Fractional simulations for thermal flow of hybrid nanofluid with aluminum oxide and titanium oxide nanoparticles with water and blood base fluids
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The fractional model has been developed for the thermal flow of hybrid nanofluid due to the inclined surface. The thermal investigation of the hybrid nanomaterial is predicted by utilizing the molybdenum disulphide nanoparticles and graphene oxide nanomaterials. The flow computations for mixed convection flow of nanoparticles and base fluids are performed due to vertical oscillating plate. The simulations for the formulated model have been done ρ -Laplace transform technique for Caputo fractional simulations. Definitions of Mittage–Leffler function and ρ -Laplace transform are also presented for the governing model. The application of updated definitions of ρ -Laplace transform for the Caputo fractional model is quite interesting unlike traditional Laplace transforms. The comparative investigation for both types of nanoparticles is performed for heat and mass transfer rates. It is observed that the heat enhancement rate due to water-based nanoparticles is relatively impressive compared to the kerosene oil-based nanomaterials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer · Fractional Differential Equations Solutions · Differential Equations and Numerical Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Riphah International University I-14 , Islamabad 44000 , Pakistan
Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University , Alkharj 16273 , Saudi Arabia
Department of Mathematics, University of Engineering and Technology , Lahore 54890 , Pakistan
Department of Mathematics, COMSATS University Islamabad , Sahiwal 57000 , Pakistan
Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University , P.O.Box 84428, Riyadh 11671 , Saudi Arabia
Department of Business Management/Information System, College of Science and Humanities at Alghat, Majmaah University , Al-Majmaah 11952 , Saudi Arabia
Faculty of Computing Science IT, Cairo, Egypt, Ahram Canadian University , 6 October , Cairo , Egypt
Physics Department, College of Science, Al-Zulfi, Majmaah University , Al-Majmaah 11952 , Saudi Arabia
Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Umm Al-Qura University , Makkah , Saudi Arabia
Production Engineering and Mechanical Design Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University , P.O 35516 , Mansoura , Egypt
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Choi SUS. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. ASME-Publ-Fed. 1995;231:99–106.10.1115/IMECE1995-0926 ↗
2. Shehzad SA, Khan SU, Abbas Z, Rauf A. A revised Cattaneo-Christov micropolar viscoelastic nanofluid model with combined porosity and magnetic effects. Appl Math Mech. 2020;41:521–32.10.1007/s10483-020-2581-5 ↗
3. Turkyilmazoglu M. On the transparent effects of Buongiorno nanofluid model on heat and mass transfer. Eur Phys J Plus. 2021;136:376.10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01359-2 ↗
4. Nadeem S, Fuzhang W, Alharbi FM, Sajid F, Abbas N, El-Shafay AS, Al-Mubaddel FS. Al-Mubaddel, Numerical computations for Buongiorno nano fluid model on the boundary layer flow of viscoelastic fluid towards a nonlinear stretching sheet. Alexandria Eng J. February 2022;61(2):1769–78.10.1016/j.aej.2021.11.013 ↗
5. Abdelmalek Z, Khan SU, Awais M, Mustfa MS. Analysis of generalized micropolar nanofluid with swimming of microorganisms over an accelerated surface with activation energy. J Thermal Anal Calorimetry. 2021;144:1051–63.10.1007/s10973-020-09474-5 ↗
6. Mahanthesh B, Srikantha N, Mackolil J. A study on heat transfer in three-dimensional nonlinear convective boundary layer flow of nanomaterial considering the aggregation of nanoparticles. Heat Transfer Asian Res. January 2022;51(1):891–908.10.1002/htj.22334 ↗
7. Ramezanizadeh M, Nazari MA, Ahmadi MH, Lorenzini G, Pop I. A review on the applications of intelligence methods in predicting thermal conductivity of nanofluids. J Thermal Anal Calorimetry. 2019;138(1):827–43.10.1007/s10973-019-08154-3 ↗
8. Khan SU, Al-Khaled K, Bhatti MM. Numerical experiment of Reiner-Philippoff nanofluid flow subject to the higher-order slip features, activation energy, and bioconvection. Partial Differ Equ Appl Math. December 2021;4:100126.10.1016/j.padiff.2021.100126 ↗
9. Reddy PS, Sreedevi P, Rao KV. Impact of heat generation/absorption on heat and mass transfer of nanofluid over rotating disk filled with carbon nanotubes. Int J Num Methods Heat Fluid Flow. 2021;31(9):2962–85.10.1108/HFF-10-2020-0621 ↗
10. Abbasi A, Farooq W, Muhammad T, Khan MI, Khan SU, Mabood F, Bibi S. Implications of the third-grade nanomaterials lubrication problem in terms of radiative heat flux: A Keller box analysis. Chem Phys Lett. 16 November 2021;783:139041.10.1016/j.cplett.2021.139041 ↗
11. Sabu AS, Wakif A, Areekara S, Mathew A, Shah NA. Significance of nanoparticles’ shape and thermo-hydrodynamic slip constraints on MHD alumina-water nanoliquid flows over a rotating heated disk: The passive control approach. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer. December 2021;129:105711.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105711 ↗
