journal article·2022-07-22Open access

Interfacial interactions and reinforcing mechanisms of cellulose and chitin nanomaterials and starch derivatives for cement and concrete strength and durability enhancement: A review

Tuhua Zhong, Guoqing Jian, Zhen Chen, Michael Wolcott, Somayeh Nassiri, Carlos A. Fernandez

Nanotechnology Reviews· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Nanomaterials have been widely researched for use in construction materials. Numerous studies demonstrate that nanomaterials in small quantities can significantly improve the macroscopic properties of cement paste, mortar, or concrete through various mechanisms. Nanomaterials retrieved from biomass sources have recently gained particular research interest due to remarkable structural properties and the source material’s abundance and renewability. Cellulose and chitin are the most abundant polysaccharides in nature; thus, they are candidates for nanomaterials extraction as multifunctional additives in cementitious systems. In recent years, cellulose nanomaterials in cementitious composites have been extensively investigated, but chitin nanomaterials and starch derivatives for cement and concrete are still emerging research areas. This review article starts with an overview of polysaccharide nanomaterials’ (PNMs) physicochemical properties as a result of different chemical and mechanical extraction processes. Next a brief overview of cement hydration chemistry and microstructure and the interfacial interactions between the cement and the various surface chemical functionalities of PNMs are discussed. Then, the key mechanisms governing the cement strength enhancement by PNMs, such as bridging, nucleating and filling effect, and internal curing, are described. Finally, the impacts of PNMs on other properties of the cement are discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Microbial Applications in Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Composite Materials & Engineering Center, Washington State University , Pullman , WA 99164 , United States of America

Institute of New Bamboo and Rattan Based Biomaterials, International Center for Bamboo and Rattan , Beijing 100102 , China

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory , Richland , WA 99352 , United States of America

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Washington State University , Pullman , WA 99164 , United States of America

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Mehta PK, Monteiro PJ. Concrete microstructure, properties and materials. 4th ed, New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014.
2. Bernhardt D, James RI. US geological survey, Reston, Virginia: Mineral Commodity Summary. 2020:1–200.
3. Hooton RD, Bickley JA. Design for durability: The key to improving concrete sustainability. Constr Build Mater. 2014;67:422–30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.016.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.016 ↗
4. Ali MB, Saidur R, Hossain MS. A review on emission analysis in cement industries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15(5):2252–61. 10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.014.10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.014 ↗
5. Hasanbeigi A, Price L, Lin E. Emerging energy-efficiency and CO2 emission-reduction technologies for cement and concrete production: A technical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16(8):6220–38. 10.1016/j.rser.2012.07.019.10.1016/j.rser.2012.07.019 ↗
6. Rehan R, Nehdi M. Carbon dioxide emissions and climate change: policy implications for the cement industry. Environ Sci Policy. 2005;8(2):105–14. 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.12.006.10.1016/j.envsci.2004.12.006 ↗
7. Worrell E, Price L, Martin N, Hendriks C, Meida LO. Carbon dioxide emissions from the global cement industry. Annu Rev Energy Environ. 2001;26(1):303–29. 10.1146/annurev.energy.26.1.303.10.1146/annurev.energy.26.1.303 ↗
8. Yang K, Zhong M, Magee B, Yang C, Wang C, Zhu X, et al. Investigation of effects of Portland cement fineness and alkali content on concrete plastic shrinkage cracking. Constr Build Mater. 2017;144:279–90. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.130.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.130 ↗
9. Ghourchian S, Wyrzykowski M, Baquerizo L, Lura P. Susceptibility of Portland cement and blended cement concretes to plastic shrinkage cracking. Cem Concr Compos. 2018;85:44–55. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.10.002.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.10.002 ↗
10. Pan Z, Sanjayan JG, Kong DLY. Effect of aggregate size on spalling of geopolymer and Portland cement concretes subjected to elevated temperatures. Constr Build Mater. 2012;36:365–72. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.120.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.120 ↗
11. Singh NB, Kalra M, Saxena SK. Nanoscience of cement and concrete. Mater Today Proc. 2017;4(4, Part E):5478–87. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.06.003.10.1016/j.matpr.2017.06.003 ↗
12. Thomas JJ, Jennings HM, Chen JJ. Influence of nucleation seeding on the hydration mechanisms of tricalcium silicate and cement. J Phys Chem C. 2009;113(11):4327–34. 10.1021/jp809811w.10.1021/jp809811w ↗
13. Cappelletto E, Borsacchi S, Geppi M, Ridi F, Fratini E, Baglioni P. Comb-shaped polymers as nanostructure modifiers of calcium silicate hydrate: A 29Si solid-state NMR investigation. J Phys Chem C. 2013;117(44):22947–53. 10.1021/jp407740t.10.1021/jp407740t ↗
14. Beaudoin JJ, Raki L, Alizadeh R. A 29Si MAS NMR study of modified C–S–H nanostructures. Cem Concr Compos. 2009;31(8):585–90. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.11.004.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.11.004 ↗
15. Yakovlev G, Kerienė J, Gailius A, Girnienė I. Cement based foam concrete reinforced by carbon nanotubes. Mater Sci. 2006;12(2):147–51. http://dspace1.vgtu.lt/handle/1/220.
