Homotopic simulation for heat transport phenomenon of the Burgers nanofluids flow over a stretching cylinder with thermal convective and zero mass flux conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study is focused to elaborate on the effect of heat source/sink on the flow of non-Newtonian Burger nanofluid toward the stretching sheet and cylinder. The current flow analysis is designed in the form of higher order nonlinear partial differential equations along with convective heat and zero mass flux conditions. Suitable similarity transformations are used for the conversion of higher order nonlinear partial differential equations into the nonlinear ordinary differential equations. For the computation of graphical and tabular results, the most powerful analytical technique, known as the homotopy analysis method, is applied to the resulting higher order nonlinear ordinary differential equations. The consequence of distinct flow parameters on the Burger nanofluid velocity, temperature, and concentration profiles are determined and debated in a graphical form. The key outcomes of this study are that the Burger nanofluid parameter and Deborah number have reduced the velocity of the Burger nanofluid for both the stretching sheet and cylinder. Also, it is attained that the Burger nanofluid temperature is elevated with the intensifying of thermal Biot number for both stretching sheet and cylinder. The Burger nanofluid concentration becomes higher with the escalating values of Brownian motion parameter and Lewis number for both stretching sheet and cylinder. The Nusselt number of the Burger nanofluid upsurges due to the increment of thermal Biot number for both stretching sheet and cylinder. Also, the different industrial and engineering applications of this study were obtained. The presented model can be used for a variety of industrial and engineering applications such as biotechnology, electrical engineering, cooling of devices, nuclear reactors, mechanical engineering, pharmaceutical science, bioscience, medicine, cancer treatment, industrial-grid engines, automobiles, and many others.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer · Heat Transfer Mechanisms · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
KMUTT Fixed Point Research Laboratory, Room SCL 802 Fixed Point Laboratory, Science Laboratory Building, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT) , Bangkok 10140 , Thailand
Center of Excellence in Theoretical and Computational Science (TaCS-CoE), Science Laboratory Building, Faculty of Science, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT) , 126 Pracha-Uthit Road, Bang Mod, Thung Khru , Bangkok 10140 , Thailand
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk , P.O. Box 741 , Tabuk 71491 , Saudi Arabia
Nanotechnology Research Unit (NRU), University of Tabuk , Tabuk 71491 , Saudi Arabia
Department of Mathematics, Abdul Wali Khan University , Mardan , 23200, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa , Pakistan
Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University , Taichung 40402 , Taiwan
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Khan AA, Abbas N, Nadeem S, Shi QH, Malik MY, Ashraf M, et al. Non-Newtonian based micropolar fluid flow over nonlinear starching cylinder under Soret and Dufour numbers effects. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2021;127:105571.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105571 ↗
2. Bilal M, Urva Y. Analysis of non-Newtonian fluid flow over fine rotating thin needle for variable viscosity and activation energy. Archive Appl Mech. 2021;91(3):1079–95.10.1007/s00419-020-01811-2 ↗
3. Ramzan M, Khan NS, Kumam P. Mechanical analysis of non-Newtonian nanofluid past a thin needle with dipole effect and entropic characteristics. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–25.10.1038/s41598-021-98128-z ↗
4. Alhadhrami A, Vishalakshi CS, Prasanna BM, Sreenivasa BR, Alzahrani HA, Gowda RP, et al. Numerical simulation of local thermal non-equilibrium effects on the flow and heat transfer of non-Newtonian Casson fluid in a porous media. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2021;28:101483.10.1016/j.csite.2021.101483 ↗
5. Mallawi FOM, Eswaramoorthi S, Sivasankaran S, Bhuvaneswari M. Impact of stratifications and chemical reaction on convection of a non-Newtonian fluid in a Riga plate with thermal radiation and Cattaneo-Christov flux. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2021;1–17.10.1007/s10973-021-10930-z ↗
