journal article·2021-11-20Open access

Layup sequence and interfacial bonding of additively manufactured polymeric composite: A brief review

Nabilah Afiqah Mohd Radzuan, Abu Bakar Sulong, Anil Verma, Norhamidi Muhamad

Nanotechnology Reviews· Volume 10· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Additively manufactured polymeric composites exhibit customised properties beyond those offered by conventionally fabricated ones. However, in many cases, the mechanical performance mainly depends on the processing parameters, tools, and material selection. Yet, one of the issues of the additive manufacturing process especially in the material extrusion process is the inability to control the printing layups, thereby causing interlaminar damage. Thus far, literature and research have focused on improving the mechanical performance of such polymeric composites by focusing on the interlaminar shear strength under a transverse load transfer. Polymeric composites prepared using the material extrusion technique namely fused deposition modelling (FDM) are discussed upon its layup sequence and orientation. This article proposes that by realising a homogenous distribution of the transverse load, the orientation and the printing direction can maximise the printed load bearing. Moreover, the layup sequence and the interlayer diffusion are key for controlling the mechanical properties of the polymeric composites. This brief review presents a comprehensive elucidation of the polymeric composites manufactured using FDM that interprets the needs of having greater load bearing in each layup printing sequence of the polymeric composites. By able to control the layup sequence, one can control the mechanical performance based on specific functionality.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing, Precision Research Group, Faculty Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia , 43600 Bangi , Selangor , Malaysia

Department of Chemical Engineering, Sustainable Environergy Research Lab (SERL), Indian Institute of Technology Delhi , Hauz Khas , New Delhi-110 016 , India

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Tofangchi A, Han P, Izquierdo J, Iyengar A, Hsu K. Effect of ultrasonic vibration on interlayer adhesion in fused filament fabrication 3D printed ABS. Polymers (Basel). 2019;11(2):315.10.3390/polym11020315 ↗
2. Zindani D, Kumar K. An insight into additive manufacturing of fiber-reinforced polymer composite. Int J Light Mater Manuf. 2019;2(4):267–78.10.1016/j.ijlmm.2019.08.004 ↗
3. Razak Z, Sulong AB, Muhamad N, Che Haron CH, Radzi MKFM, Ismail NF, et al. Effects of thermal cycling on physical and tensile properties of injection moulded kenaf/carbon nanotubes/polypropylene hybrid composites. Compos Part B. 2019;168(December 2018):159–65.10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.031 ↗
4. Kuo J, Chen C. A novel Nylon-6–S316L fiber compound material for injection molded PEM fuel cell bipolar plates. J Power Sources. 2006;162:207–14.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.06.034 ↗
5. Azam FAA, Royan NRR, Yuhana NY, Radzuan NAM, Ahmad S, Sulong AB. Fabrication of porous recycled HDPE biocomposites foam: effect of rice husk filler contents and surface treatments on the mechanical properties. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(2):4–17.10.3390/polym12020475 ↗
6. Du C, Ming P, Hou M, Fu J, Fu Y, Luo X, et al. The preparation technique optimization of epoxy/compressed expanded graphite composite bipolar plates for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Power Sources. 2010;195(16):5312–9.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.005 ↗
7. Mohd Radzuan NANA, Tholibon D, Sulong ABAB, Muhamad N, Haron CHCCHC. New processing technique for biodegradable kenaf composites: a simple alternative to commercial automotive parts. Compos Part B Eng. 2020;184(December 2019):107644.10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107644 ↗
8. Margossian A, Bel S, Hinterhoelzl R. On the characterisation of transverse tensile properties of molten unidirectional thermoplastic composite tapes for thermoforming simulations. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2016;88:48–58.10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.019 ↗