16. Parveen S, Rana S, Fangueiro R. A review on nanomaterial dispersion, microstructure, and mechanical properties of carbon nanotube and nanofiber reinforced cementitious composites. J Nanomaterials. 2013;2013(80):80–119. 10.1155/2013/710175.10.1155/2013/710175 ↗
17. Zhang M, Li H. Pore structure and chloride permeability of concrete containing nano-particles for pavement. Constr Build Mater. 2011;25(2):608–16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.032.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.032 ↗
18. Papatzani S, Paine K, Calabria-Holley J. A comprehensive review of the models on the nanostructure of calcium silicate hydrates. Constr Build Mater. 2015;74:219–34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.029.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.029 ↗
19. Lepech MD, Li VC. Water permeability of cracked cementitious composites. Proceedings of Eleventh International Conference on Fracture. Turin, Italy: Curran Associates, Inc. 2005. p. 20–5.
20. Li GY, Wang PM, Zhao X. Mechanical behavior and microstructure of cement composites incorporating surface-treated multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon. 2005;43(6):1239–45. 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.12.017.10.1016/j.carbon.2004.12.017 ↗
21. Xie X-L, Mai Y-W, Zhou X-P. Dispersion and alignment of carbon nanotubes in polymer matrix: A review. Mater Sci Engineering R Rep. 2005;49(4):89–112. 10.1016/j.mser.2005.04.002.10.1016/j.mser.2005.04.002 ↗
22. Ma P-C, Siddiqui NA, Marom G, Kim J-K. Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites: A review. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2010;41(10):1345–67. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.003.10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.003 ↗
23. Mohammadkazemi F, Doosthoseini K, Ganjian E, Azin M. Manufacturing of bacterial nano-cellulose reinforced fiber−cement composites. Constr Build Mater. 2015;101:958–64. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.093.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.093 ↗
24. Hisseine OA, Wilson W, Sorelli L, Tolnai B, Tagnit-Hamou A. Nanocellulose for improved concrete performance: A macro-to-micro investigation for disclosing the effects of cellulose filaments on strength of cement systems. Constr Build Mater. 2019;206:84–96. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.042.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.042 ↗
25. Akhlaghi MA, Bagherpour R, Kalhori H. Application of bacterial nanocellulose fibers as reinforcement in cement composites. Constr Build Mater. 2020;241:118061. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118061.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118061 ↗
26. El Knidri H, Belaabed R, Addaou A, Laajeb A, Lahsini A. Extraction, chemical modification and characterization of chitin and chitosan. Int J Biol Macromolecules. 2018;120:1181–9. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.139.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.139 ↗
27. Rolandi M, Rolandi R. Self-assembled chitin nanofibers and applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2014;207:216–22. 10.1016/j.cis.2014.01.019.10.1016/j.cis.2014.01.019 ↗
28. Dewacker DR. Cement mortar systems using blends of polysaccharides and cold-water-soluble, unmodified starches. US5575840A; 1996. https://patents.google.com/patent/US5575840A/en?oq = US5575840A.
