Data-driven and physics-informed estimation of magnetic nanoparticle properties via stochastic Langevin model
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The dynamic magnetization of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) arises from coupled Néel and Brownian relaxations, which are influenced by intrinsic particle properties such as size, saturation magnetization, magnetic anisotropy, and damping. While experimental AC magnetization measurements can reveal the collective dynamic behavior of MNP ensembles, extracting accurate nanoparticle-specific parameters from such data remains a challenge due to experimental limitations and model oversimplifications. To address this, we apply a stochastic Langevin model that explicitly captures the time-dependent magnetization response of MNPs under alternating magnetic fields by incorporating both thermal fluctuations and stochastic relaxation processes. This model provides a physically grounded framework for simulating magnetization hysteresis under experimental conditions, enabling parameter estimation through direct data fitting. In this work, we fit the stochastic Langevin model to experimentally measured hysteresis loops of different MNPs collected under a 20 mT, 5 kHz AC field. By coupling the model with Bayesian optimization and Gaussian process regression, we identify optimal values of key magnetic parameters: saturation magnetization ( {M}s ), effective anisotropy ( {K}a ), and Gilbert damping parameter ( α ). Furthermore, the {M}s is experimentally measured and employed as a validation parameter. Accordingly, the determination of the α and the {K}a is based on two complementary criteria: (1) the best agreement between the simulated and experimental AC response magnetization hysteresis loops, quantified by the coefficient of determination ( {R}2 ), and (2) the closest correspondence between the estimated and experimentally measured {M}s values, evaluated using the mean absolute percentage error. Our approach is validated on four commercial MNP products (SHS30, IPG30, SHP25, and SHP15, from Ocean Nanotech, LLC), yielding high-fidelity fits to experimental data and robust estimation of their magnetic properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Magnetic properties of thin films · Machine Learning in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Review on recent progress in magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and diverse applications10.3389/fchem.2021.629054 ↗
2. Recent advances in magnetic nanoparticles: key applications, environmental insights, and future strategies10.1016/j.susmat.2024.e00985 ↗
3. Magnetic nanoparticles: advances in synthesis, sensing, and theragnostic applications10.3390/magnetochemistry11020009 ↗
4. The recent applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedical fields10.3390/ma17122870 ↗
5. Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, anisotropy, and applications10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00860 ↗
6. Roadmap on magnetic nanoparticles in nanomedicine10.1088/1361-6528/ad8626 ↗
7. Magnetic nanosystem a tool for targeted delivery and diagnostic application: current challenges and recent advancement10.1016/j.ijpx.2024.100231 ↗
8. Magnetic nanoparticles: a review on synthesis, characterization, functionalization, and biomedical applications10.1002/smll.202304848 ↗
9. Review on the use of magnetic nanoparticles in the detection of environmental pollutants10.3390/w15173077 ↗
10. Magnetomechanical coupling and ferromagnetic resonance in magnetic nanoparticles10.1103/PhysRevB.95.134447 ↗
11. Field-dependent magnetic relaxation times of magnetic nanoparticle systems: analytic approximations supported by numerical simulations10.1103/PhysRevB.110.144447 ↗
12. Effective anisotropy due to the surface of magnetic nanoparticles10.1103/PhysRevB.98.054427 ↗
13. Influence of the magnetic nanoparticle coating on the magnetic relaxation time10.3762/bjnano.11.105 ↗
14. