Optimization of non-linear conductance modulation based on metal oxide memristors
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract As memristor-simulating synaptic devices have become available in recent years, the optimization on non-linearity degree (NL, related to adjacent conductance values) is unignorable in the promotion of the learning accuracy of systems. Importantly, based on the theoretical support of the Mott theory and the three partial differential equations, and the model of conductive filaments (CFs), we analyzed and summarized the optimization schemes on the physical structure and the extra stimulus signal from the internal factor and external influence, two aspects, respectively. It is worth noting that we divided the extra stimulus signals into two categories, the combined pulse signal and the feedback pulse signal. The former has an internal logical optimized phenomenon, and the composition of only two parts in each cycle leads to a simple peripheral circuit. The latter can obtain an almost linear NL curve in software stimulation because of its feature in real-time adjustment of signals, but it is complex in hardware implementation. In consideration of space and energy consumption, achieving memristor with different resistive switching (RS) layers can be another optimization scheme. Special attention should be paid to the weaker NL, which could improve learning accuracy at the system level only when the value of other non-ideal properties such as the on/off ratio is within a certain range.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Film and Integrated Devices , University of Electronic Science and Technology of China , Chengdu 610054 , P.R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Borghetti J, Li ZY, Straznicky J, Li XM, Ohlberg DAA, Wu W, Stewart DR, Williams RS. A hybrid nanomemristor/transistor logic circuit capable of self-programming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 1699–1703.10.1073/pnas.0806642106 ↗
2. Yu SM, Gao B, Fang Z, Yu HY, Kang JF, Wong HSP. A neuromorphic visual system using RRAM synaptic devices with sub-pJ energy and tolerance to variability: experimental characterization and large-scale modeling. In 2012 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2012.10.1109/IEDM.2012.6479018 ↗
3. Kuzum D, Jeyasingh RGD, Wong HSP. Energy efficient programming of nanoelectronic synaptic devices for large-scale implementation of associative and temporal sequence learning. In 2011 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2011.10.1109/IEDM.2011.6131643 ↗
4. Suri M, Bichler O, Querlioz D, Palma G, Vianello E, Vuillaume D, Gamrat C, DeSalvo B. CBRAM devices as binary synapses for low-power stochastic neuromorphic systems: auditory (cochlea) and visual (retina) cognitive processing applications. In 2012 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2012.10.1109/IEDM.2012.6479017 ↗
5. Strukov DB, Snider GS, Stewart DR, Williams RS. The missing memristor found. Nature 2008, 453, 80–83.10.1038/nature06932 ↗
6. Waser R, Dittmann R, Staikov G, Szot K. Redox-based resistive switching memories – nanoionic mechanisms, prospects, and challenges. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2632–2663.10.1002/adma.200900375 ↗
7. Yang YC, Lu W. Nanoscale resistive switching devices: mechanisms and modeling. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 10076–10092.10.1039/c3nr03472k ↗
8. Yang JJS, Strukov DB, Stewart DR. Memristive devices for computing. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 13–24.10.1038/nnano.2012.240 ↗
