Show source-provided references
1. Rashed AS, Mahmoud TA, Mabrouk SM. Enhanced flow and temperature profiles in ternary hybrid nanofluid with gyrotactic microorganisms: a study on magnetic field, brownian motion, and thermophoresis phenomena. J Appl Comput Mech. 2024;10:597–609. 10.22055/jacm.2024.45899.4427.
2. Atif SM, Hussain S, Sagheer M. Magnetohydrodynamic stratified bioconvective flow of micropolar nanofluid due to gyrotactic microorganisms. AIP Adv. 2019;9:025208. 10.1063/1.5085742.
10.1063/1.5085742 ↗3. Begum N, Siddiqa S, Sulaiman M, Islam S, Hossain MA, Gorla RSR. Numerical solutions for gyrotactic bioconvection of dusty nanofluid along a vertical isothermal surface. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;113:229–36. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.05.071.
10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.05.071 ↗4. Agarwal P, Jain R, Loganathan K. Thermally radiative flow of MHD Powell-Eyring nanofluid over an exponential stretching sheet with swimming microorganisms and viscous dissipation: A numerical computation. Int J Thermofluids. 2024;23:100773. 10.1016/j.ijft.2024.100773.
10.1016/j.ijft.2024.100773 ↗5. Rajeswari PM, De P. Multi-stratified effects on stagnation point nanofluid flow with gyrotactic microorganisms over porous medium. J Porous Media. 2024;27:67–84. 10.1615/JPorMedia.2023050040.
10.1615/JPorMedia.2023050040 ↗6. Jakeer S, Polu BAR. Homotopy perturbation method solution of magneto-polymer nanofluid containing gyrotactic microorganisms over the permeable sheet with Cattaneo–Christov heat and mass flux model. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng. 2021;236:525–34. 10.1177/09544089211048993.
10.1177/09544089211048993 ↗7. Basha HT, Sivaraj R. Numerical simulation of blood nanofluid flow over three different geometries by means of gyrotactic microorganisms: Applications to the flow in a circulatory system. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci. 2021;235:441–60. 10.1177/0954406220947454.
10.1177/0954406220947454 ↗8. Alharbi FM, Naeem M, Zubair M, Jawad M, Jan WU, Jan R. Bioconvection due to gyrotactic microorganisms in couple stress hybrid nanofluid laminar mixed convection incompressible flow with magnetic nanoparticles and chemical reaction as carrier for targeted drug delivery through porous stretching sheet. Molecules. 2021;26:3954. 10.3390/molecules26133954.
10.3390/molecules26133954 ↗9. Waqas H, Kamran T, Imran M, Muhammad T. MHD bioconvectional flow of Jeffrey nanofluid with motile microorganisms over a stretching sheet: solar radiation applications. Waves Random Complex Media. 2022;1–30. 10.1080/17455030.2022.2105418.
10.1080/17455030.2022.2105418 ↗10. Mehmood Z, Iqbal Z. Interaction of induced magnetic field and stagnation point flow on bioconvection nanofluid submerged in gyrotactic microorganisms. J Mol Liq. 2016;224:1083–91. 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.10.014.
10.1016/j.molliq.2016.10.014 ↗11. Kuznetsov AV. The onset of nanofluid bioconvection in a suspension containing both nanoparticles and gyrotactic microorganisms. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2010;37:1421–5. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2010.08.015.
10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2010.08.015 ↗12. Ahmad S, Akhter S, Imran Shahid M, Ali K, Akhtar M, Ashraf M. Novel thermal aspects of hybrid nanofluid flow comprising of manganese zinc ferrite MnZnFe2O4, nickel zinc ferrite NiZnFe2O4 and motile microorganisms. Ain Shams Eng J. 2022;13:101668. 10.1016/j.asej.2021.101668.
10.1016/j.asej.2021.101668 ↗13. Dey D, Chutia B. Dusty nanofluid flow with bioconvection past a vertical stretching surface. J King Saud Univ – Eng Sci. 2022;34:375–80. 10.1016/j.jksues.2020.11.001.
10.1016/j.jksues.2020.11.001 ↗14. Rajeswari PM, De P. Shape factor and sensitivity analysis on stagnation point of bioconvective tetra-hybrid nanofluid over porous stretched vertical cylinder. Bionanoscience. 2024;14:3035–58. 10.1007/s12668-024-01586-8.
10.1007/s12668-024-01586-8 ↗15. Loganathan K, Jain R, Eswaramoorthi S, Abbas M, Alqahtani MS. Bioconvective gyrotactic microorganisms in third-grade nanofluid flow over a Riga surface with stratification: An approach to entropy minimization. Open Phys. 2023;21:20230273. 10.1515/phys-2023-0273.
