From materials to devices using fused deposition modeling: A state-of-art review
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Fused deposition modeling (FDM) uses computer-aided design to direct a 3D printer to build successful layers of product from polymeric materials to generate 3D devices. Many reviews have been reported recently on the cutting-edge FDM technology from different perspectives. However, few studies have delved into the advances in FDM technology from materials to 3D devices. Therefore, in this work, with a bottom-up approach from materials (including commodities and nanomaterials) to printing process (including effort for fast printing, effort for resolution improvement, and simulations) and from printing process to 3D devices (including biomedical implants, topological structures, and multifunctional devices), it aims at reviewing the FDM technology developed over the past decades.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electromechanical Engineering, Qingdao University , Qingdao , Shandong 266071 , China
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Chimene D, Kaunas R, Gaharwar A. Hydrogel bioink reinforcement for additive manufacturing: a focused review of emerging strategies. Adv Mater. 2020;32:1902026. 10.1002/adma.201902026.10.1002/adma.201902026 ↗
2. Plocher J, Panesar A. Review on design and structural optimisation in additive manufacturing: towards next-generation lightweight structures. Mater Des. 2019;183:108164. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108164.10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108164 ↗
3. Culmone C, Smit G, Breedveld P. Additive manufacturing of medical instruments: a state-of-the-art review. Addit Manuf. 2019;27:461–73. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.015.10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.015 ↗
4. Paolini A, Kollmannsberger S, Rank E. Additive manufacturing in construction: a review on processes, applications, and digital planning methods. Addit Manuf. 2019;30:100894. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.100894.10.1016/j.addma.2019.100894 ↗
5. Ngo T, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen K, Hui D. Additive manufacturing (3d printing): a review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B. 2018;143:172–96. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012.10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
6. Parandoush P, Lin D. A review on additive manufacturing of polymer–fiber composites. Compos Struct. 2017;182:36–53. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088.10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088 ↗
7. Kim H, Lin Y, Tseng T. A review on quality control in additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J. 2018;24:645–69. 10.1108/RPJ-03-2017-0048.10.1108/RPJ-03-2017-0048 ↗
8. Popescu D, Zapciu A, Amza C, Baciu F, Marinescu R. FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: a review. Polym Test. 2018;69:157–66. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020 ↗
9. Gao M, Zheng F, Xu J, Zhang S, Bhosale S, Gu J, et al. Surface modification of nano-sized carbon black for reinforcement of rubber. Nanotechnol Rev. 2019;8:405–14. 10.1515/ntrev-2019-0036.10.1515/ntrev-2019-0036 ↗
10. Pan Y, Xu K, Wu C. Recent progress in supercapacitors based on the advanced carbon electrodes. Nanotechnol Rev. 2019;8:299–314. 10.1515/ntrev-2019-0029.10.1515/ntrev-2019-0029 ↗
11. Berger U. Aspects of accuracy and precision in the additive manufacturing of plastic gears. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2015;10:49–57. 10.1080/17452759.2015.1026127.10.1080/17452759.2015.1026127 ↗
12. Lu H, Liu Y, Leng J, Du S. Qualitative separation of the physical swelling effect on the recovery behavior of shape memory polymer. Eur Polym J. 2010;46:1908–14. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.06.013.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.06.013 ↗
13. Lu H, Du S. A phenomenological thermodynamic model for the chemo-responsive shape memory effect in polymers based on flory-huggins solution theory. Polym Chem. 2014;5:1155–62. 10.1039/C3PY01256E.10.1039/C3PY01256E ↗
14. Lei C. The research of key technologies of plastic particles 3d printer based on simulation. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology.
15. Shrivastava A. Introduction to plastics engineering. Cambridge, MA, United States: William Andrew Publishing; 2018. 10.1016/B978-0-323-39500-7.00009-5.10.1016/B978-0-323-39500-7.00001-0 ↗
16. Zhang P, Arceneaux DJ, Khattab A. Mechanical properties of 3D printed polycaprolactone honeycomb structure. J Appl Polym Sci. 2018;135:46018. 10.1002/app.46018.10.1002/app.46018 ↗
17. Zhang P, Arceneaux D, Liu Z, Nikaeen P, Khattab A, Li G. A crack healable syntactic foam reinforced by 3D printed healing-agent based honeycomb. Composites Part B. 2018;151:25–34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.005.10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.005 ↗
18. Hussey B, Nikaeen P, Dixon M, Akobi M, Khattab A, Cheng L, et al. Light-weight/defect-tolerant topologically self-interlocking polymeric structure by fused deposition modeling. Composites Part B. 2020;183:107700. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107700.10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107700 ↗
19. Ramli M, Wahab M, Ahmad M, Bala A. FDM preparation of bio-compatible UHMWPE polymer for artificial implant. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci. 2016;11:5473–80.