9. Mohd Radzuan NA, Sulong AB, Iswandi I. Effect of multi-sized graphite filler on the mechanical properties and electrical conductivity. Sains Malaysiana. 2021;50(7):2025–34.10.17576/jsm-2021-5007-17 ↗
10. Radzuan NAMNAM, Sulong ABABAB, Husaini T, Majlan EHEH, Rosli MIMI, Aman MFMF, et al. Fabrication of multi-filler MCF/MWCNT/SG-based bipolar plates. Ceram Int. 2019;45(6):7413–8.10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.01.028 ↗
11. Kargarzadeh H, Huang J, Lin N, Ahmad I, Mariano M, Dufresne A, et al. Recent developments in nanocellulose-based biodegradable polymers, thermoplastic polymers, and porous nanocomposites. Prog Polym Sci. 2018;87:197–227.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.07.008 ↗
12. Albdiry MT, Yousif BF, Ku H, Lau KT. A critical review on the manufacturing processes in relation to the properties of nanoclay/polymer composites. J Compos Mater. 2013;47(9):1093–115.10.1177/0021998312445592 ↗
13. Mahesh V, Joladarashi S, Kulkarni SM. A comprehensive review on material selection for polymer matrix composites subjected to impact load. Def Technol. 2021;17(1):257–77.10.1016/j.dt.2020.04.002 ↗
14. Pickering KL, Efendy MGA, Le TM. A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2016;83:98–112.10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038 ↗
15. van de Werken N, Tekinalp H, Khanbolouki P, Ozcan S, Williams A, Tehrani M. Additively manufactured carbon fiber-reinforced composites: state of the art and perspective. Addit Manuf. 2020;31:100962.10.1016/j.addma.2019.100962 ↗
16. Saeed K, McIlhagger A, Harkin-Jones E, Kelly J, Archer E. Predication of the in-plane mechanical properties of continuous carbon fibre-reinforced 3D printed polymer composites using classical laminated-plate theory. Compos Struct. 2021;259(July):113226.10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113226 ↗
17. Yavas D, Zhang Z, Liu Q, Wu D. Interlaminar shear behavior of continuous and short carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites fabricated by additive manufacturing. Compos Part B Eng. 2021;204:108460.10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108460 ↗
18. Zhang H, Gao C, Li H, Pang F, Zou T, Wang H, et al. Analysis of functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced composite structures: a review. Nanotechnol Rev. 2020;9(1):1408–26.10.1515/ntrev-2020-0110 ↗
19. Zhang P, Wang Z, Li J, Li X, Cheng L. From materials to devices using fused deposition modeling: a state-of-art review. Nanotechnol Rev. 2020;9(1):1594–609.10.1515/ntrev-2020-0101 ↗
20. Zhang H, Dickson AN, Sheng Y, McGrail T, Dowling DP, Wang C, et al. Failure analysis of 3D printed woven composite plates with holes under tensile and shear loading. Compos Part B Eng. 2020;186(January):107835.10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107835 ↗
21. Nakajima J, Fayazbakhsh K, Teshima Y. Experimental study on tensile properties of 3D printed flexible kirigami specimens. Addit Manuf. 2020;32(October 2019):101100–828.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101100 ↗
22. Jin M, Neuber C, Schmidt HW. Tailoring polypropylene for extrusion-based additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2020;33:101101.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101101 ↗
23. Amza CG, Zapciu A, Constantin G, Baciu F, Vasile MI. Enhancing mechanical properties of polymer 3D printed parts. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(4):1–18.10.3390/polym13040562 ↗
24. Lepoivre A, Boyard N, Levy A, Sobotka V. Heat transfer and adhesion study for the FFF additive manufacturing process. Proc Manuf. 2020;47(2019):948–55.10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.291 ↗
25. Wu PH, Kim HS, Jang IT. Recent developments in polymers/polymer nanocomposites for additive manufacturing. Prog Mater Sci. 2020;21:111.10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100638 ↗
26. Striemann P, Hülsbusch D, Niedermeier M, Walther F. Optimization and quality evaluation of the interlayer bonding performance of additively manufactured polymer structures. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12:510.3390/polym12051166 ↗
27. Chen RDE, Huang CF, Hsu SH. Composites of waterborne polyurethane and cellulose nanofibers for 3D printing and bioapplications. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;212(1):75–88.10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.02.025 ↗