10.1515/phys-2023-0273 ↗16. Loganathan K, Alessa N, Jain R, Ali F, Zaib A. Dynamics of heat and mass transfer: Ree-Eyring nanofluid flow over a Riga plate with bioconvention and thermal radiation. Front Phys. 2022;10:974562. 10.3389/fphy.2022.974562.
10.3389/fphy.2022.974562 ↗17. Rashed AS, Nasr E, Mabrouk SM. Bioconvective flow surrounding a thin surgical needle in blood incorporating ternary hybrid nanoparticles. Comput Methods Differ Equations. 2024. 10.22034/CMDE.2024.61425.2643.
18. Fortov VE, Vaulina OS, Petrov OF, Vasiliev MN, Gavrikov AV, Shakova IA, et al. Experimental study of the heat transport processes in dusty plasma fluid. Phys Rev E – Stat Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. 2007;75:026403. 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.026403.
10.1103/PhysRevE.75.026403 ↗19. Basha HT, Kim H, Jang B. Buoyancy-driven heat transfer and entropy analysis of a hydromagnetic GO-Fe3O4/H2O hybrid nanofluid in an energy storage enclosure partially filled with non-Darcy porous medium under an oblique magnetic field. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow. 2024;35:491–523. 10.1108/HFF-03-2024-0193/FULL/XML.
10.1108/HFF-03-2024-0193 ↗20. Basha HT, Jang B. Machine learning analysis for heat transfer enhancement in nano-encapsulated phase change materials within L-shaped enclosure with heated blocks. Appl Therm Eng. 2025;259:124803. 10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2024.124803.
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.124803 ↗21. Jakeer S, Reddy PBA. Entropy generation on the variable magnetic field and magnetohydrodynamic stagnation point flow of Eyring–Powell hybrid dusty nanofluid: Solar thermal application. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci. 2022;236:7442–55. 10.1177/09544062211072457.
10.1177/09544062211072457 ↗22. Lou Q, Ali B, Rehman SU, Habib D, Abdal S, Shah NA, et al. Micropolar dusty fluid: Coriolis force effects on dynamics of MHD rotating fluid when Lorentz force is significant. Mathematics. 2022;10:1–13. 10.3390/math10152630.
10.3390/math10152630 ↗23. Kalpana G, Madhura KR, Kudenatti RB. Impact of temperature-dependant viscosity and thermal conductivity on MHD boundary layer flow of two-phase dusty fluid through permeable medium. Eng Sci Technol Int J. 2019;22:416–27. 10.1016/j.jestch.2018.10.009.
10.1016/j.jestch.2018.10.009 ↗24. Mahdy A, Hoshoudy GA. Two-phase mixed convection nanofluid flow of a dusty tangent hyperbolic past a nonlinearly stretching sheet. J Egypt Math Soc. 2019;27:44. 10.1186/s42787-019-0050-9.
10.1186/s42787-019-0050-9 ↗25. Ramana Reddy JV, Sugunamma V, Sandeep N. Thermophoresis and Brownian motion effects on unsteady MHD nanofluid flow over a slendering stretching surface with slip effects. Alex Eng J. 2018;57:2465–73. 10.1016/j.aej.2017.02.014.
10.1016/j.aej.2017.02.014 ↗26. Ghadikolaei SS, Hosseinzadeh K, Hatami M, Ganji DD. MHD boundary layer analysis for micropolar dusty fluid containing Hybrid nanoparticles (Cu‑Al2O3) over a porous medium. J Mol Liq. 2018;268:813–23. 10.1016/J.MOLLIQ.2018.07.105.
10.1016/j.molliq.2018.07.105 ↗27. Gnaneswara Reddy M, Sudha Rani MVVNL, Ganesh Kumar K, Prasannakumar BC, Lokesh HJ. Hybrid dusty fluid flow through a Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model. Phys A Stat Mech Its Appl. 2020;511:123975. 10.1016/j.physa.2019.123975.
10.1016/j.physa.2019.123975 ↗28. Imitaz A, Aamina A, Ali F, Khan I, Nisar KS. Two-phase flow of blood with magnetic dusty particles in cylindrical region: A Caputo-Fabrizio fractional model. Comput Mater Contin. 2020;66:2253–64. 10.32604/cmc.2021.012470.
10.32604/cmc.2021.012470 ↗29. Nawaz M, Madkhali HA, Haneef M, Alharbi SO, Alaoui MK. Numerical study on thermal enhancement in hyperbolic tangent fluid with dust and hybrid nanoparticles. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2021;127:105535. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105535.