29. Crépy L, Petit J-Y, Wirquin E, Martin P, Joly N. Synthesis and evaluation of starch-based polymers as potential dispersants in cement pastes and self leveling compounds. Cem Concr Compos. 2014;45:29–38. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.09.004.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.09.004 ↗
30. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J. Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40(7):3941–94. 10.1039/C0CS00108B.10.1039/c0cs00108b ↗
31. Sjostrom E. Wood chemistry: Fundamentals and applications. Houston: Gulf Professional Publishing; 1993.
32. Azizi Samir MAS, Alloin F, Dufresne A. Review of recent research into cellulosic whiskers, their properties and their application in nanocomposite field. Biomacromolecules. 2005;6(2):612–26. 10.1021/bm0493685.10.1021/bm0493685 ↗
33. Onuaguluchi O, Panesar DK, Sain M. Properties of nanofibre reinforced cement composites. Constr Build Mater. 2014;63:119–24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.072.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.072 ↗
34. Sun X, Wu Q, Lee S, Qing Y, Wu Y. Cellulose nanofibers as a modifier for rheology, curing and mechanical performance of oil well cement. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):31654. 10.1038/srep31654.10.1038/srep31654 ↗
35. Sun X, Wu Q, Zhang J, Qing Y, Wu Y, Lee S. Rheology, curing temperature and mechanical performance of oil well cement: Combined effect of cellulose nanofibers and graphene nano-platelets. Mater & Des. 2017;114:92–101. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.050.10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.050 ↗
36. Hisseine OA, Basic N, Omran AF, Tagnit-Hamou A. Feasibility of using cellulose filaments as a viscosity modifying agent in self-consolidating concrete. Cem Concr Compos. 2018;94:327–40. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.09.009.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.09.009 ↗
37. Haddad Kolour H. An investigation on the effects of cellulose nanofibrils on the performance of cement based composites. PhD Dissertation, Orono, Maine: The University of Maine; 2019. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/3128/.
38. Bakkari ME, Bindiganavile V, Goncalves J, Boluk Y. Preparation of cellulose nanofibers by TEMPO-oxidation of bleached chemi-thermomechanical pulp for cement applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;203:238–45. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.036.10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.036 ↗
39. Goncalves J, El-Bakkari M, Boluk Y, Bindiganavile V. Cellulose nanofibres (CNF) for sulphate resistance in cement based systems. Cem Concr Compos. 2019;99:100–11. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.03.005.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.03.005 ↗
40. Jiao L, Su M, Chen L, Wang Y, Zhu H, Dai H. Natural cellulose nanofibers as sustainable enhancers in construction cement. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0168422. 10.1371/journal.pone.0168422.10.1371/journal.pone.0168422 ↗
41. Mejdoub R, Hammi H, Suñol JJ, Khitouni M, M’nif A, Boufi S. Nanofibrillated cellulose as nanoreinforcement in Portland cement: Thermal, mechanical and microstructural properties. J Composite Mater. 2017;51(17):2491–503. 10.1177/0021998316672090.10.1177/0021998316672090 ↗
42. Cao Y, Zavaterri P, Youngblood J, Moon R, Weiss J. The influence of cellulose nanocrystal additions on the performance of cement paste. Cem Concr Compos. 2015;56:73–83. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.11.008.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.11.008 ↗
43. Cao Y, Tian N, Bahr D, Zavattieri PD, Youngblood J, Moon RJ, et al. The influence of cellulose nanocrystals on the microstructure of cement paste. Cem Concr Compos. 2016;74:164–73. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.09.008.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.09.008 ↗
44. Montes F, Fu T, Youngblood JP, Weiss J. Rheological impact of using cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) in cement pastes. Constr Build Mater. 2020;235:117497. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117497.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117497 ↗
45. Dousti MR, Boluk Y, Bindiganavile V. The effect of cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) particles on the porosity and strength development in oil well cement paste. Constr Build Mater. 2019;205:456–62. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.073.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.073 ↗