28. Velu R, Vaheed NM, Venkatesan C, Raspall F, Krishnan M. Experimental investigation on fabrication of thermoset prepreg composites using automated fibre placement process and 3D printed substrate. Proc CIRP. 2020;85:293–8.10.1016/j.procir.2019.09.049 ↗
29. Pagani A, Sanchez-Majano AR. Stochastic stress analysis and failure onset of variable angle tow laminates affected by spatial fibre variations. Compos Part C Open Access. 2021;4(October 2020):100091.10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100091 ↗
30. Popescu D, Zapciu A, Amza C, Baciu F, Marinescu R. FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: a review. Polym Test. 2018;69:157–66.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020 ↗
31. Pinho AC, Piedade AP. Influence of build orientation, geometry and artificial saliva aging on the mechanical properties of 3D printed poly(ε-caprolactone). Materials (Basel). 2021;14(12);3335.10.3390/ma14123335 ↗
32. Ehrmann G, Ehrmann A. Pressure orientation-dependent recovery of 3D-printed PLA objects with varying infill degree. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(8):1–13.10.3390/polym13081275 ↗
33. Rabbi MF, Chalivendra V. Interfacial fracture characterization of multi-material additively manufactured polymer composites. Compos Part C Open Access. 2021;5(February):100145.10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100145 ↗
34. Nie L, Lee K, Lee S, Shi T, Liao G. Void control in adhesive bonding using thermosetting polymer. Sens Actuators A Phys. 2011;167(2):398–405.10.1016/j.sna.2011.03.028 ↗
35. Matsuzaki R, Nakamura T, Sugiyama K, Ueda M, Todoroki A, Hirano Y, et al. Effects of set curvature and fiber bundle size on the printed radius of curvature by a continuous carbon fiber composite 3D printer. Addit Manuf. 2018;24:93–102.10.1016/j.addma.2018.09.019 ↗
36. Dickson AN, Dowling DP. Enhancing the bearing strength of woven carbon fibre thermoplastic composites through additive manufacturing. Compos Struct. 2019;212(January):381–8.10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.050 ↗
37. Singh R, Singh H, Farina I, Colangelo F, Fraternali F. On the additive manufacturing of an energy storage device from recycled material. Compos Part B Eng. 2019;156:259–65.10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.080 ↗
38. Mei H, Ali Z, Yan Y, Ali I, Cheng L. Influence of mixed isotropic fiber angles and hot press on the mechanical properties of 3D printed composites. Addit Manuf. 2019;27(November 2018):150–8.10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.008 ↗
39. Liu T, Tian X, Zhang M, Abliz D, Li D, Ziegmann G. Interfacial performance and fracture patterns of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber with sizing reinforced PA6 composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2018;114(July):368–76.10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.001 ↗
40. Stark MS. Improving and understanding inter-filament bonding in 3D-printed polymers. Univ Tenn Honor Thesis Proj. 2016;1–25.
41. Zhang H, Yang D, Sheng Y. Performance-driven 3D printing of continuous curved carbon fibre reinforced polymer composites: a preliminary numerical study. Compos Part B Eng. 2018;151:256–64.10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.017 ↗
42. Billah KMM, Lorenzana FAR, Martinez NL, Wicker RB, Espalin D. Thermomechanical characterization of short carbon fiber and short glass fiber-reinforced ABS used in large format additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2020;35(April):101299.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101299 ↗
43. Bhandari S, Lopez-Anido RA, Gardner DJ. Enhancing the interlayer tensile strength of 3D printed short carbon fiber-reinforced PETG and PLA composites via annealing. Addit Manuf. 2019;30:100922.10.1016/j.addma.2019.100922 ↗
44. Gao X, Qi S, Kuang X, Su Y, Li J, Wang D. Fused filament fabrication of polymer materials: a review of interlayer bond. Addit Manuf. 2021;37:101658.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101658 ↗
45. Rostom S, Dadmun MD. Improving heat transfer in fused deposition modeling with graphene enhances inter-filament bonding. Polym Chem. 2019;10(44):5967–78.10.1039/C9PY00832B ↗
46. Islam MS, Prabhakar P. Interlaminar strengthening of multidirectional laminates using polymer additive manufacturing. Mater Des. 2017;133:332–9.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.038 ↗
