha S, Lorenzini G. Entropy generation analysis of radiative heat transfer in Williamson fluid flowing in a microchannel with nonlinear mixed convection and Joule heating. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng. 2022;09544089221074846. 10.1177/09544089221074846.10.1177/09544089221074846 ↗
31. Gangadhar K, Lakshmi KB, Kannan T, Chamkha AJ. Bioconvective magnetized oldroyd-B nanofluid flow in the presence of Joule heating with gyrotactic microorganisms. Waves Random Complex Media. 2022;1–21. 10.1080/17455030.2022.2050441.10.1080/17455030.2022.2050441 ↗
32. Mishra A, Upreti H. A comparative study of Ag–MgO/water and Fe3O4–CoFe2O4/EG–water hybrid nanofluid flow over a curved surface with chemical reaction using Buongiorno model. Partial Differ Equations Appl Math. 2022;5:100322.10.1016/j.padiff.2022.100322 ↗
33. Maity S, Kundu PK. Magnetically driven chemically reactive Casson nanofluid flow over curved surface with thermal radiation. Heat Transf. 2022;51:4882–905.10.1002/htj.22527 ↗
34. Khan U, Zaib A, Ishak A, Bakar AS, Animasaun IL, Yook SJ. Insights into the dynamics of blood conveying gold nanoparticles on a curved surface when suction, thermal radiation, and Lorentz force are significant: The case of Non-Newtonian Williamson fluid. Math Comput Simul. 2022;193:250–68.10.1016/j.matcom.2021.10.014 ↗
35. Sun Z, Shi Z, Li Z, Geng X, Sun Q, Chen S, et al. Experimental investigation of flow control of a curved-surface jet hypersonic flow. Phys Fluids. 2022;34:66107.10.1063/5.0094555 ↗
36. Fuzhang W, Anwar MI, Ali M, El-Shafay AS, Abbas N, Ali R. Inspections of unsteady micropolar nanofluid model over exponentially stretching curved surface with chemical reaction. Waves Random Complex Media. 2022;1–22. 10.1080/17455030.2021.2025280.10.1080/17455030.2021.2025280 ↗
37. Nadeem S, Abbas N, Malik MY. Inspection of hybrid based nanofluid flow over a curved surface. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020;189:105193. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105193.10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105193 ↗
38. Sarada K, Gamaoun F, Abdulrahman A, Paramesh SO, Kumar R, Prasanna GD, et al. Impact of exponential form of internal heat generation on water-based ternary hybrid nanofluid flow by capitalizing non-Fourier heat flux model. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2022;38:102332.10.1016/j.csite.2022.102332 ↗
39. Dawar A, Islam S, Shah Z, Mahmuod SR. A passive control of Casson hybrid nanofluid flow over a curved surface with alumina and copper nanomaterials: A study on sodium alginate-based fluid. J Mol Liq. 2023;382:122018.10.1016/j.molliq.2023.122018 ↗
40. Sun X, Animasaun IL, Swain K, Shah NA, Wakif A, Olanrewaju PO. Significance of nanoparticle radius, inter‐particle spacing, inclined magnetic field, and space‐dependent internal heating: The case of chemically reactive water conveying copper nanoparticles. ZAMM‐J Appl Math Mech Für Angew Math Und Mech. 2022;102:e202100094.10.1002/zamm.202100094 ↗
41. Dawar A, Wakif A, Saeed A, Shah Z, Muhammad T, Kumam P. Significance of Lorentz forces on Jeffrey nanofluid flows over a convectively heated flat surface featured by multiple velocity slips and dual stretching constraint: a homotopy analysis approach. J Comput Des Eng. 2022;9:564–82.10.1093/jcde/qwac019 ↗
42. Souayeh B, Ramesh K. Numerical scrutinization of ternary nanofluid flow over an exponentially stretching sheet with gyrotactic microorganisms. Mathematics. 2023;11(4):981.10.3390/math11040981 ↗
43. Priyadharshini P, Archana MV, Shah NA, Alshehri MH. Ternary hybrid nanofluid flow emerging on a symmetrically stretching sheet optimization with machine learning prediction scheme. Symmetry. 2023;15:1225.10.3390/sym15061225 ↗