20. Rupinder S, Bedi P, Fraternali F, Ahuja I. Effect of single particle size, double particle size and triple particle size AL2O3 in nylon-6 matrix on mechanical properties of feed stock filament for FDM. Composites Part B. 2016;106:20–7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.08.039.10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.08.039 ↗
21. Skowyra J, Pietrzak K, Alhnan M. Fabrication of extended-release patient-tailored prednisolone tablets via fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D printing. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2015;68:11–7. 10.1016/j.ejps.2014.11.009.10.1016/j.ejps.2014.11.009 ↗
22. Bates S, Farrow I, Trask R. 3D printed polyurethane honeycombs for repeated tailored energy absorption. Mater Des. 2016;112:172–83. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.062.10.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.062 ↗
23. Haque R, Chandran O, Lani S, Briand D. Self-powered triboelectric touch sensor made of 3D printed materials. Nano Energy. 2018;52:54–62. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.038.10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.038 ↗
24. Puigoriol-Forcada J, Alsina A, Salazar-Martin A, Gomez-Gras G, Perez M. Flexural fatigue properties of polycarbonate fused-deposition modelling specimens. Mater Des. 2018;155:414–21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.018.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.018 ↗
25. Compton B, Lewis J. 3D printing of lightweight cellular composites. Adv Mater. 2014;26:5930–5. 10.1002/adma.201401804.10.1002/adma.201401804 ↗
26. Wu W, Geng P, Li G, Zhao D, Zhang H, Zhao J. Influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PEEK and a comparative mechanical study between PEEK and ABS. Mater. 2015;8:5834–46. 10.3390/ma8095271.10.3390/ma8095271 ↗
27. Rinaldi M, Ghidini T, Cecchini F, Brandao A, Nanni F. Additive layer manufacturing of poly(ether ether ketone) via FDM. Composites Part B. 2018;145:162–72. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.029.10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.029 ↗
28. Arif M, Kumar S, Varadarajan K, Cantwell W. Performance of biocompatible PEEK processed by fused deposition additive manufacturing. Mater Des. 2018;146:249–59. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.015.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.015 ↗
29. Zhao F, Li D, Jin Z. Preliminary investigation of poly-ether-ether-ketone based on fused deposition modeling for medical applications. Materials. 2018;11:288. 10.3390/ma11020288.10.3390/ma11020288 ↗
30. Berretta S, Evans K, Ghita O. Additive manufacture of PEEK cranial implants: manufacturing considerations versus accuracy and mechanical performance. Mater Des. 2018;139:141–52. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.078.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.078 ↗
31. Lee K, Park H, Kim J, Chun D. Fabrication of a superhydrophobic surface using a fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printer with poly lactic acid (PLA) filament and dip coating with silica nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci. 2019;467:979–91. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.205.10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.205 ↗
32. Wu T, Tong Y, Qiu F, Yuan D, Zhang G, Qu J. Morphology, rheology property, and crystallization behavior of PLLA/OMMT nanocomposites prepared by an innovative eccentric rotor extruder. Polym Adv Technol. 2018;29:41–51. 10.1002/pat.4087.10.1002/pat.4087 ↗
33. Tao Y, Wang H, Li Z, Li P, Shi S. Development and application of wood flour-filled polylactic acid composite filament for 3D printing. Mater. 2017;10:339. 10.3390/ma10040339.10.3390/ma10040339 ↗
34. Daver F, Lee K, Brandt M, Shanks R. Cork-pla composite fifilaments for fused deposition modelling. Compos Sci Technol. 2018;168:230–7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.10.008.10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.10.008 ↗