9. Park S, Kim H, Choo M, Noh J, Sheri A, Jung S, Seo K, Park J, Kim S, Lee W, Shin J, Lee D, Choi G, Woo J, Cha E, Jang J, Park C, Jeon M, Lee B, Lee BH, Hwang H. RRAM-based synapse for neuromorphic system with pattern recognition function. In 2012 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2012.10.1109/IEDM.2012.6479016 ↗
10. Matveyev Y, Kirtaev R, Fetisova A, Zakharchenko S, Negrov D, Zenkevich A. Crossbar nanoscale HfO2-based electronic synapses. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 147.10.1186/s11671-016-1360-6 ↗
11. Chen PY, Lin BB, Wang IT, Hou TH, Ye JP, Vrudhula S, Seo JS, Cao Y, Yu SM. Mitigating effects of non-ideal synaptic device characteristics for on-chip learning. ICCAD-IEEE ACM Int. 2015, 194–199.10.1109/ICCAD.2015.7372570 ↗
12. Burr GW, Shelby RM, di Nolfo C, Jang JW, Shenoy RS, Narayanan P, Virwani K, Giacometti EU, Kurdi B, Hwang H. Experimental demonstration and tolerancing of a large-scale neural network (165,000 synapses), using phase-change memory as the synaptic weight element. In International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM). 2014.10.1109/IEDM.2014.7047135 ↗
13. Yu SM, Chen PY, Cao Y, Xia LX, Wang Y, Wu HQ. Scaling-up resistive synaptic arrays for neuro-inspired architecture: challenges and prospect. In 2015 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM). 2015.10.1109/IEDM.2015.7409718 ↗
14. Izhikevich EM, Edelman GM. Large-scale model of mammalian thalamocortical systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 3593–3598.10.1073/pnas.0712231105 ↗
15. Indiveri G, Chicca E, Douglas R. A VLSI array of low-power spiking neurons and bistable synapses with spike-timing dependent plasticity. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2006, 17, 211–221.10.1109/TNN.2005.860850 ↗
16. Bi GQ, Poo MM. Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: Dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. J. Neurosci. 1998, 18, 10464–10472.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-24-10464.1998 ↗
17. Li C, Min FH, Jin QS, Ma HY. Extreme multistability analysis of memristor-based chaotic system and its application in image decryption. AIP Adv. 2017, 7, 125204.10.1063/1.5006593 ↗
18. He WF, Sun HJ, Zhou YX, Lu K, Xue KH, Miao XS. Customized binary and multi-level HfO2-x-based memristors tuned by oxidation conditions. Sc.i Rep-UK 2017, 7, 10070.10.1038/s41598-017-09413-9 ↗
19. Su TY, Huang CH, Shih YC, Wang TH, Medina H, Huang JS, Tsai HS, Chueh YL. Tunable defect engineering in TiON thin films by multi-step sputtering processes: from a Schottky diode to resistive switching memory. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 6319–6327.10.1039/C7TC01130J ↗
20. Merced-Grafals EJ, Davila N, Ge N, Williams RS, Strachan JP. Repeatable, accurate, and high speed multi-level programming of memristor 1T1R arrays for power efficient analog computing applications. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 365202.10.1088/0957-4484/27/36/365202 ↗
21. Bass O, Fish A, Naveh D. A Memristor as multi-bit memory: feasibility analysis. Radioengineering 2015, 24, 425–430.10.13164/re.2015.0425 ↗
22. Park S, Sheri A, Kim J, Noh J, Jang J, Jeon M, Lee B, Lee BR, Lee BH, Hwang H. Neuromorphic speech systems using advanced ReRAM-based synapse. In 2013 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2013.10.1109/IEDM.2013.6724692 ↗
23. Yu SM, Guan XM, Wong HSP. Understanding metal oxide RRAM current overshoot and reliability using kinetic Monte Carlo simulation. In 2012 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2012.10.1109/IEDM.2012.6479105 ↗
24. Gao B, Bi YJ, Chen HY, Liu R, Huang P, Chen B, Liu L, Liu X, Yu S, Philip Wong H-S, Kang J. Ultra-Low-Energy Three-Dimensional Oxide-Based electronic synapses for implementation of robust high-accuracy neuromorphic computation systems. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 6998–7004.10.1021/nn501824r ↗
25. Chang T, Jo SH, Kim KH, Sheridan P, Gaba S, Lu W. Synaptic behaviors and modeling of a metal oxide memristive device. Appl. Phys. A-Mater. 2011, 102, 857–863.10.1007/s00339-011-6296-1 ↗
26. Jo SH, Chang T, Ebong I, Bhadviya BB, Mazumder P, Lu W. Nanoscale memristor device as synapse in neuromorphic systems. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1297–1301.10.1021/nl904092h ↗
27. Park SG, Yang MK, Ju H, Seong D-J, Lee JM, Kim E, Jung S, Zhang L, Shin YC, Baek I-G, Choi J, Kang H-K, Chung C. A non-linear ReRAM cell with sub-1 mu A ultralow operating current for high density vertical resistive memory (VRRAM). In 2012 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2012.10.1109/IEDM.2012.6479084 ↗
28. Seo K, Kim I, Jung S, Jo M, Park S, Park J, Shin J, Biju KP, Kong J, Lee K, Lee B, Hwang H. Analog memory and spike-timing-dependent plasticity characteristics of a nanoscale titanium oxide bilayer resistive switching device. Nanotechnology 2011, 22, 254023.10.1088/0957-4484/22/25/254023 ↗
29. Prezioso M, Merrikh-Bayat F, Hoskins BD, Adam GC, Likharev KK, Strukov DB. Training and operation of an integrated neuromorphic network based on metal-oxide memristors. Nature 2015, 521, 61–64.10.1038/nature14441 ↗
30. Hong DS, Chen YS, Sun JR, Shen BG. Ternary synaptic plasticity arising from memdiode behavior of TiOx single nanowires. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2016, 2, 1500359.10.1002/aelm.201500359 ↗
31. Alamgir Z, Holt J, Beckmann K, Cady NC. The effect of different oxygen exchange layers on TaOx based RRAM devices. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2018, 33, 0150114.10.1088/1361-6641/aa9a8f ↗
32. Du C, Ma W, Chang T, Sheridan P, Lu WD. Biorealistic Implementation of synaptic functions with oxide memristors through internal ionic dynamics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 4290–4299.10.1002/adfm.201501427 ↗
33. Qu B, Younis A, Chu D. Recent progress in tungsten oxides based memristors and their neuromorphological applications. Electron. Mater. Lett. 2016, 12, 715–731.10.1007/s13391-016-6129-7 ↗
34. Wang IT, Lin YC, Wang YF, Hsu CW, Hou TH. 3D synaptic architecture with ultralow sub-10 fJ energy per spike for neuromorphic computation. In International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM). 2014.10.1109/IEDM.2014.7047127 ↗
35. Li X, Wu H, Bin G, Wu W, Wu D, Deng N, Cai J, Qian H. Electrode-induced digital-to-analog resistive switching in TaO x-based RRAM devices. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 305201.10.1088/0957-4484/27/30/305201 ↗
36. Wang ZW, Kang J, Yu ZZ, Fang YC, Ling YT, Cai YM, Huang R, Wang YY. Modulation of nonlinear resistive switching behavior of a TaOx-based resistive device through interface engineering. Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 055204.10.1088/1361-6528/28/5/055204 ↗
37. Lee MJ, Lee CB, Lee D, Lee SR, Chang M, Hur JH, Kim Y-B, Kim C-J, Seo DH, Seo S, Chung U-I, Yoo I-K, Kim K. A fast, high-endurance and scalable non-volatile memory device made from asymmetric Ta2O5−x/TaO2−x bilayer structures. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 625–630.10.1038/nmat3070 ↗
38. Yang JJ, Zhang MX, Strachan JP, Miao F, Pickett MD, Kelley RD, Medeiros-Ribeiro G, Williams RS. High switching endurance in TaOx memristive devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 232102.10.1063/1.3524521 ↗
39. Yang YC, Choi S, Lu W. Oxide heterostructure resistive memory. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 2908–2915.10.1021/nl401287w ↗
40. Yang YC, Lee J, Lee S, Liu CH, Zhong ZH, Lu W. Oxide resistive memory with functionalized graphene as built-in selector element. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3693–3699.10.1002/adma.201400270 ↗
41. Yang YC, Sheridan P, Lu W. Complementary resistive switching in tantalum oxide-based resistive memory devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 203112.10.1063/1.4719198 ↗
42. Wedig A, Luebben M, Cho DY, Moors M, Skaja K, Rana V, Hasegawa T, Adepalli KK, Yildiz B, Waser R, Valov I. Nanoscale cation motion in TaOx, HfOx and TiOx memristive systems. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 67–74.10.1038/nnano.2015.221 ↗
43. Suhas KA, Wang ZW, Huang XP, Kumari N, Davila N, Strachan JP, Vine D, David Kilcoyne AL, Nishi Y, Stanley R. Oxygen migration during resistance switching and failure of hafnium oxide memristors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 103503.10.1063/1.4974535 ↗
44. Piccolboni G, Molas G, Garbin D, Vianello E, Cueto O, Cagli C, Traore B, De Salvo B, Ghibaudo G, Perniola L. Investigation of cycle-to-cycle variability in HfO2-Based OxRAM. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2016, 37, 721–723.10.1109/LED.2016.2553370 ↗
45. Covi E, Brivio S, Serb A, Prodromakis T, Fanciulli M, Spiga S. HfO2-based memristors for neuromorphic applications. IEEE Int. Symp. Circ. S. 2016, 393–396.10.1109/ISCAS.2016.7527253 ↗
46. Jiang H, Han L, Lin P, Wang Z, Jang MH, Wu Q, Barnell M, Yang JJ, Xin HL, Xia Q. Sub-10 nm Ta channel responsible for superior performance of a HfO2 memristor. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28525.10.1038/srep28525 ↗
47. Murdoch BJ, McCulloch DG, Ganesan R, McKenzie DR, Bilek MMM, Partridge JG. Memristor and selector devices fabricated from HfO2−xNx. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 108, 143504.10.1063/1.4945727 ↗
48. Yan ZB, Liu JM. Resistance switching memory in perovskite oxides. Ann. Phys.-New York. 2015, 358, 206–224.10.1016/j.aop.2015.03.028 ↗
49. Wu ML, Yang CP, Shi DW, Wang RL, Xu LF, Xiao HB, Baerner K. Electric-pulse-induced resistance switching effect in the bulk of La0.5Ca0.5MnO3 ceramics. AIP Adv. 2014, 4, 047123.10.1063/1.4872216 ↗
50. Zhuge F, Li K, Fu B, Zhang H, Li J, Chen H, Liang L, Gao J, Cao H, Liu Z, Luo H. Mechanism for resistive switching in chalcogenide-based electrochemical metallization memory cells. AIP Adv. 2015, 5, 057125.10.1063/1.4921089 ↗
51. Ohno T, Hasegawa T, Tsuruoka T, Terabe K, Gimzewski JK, Aono M. Short-term plasticity and long-term potentiation mimicked in single inorganic synapses. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 591–595.10.1038/nmat3054 ↗
52. Shigeoka Y, Tsuruoka T, Hasegawa T. The rate limiting process and its activation energy in the forming process of a Cu/Ta2O5/Pt gapless-type atomic switch. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 57, 035202.10.7567/JJAP.57.035202 ↗
53. Bousoulas P, Giannopoulos I, Asenov P, Karageorgiou I, Tsoukalas D. Investigating the origins of high multilevel resistive switching in forming free Ti/TiO2−x-based memory devices through experiments and simulations. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 121, 094501.10.1063/1.4977063 ↗
54. Yang Y, Gao P, Li L, Pan X, Tappertzhofen S, Choi S, Waser R, Valov I, Lu WD. Electrochemical dynamics of nanoscale metallic inclusions in dielectrics. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4232.10.1038/ncomms5232 ↗
55. Yang Y, Gao P, Gaba S, Chang T, Pan X, Lu W. Observation of conducting filament growth in nanoscale resistive memories. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 732.10.1038/ncomms1737 ↗
56. Kim S, Choi S, Lu W. Comprehensive physical model of dynamic resistive switching in an oxide memristor. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 2369–2376.10.1021/nn405827t ↗
57. Kim S, Kim SJ, Kim KM, Lee SR, Chang M, Cho E, Kim Y-B, Kim CJ, Chung U-I, Yoo I-K. Physical electro-thermal model of resistive switching in bi-layered resistance-change memory. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1680.10.1038/srep01680 ↗
58. Nardi F, Balatti S, Larentis S, Ielmini D. Complementary switching in metal oxides: toward diode-less crossbar RRAMs. In 2011 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2011.10.1109/IEDM.2011.6131647 ↗
59. Kim S, Choi B, Lim M, Yoon J, Lee J, Kim HD, Choi SJ. Pattern recognition using carbon nanotube synaptic transistors with an adjustable weight update protocol. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 2814–2822.10.1021/acsnano.6b07894 ↗
60. Kim S, Choi S, Lee J, Lu WD. Tuning resistive switching characteristics of tantalum oxide memristors through Si doping. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 10262–10269.10.1021/nn503464q ↗
61. Zhu J, Yang Y, Jia R, Liang Z, Zhu W, Rehman ZU, Bao L, Zhang X, Cai Y, Song L, Huang R. Ion gated synaptic transistors based on 2D van der Waals crystals with tunable diffusive dynamics. Adv. Mater. (Deerfield Beach, Fla.). 2018, 30, 1800195.10.1002/adma.201800195 ↗
62. Kim S, Kim H, Jung S, Kim MH, Lee SH, Cho S, Park BG. Tuning resistive switching parameters in Si3N4-based RRAM for three-dimensional vertical resistive memory applications. J. Alloy Compd. 2016, 663, 419–423.10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.10.142 ↗
63. Kim S, Lim M, Kim Y, Kim HD, Choi SJ. Impact of synaptic device variations on pattern recognition accuracy in a hardware neural network. Sci. Rep.-UK 2018, 8, 2638.10.1038/s41598-018-21057-x ↗
64. Thomas A, Niehorster S, Fabretti S, Shepheard N, Kuschel O, Kupper K, Wollschlager J, Krzysteczko P, Chicca E. Tunnel junction based memristors as artificial synapses. Front. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 241.10.3389/fnins.2015.00241 ↗
65. Zhu X, Du C, Jeong Y, Lu WD. Emulation of synaptic metaplasticity in memristors. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 45–51.10.1039/C6NR08024C ↗
66. Kaveh M, Mott NF. Metal-insulator-transition near a superconducting state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 68, 1904–1907.10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1904 ↗
67. Wang YF, Lin YC, Wang IT, Lin TP, Hou TH. Characterization and modeling of nonfilamentary Ta/TaOx/TiO2/Ti analog synaptic device. Sci. Rep.-UK 2015, 5, 10150.10.1038/srep10150 ↗
68. Wang LG, Zhang W, Chen Y, Cao YQ, Li AD, Wu D. Synaptic plasticity and learning behaviors mimicked in single inorganic synapses of Pt/HfOx/ZnOx/TiN memristive system. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 65.10.1186/s11671-017-1847-9 ↗
69. Wang Z, Yin M, Zhang T, Cai Y, Wang Y, Yang Y, Huang R. Engineering incremental resistive switching in TaOx based memristors for brain-inspired computing. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 14015–14022.10.1039/C6NR00476H ↗
70. Zhang C, Tai Y-T, Shang J, Liu G, Wang K-L, Hsu C, Yi X, Yang X, Xue W, Tan H, Guo S, Pan L, Li R-W. Synaptic plasticity and learning behaviours in flexible artificial synapse based on polymer/viologen system. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 3217–3223.10.1039/C6TC00496B ↗
71. Gou GY, Sun J, Qian C, He YK, Kong LA, Fu Y, Dai GZ, Yang JL, Gao YL. Artificial synapses based on biopolymer electrolyte-coupled SnO2 nanowire transistors. J. Mater. Chem. C.2016, 4, 11110–11117.10.1039/C6TC03731C ↗
72. He Y, Sun J, Qian C, Kong L-A, Gou G, Li H. Oxide-based synaptic transistors gated by solution-processed gelatin electrolytes. Appl. Phys. A. 2017, 123, 277.10.1007/s00339-017-0917-2 ↗
73. Diorio C, Hasler P, Minch A, Mead CA. A single-transistor silicon synapse. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 1996, 43, 1972–1980.10.1109/16.543035 ↗
74. Agnus G, Zhao WS, Derycke V, Filoramo A, Lhuillier Y, Lenfant S, Vuillaume D, Gamrat C, Bourgoin JP. Two-terminal carbon nanotube programmable devices for adaptive architectures. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 702–706.10.1002/adma.200902170 ↗
75. Akinaga H, Shima H. Resistive random access memory (ReRAM) based on metal oxides. Proc. IEEE. 2010, 98, 2237–2251.10.1109/JPROC.2010.2070830 ↗
76. Lai QX, Zhang L, Li ZY, Stickle WF, Williams RS, Chen Y. Ionic/electronic hybrid materials integrated in a synaptic transistor with signal processing and learning functions. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 2448–2453.10.1002/adma.201000282 ↗
77. Han N, Park MU, Yoo KH. Memristive switching in Bi(1-x)Sb(x) nanowires. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 9224–9230.10.1021/acsami.6b01050 ↗
78. Yang X, Fang Y, Yu Z, Wang Z, Zhang T, Yin M, Lin M, Yang Y, Cai Y, Huang R. Nonassociative learning implementation by a single memristor-based multi-terminal synaptic device. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 18897–18904.10.1039/C6NR04142F ↗
79. Das M, Kumar A, Singh R, Htay MT, Mukherjee S. Realization of synaptic learning and memory functions in Y2O3 based memristive device fabricated by dual ion beam sputtering. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 055203.10.1088/1361-6528/aaa0eb ↗
80. Banerjee W, Liu Q, Lv HB, Long SB, Liu M. Electronic imitation of behavioral and psychological synaptic activities using TiOx/Al2O3-based memristor devices. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 14442–14450.10.1039/C7NR04741J ↗
81. Jeong DS, Kim KM, Kim S, Choi BJ, Hwang CS. Memristors for energy-efficient new computing paradigms. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2016, 2, 1600090.10.1002/aelm.201600090 ↗
82. Ranjan R, Ponce PM, Hellweg WL, Kyrmanidis A, Abu Saleh L, Schroeder D, Krautschneider WH. Integrated circuit with memristor emulator array and neuron circuits for biologically inspired neuromorphic pattern recognition. J. Circuit Syst. Comp. 2017, 26, 1750183.10.1142/S0218126617501833 ↗
83. Qu B, Du HW, Wan T, Lin X, Younis A, Chu DW. Synaptic plasticity and learning behavior in transparent tungsten oxide-based memristors. Mater. Design. 2017, 129, 173–179.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.022 ↗
84. Cai WR, Ellinger F, Tetzlaff R. Neuronal synapse as a memristor: modeling pair- and triplet-based STDP rule. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circ. S. 2015, 9, 87–95.10.1109/TBCAS.2014.2318012 ↗
85. Wang IT, Chang CC, Chiu LW, Chou T, Hou TH. 3D Ta/TaOx/TiO2/Ti synaptic array and linearity tuning of weight update for hardware neural network applications. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 365204.10.1088/0957-4484/27/36/365204 ↗
86. Prezioso M, Merrikh Bayat F, Hoskins B, Likharev K, Strukov D. Self-adaptive spike-time-dependent plasticity of metal-oxide memristors. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21331.10.1038/srep21331 ↗
87. Prezioso M, Zhong Y, Gavrilov D, Merrikh-Bayat F, Hoskins B, Adam G, Likharev K, Strukov D. Spiking neuromorphic networks with metal-oxide memristors. IEEE Int. Symp. Circ. S. 2016, 177–180.10.1109/ISCAS.2016.7527199 ↗
88. Chakrabarti B, Lastras-Montano MA, Adam G, Prezioso M, Hoskins B, Cheng KT, Strukov DB. A multiply-add engine with monolithically integrated 3D memristor crossbar/CMOS hybrid circuit. Sci. Rep.-UK 2017, 7, 42429.10.1038/srep42429 ↗
89. Egorov KV, Kirtaev RV, Lebedinskii YY, Markeev AM, Matveyev YA, Orlov OM, Zablotskiy AV, Zenkevich AV. Complementary and bipolar regimes of resistive switching in TiN/HfO2/TiN stacks grown by atomic-layer deposition. Phys. Status Solidi (A) 2015, 212, 809–816.10.1002/pssa.201431674 ↗
90. Matveyev Y, Egorov K, Markeev A, Zenkevich A. Resistive switching and synaptic properties of fully atomic layer deposition grown TiN/HfO2/TiN devices. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 117, 044901.10.1063/1.4905792 ↗
91. Negrov D, Karandashev I, Shakirov V, Matveyev Y, Dunin-Barkowski W, Zenkevich A. An approximate backpropagation learning rule for memristor based neural networks using synaptic plasticity. Neurocomputing 2017, 237, 193–199.10.1016/j.neucom.2016.10.061 ↗
92. Sung C, Lim S, Kim H, Kim T, Moon K, Song J, Kim JJ, Hwang H. Effect of conductance linearity and multi-level cell characteristics of TaOx-based synapse device on pattern recognition accuracy of neuromorphic system. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 115203.10.1088/1361-6528/aaa733 ↗
93. Garbin D, Rafhay Q, Vianello E, Jeannot S, Candelier P, DeSalvo B, Ghibaudo G, Perniola L. Modeling of OxRAM variability from low to high resistance state using a stochastic trap assisted tunneling-based resistor network. In 2015 Joint International Eurosoi Workshop and International Conference on Ultimate Integration on Silicon (Eurosoi-Ulis), 2015, pp. 125–128.10.1109/ULIS.2015.7063789 ↗
94. Mott NF, Gurney RW. Electronic processes in ionic crystals, 2nd ed., Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1948.
95. Larentis S, Nardi F, Balatti S, Gilmer DC, Ielmini D. Resistive switching by voltage-driven ion migration in bipolar RRAM – part II: modeling. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices. 2012, 59, 2468–2475.10.1109/TED.2012.2202320 ↗
96. Niraula D, Karpov VG. Heat transfer in filamentary RRAM devices. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2017, 64, 4106–4113.10.1109/TED.2017.2741782 ↗
97. Sadi T, Mehonic A, Montesi L, Buckwell M, Kenyon A, Asenov A. Investigation of resistance switching in SiOx RRAM cells using a 3D multi-scale kinetic Monte Carlo simulator. J. Phys.-Condens. Mater. 2018, 30, 084005.10.1088/1361-648X/aaa7c1 ↗
98. Kim S, Du C, Sheridan P, Ma W, Choi S, Lu WD. Experimental demonstration of a second-order memristor and its ability to biorealistically implement synaptic plasticity. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 2203–2211.10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00697 ↗
99. Xiao M, Shen DZ, Musselman KP, Duley WW, Zhou YN. Oxygen vacancy migration/diffusion induced synaptic plasticity in a single titanate nanobelt. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 6069–6079.10.1039/C7NR09335G ↗
100. Kumar S, Davila N, Wang ZW, Huang XP, Strachan JP, Vine D, Kilcoyne ALD, Nishi Y, Williams RS. Spatially uniform resistance switching of low current, high endurance titanium-niobium-oxide memristors. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 1793–1798.10.1039/C6NR07671H ↗