10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105535 ↗30. De MA. Comparative study of hybrid, tri-hybrid and tetra-hybrid nanoparticles in MHD unsteady flow with chemical reaction, activation energy, Soret-Dufour effect and sensitivity analysis over non-Darcy porous stretching cylinder. Heliyon. 2024;10:e35731. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35731.
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35731 ↗31. Khan MI, Hayat T, Khan MI, Alsaedi A. Activation energy impact in nonlinear radiative stagnation point flow of cross nanofluid. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2018;91:216–24. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2017.11.001.
10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2017.11.001 ↗32. Hayat T, Riaz R, Aziz A, Alsaedi A. Influence of Arrhenius activation energy in MHD flow of third grade nanofluid over a nonlinear stretching surface with convective heat and mass conditions. Phys A Stat Mech Appl. 2020;549:124006. 10.1016/j.physa.2019.124006.
10.1016/j.physa.2019.124006 ↗33. Lian W, Wang J, Wang G, Gao D, Li X, Zhang Z, et al. Investigation on the lignite pyrolysis reaction kinetics based on the general Arrhenius formula. Fuel. 2020;268:117364. 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117364.
10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117364 ↗34. Khan MI, Qayyum S, Hayat T, Waqas M, Imran M, Alsaedi A. Entropy generation minimization and binary chemical reaction with Arrhenius activation energy in MHD radiative flow of nanomaterial. J Mol Liq. 2018;259:274–83. 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.03.049.
10.1016/j.molliq.2018.03.049 ↗35. Khan MI, Ahmad MW, Alsaedi A, Hayat T. Entropy generation optimization in flow of non-Newtonian nanomaterial with binary chemical reaction and Arrhenius activation energy. Phys A. 2020;538:122806. 10.1016/j.physa.2019.122806.
10.1016/j.physa.2019.122806 ↗36. Shafique Z, Mustafa M, Mushtaq A. Boundary layer flow of Maxwell fluid in rotating frame with binary chemical reaction and activation energy. Results Phys. 2016;6:627–33. 10.1016/j.rinp.2016.09.006.
10.1016/j.rinp.2016.09.006 ↗37. Reddy SRR, Bala Anki Reddy P, Bhattacharyya K. Effect of nonlinear thermal radiation on 3D magneto slip flow of Eyring-Powell nanofluid flow over a slendering sheet with binary chemical reaction and Arrhenius activation energy. Adv Powder Technol. 2019;30:3203–13. 10.1016/j.apt.2019.09.029.
10.1016/j.apt.2019.09.029 ↗38. Gomathi N, Poulomi D. Dual solutions of Casson Williamson nanofluid with thermal radiation and chemical reaction. Numer Heat Transf Part A Appl. 2024;1–24. 10.1080/10407782.2024.2326980.
10.1080/10407782.2024.2326980 ↗39. Mabrouk SM, Inc M, Rashed AS, Akgül A. Similarity analysis of bioconvection of unsteady nonhomogeneous hybrid nanofluids influenced by motile microorganisms. J Biol Phys. 2024;50:119–48. 10.1007/s10867-023-09651-1.
10.1007/s10867-023-09651-1 ↗40. Reddy SRR, Jakeer S, Rupa ML. ANN model of three-dimensional micropolar dusty hybrid nanofluid flow with Coriolis force: biomedical applications. Indian J Phys. 2023;97:3801–25. 10.1007/s12648-023-02737-5.
10.1007/s12648-023-02737-5 ↗41. Jakeer S, Rupa ML, Reddy SRR, Rashad AM. Artificial neural network model of non-Darcy MHD Sutterby hybrid nanofluid flow over a curved permeable surface: Solar energy applications. Propuls Power Res. 2023;12:410–27. 10.1016/j.jppr.2023.07.002.
10.1016/j.jppr.2023.07.002 ↗42. Rehman SU, Mariam A, Ullah A, Asjad MI, Bajuri MY, Pansera BA, et al. Numerical computation of buoyancy and radiation effects on MHD micropolar nanofluid flow over a stretching/shrinking sheet with heat source. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2021;25:100867. 10.1016/J.CSITE.2021.100867.
10.1016/j.csite.2021.100867 ↗43. Ali B, Nie Y, Khan SA, Sadiq MT, Tariq M. Finite element simulation of multiple slip effects on MHD unsteady Maxwell nanofluid flow over a permeable stretching sheet with radiation and thermo-diffusion in the presence of chemical reaction. Processes. 2019;7:628. 10.3390/PR7090628.
10.3390/pr7090628 ↗