journal article·2020-06-26Open access

High Critical Current Density and Enhanced Pinning in Superconducting Films of YBa2Cu3O7−δ Nanocomposites with Embedded BaZrO3, BaHfO3, BaTiO3, and SrZrO3 Nanocrystals

Javier Díez-Sierra, Pedro López-Domínguez, Hannes Rijckaert, Mark Rikel, Jens Hänisch, Mukarram Zaman Khan, Martina Falter, Jan Bennewitz, Hannu Huhtinen, Sebastian Schäfer, Robert Müller, Stephan Andreas Schunk, Petriina Paturi, Michael Bäcker, Klaartje De Buysser, Isabel Van Driessche

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 3· Issue 6

Abstract

Chemical solution deposition (CSD) of YBa2Cu3O7−δ (YBCO) nanocomposites from colloidal precursor solutions containing double metal oxide preformed nanocrystals is a promising, cost-effective, and reproducible approach to producing superconducting films with high critical current density (Jc) and enhanced pinning. Here, the influence of the preformed nanocrystal composition on the microstructure and superconducting properties of the YBCO nanocomposite films is studied, with a focus on establishing a simple and scalable process to grow nanocomposites that can be transferred to grow nanoadded coated conductors. Colloidal stable BaZrO3, BaHfO3, BaTiO3, and SrZrO3 nanocrystals (3–6 nm diameter) were synthesized and added to an environmentally friendly low-fluorine YBCO precursor solution. High-quality superconducting layers were grown on LaAlO3 single-crystal substrates from these four nanocomposite precursor solutions in a single deposition process, without the need of a seed layer, yielding self-field Jc of 4–5 MA/cm2 at 77 K. The different YBCO microstructures produced by the four types of nanocrystals and the resulting microstrain of the films are compared and related with the magnetic-field and angular dependence of Jc. We demonstrate the BaHfO3-containing nanocomposite as the best-performing with a homogeneous distribution of nanoparticles with 7 nm average diameter and a high density of stacking faults, which leads to some of the best superconducting properties ever achieved via low-fluorine CSD. Jc exhibits a much smoother decay in the applied magnetic fields and a much more isotropic behavior for nonparallel magnetic fields, and the pinning force is increased by a factor of 3.5 at 77 K and 1 T with respect to the pristine film.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · ZnO doping and properties · Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S3, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

Deutsche Nanoschicht GmbH, Heisenbergstrasse 16, 53359 Rheinbach, Germany

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Technical Physics, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Pl. 1, 76131 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany

Wihuri Physical Laboratory, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland

BASF SE, Advanced Materials & Systems Research, Carl-Bosch-Strasse 38, 67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany

hte GmbH, Kurpfalzring 104, 69123 Heidelberg, Germany

Funding

Jenny ja Antti Wihurin Rahasto

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. Larbalestier D. · 2011 · 311
2. 10.1524/zkri.2011.133010.1524/zkri.2011.1330 ↗
3. 10.1088/0953-2048/27/4/04400310.1088/0953-2048/27/4/044003 ↗
4. 10.1002/3527600434.eap80710.1002/3527600434.eap807 ↗
5. 10.1088/0953-2048/19/3/00310.1088/0953-2048/19/3/003 ↗
6. 10.1039/C1JM14899K10.1039/C1JM14899K ↗
7. 10.1088/0953-2048/25/12/12300110.1088/0953-2048/25/12/123001 ↗
8. 10.1038/nmat115610.1038/nmat1156 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.487206010.1063/1.4872060 ↗
10. 10.1088/0953-2048/23/1/01400110.1088/0953-2048/23/1/014001 ↗
11. 10.1088/0953-2048/28/11/11400210.1088/0953-2048/28/11/114002 ↗
12. 10.1088/0953-2048/27/4/04400810.1088/0953-2048/27/4/044008 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.01.03010.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.01.030 ↗
14. 10.1038/nmat189310.1038/nmat1893 ↗
15. 10.1002/aelm.20160016110.1002/aelm.201600161 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0211610.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02116 ↗
17. 10.1088/0953-2048/28/12/12400710.1088/0953-2048/28/12/124007 ↗
18. 10.1039/C4TC02543A10.1039/C4TC02543A ↗
19. 10.1166/jnn.2011.376210.1166/jnn.2011.3762 ↗
20. 10.3390/coatings1001001710.3390/coatings10010017 ↗
21. 10.1088/1361-6668/aaaad710.1088/1361-6668/aaaad7 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41598-019-42291-x10.1038/s41598-019-42291-x ↗
23. 10.1021/cm903080k10.1021/cm903080k ↗
24. 10.1088/0953-2048/29/2/02400210.1088/0953-2048/29/2/024002 ↗
25. 10.3390/ma1107106610.3390/ma11071066 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0252310.1021/acs.chemmater.8b02523 ↗
27. 10.1002/anie.20140216410.1002/anie.201402164 ↗
28. 10.1021/ja503297910.1021/ja5032979 ↗
29. 10.1111/jace.1622810.1111/jace.16228 ↗
30. Rikel, M.; Alekseeva, Z. M. Calculations and Experimental Methods in Evaluation of Phase Diagrams; Nauka: Moscow, 1985; pp 160–164.
31. 10.1107/S002188980400458310.1107/S0021889804004583 ↗
32. 10.1109/TASC.2010.207991110.1109/TASC.2010.2079911 ↗
33. 10.1109/TASC.2009.201790710.1109/TASC.2009.2017907 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0921-4534(01)00549-410.1016/S0921-4534(01)00549-4 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.236418510.1063/1.2364185 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.488348310.1063/1.4883483 ↗
37. 10.1109/TASC.2012.223384310.1109/TASC.2012.2233843 ↗
38. Koblichka-Veneva A. · 2003 · 1
39. 10.1088/1361-6668/aafe1d10.1088/1361-6668/aafe1d ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.742610.1103/PhysRevB.37.7426 ↗
41. 10.1038/nmat324710.1038/nmat3247 ↗
42. 10.1109/TASC.2010.209240810.1109/TASC.2010.2092408 ↗
43. 10.1088/0953-2048/21/3/03400810.1088/0953-2048/21/3/034008 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.479374910.1063/1.4793749 ↗
45. 10.1039/c3cs60365b10.1039/c3cs60365b ↗
46. 10.1063/1.11201110.1063/1.112011 ↗
47. Diez Sierra, J.; Rikel, M.; Rijckaert, H.; Falter, M.; Khan, M.; Huhtinen, H.; Paturi, P.; Bäcker, M.; Van Driessche, I. Oxygen doping effects in CSD-YBCO nanocomposite films with preformed nanocrystals. EUCAS 2019, 2019.
48. 10.1021/nn200762810.1021/nn2007628 ↗
49. 10.1038/srep0231010.1038/srep02310 ↗
50. 10.1109/TASC.2015.239091510.1109/TASC.2015.2390915 ↗
51. 10.1007/s10948-014-2712-z10.1007/s10948-014-2712-z ↗
52. 10.1109/TASC.2005.84821810.1109/TASC.2005.848218 ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.385510.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3855 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.1306010.1103/PhysRevB.48.13060 ↗
55. 10.1016/0038-1098(89)90330-X10.1016/0038-1098(89)90330-X ↗
56. 10.1038/nmat240810.1038/nmat2408 ↗
57. 10.1063/1.294326610.1063/1.2943266 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.04.09310.1016/j.tsf.2014.04.093 ↗
59. 10.1109/TASC.2019.289208810.1109/TASC.2019.2892088 ↗
60. 10.1088/0953-2048/23/2/02503010.1088/0953-2048/23/2/025030 ↗
61. 10.1088/0953-2048/21/02/02500710.1088/0953-2048/21/02/025007 ↗
62. 10.1109/TASC.2007.89911910.1109/TASC.2007.899119 ↗
63. 10.1038/srep3604710.1038/srep36047 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.138910.1103/PhysRevB.51.1389 ↗
65. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.25700210.1103/PhysRevLett.97.257002 ↗
66. 10.1088/0953-2048/27/12/12500910.1088/0953-2048/27/12/125009 ↗
67. 10.1088/1361-6668/ab2aa810.1088/1361-6668/ab2aa8 ↗
68. 10.1109/TASC.2014.236540710.1109/TASC.2014.2365407 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.physc.2017.11.01610.1016/j.physc.2017.11.016 ↗