6. Dawar A, Shah Z, Tassaddiq A, Kumam P, Islam S, Khan W. A convective flow of williamson nanofluid through cone and wedge with non-isothermal and non-isosolutal conditions: a revised buongiorno model. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2021;24:100869.10.1016/j.csite.2021.100869 ↗
7. Reddy MV, Lakshminarayana P. Cross-diffusion and heat source effects on a three-dimensional MHD flow of Maxwell nanofluid over a stretching surface with chemical reaction. Eur Phys J Spec Top. 2021;230:1–9.10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00037-9 ↗
8. Qaiser D, Zheng Z, Khan MR. Numerical assessment of mixed convection flow of Walters-B nanofluid over a stretching surface with Newtonian heating and mass transfer. Therm Sci Eng Prog. 2021;22:100801.10.1016/j.tsep.2020.100801 ↗
9. Hiba B, Redouane F, Jamshed W, Saleel CA, Devi SSU, Prakash M, et al. A novel case study of thermal and streamline analysis in a grooved enclosure filled with (Ag–MgO/Water) hybrid nanofluid: Galerkin FEM. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2021;28:101372.10.1016/j.csite.2021.101372 ↗
10. Ouni M, Ladhar LM, Omri M, Jamshed W, Eid MR. Solar water-pump thermal analysis utilizing copper–gold/engine oil hybrid nanofluid flowing in parabolic trough solar collector: Thermal case study. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2022;30:101756.10.1016/j.csite.2022.101756 ↗
11. Khan U, Bouslimi J, Zaib A, Al-Mubaddel FS, Imtiaz N, Alharbi AN, et al. MHD 3D crossflow in the streamwise direction induced by nanofluid using Koo–Kleinstreuer and Li (KLL) correlation. Coatings. 2021;11(12):1472.10.3390/coatings11121472 ↗
12. Bejawada SG, Jamshed W, Safdar R, Reddy YD, Alanazi M, Zahran HY, et al. Chemical reactive and viscous dissipative flow of magneto nanofluid via natural convection by employing galerkin finite element technique. Coatings. 2022;12(2):151.10.3390/coatings12020151 ↗
13. Jamshed W, Prakash M, Devi S, Ibrahim RW, Shahzad F, Nisar KS, et al. A brief comparative examination of tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluid through a extending surface: numerical Keller–Box scheme. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–32.10.1038/s41598-021-03392-8 ↗
14. Redouane F, Jamshed W, Devi S, Amine BM, Safdar R, Al-Farhany K, et al. Influence of entropy on Brinkman–Forchheimer model of MHD hybrid nanofluid flowing in enclosure containing rotating cylinder and undulating porous stratum. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–26.10.1038/s41598-021-03477-4 ↗
15. Waqas H, Yasmin S, Muhammad T, Imran M. Flow and heat transfer of nanofluid over a permeable cylinder with nonlinear thermal radiation. J Mater Res Technol. 2021;14:2579–85.10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.030 ↗
16. Hayat T, Ullah H, Ahmad B, Alhodaly MS. Heat transfer analysis in convective flow of Jeffrey nanofluid by vertical stretchable cylinder. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2021;120:104965.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.104965 ↗
17. Siddiqui BK, Batool S, Ul Hassan QM, Malik MY. Irreversibility analysis in the boundary layer MHD two dimensional flow of Maxwell nanofluid over a melting surface. Ain Shams Eng J. 2021;12:3217–27.10.1016/j.asej.2021.01.017 ↗
18. Awan SE, Raja MAZ, Gul F, Khan ZA, Mehmood A, Shoaib M. Numerical computing paradigm for investigation of micropolar nanofluid flow between parallel plates system with impact of electrical MHD and Hall current. Arab J Sci Eng. 2021;46(1):645–62.10.1007/s13369-020-04736-8 ↗
19. Ramesh GK, Roopa GS, Rauf A, Shehzad SA, Abbasi FM. Time-dependent squeezing flow of Casson-micropolar nanofluid with injection/suction and slip effects. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2021;126:105470.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105470 ↗
20. Lv YP, Gul H, Ramzan M, Chung JD, Bilal M. Bioconvective Reiner–Rivlin nanofluid flow over a rotating disk with Cattaneo–Christov flow heat flux and entropy generation analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–18.10.1038/s41598-021-95448-y ↗
21. Waqas H, Farooq U, Alqarni MS, Muhammad T. Numerical investigation for 3D bioconvection flow of Carreau nanofluid with heat source/sink and motile microorganisms. Alex Eng J. 2021;61(3):2366–75.10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.089 ↗