46. Mazlan D, Krishnan S, Din MFM, Tokoro C, Khalid NHA, Ibrahim IS, et al. Effect of cellulose nanocrystals extracted from oil palm empty fruit bunch as green admixture for mortar. Sci Rep. 2020;10:6412. 10.1038/s41598-020-63575-7.10.1038/s41598-020-63575-7 ↗
47. Ong KJ, Shatkin JA, Nelson K, Ede JD, Retsina T. Establishing the safety of novel bio-based cellulose nanomaterials for commercialization. NanoImpact. 2017;6:19–29. 10.1016/j.impact.2017.03.002.10.1016/j.impact.2017.03.002 ↗
48. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ. Cellulose nanocrystals: Chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev. 2010;110(6):3479–500. 10.1021/cr900339w.10.1021/cr900339w ↗
49. Battista OA, Coppick S, Howsmon JA, Morehead FF, Sisson WA. Level-off degree of polymerization. Ind Eng Chem. 1956;48(2):333–5. 10.1021/ie50554a046.10.1021/ie50554a046 ↗
50. Takaragi A, Minoda M, Miyamoto T, Liu HQ, Zhang LN. Reaction characteristics of cellulose in the LiCl/1,3‐dimethyl‐2‐imidazolidinone solvent system. Cellulose. 1999;6(2):93–102. 10.1023/A:1009208417954.10.1023/A:1009208417954 ↗
51. Lin N, Dufresne A. Nanocellulose in biomedicine: Current status and future prospect. Eur Polym J. 2014;59:302–25. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.07.025.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.07.025 ↗
52. Reid MS, Villalobos M, Cranston ED. Benchmarking cellulose nanocrystals: From the laboratory to industrial production. Langmuir. 2017;33(7):1583–98. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03765.10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03765 ↗
53. Dufresne A. Nanocellulose: from nature to high performance tailored materials. Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG; 2017.10.1515/9783110480412 ↗
54. Saito T, Isogai A. TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. The effect of oxidation conditions on chemical and crystal structures of the water-insoluble fractions. Biomacromolecules. 2004;5(5):1983–9. 10.1021/bm0497769.10.1021/bm0497769 ↗
55. Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H. TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale. 2011;3(1):71–85. 10.1039/C0NR00583E.10.1039/C0NR00583E ↗
56. Abe K, Yano H. Comparison of the characteristics of cellulose microfibril aggregates of wood, rice straw and potato tuber. Cellulose. 2009;16(6):1017–23. 10.1007/s10570-009-9334-9.10.1007/s10570-009-9334-9 ↗
57. de Assis CA, Iglesias MC, Bilodeau M, Johnson D, Phillips R, Peresin MS, et al. Cellulose micro- and nanofibrils (CMNF) manufacturing – financial and risk assessment. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref. 2018;12(2):251–64. 10.1002/bbb.1835.10.1002/bbb.1835 ↗
58. Iwamoto S, Nakagaito AN, Yano H. Nano-fibrillation of pulp fibers for the processing of transparent nanocomposites. Appl Phys A. 2007;89(2):461–6. 10.1007/s00339-007-4175-6.10.1007/s00339-007-4175-6 ↗
59. Chaker A, Alila S, Mutjé P, Vilar MR, Boufi S. Key role of the hemicellulose content and the cell morphology on the nanofibrillation effectiveness of cellulose pulps. Cellulose. 2013;20(6):2863–75. 10.1007/s10570-013-0036-y.10.1007/s10570-013-0036-y ↗
60. Kurita K. Chemistry and application of chitin and chitosan. Polym Degrad Stab. 1998;59(1–3):117–20. 10.1016/S0141-3910(97)00160-2.10.1016/S0141-3910(97)00160-2 ↗
61. Rinaudo M. Chitin and chitosan: Properties and applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2006;31(7):603–32. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.06.001.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.06.001 ↗
62. Dong Y, Xu C, Wang J, Wu Y, Wang M, Ruan Y. Influence of degree of deacetylation on critical concentration of chitosan/dichloroacetic acid liquid-crystalline solution. J Appl Polym Sci. 2002;83(6):1204–8. 10.1002/app.2286.10.1002/app.2286 ↗
63. Pillai CKS, Paul W, Sharma CP. Chitin and chitosan polymers: Chemistry, solubility and fiber formation. Prog Polym Sci. 2009;34(7):641–78. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.04.001.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.04.001 ↗
64. Fan Y, Saito T, Isogai A. Chitin nanocrystals prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of α-chitin. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9(1):192–8. 10.1021/bm700966g.10.1021/bm700966g ↗
65. Shinoda R, Saito T, Okita Y, Isogai A. Relationship between length and degree of polymerization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13(3):842–9. 10.1021/bm2017542.10.1021/bm2017542 ↗
66. Fan Y, Saito T, Isogai A. Individual chitin nano-whiskers prepared from partially deacetylated α-chitin by fibril surface cationization. Carbohydr Polym. 2010;79(4):1046–51. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.10.044.10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.10.044 ↗
