journal article·2019-05-31Open access

Dynamic mechanical behavior of nano-ZnO reinforced dental composite

Shubham Mahna, Hemraj Singh, Sumit Tomar, Deep Bhagat, Amar Patnaik, Shiv Ranjan Kumar

Nanotechnology Reviews· Volume 8· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract In the present work, Bisphenol-A Glycidyl Methacrylate / Triethylene Glycol Dimethylacrylate based dental composites filled with 0-30 wt.% silane treated nano-ZnO were fabricated and tested for their dynamic mechanical properties. Samples were kept in each of three different mediums such as cold drink, distilled water and saliva for 7 days. The dynamic mechanical properties such as storage modulus, loss modulus and Tan delta were evaluated and compared for each composite under different conditions. The finding of results indicated that on adding 30 wt.% nano-ZnO, the storage modulus was increased by 109% in case of post cured, 120% in case of cold drink, 125% in case of artificial saliva but decreased by 70% in case of distilled water. The loss modulus was increased by 175% in case of post cured, 30% in case of cold drink, 50% in case of artificial saliva but decreased by 50% in case of distilled water. Further, minimum value of storage modulus was reported in case of distilled water medium followed by cold drink and then artificial saliva. Also, cold drink seems to be better medium than distilled water in terms of dynamic mechanical properties of dental composite. Graphical abstract Variation of storage modulus of sample kept in artificial saliva for 7 days Addition of 30 wt.% nano-ZnO increased the storage modulus by 109% in case of post cured, 120% in case of cold drink, 125% in case of artificial saliva but decreased by 70% in case of distilled water. Addition of 30 wt.% nano-ZnO increased the loss modulus by 175% in case of post cured, 30% in case of cold drink, 50% in case of artificial saliva but decreased by 50% in case of distilled water. Immersion of sample in each medium led to decrease in storage modulus but increase in Tan delta. Further, minimum value of storage modulus was reported in case of distilled water medium followed by cold drink and then artificial saliva. Cold drink seems to be better medium than distilled water in terms of dynamic mechanical properties of dental composite.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Erosion and Treatment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechanical Engineering Department, M.N.I.T Jaipur , India

Mechanical Engineering Department, JECRC University , Jaipur , India

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Kumar SR, Patnaik A and Bhat IK. Abrasive wear behavior of silane treated nanoalumina filled dental composite under food slurry and distilled water condition, Sci Eng Compos Mater. 2018, 25(3), 541–553.10.1515/secm-2016-0175 ↗
2. Kumar SR, Patnaik A and Bhat IK. Analysis of polymerization shrinkage and thermo-mechanical characterizations of resin-based dental composite reinforced with silane modified nanosilica filler particle. P I Mech Eng L-J Mat, 2016, 230, 492-503.10.1177/1464420715581003 ↗
3. Abenojar J, Martinez MA, Velasco F, Sanchez VP, Martín-Martínez JM. Effect of boron carbide filler on the curing and mechanical properties of an epoxy resin. J. Adhes. 2009, 85, 216–238.10.1080/00218460902881782 ↗
4. Abenojar J, Martinez MA, Velasco F, del Real JC. Effect of moisture and temperature on the mechanical properties of an epoxy reinforced with boron carbide. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2011, 25, 2445–2460.10.1163/016942411X580135 ↗
5. Abenojar J, Martinez MA, Pantoja M, del Real JC. Epoxy composite reinforced with nano and micro SiC particles: curing kinetics and mechanical properties. J. Adhes. 2012, 88, 418–434.10.1080/00218464.2012.660396 ↗
6. Meena A, Mali HS, Patnaik A, Kumar SR. Comparative investigation on physical, mechanical and thermo-mechanical behavior of nanohydroxyapatite and MTA filled dental composites, e-Polymers, 2018, 17(4), 311–319.10.1515/epoly-2016-0319 ↗
7. Pantoja M, Diaz-Benito B, Velasco F, Abenojar J, del Real JC. Analysis of hydrolysis process of γ-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane and its influence on the formation of silane coatings on 6063 aluminum alloy. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 6386–6390.10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.02.022 ↗
8. Wilson TW, Turner DT. Characterization of polydimethacrylates and their composites by dynamic mechanical analysis. J Dent Res, 1987, 66(5), 1032-1035.10.1177/00220345870660050801 ↗
9. Jones DW. Dental composite biomaterials. J Can Dent Assoc, 1998, 64, 732-734.
10. Saber-Sheikh K, Clarke RL, Braden M. Viscoelastic properties of some soft lining materials. I–Effect of temperature. Biomaterials. 1999, 20 (9), 817-822.10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00236-1 ↗
11. Vouvoudi EC, Sideridou ID. Dynamic mechanical properties of dental nanofilled light-cured resin composites: Effect of food-simulating liquids. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. 2012, 10, 87–96.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.02.007 ↗
12. Sideridou I, Karabela MM, Spyroudi CS, Dynamic Mechanical Analysis of a Hybrid and a Nanohybrid Light-Cured Dental Resin Composite, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2009, 20(12), 1797-808.10.1163/156856208X386408 ↗
13. Harris JS, Jacobsen PH, O’Doherty DM. The effect of curing light intensity and test temperature on the dynamic mechanical properties of two polymer composites. J. Oral. Rehabil., 1999, 26 (8), 635-639.10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00432.x ↗
14. Dionysopoulos P, Watts DC. Dynamic mechanical properties of an inlay composite. J. Dent., 1989, 17(3), 140-144.10.1016/0300-5712(89)90110-3 ↗
15. Kumar SR, Patnaik A, Bhat IK. Abrasive wear behavior of silane treated nanoalumina filled dental composite under food slurry and distilled water condition, Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2018, 25(3), 541–553.10.1515/secm-2016-0175 ↗
16. Meena A, Mali HS, Patnaik A, Kumar SR. Comparative investigation on physical, mechanical and thermo-mechanical behavior of nanohydroxyapatite and MTA filled dental composites, e-Polymers, 2018, 17(4), 311–319.10.1515/epoly-2016-0319 ↗
17. Aydin SB, Hanley L. Antibacterial activity of dental composites containing zinc oxide nanoparticles. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B. Appl. Biomater. 2010, 94(1), 22-31.10.1002/jbm.b.31620 ↗
18. Gharazi S, Ershad-Langroudi A, Rahimi A. The influence of silica synthesis on the morphology of hydrophilic nanocomposite coating. Scientia Iranica F. 2011, 18 (3), 785-789.10.1016/j.scient.2011.06.005 ↗
19. Saude N, Masood SH, Nikzad M, Ibrahim M, Ibrahim. Dynamic mechanical properties of copper-ABS composites for FDM feedstock. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 2013, 3, 1257-1263.
20. Wei X, Li D, Jiang W, Gu Z, Wang X, Zhang Z, Sun Z. 3D printable graphene composite. Sci. Rep. 5, 11181; 10.1038/srep11181 (2015).10.1038/srep11181 ↗
21. Startsev OV, Krotov AS, Perov BV, Vapirov YM. Interaction of water with polymers under their climatic ageing. In: Milan AIM, editor. Proc of the 4th European conference of advanced materialsand processes—EUROMAT 95, 1995, 245–254.
22. Moraes JCS, Sostena MMDS, Grandini CR. The glass transition temperature in dental composites. In: John, Cuppoletti (Ed.), Metal, Ceramic and Polymeric Composites for Various Uses. In-Tech, 2011.