47. Khosravani MR, Reinicke T. Effects of raster layup and printing speed on strength of 3D-printed structural components. Proc Struct Integr. 2020;28:720–5.10.1016/j.prostr.2020.10.083 ↗
48. Vaezi M, Seitz H, Yang S. A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2013;67(5–8):1721–54.10.1007/s00170-012-4605-2 ↗
49. Frazier WE. Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform. 2014;23(6):1917–28.10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
50. Avila JD, Alrawahi Z, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A. Additively manufactured Ti6Al4V-Si-hydroxyapatite composites for articulating surfaces of load-bearing implants. Addit Manuf. 2020;34(April):101241.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101241 ↗
51. Kennedy ZC, Christ JF. Printing polymer blends through in situ active mixing during fused filament fabrication. Addit Manuf. 2020;36(August 2019):101233.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101233 ↗
52. Shen X, Chu M, Hariri F, Vedula G, Naguib HE. Binder jetting fabrication of highly flexible and electrically conductive graphene/PVOH composites. Addit Manuf. 2020;36(August):101565.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101565 ↗
53. Parandoush P, Lin D. A review on additive manufacturing of polymer-fiber composites. Compos Struct. 2017;182(August):36–53.10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088 ↗
54. Askari M, Hutchins DA, Thomas PJ, Astolfi L, Watson RL, Abdi M, et al. Additive manufacturing of metamaterials: a review. Addit Manuf. 2020;36(August):101562.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101562 ↗
55. Penumakala PK, Santo J, Thomas A. A critical review on the fused deposition modeling of thermoplastic polymer composites. Compos Part B Eng. 2020;201(August):108336.10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108336 ↗
56. Hashemi Sanatgar R, Campagne C, Nierstrasz V. Investigation of the adhesion properties of direct 3D printing of polymers and nanocomposites on textiles: effect of FDM printing process parameters. Appl Surf Sci. 2017;403:551–63.10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.112 ↗
57. Shi X, Chen B, Tuo X, Gong Y, Guo J. Study on performance characteristics of fused deposition modeling 3D‐printed composites by blending and lamination. J Appl Polym Sci. 2021;138(9):32495.10.1002/app.49926 ↗
58. Tekinalp HL, Kunc V, Velez-Garcia GM, Duty CE, Love LJ, Naskar AK, et al. Highly oriented carbon fiber-polymer composites via additive manufacturing. Compos Sci Technol. 2014;105:144–50.10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009 ↗
59. Dickson AN, Barry JN, McDonnell KA, Dowling DP. Fabrication of continuous carbon, glass and Kevlar fibre reinforced polymer composites using additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2017;16:146–52.10.1016/j.addma.2017.06.004 ↗
60. Han D, Lee H. Recent advances in multi-material additive manufacturing: methods and applications. Curr Opin Chem Eng. 2020;28:158–66.10.1016/j.coche.2020.03.004 ↗
61. Chueh YH, Zhang X, Ke JCR, Li Q, Wei C, Li L. Additive manufacturing of hybrid metal/polymer objects via multiple-material laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf. 2020;36(July):101465.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101465 ↗
62. Lai KC, Lee LY, Hiew BYZ, Yang TCK, Pan GT, Thangalazhy-Gopakumar S, et al. Utilisation of eco-friendly and low cost 3D graphene-based composite for treatment of aqueous Reactive Black 5 dye: characterisation, adsorption mechanism and recyclability studies. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2020;114:57–66.10.1016/j.jtice.2020.09.024 ↗
63. Tan C, Zhang X, Dong D, Attard B, Wang D, Kuang M, et al. In situ synthesised interlayer enhances bonding strength in additively manufactured multi-material hybrid tooling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2020;155(June):103592.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2020.103592 ↗
64. Tee YL, Tran P, Leary M, Pille P, Brandt M. 3D Printing of polymer composites with material jetting: mechanical and fractographic analysis. Addit Manuf. 2020;36(August):101558.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101558 ↗