22. Kumar R, Kumar R, Sharma T, Sheikholeslami M. Mathematical modeling of stagnation region nanofluid flow through Darcy–Forchheimer space taking into account inconsistent heat source/sink. J Appl Math Comput. 2021;65(1):713–34.10.1007/s12190-020-01412-w ↗
23. El-Shorbagy MA, Algehyne EA, Ibrahim M, Ali V, Kalbasi R. Effect of fin thickness on mixed convection of hybrid nanofluid exposed to magnetic field-Enhancement of heat sink efficiency. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2021;26:101037.10.1016/j.csite.2021.101037 ↗
24. Ibrahim M, Algehyne EA, Saeed T, Berrouk AS, Chu YM, Cheraghian G. Assessment of economic, thermal and hydraulic performances a corrugated helical heat exchanger filled with non-Newtonian nanofluid. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–16.10.1038/s41598-021-90953-6 ↗
25. Mahmoud EE, Algehyne EA, Alqarni MM, Afzal A, Ibrahim M. Investigating the thermal efficiency and pressure drop of a nanofluid within a micro heat sink with a new circular design used to cool electronic equipment. Chem Eng Commun. 2021;1–13.10.1080/00986445.2021.1935254 ↗
26. Shah NA, Animasaun IL, Chung JD, Wakif A, Alao FI, Raju CSK. Significance of nanoparticle’s radius, heat flux due to concentration gradient, and mass flux due to temperature gradient: the case of Water conveying copper nanoparticles. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–11.10.1038/s41598-021-81417-y ↗
27. Wakif A, Animasaun IL, Khan U, Alshehri AM. Insights into the gen1eralized Fourier’s and Fick’s laws for simulating mixed bioconvective flows of radiative-reactive walters-b fluids conveying tiny particles subject to Lorentz force. 2021.10.21203/rs.3.rs-398087/v1 ↗
28. Shafiq A, Rasool G, Alotaibi H, Aljohani HM, Wakif A, Khan I, et al. Thermally enhanced Darcy–Forchheimer Casson-water/glycerine rotating nanofluid flow with uniform magnetic field. Micromachines. 2021;12(6):605.10.3390/mi12060605 ↗
29. Wakif A, Chamkha A, Animasaun IL, Zaydan M, Waqas H, Sehaqui R. Novel physical insights into the thermodynamic irreversibilities within dissipative EMHD fluid flows past over a moving horizontal riga plate in the coexistence of wall suction and joule heating effects: a comprehensive numerical investigation. Arab J Sci Eng. 2020;45(11):9423–38.10.1007/s13369-020-04757-3 ↗
30. Wakif A. A novel numerical procedure for simulating steady MHD convective flows of radiative Casson fluids over a horizontal stretching sheet with irregular geometry under the combined influence of temperature-dependent viscosity and thermal conductivity. Math Probl Eng. 2020;2020:1–20.10.1155/2020/1675350 ↗
31. Wakif A, Animasaun IL, Khan U, Shah NA, Thumma T. Dynamics of radiative-reactive Walters-b fluid due to mixed convection conveying gyrotactic microorganisms, tiny particles experience haphazard motion, thermo-migration, and Lorentz force. Phys Scr. 2021;96(12):125239.10.1088/1402-4896/ac2b4b ↗
32. Khashi’ie NS, Arifin NM, Pop I. Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) boundary layer flow of hybrid nanofluid over a moving plate with Joule heating. Alex Eng J. 2021;11:14128.
33. Krishna MV, Ahammad NA, Chamkha AJ. Radiative MHD flow of Casson hybrid nanofluid over an infinite exponentially accelerated vertical porous surface. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2021;27:101229.10.1016/j.csite.2021.101229 ↗
34. Haider SMA, Ali B, Wang Q, Zhao C. Stefan blowing impacts on unsteady mhd flow of nanofluid over a stretching sheet with electric field, thermal radiation and activation energy. Coatings. 2021;11(9):1048.10.3390/coatings11091048 ↗
35. Ahmed K, Akbar T, Muhammad T, Alghamdi M. Heat transfer characteristics of MHD flow of Williamson nanofluid over an exponential permeable stretching curved surface with variable thermal conductivity. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2021;28:101544.10.1016/j.csite.2021.101544 ↗
36. Tassaddiq A. Impact of Cattaneo-Christov heat flux model on MHD hybrid nano-micropolar fluid flow and heat transfer with viscous and joule dissipation effects. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–14.10.1038/s41598-020-77419-x ↗
37. Qayyum S, Hayat T, Shehzad SA, Alsaedi A. Effect of a chemical reaction on magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) stagnation point flow of Walters-B nanofluid with Newtonian heat and mass conditions. Nucl Eng Technol. 2017;49(8):1636–44.10.1016/j.net.2017.07.028 ↗