35. Hanon M, Alshammas Y, Zsidai L. Effect of print orientation and bronze existence on tribological and mechanical properties of 3D-printed bronze/pla composite. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2020;108:553–70. 10.1007/s00170-020-05391-x.10.1007/s00170-020-05391-x ↗
36. Nikzad M, Masood S, Sbarski I. Thermo-mechanical properties of a highly filled polymeric composites for fused deposition modeling. Mater Des. 2011;32:3448–56. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.056.10.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.056 ↗
37. Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A. Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Des. 2013;16:496–504. 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017.10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017 ↗
38. Quan Z, Larimore Z, Wu A, Yu J, Qin X, Mirotznik M, et al. Microstructural design and additive manufacturing and characterization of 3D orthogonal short carbon fiber/acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene preform and composite. Compos Sci Technol. 2016;126:139–48. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.02.021.10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.02.021 ↗
39. Galatas A, Hassanin H, Zweiri Y, Seneviratne L. Additive manufactured sandwich composite/ABS parts for unmanned aerial vehicle applications. Polymers. 2018;10:1262–78. 10.3390/polym10111262.10.3390/polym10111262 ↗
40. Gao X, Zhang D, Qi S, Wen X, Su Y. Mechanical properties of 3D parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling: effect of various fillers in polylactide. J Appl Polym Sci. 2019;136:10. 10.1002/app.47824.10.1002/app.47824 ↗
41. Paul D, Robeson L. Polymer nanotechnology: nanocomposites. Polym. 2008;49:3187–204. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.017.10.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.017 ↗
42. Lu H, Liang F, Gou J. Nanopaper enabled shape-memory nanocomposite with vertically aligned nickel nanostrand: controlled synthesis and electrical actuation. Soft Matter. 2011;7:7416–23. 10.1039/C1SM05765K.10.1039/c1sm05765k ↗
43. Li Z, Xu K, Pan Y. Recent development of supercapacitor electrode based on carbon materials. Nanotechnol Rev. 2019;8:35–49. 10.1515/ntrev-2019-0004.10.1515/ntrev-2019-0004 ↗
44. Lu H, Huang W. Synergistic effect of self-assembled carboxylic acid-functionalized carbon nanotubes and carbon fiber for improved electro-activated polymeric shape-memory nanocomposite. Appl Phys Lett. 2013;102:231910. 10.1063/1.4811134.10.1063/1.4811134 ↗
45. Pantic S, Skodric S, Loncar Z, Pantic I. Zinc oxide nanoparticles: potential novel applications in cellular physiology, pathology, neurosciences and cancer research. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2019;58:17–21. 10.1515/rams-2019-0002.10.1515/rams-2019-0002 ↗
46. Pantic S, Skodric S, Loncar Z, Pantic I. Neurotoxocity, nephrotoxicity, and hepatotoxicity of copper-based nanoparticles: potential implications in molecular medicine and neurosciences. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2019;58:201–5. 10.1515/rams-2019-0032.10.1515/rams-2019-0032 ↗
47. Power A, Gorey B, Chandra S, Chapman J. Carbon nanomaterials and their application to electrochemical sensors: a review. Nanotechnol Rev. 2018;7:19–41. 10.1515/ntrev-2017-0160.10.1515/ntrev-2017-0160 ↗
48. Alexander M, Dubois P. Polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites: preparation, properties and uses of a new class of materials. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2000;28:1–63. 10.1016/S0927-796X(00)00012-7.10.1016/S0927-796X(00)00012-7 ↗
49. Muller K, Bugnicourt E, Latorre M, Jorda M, Echegoyen S, Lagaron J, et al. Review on the processing and properties of polymer nanocomposites and nanocoatings and their applications in the packaging, automotive and solar energy fields. Nanomater. 2017;7:74. 10.3390/nano7040074.10.3390/nano7040074 ↗
50. Liu Z, Wang Y, Shi J. Tensile performance of fused deposition modeling PA 6 polymer composites with nanoparticle reinforcement and/or continuous fiber reinforcement. J Micro Nanomanuf. 2019;9:041001. 10.1115/1.4044913.10.1115/1.4044913 ↗