65. Liu F, Li T, Jiang X, Jia Z, Xu Z, Wang L. The effect of material mixing on interfacial stiffness and strength of multi-material additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2020;36(January):101502.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101502 ↗
66. Balla VK, Kate KH, Satyavolu J, Singh P, Tadimeti JGD. Additive manufacturing of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: processing and prospects. Compos Part B Eng. 2019;174(March):106956.10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106956 ↗
67. Singh R, Kumar R, Farina I, Colangelo F, Feo L, Fraternali F. Multi-material additive manufacturing of sustainable innovative materials and structures. Polymers (Basel). 11(1);2019:1–14.10.3390/polym11010062 ↗
68. Baca D, Ahmad R. The impact on the mechanical properties of multi-material polymers fabricated with a single mixing nozzle and multi-nozzle systems via fused deposition modeling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2020;106(9–10):4509–20.10.1007/s00170-020-04937-3 ↗
69. Sanz-Horta R, Elvira C, Gallardo A, Reinecke H, Rodríguez-Hernández J. Fabrication of 3d-printed biodegradable porous scaffolds combining multi-material fused deposition modeling and supercritical CO2 techniques. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(6):1080.10.3390/nano10061080 ↗
70. Yadav D, Chhabra D, Gupta RK, Phogat A, Ahlawat A. Modeling and analysis of significant process parameters of FDM 3D printer using ANFIS. Mater Today Proc. 2020;21:1592–604.10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.227 ↗
71. Wolcott PJ, Hehr A, Pawlowski C, Dapino MJ. Process improvements and characterization of ultrasonic additive manufactured structures. J Mater Process Technol. 2016;233:44–52.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.02.009 ↗
72. Gill EL, Wang W, Liu R, Huang YYS. Additive batch electrospinning patterning of tethered gelatin hydrogel fibres with swelling-induced fibre curling. Addit Manuf. 2020;36(July):101456.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101456 ↗
73. Xiang D, Zhang Z, Han Z, Zhang X, Zhou Z, Zhang J, et al. Effects of non-covalent interactions on the properties of 3D printed flexible piezoresistive strain sensors of conductive polymer composites. Compos Interfaces. 2020;00(00):1–15.10.1080/09276440.2020.1794479 ↗
74. Angelopoulos PM, Samouhos M, Taxiarchou M. Functional fillers in composite filaments for fused filament fabrication; a review. Mater Today Proc. 2021;37:4031–43.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.069 ↗
75. Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, Gurr M, Mülhaupt R. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem Rev. 2017;117(15):10212–90.10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 ↗
76. Regalla SP, Karwa SS, Rajesh S, Shyam PV, Shrivastava PN. Strength and fracture behaviour of polymer matrix composite layered structures made by additive manufacturing. Mater Today Proc. 2019;28:1030–8.10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.347 ↗
77. Badini C, Padovano E, De Camillis R, Lambertini VG, Pietroluongo M. Preferred orientation of chopped fibers in polymer-based composites processed by selective laser sintering and fused deposition modeling: effects on mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci. 2020;137(38):1–12.10.1002/app.49152 ↗
78. Kousiatza C, Tzetzis D, Karalekas D. In situ characterization of 3D printed continuous fiber-reinforced composites: a methodological study using fiber Bragg grating sensors. Compos Sci Technol. 2019;174:134–41.10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.02.008 ↗
79. Young D, Wetmore N, Czabaj M. Interlayer fracture toughness of additively manufactured unreinforced and carbon-fiber-reinforced acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. Addit Manuf. 2018;22(February):883–90.10.1016/j.addma.2018.02.010 ↗
80. Laguna OH, Lietor PF, Godino FJI, Corpas-Iglesias FA. A review on additive manufacturing and materials for catalytic applications: milestones, key concepts, advances and perspectives. Mater Des. 2021;208:109927.10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109927 ↗
81. Valino AD, Dizon JRC, Espera AH, Chen Q, Messman J, Advincula RC. Advances in 3D printing of thermoplastic polymer composites and nanocomposites. Prog Polym Sci. 2019;98:101162.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101162 ↗