38. Ghasemi SE, Hatami M. Solar radiation effects on MHD stagnation point flow and heat transfer of a nanofluid over a stretching sheet. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2021;25:100898–1004.10.1016/j.csite.2021.100898 ↗
39. Ramzan M, Kumam P, Nisar KS, Khan I, Jamshed W. A numerical study of chemical reaction in a nanofluid flow due to rotating disk in the presence of magnetic field. Sci Rep. 2021;11:19399.10.1038/s41598-021-98881-1 ↗
40. Awais M, Awan SE, Raja MAZ, Parveen N, Khan WU, Malik MY, et al. Effects of variable transport properties on heat and mass transfer in MHD bioconvective nanofluid rheology with gyrotactic microorganisms: numerical approach. Coatings. 2021;11(2):231.10.3390/coatings11020231 ↗
41. Srinivasulu T, Goud BS. Effect of inclined magnetic field on flow, heat and mass transfer of Williamson nanofluid over a stretching sheet. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2021;23:100819.10.1016/j.csite.2020.100819 ↗
42. Zeeshan A, Majeed A, Akram MJ, Alzahrani F. Numerical investigation of MHD radiative heat and mass transfer of nanofluid flow towards a vertical wavy surface with viscous dissipation and Joule heating effects using Keller-box method. Math Comput Simul. 2021;190:1080–109.10.1016/j.matcom.2021.07.002 ↗
43. Punith Gowda RJ, Naveen Kumar R, Jyothi AM, Prasannakumara BC, Sarris IE. Impact of binary chemical reaction and activation energy on heat and mass transfer of marangoni driven boundary layer flow of a non-Newtonian nanofluid. Processes. 2021;9(4):702.10.3390/pr9040702 ↗
44. Shi QH, Khan MN, Abbas N, Khan MI, Alzahrani F. Heat and mass transfer analysis in the MHD flow of radiative Maxwell nanofluid with non-uniform heat source/sink. Waves Random Complex Media. 2021;1–24.10.1080/17455030.2021.1978591 ↗
45. Zhao T, Khan MR, Chu Y, Issakhov A, Ali R, Khan S. Entropy generation approach with heat and mass transfer in magnetohydrodynamic stagnation point flow of a tangent hyperbolic nanofluid. Appl Math Mech. 2021;42(8):1205–18.10.1007/s10483-021-2759-5 ↗
46. Arif M, Kumam P, Kumam W, Khan I, Ramzan M. A fractional model of casson fluid with ramped wall temperature: engineering applications of engine oil. Comput Math Methods. 2021;3:e1162.10.1002/cmm4.1162 ↗
47. Rasool G, Shafiq A, Alqarni MS, Wakif A, Khan I, Bhutta MS. Numerical scrutinization of Darcy–Forchheimer relation in convective magnetohydrodynamic nanofluid flow bounded by nonlinear stretching surface in the perspective of heat and mass transfer. Micromachines. 2021;12(4):374.10.3390/mi12040374 ↗
48. Wakif A, Boulahia Z, Sehaqui R. A semi-analytical analysis of electro-thermo-hydrodynamic stability in dielectric nanofluids using Buongiorno’s mathematical model together with more realistic boundary conditions. Results Phys. 2018;9:1438–54.10.1016/j.rinp.2018.01.066 ↗
49. Hayat T, Waqas M, Shehzad SA, Alsaedi A. Mixed convection flow of a Burgers nanofluid in the presence of stratifications and heat generation/absorption. Eur Phys J Plus. 2016;131(8):1–11.10.1140/epjp/i2016-16253-9 ↗
50. Khan M, Iqbal Z, Ahmed A. Stagnation point flow of magnetized Burgers’ nanofluid subject to thermal radiation. Appl Nanosci. 2020;10(12):5233–46.10.1007/s13204-020-01360-8 ↗
51. Khan M, Iqbal Z, Ahmed A. A mathematical model to examine the heat transport features in Burgers fluid flow due to stretching cylinder. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2020;1–15.10.1007/s10973-020-10224-w ↗
52. Mabood F, Khan WA, Ismail AM. MHD boundary layer flow and heat transfer of nanofluids over a nonlinear stretching sheet: a numerical study. J Magnetism Magnetic Mater. 2015;374:569–76.10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.09.013 ↗
53. Wang CY. Free convection on a vertical stretching surface. ZAMM‐J Appl Math Mechanics/Z Angew Math Mechanik. 1989;69(11):418–20.10.1002/zamm.19890691115 ↗
54. Khan WA, Pop I. Boundary-layer flow of a nanofluid past a stretching sheet. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2010;53(11–12):2477–83.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.01.032 ↗
55. Salahuddin T, Hussain A, Malik MY, Awais M, Khan M. Carreau nanofluid impinging over a stretching cylinder with generalized slip effects: using finite difference scheme. Results Phys. 2017;7:3090–9.10.1016/j.rinp.2017.07.036 ↗