51. Vidakis N, Petousis M, Savvakis K, Maniadi A, Koudoumas E. A comprehensive investigation of the mechanical behavior and the dielectrics of pure polylactic acid (PLA) and PLA with graphene (GNP) in fused deposition modeling (FDM). Int J Plast Technol. 2019;23:195–206. 10.1007/s12588-019-09248-1.10.1007/s12588-019-09248-1 ↗
52. Wang Q, Ji C, Sun L, Sun J, Liu J. Cellulose nanofibrils filled poly(lactic acid) biocomposite filament for fdm 3D printing. Molecules. 2020;25:2319. 10.3390/molecules25102319.10.3390/molecules25102319 ↗
53. Kim H, Ryu K, Baek D, Khan T, Kim H, Shin S, et al. 3D printing of polyethylene terephthalate glycol-sepiolite composites with nanoscale orientation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:23453–63. 10.1021/acsami.0c03830.10.1021/acsami.0c03830 ↗
54. Woosley S, Galehdari N, Kelkar A, Aravamudhan S. Fused deposition modeling 3D printing of boron nitride composites for neutron radiation shielding. J Mater Res. 2018;33:3657–64. 10.1557/jmr.2018.316.10.1557/jmr.2018.316 ↗
55. Dul S, Fambri L, Pegoretti A. Filaments production and fused deposition modelling of ABS/carbon nanotubes composites. Nanomater. 2018;8:49. 10.3390/nano8010049.10.3390/nano8010049 ↗
56. Zhang W, Cotton C, Sun J, Heider D, Gu B, Sun B, et al. Interfacial bonding strength of short carbon fiber/acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene composites fabricated by fused deposition modeling. Composites Part B. 2018;137:51–9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.018.10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.018 ↗
57. Cobos C, Fenollar O, Martinez J, Ferrandiz S, Garzon L. Effect of maleinized linseed oil (MLO) on thermal and rheolological properties of PLA/MWCNT and PLA/HNT nanocomposites for additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J. 2020;26:1027–33. 10.1108/RPJ-08-2019-0217.10.1108/RPJ-08-2019-0217 ↗
58. Bustillos J, Montero D, Nautiyal P, Loganathan A, Boesl B, Agarwal A. Integration of graphene in poly (lactic) acid by 3D printing to develop creep and wearresistant hierarchical nanocomposites. Polym Compos. 2018;39:3877–88. 10.1002/pc.24422.10.1002/pc.24422 ↗
59. Prashantha K, Roger F. Multifunctional properties of 3D printed poly (lactic acid)/graphene nanocomposites by fused deposition modeling. J Macromol Sci A. 2017;54:24–9. 10.1080/10601325.2017.1250311.10.1080/10601325.2017.1250311 ↗
60. Zhang F, Wei M, Viswanathan V, Swart B, Shao Y, Wu G, et al. 3D printing technologies for electrochemical energy storage. Nano Energy. 2017;40:418–31. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.037.10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.037 ↗
61. Gonçalves J, Lima P, Krause B, Pötschke P, Lafont U, Gomes J, et al. Electrically conductive polyetheretherketone nanocomposite filaments: from production to fused deposition modeling. Polymers. 2018;10:925. 10.3390/polym10080925.10.3390/polym10080925 ↗
62. Kwon S, Kim S, Kim I, Hong Y, Na S. Direct 3D printing of graphene nanoplatelet/silver nanoparticlebased nanocomposites for multiaxial piezoresistive sensor applications. Adv Mater Technol. 2018;4:1800500. 10.1002/admt.201800500.10.1002/admt.201800500 ↗
63. Ivanov E, Kotsilkova R, Xia H, Chen Y, Donato R, Donato K, et al. PLA/graphene/MWCNT composites with improved electrical and thermal properties suitable for FDM 3D printing applications. Appl Sci. 2019;9:1209. 10.3390/app9061209.10.3390/app9061209 ↗
64. Shmueli Y, Lin Y, Zuo X, Guo Y, Lee S, Freychet G, et al. In situ X-ray scattering study of isotactic polypropylene/graphene nanocomposites under shear during fused deposition modeling 3D printing. Compos Sci Technol. 2020;196:108227. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108227.10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108227 ↗
65. Yang L, Chen Y, Wang M, Shi S, Jing J. Fused deposition modeling 3D printing of novel poly(vinyl alcohol)/graphene nanocomposite with enhanced mechanical and electromagnetic interference shielding properties. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2020;59:8066–77. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c00074.10.1021/acs.iecr.0c00074 ↗
66. Zhu D, Ren Y, Liao G, Jiang S, Liu F, Guo J, et al. Thermal and mechanical properties of polyamide 12/graphene nanoplatelets nanocomposites and parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling. J Appl Polym Sci. 2017;134:45332. 10.1002/app.45332.10.1002/app.45332 ↗