82. Zeng L, Li P, Yao Y, Niu B, Niu S, Xu B. Recent progresses of 3D printing technologies for structural energy storage devices. Mater Today Nano. 2020;12:100094.10.1016/j.mtnano.2020.100094 ↗
83. Sitharaman B, Shi X, Walboomers XF, Liao H, Cuijpers V, Wilson LJ, et al. In vivo biocompatibility of ultra-short single-walled carbon nanotube/biodegradable polymer nanocomposites for bone tissue engineering. Bone. 2008;43(2):362–70.10.1016/j.bone.2008.04.013 ↗
84. Kong D, Dong C, Ni X, Li X. Corrosion of metallic materials fabricated by selective laser melting. npj Mater Degrad. 2019;3(1):1–14.10.1038/s41529-019-0086-1 ↗
85. Haghighi A, Li L. A hybrid physics-based and data-driven approach for characterizing porosity variation and filament bonding in extrusion-based additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2020;36(May):101399.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101399 ↗
86. Yuan C, Wang F, Rosen DW, Ge Q. Voxel design of additively manufactured digital material with customized thermomechanical properties. Mater Des. 2021;197:109205.10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109205 ↗
87. Allum J, Moetazedian A, Gleadall A, Silberschmidt VV. Interlayer bonding has bulk-material strength in extrusion additive manufacturing: new understanding of anisotropy. Addit Manuf. 2020;34(June):101297.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101297 ↗
88. Aliheidari N, Christ J, Tripuraneni R, Nadimpalli S, Ameli A. Interlayer adhesion and fracture resistance of polymers printed through melt extrusion additive manufacturing process. Mater Des. 2018;156:351–61.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.07.001 ↗
89. Wang SF, Ogale AA. Simulation of percolation behavior of anisotropic short-fiber composites with a continuum model and non-cubic control geometry. Compos Sci Technol. 1993;46(4):389–98.10.1016/0266-3538(93)90184-I ↗
90. Ji H, Zhang X, Huang X, Zheng L, Ye X, Li Y. Effect of extrusion on viscoelastic slurry 3D print quality: numerical analysis and experiment validation. SN Appl Sci. 2019;1(9):1036.10.1007/s42452-019-1097-9 ↗
91. Kakanuru P, Pochiraju K. Moisture ingress and degradation of additively manufactured PLA, ABS and PLA/SiC composite parts. Addit Manuf. 2020;36(August):101529.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101529 ↗
92. Faes M, Ferraris E, Moens D. Influence of inter-layer cooling time on the quasi-static properties of ABS components produced via fused deposition modelling. Proc CIRP. 2016;42(Isem Xviii):748–53.10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.313 ↗
93. Türk D-A, Kussmaul R, Zogg M, Klahn C, Leutenecker-Twelsiek B, Meboldt M. Composites part production with additive manufacturing technologies. Proc CIRP. 2017;66(Section 4):306–11.10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.359 ↗
94. Wei K, Xiao X, Chen J, Wu Y, Li M, Wang Z. Additively manufactured bi-material metamaterial to program a wide range of thermal expansion. Mater Des. 2021;198:109343.10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109343 ↗
95. Taufiq MJ, Mansor MR, Mustafa Z. Characterisation of wood plastic composite manufactured from kenaf fibre-reinforced recycled-unused plastic blend. Compos Struct. 2018;189:510–5.10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.090 ↗
96. Kishore V, Ajinjeru C, Nycz A, Post B, Lindahl J, Kunc V, et al. Infrared preheating to improve interlayer strength of big area additive manufacturing (BAAM) components. Addit Manuf. 2017;14:7–12.10.1016/j.addma.2016.11.008 ↗
97. Han J, Hoa SV. A three-dimensional multilayer composite finite element for stress analysis of composite laminates. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1993;36(22):3903–14.10.1002/nme.1620362209 ↗
98. Iremanatb T. Three-dimensional stress analysis of bolted single-lap composite joints. Compos Struct. 1998;43:195–216.10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00103-2 ↗
99. Iragi M, Pascual-González C, Esnaola A, Lopes CS, Aretxabaleta L. Ply and interlaminar behaviours of 3D printed continuous carbon fibre-reinforced thermoplastic laminates; effects of processing conditions and microstructure. Addit Manuf. 2019;30(July):100884.10.1016/j.addma.2019.100884 ↗
100. Sanei SHR, Popescu D. 3D-printed carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites: a systematic review. J Compos Sci. 2020;4(3):98.10.3390/jcs4030098 ↗