journal article·2021-12-21Open access

Research on a mechanical model of magnetorheological fluid different diameter particles

Jun Qiu, Yiping Luo, Yuqing Li, Jiao Luo, Zhibin Su, Ying Wang

Nanotechnology Reviews· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, the chain structure of magnetorheological fluid (MRF) magnetic particles was studied and analyzed, the mechanical model of MRF with different diameter ferromagnetic particles was established, silicone oil-based MRF with different particle volume fractions was prepared, the shear properties of the MRF were tested, and the theoretical and experimental data were compared. The experimental results show that the shear stress is stable with the increase of shear strain rate under the action of the magnetic field, and it has a shear thinning effect. The shear stress increases linearly with the increase of particle volume fraction. The shear stress increases with the increase of magnetic induction intensity. After data analysis and in the case of control variables, the average error of improved theoretical data and experimental data is lower than that of previous theoretical data and experimental data, which verifies that the improved theory (mechanical model) has a certain accuracy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis · Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science , Shanghai 201620 , China

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. McDonald K, Rendos A, Woodman S, Brown KA, Ranzani T. Magnetorheological fluid-based flow control for soft robots. Adv Intell Syst. 2020;2(11):2000139.10.1002/aisy.202070107 ↗
2. Du C, Zeng F, Liu B. The preparation of multifunctional shear thickening fluid and the application in shock absorber. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science. Vol. 639; 2021. p. 01200610.1088/1755-1315/639/1/012006 ↗
3. Fernández MA. A study of factors affecting torque transmission in permanent magnet-based magnetorheological fluid clutch. Smart Mater Struct. 2021;30(6):065024 (20pp).10.1088/1361-665X/abfc68 ↗
4. Zhang S, Shi W, Chen Z. Modeling and parameter identification of MR damper considering excitation characteristics and current. Shock Vib. 2021;2021:1–17.10.1155/2021/6691650 ↗
5. Hu G, Wu L, Li L. Torque characteristics analysis of a magnetorheological brake with double brake disc. Actuators. 2021;10(2):23.10.3390/act10020023 ↗
6. Lemaire E, Bossis G. Yield stress and wall effects in magnetic colloidal suspensions. J Phys D:Appl Phys. 1991;24(8):1473–7.10.1088/0022-3727/24/8/037 ↗
7. Klingenberg DJ, Zukoski CE. Studies on the steady-shear behavior of electrorheological suspensions. Langmuir. 1990;6(1):15–24.10.1021/la00091a003 ↗
8. Rodríguez-López J, Castro P, Elvira L, de Espinosa FM. Study of the effect of particle volume fraction on the microstructure of magnetorheological fluids using ultrasound: transition between the strong-link to the weak-link regimes. Ultrasonics. 2015;61:10–4.10.1016/j.ultras.2015.03.011 ↗
9. Zhang J, Song W, Peng Z, Gao J, Wang N, Choi SB, et al. Microstructure simulation and constitutive modelling of magnetorheological fluids based on the hexagonal close-packed structure. Materials. 2020;13(7):1674.10.3390/ma13071674 ↗
10. Yang Y, Xu ZD, Xu YW, Guo YQ. Analysis on influence of the magnetorheological fluid microstructure on the mechanical properties of magnetorheological dampers. Smart Mater Struct. 2020;29(11):115025.10.1088/1361-665X/abadd2 ↗
11. Li H, Chen F, Liu C, Tian Z. Error analysis and optimization of shear yield stress model for magnetorheological fluid. Arab J Sci Eng. 2019;44(9):7779–87.10.1007/s13369-019-03903-w ↗
12. Xu F, Xu Z, Chen. B. Compact two-column microstructure model of magnetorheological fluid. J Southeast Univ (Nat Sci Ed). 2014;44(6):1206–10.
13. Zhao C, Peng X, Shi X. Experimental observation the micro-structure of MRF. J Funct Mater. 2014;45(10):10049–54.
14. Yi C, Peng X, Zhao C. A magnetic-dipoles-based micro–macro constitutive model for mrfs subjected to shear deformation. Rheologica acta. 2010;49(8):815–25.10.1007/s00397-010-0468-3 ↗
15. Neuringer JL, Rosensweig RE. Ferrohydrodynamics. Phys Fluids. 1964;7(12):1927.10.1063/1.1711103 ↗
16. Dongsheng J, Yiping L, Hongjuan R, Dan W, Jun S, Francesco Marottide S. Numerical simulation and experimental analysis of microstructure of magnetorheological fluid. J Nanomater. 2019;12:2019.10.1155/2019/6312606 ↗