67. Zhong T, Wolcott MP, Liu H, Glandon N, Wang J. The influence of pre-fibrillation via planetary ball milling on the extraction and properties of chitin nanofibers. Cellulose. 2020;27(11):6205–16. 10.1007/s10570-020-03186-7.10.1007/s10570-020-03186-7 ↗
68. Patural L, Marchal P, Govin A, Grosseau P, Ruot B, Devès O. Cellulose ethers influence on water retention and consistency in cement-based mortars. Cem Concr Res. 2011;41(1):46–55. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.09.004.10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.09.004 ↗
69. Peschard A, Govin A, Grosseau P, Guilhot B, Guyonnet R. Effect of polysaccharides on the hydration of cement paste at early ages. Cem Concr Res. 2004;34(11):2153–8. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.001.10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.001 ↗
70. Vieira MC, Klemm D, Einfeldt L, Albrecht G. Dispersing agents for cement based on modified polysaccharides. Cem Concr Res. 2005;35(5):883–90. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.022.10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.022 ↗
71. Zhang D-F, Ju B-Z, Zhang S-F, He L, Yang J-Z. The study on the dispersing mechanism of starch sulfonate as a water-reducing agent for cement. Carbohydr Polym. 2007;70(4):363–8. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.04.024.10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.04.024 ↗
72. Zhang H, Wang W, Li Q, Tian Q, Li L, Liu J. A starch-based admixture for reduction of hydration heat in cement composites. Constr Build Mater. 2018;173:317–22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.199.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.199 ↗
73. Claramunt J, Ventura H, Toledo Filho RD, Ardanuy M. Effect of nanocelluloses on the microstructure and mechanical performance of CAC cementitious matrices. Cem Concr Res. 2019;119:64–76. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.02.006.10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.02.006 ↗
74. Alzoubi HH, Albiss BA. Performance of cementitious composites with nano PCMs and cellulose nano fibers. Constr Build Mater. 2020;236:117483. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117483.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117483 ↗
75. Kamasamudram KS, Ashraf W, Landis EN. Cellulose nanofibrils with and without nanosilica for the performance enhancement of Portland cement systems. Constr Build Mater. 2021;285:121547. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121547.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121547 ↗
76. Nassiri S, Chen Z, Jian G, Zhong T, Haider MM, Li H, et al. Comparison of unique effects of two contrasting types of cellulose nanomaterials on setting time, rheology, and compressive strength of cement paste. Cem Concr Compos. 2021;123:104201. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104201.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104201 ↗
77. Cuenca E, Mezzena A, Ferrara L. Synergy between crystalline admixtures and nano-constituents in enhancing autogenous healing capacity of cementitious composites under cracking and healing cycles in aggressive waters. Constr Build Mater. 2021;266:121447. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121447.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121447 ↗
78. Flores J, Kamali M, Ghahremaninezhad A. An investigation into the properties and microstructure of cement mixtures modified with cellulose nanocrystal. Materials. 2017;10(5):498. 10.3390/ma10050498.10.3390/ma10050498 ↗
79. Mcalpine S, Nakoneshny J, Kunkel B. Crystalline cellulose reinforced cement. US20200079692A1; 2020. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20200079692A1/en?oq = US20200079692A1.
80. Barría JC, Vázquez A, Pereira J-M, Manzanal D. Effect of bacterial nanocellulose on the fresh and hardened states of oil well cement. J Pet Sci Eng. 2021;199:108259. 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108259.10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108259 ↗
81. Tegiacchi F, Casu B. Alkylsulfonated polysaccharides and mortar and concrete mixes containing them. USH493H; 1988. https://patents.google.com/patent/USH493H/en?oq = USH493H.
82. Yamamuro H. Property of new polysaccharide derivative as a viscosity agent for self-compacting concrete. Cachan, France: RILEM Publications; 1999. p. 449–59.
83. Wang X, Ma J, Wang Y, He B. Reinforcement of calcium phosphate cements with phosphorylated chitin. Chin J Polym Sci. 2002;20(4):325–32. http://www.cjps.org/article/id/112d256e-9075-421e-bbf3-f9165b56e2b0?pageType = en.