44. Wang F, Nazir U, Sohail M, El-Zahar ER, Park C, Thounthong P. A Galerkin strategy for tri-hybridized mixture in ethylene glycol comprising variable diffusion and thermal conductivity using non-Fourier’s theory. Nanotechnol Rev. 2022;11:834–45.10.1515/ntrev-2022-0050 ↗
45. Acharya N, Maity S, Kundu PK. Framing the hydrothermal features of magnetized TiO2–CoFe2O4 water-based steady hybrid nanofluid flow over a radiative revolving disk. Multidiscip. Model Mater Struct. 2020;16:765–90. 10.1108/MMMS-08-2019-0151/FULL/XML.10.1108/MMMS-08-2019-0151 ↗
46. Mishra A, Pandey AK, Kumar M. Thermal performance of Ag–water nanofluid flow over a curved surface due to chemical reaction using Buongiorno’s model. Heat Transf. 2021;50:257–78.10.1002/htj.21875 ↗
47. Abbas Z, Naveed M, Sajid M. Hydromagnetic slip flow of nanofluid over a curved stretching surface with heat generation and thermal radiation. J Mol Liq. 2016;215:756–62.10.1016/j.molliq.2016.01.012 ↗
48. Algehyne EA, Wakif A, Rasool G, Saeed A, Ghouli Z. Significance of Darcy-Forchheimer and Lorentz forces on radiative alumina-water nanofluid flows over a slippery curved geometry under multiple convective constraints: a renovated Buongiorno’s model with validated thermophysical correlations. Waves Random Complex Media. 2022;1–30. 10.1080/17455030.2022.2074570.10.1080/17455030.2022.2074570 ↗
49. Roşca NC, Pop I. Unsteady boundary layer flow over a permeable curved stretching/shrinking surface. Eur J Mech. 2015;51:61–7.10.1016/j.euromechflu.2015.01.001 ↗
50. Afridi MI, Qasim M, Wakif A, Hussanan A. Second law analysis of dissipative nanofluid flow over a curved surface in the presence of Lorentz Force: Utilization of the Chebyshev–Gauss–Lobatto spectral method. Nanomater. 2019;9:195. 10.3390/NANO9020195.10.3390/nano9020195 ↗
51. Abbas Z, Naveed M, Sajid M. Heat transfer analysis for stretching flow over a curved surface with magnetic field. J Eng Thermophys. 2013;22:337–45.10.1134/S1810232813040061 ↗
52. Ahmad S, Nadeem S, Muhammad N. Boundary layer flow over a curved surface imbedded in porous medium. Commun Theor Phys. 2019;71:344.10.1088/0253-6102/71/3/344 ↗
53. Dey D, Makinde OD, Chutia B. Hydromagnetic flow of dusty fluid with heat and mass transfer past a stretching curved surface in a porous medium. Lat Am Appl Res. 2022;52:201–6.10.52292/j.laar.2022.831 ↗
54. Khan WA, Pop I. Boundary-layer flow of a nanofluid past a stretching sheet. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2010;53:2477–83.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.01.032 ↗
55. Wang CY. Free convection on a vertical stretching surface. ZAMM‐J Appl Math Mech Für Angew Math Und Mech. 1989;69:418–20.10.1002/zamm.19890691115 ↗
56. Gorla RS, Sidawi I. Free convection on a vertical stretching surface with suction and blowing. Appl Sci Res. 1994;52:247–57.10.1007/BF00853952 ↗
57. Devi SU, Devi SPA. Heat transfer enhancement of cu− $ al_ {2} o_ {3} $/water hybrid nanofluid flow over a stretching sheet. J Niger Math Soc. 2017;36:419–33.
58. Grubka LG, Bobba KM. Heat transfer characteristics of a continuous stretching surface with variable temperature. J Heat Transfer. 1985;107:248–50.10.1115/1.3247387 ↗
59. Gowda RJP, Al-Mubaddel FS, Kumar RN, Prasannakumara BC, Issakhov A, Rahimi-Gorji A, et al. Computational modelling of nanofluid flow over a curved stretching sheet using Koo–Kleinstreuer and Li (KKL) correlation and modified Fourier heat flux model. Chaos Solit Fractals. 2021;145:110774.10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110774 ↗