67. Chen Q, Mangadlao J, Wallat D, Leon A, Pokorski J, Advincula R. 3D printing biocompatible polyurethane/poly (lactic acid)/graphene oxide nanocomposites: anisotropic properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:4015–23. 10.1021/acsami.6b11793.10.1021/acsami.6b11793 ↗
68. Dorigato A, Moretti V, Dul S, Unterberger S, Pegoretti A. Electrically conductive nanocomposites for fused deposition modelling. Synth Met. 2017;226:7–14. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2017.01.009.10.1016/j.synthmet.2017.01.009 ↗
69. Singh D, Singh R, Boparai K. Development and surface improvement of FDM pattern based investment casting of biomedical implants: a state of art review. J Manuf Process. 2018;31:80–95. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.10.026.10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.10.026 ↗
70. Zhao Y, Yang J, Ding X, Ding X, Duan S, Xu F. Polycaprolactone/polysaccharide functional composites for low-temperature fused deposition modelling. Bioact Mater. 2020;5:185–91. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.02.006.10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.02.006 ↗
71. Mohamed O, Masood S, Bhowmik J. Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects. J Adv Manuf. 2015;3:42–53. 10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7.10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7 ↗
72. Mohan N, Senthil P, Vinodh S, Jayanth N. A review on composite materials and process parameters optimisation for the fused deposition modelling process. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2017;12:47–59. 10.1080/17452759.2016.1274490.10.1080/17452759.2016.1274490 ↗
73. Carrell J, Gruss G, Gomez E. Four-dimensional printing using fused-deposition modeling: a review. Rapid Prototyp J. 2020;26:855–69. 10.1108/RPJ-12-2018-0305.10.1108/RPJ-12-2018-0305 ↗
74. Gosselin C, Duballet R, Roux P, Gaudilliere N, Dirrenberger J, Morel P. Large-scale 3D printing of ultra-high performance concrete-a new processing route for architects and builders. Mater Des. 2016;100:102–9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.097.10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.097 ↗
75. Duty C, Kunc V, Compton B, Post B, Erdman D, Smith R, et al. Structure and mechanical behavior of big area additive manufacturing (BAAM). Mater Rapid Prototyp J. 2017;23:181–9. 10.1108/RPJ-12-2015-0183.10.1108/RPJ-12-2015-0183 ↗
76. Jones R, Haufe P, Sells E, Iravani P, Olliver V, Palmer C, et al. Reprap-the replicating rapid prototyper. Robotica. 2011;29:177–91. 10.1017/S026357471000069X.10.1017/S026357471000069X ↗
77. Solomon I, Sevvel P, Gunasekaran J. A review on the various processing parameters in FDM. Mater Today Proc. 2020. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.484.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.484 ↗
78. Tlegenov Y, Wong Y, Hong G. A dynamic model for nozzle clog monitoring in fused deposition modelling. Rapid Prototyp J. 2017;23:391–400. 10.1108/RPJ-04-2016-0054.10.1108/RPJ-04-2016-0054 ↗
79. Go J, Schiffres S, Stevens A, Hart A. Rate limits of additive manufacturing by fused filament fabrication and guidelines for high-throughput system design. Addit Manuf. 2017;16:1–11. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.03.007.10.1016/j.addma.2017.03.007 ↗
80. Go J, Hart A. Fast desktop-scale extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2017;18:276–84. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.10.016.10.1016/j.addma.2017.10.016 ↗
81. Li F, Macdonald N, Guijt R, Breadmore M. Increasing the functionalities of 3D printed microchemical devices by single material, multimaterial, and print-pause-print 3D printing. Lab Chip. 2019;19:35–49. 10.1039/C8LC00826D.10.1039/C8LC00826D ↗
82. Truby R, Lewis J. Printing soft matter in three dimensions. Nature. 2016;540:371–8. 10.1038/nature21003.10.1038/nature21003 ↗
83. Everything about nozzles with a different diameter. URL https://blog.prusaprinters.org/everything-about-nozzles-with-a-different-diameter_8344/.