84. Pourchez J, Peschard A, Grosseau P, Guyonnet R, Guilhot B, Vallée F. HPMC and HEMC influence on cement hydration. Cem Concr Res. 2006;36(2):288–94. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.08.003.10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.08.003 ↗
85. Roddy CW, Todd BL. Methods of cementing in subterranean formations using crack resistant cement compositions. US7036586B2; 2006. https://patents.google.com/patent/US7036586B2/en?oq = US7036586B2.
86. Lasheras-Zubiate M, Navarro-Blasco I, Fernández JM, Alvarez JI. Studies on chitosan as an admixture for cement-based materials: Assessment of its viscosity enhancing effect and complexing ability for heavy metals. J Appl Polym Sci. 2011;120(1):242–52. 10.1002/app.33048.10.1002/app.33048 ↗
87. Lasheras-Zubiate M, Navarro-Blasco I, Fernández JM, Álvarez JI. Effect of the addition of chitosan ethers on the fresh state properties of cement mortars. Cem Concr Compos. 2012;34(8):964–73. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.04.010.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.04.010 ↗
88. Cestari AR, Vieira EFS, Alves FJ, Silva ECS, Andrade MAS. A novel and efficient epoxy/chitosan cement slurry for use in severe acidic environments of oil wells—Structural characterization and kinetic modeling. J Hazard Mater. 2012;213–214:109–16. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.01.068.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.01.068 ↗
89. Reddy BR, Ghosh A, Fitzgerald R. Polysaccharide based cement additives. US8586508B2; 2013. https://patents.google.com/patent/US8586508B2/en?oq = US8586508B2.
90. Vieira EFS, Lima PF, dos Santos IMG, Mangrich AS, de França AA, Le Saoût G, et al. The influence of in situ polymerized epoxidized A/F bisphenol-chitosan on features of oil well cement slurry—Molecular-level analysis and long-term interaction of API fracturing fluid. J Appl Polym Sci. 2014;131(22):41044. 10.1002/app.41044.10.1002/app.41044 ↗
91. Lv S, Liu J, Zhou Q, Huang L, Sun T. Synthesis of modified chitosan superplasticizer by amidation and sulfonation and its application performance and working mechanism. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2014;53(10):3908–16. 10.1021/ie403786q.10.1021/ie403786q ↗
92. Isik IE, Ozkul MH. Utilization of polysaccharides as viscosity modifying agent in self-compacting concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2014;72:239–47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.017.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.017 ↗
93. Liu H, Bu Y, Sanjayan J, Shen Z. Effects of chitosan treatment on strength and thickening properties of oil well cement. Constr Build Mater. 2015;75:404–14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.047.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.047 ↗
94. Liu H, Bu Y, Bu C, Guo S. A kind of pre-chelating chitosan cementing slurry retardant and preparation method thereof. CN103045213B; 2015. https://patents.google.com/patent/CN103045213B/en?oq = CN103045213B.
95. Ustinova YV, Nikiforova TP. Cement compositions with the chitosan additive. Procedia Eng. 2016;153:810–5. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.247.10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.247 ↗
96. Zhao H, Chen D, Liao Y, Ouyang F, Du Y, Xu H. A kind of preparation method of the modified chitin bio-based efficient retarding and water reducing agent containing carboxyl. CN107601945A; 2018. https://patents.google.com/patent/CN107601945A/en?oq = CN107601945A.
97. Wang J, Mignon A, Trenson G, Van Vlierberghe S, Boon N, De, et al. A chitosan based pH-responsive hydrogel for encapsulation of bacteria for self-sealing concrete. Cem Concr Compos. 2018;93:309–22. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.08.007.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.08.007 ↗
98. Hall LJ. Chitin nanocrystal containing wellbore fluids. US10259981B2; 2019. https://patents.google.com/patent/US10259981B2/en?oq = US10259981B2.
99. Arslan H, Aytaç US, Bilir T, Şen Ş. The synthesis of a new chitosan based superplasticizer and investigation of its effects on concrete properties. Constr Build Mater. 2019;204:541–9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.209.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.209 ↗
100. Zhao H, Chen D, Liao Y, Xuan W, Ouyang F, Feng J. A kind of high additive of low alkali_silica reaction expansion is discarded to crush glass self-compacting concrete preparation method. CN109534745A; 2019. https://patents.google.com/patent/CN109534745A/en?oq = CN109534745A.