12. Dawar A, Wakif A, Thumma T, Shah NA. Towards a new MHD non-homogeneous convective nanofluid flow model for simulating a rotating inclined thin layer of sodium alginate-based Iron oxide exposed to incident solar energy. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer. January 2022;130:105800.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105800 ↗
13. Hassan M, El‐Zahar ER, Khan SU, Rahimi‐Gorji M, Ahmad A. Boundary layer flow pattern of heat and mass for homogenous shear thinning hybrid-nanofluid: An experimental data base modeling. Num Methods Partial Differ Equ. March 2021;37(2):1234–49.10.1002/num.22575 ↗
14. Al‐Farhany K, Alomari MA, Al‐Saadi A, Chamkha A, Öztop HF, Al‐Kouz W. MHD mixed convection of a Cu–water nanofluid flow through a channel with an open trapezoidal cavity and an elliptical obstacle. Heat Transfer Asian Res. 2022;51(2):1691–710.10.1002/htj.22370 ↗
15. Song YQ, Hassan M, Khan SU, Khan MI, Qayyum S, Chu YM, Nadeem A. Thermal and boundary layer flow analysis for MWCNT-SiO2 hybrid nanoparticles: An experimental thermal model. Modern Phys Lett B. 2021;35(18):2150303.10.1142/S0217984921503036 ↗
16. Wahid NS, Md Arifin N, Turkyilmazoglu M, Hafidzuddin ME, Abd Rahmin NA. MHD hybrid Cu-Al2O3/water nanofluid flow with thermal radiation and partial slip past a permeable stretching surface: analytical solution. J Nano Res. 2021;64:75–91.10.4028/www.scientific.net/JNanoR.64.75 ↗
17. Madhukesh JK, Kumar RN, Gowda RP, Prasannakumara BC, Ramesh GK, Khan MI, et al. Numerical simulation of AA7072-AA7075/water-based hybrid nanofluid flow over a curved stretching sheet with Newtonian heating: A non-Fourier heat flux model approach. J Mol Liquids. August 2021;335(1):116103.10.1016/j.molliq.2021.116103 ↗
18. Saleem N, Munawar S, Tripathi D. Entropy analysis in ciliary transport of radiated hybrid nanofluid in presence of electromagnetohydrodynamics and activation energy. Case Studies Thermal Eng. December 2021;28:101665.10.1016/j.csite.2021.101665 ↗
19. Rajesh V, Sheremet MA, Öztop HF. Impact of hybrid nanofluids on MHD flow and heat transfer near a vertical plate with ramped wall temperature. Case Studies in Thermal Eng. December 2021;28:101557.10.1016/j.csite.2021.101557 ↗
20. Alghamdi W, Alsubie A, Kumam P, Saeed A, Gul T. MHD hybrid nanofluid flow comprising the medication through a blood artery. Sci Rep. 2021;11:11621.10.1038/s41598-021-91183-6 ↗
21. Shah NA, Khan I. Heat transfer analysis in a second grade fluid over and oscillating vertical plate using fractional Caputo-Fabrizio derivatives. Eur Phys J C. 2016;76(7):362.10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4209-3 ↗
22. Asjad MI, Shah NA, Aleem M, Khan I. Heat transfer analysis of fractional second-grade fluid subject to Newtonian heating with Caputo and Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivatives: A comparison. Eur Phys J Plus. 2017;132(8):340.10.1140/epjp/i2017-11606-6 ↗
23. Raza N, Awan AU, Haque E, Abdullah M, Rashidi MM. Unsteady flow of a Burgers’ fluid with Caputo fractional derivatives: A hybrid technique. Ain Shams Eng J. 2019;10(2):319–25.10.1016/j.asej.2018.01.006 ↗
24. Siddique I, Tlili I, Bukhari SM, Mahsud Y. Heat transfer analysis in convective flows of fractional second grade fluids with Caputo-Fabrizio and Atangana-Baleanu derivative subject to Newtonian heating. Mech Time-Depend Mater. 2021;21:291–311.10.1007/s11043-019-09442-z ↗
25. Alshabanat A, Jleli M, Kumar S, Samet B. Generalization of caputo-fabrizio fractional derivative and applications to electrical circuits. Front Phys. 2020;8:64.10.3389/fphy.2020.00064 ↗
26. Anwar T, Kumam P, Thounthong P, Muhammad S, Duraihem FZ. Generalized thermal investigation of unsteady MHD flow of Oldroyd-B fluid with slip effects and Newtonian heating; a Caputo-Fabrizio fractional model. Alexandria Eng J. March 2022;61(3):2188–202.10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.090 ↗
27. Khan MI, Raza A, Naseem M, Al-Khaled K, Khan SU, Khan MI, et al. Comparative analysis for radiative slip flow of magnetized viscous fluid with mixed convection features: Atangana-Baleanu and Caputo-Fabrizio fractional simulations. Case Studies Thermal Eng. December 2021;28:101682.10.1016/j.csite.2021.101682 ↗
28. Sene N, Fall AN. Homotopy perturbation ρ-laplace transform method and its application to the fractional diffusion equation and the fractional diffusion-reaction equation. Fractal Fract. 2019;3(2):14.10.3390/fractalfract3020014 ↗
29. Bhangale N, Kachhia KB, Gómez-Aguilar J. A new iterative method with $$\rho $$ ρ-Laplace transform for solving fractional differential equations with Caputo generalized fractional derivative. Eng Computers. 2020;1–14.10.1007/s00366-020-01202-9 ↗
30. Jarad F, Abdeljawad T. A modified Laplace transform for certain generalized fractional operators. Results Nonlinear Anal. 2018;1(2):88–98.
31. Zakian V. Optimisation of numerical inversion of Laplace transforms. Electron Lett. 1970;6(21):677–9.10.1049/el:19700471 ↗
32. Zakian V. Properties of IMN approximants. ed. Cambridge: Academic Press Ne3. p. 141–4
33. Halsted D, Brown D. Zakian’s technique for inverting Laplace transforms. Chem Eng J. 1972;3:312–3.10.1016/0300-9467(72)85037-8 ↗