84. Silveira Z, Freitas M, Inforcatti N, Noritomi P, Silva J. Design development and functional validation of an interchangeable head based on mini screw extrusion applied in an experimental desktop 3-D printer. Int J Rapid Manuf. 2014;4:49–65. 10.1504/IJRAPIDM.2014.062037.10.1504/IJRAPIDM.2014.062037 ↗
85. Tseng J, Liu C, Yen Y, Belkner J, Bremicker T, Liu B, et al. Screw extrusion-based additive manufacturing of PEEK. Mater Des. 2018;140:209–21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.032.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.032 ↗
86. Cai L, Wang Y, Liu Z, Cheng Q. Carrying capacity analysis and optimizing of hydrostatic slider bearings under inertial force and vibration impact using finite difference method (FDM). J Vibroeng. 2015;17:2781–94.
87. Hertle S, Drexler M, Drummer D. Additive manufacturing of poly(propylene) by means of melt extrusion. Macromol Mater Eng. 2016;301:1482–93. 10.1002/mame.201600259.10.1002/mame.201600259 ↗
88. Roopavath U, Malferrari S, Haver A, Verstreken F, Rath S, Kalaskar D. Optimization of extrusion based ceramic 3D printing process for complex bony designs. Mater Des. 2019;162:263–70. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.054.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.054 ↗
89. Zhang P, Li G. Structural relaxation behavior of strain hardened shape memory polymer fibers for self-healing applications. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys. 2013;51:966–77. 10.1002/polb.23295.10.1002/polb.23295 ↗
90. Wei C, Dong J. Direct fabrication of high-resolution three-dimensional polymeric scaffolds using electrohydrodynamic hot jet plotting. J Microm Microeng. 2013;23:025017. 10.1088/0960-1317/23/2/025017.10.1088/0960-1317/23/2/025017 ↗
91. Zhang B, Seong B, Nguyen V, Byun D. 3D printing of high-resolution pla-based structures by hybrid electrohydrodynamic and fused deposition modeling techniques. J Micromech Microeng. 2016;26:025015. 10.1088/0960-1317/26/2/025015.10.1088/0960-1317/26/2/025015 ↗
92. He J, Xia P, Li D. Development of melt electrohydrodynamic 3D printing for complex microscale poly(ϵ-caprolactone) scaffolds. Biofabrication. 2016;8:035008. 10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035008.10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035008 ↗
93. Vijayavenkataraman S, Zhang S, Lu W, Fuh J. Electrohydrodynamic-jetting (EHD-jet) 3D-printed functionally graded scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. J Micromech Microeng. 2018;33:1999–2011. 10.1557/jmr.2018.159.10.1557/jmr.2018.159 ↗
94. Liu H, Vijayavenkataraman S, Wang D, Jing L, Sun J, He K. Influence of electrohydrodynamic jetting parameters on the morphology of PCL scaffolds. Int J Bioprint. 2017;3:72–82. 10.18063/IJB.2017.01.009.10.18063/IJB.2017.01.009 ↗
95. Wang H, Vijayavenkataraman S, Wu Y, Shu Z, Sun J, Hsi J. Investigation of process parameters of electrohydrodynamic jetting for 3D printed PCL fibrous scaffolds with complex geometries. Int J Bioprint. 2016;2:02005. 10.18063/IJB.2016.01.005.10.18063/IJB.2016.01.005 ↗
96. Wu S, Li J, Mai J, Chang M. Three-dimensional electrohydrodynamic printing and spinning of flexible composite structures for oral multidrug forms. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:24876–85. 10.1021/acsami.8b08880.10.1021/acsami.8b08880 ↗
97. Li J. Numerical simulation and experimental study on fused deposition of pla-nha-based biomimetic artificial bone material. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology.
98. Ahn D, Kweon J, Choi J, Lee S. Relation between surface roughness and overlap interval in fused deposition modeling. Adv Mater Res. 2011;264:1625–30. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.264-265.1625.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.264-265.1625 ↗
99. Costa S, Duarte F, Covas J. Thermal conditions affecting heat transfer in FDM/FFE: a contribution towards the numerical modelling of the process. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2015;10:35–46. 10.1080/17452759.2014.984042.10.1080/17452759.2014.984042 ↗
100. Zhang J, Wang X, Yu W, Deng Y. Numerical investigation of the influence of process conditions on the temperature variation in fused deposition modeling. Mater Des. 2017;130:59–68. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.040.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.040 ↗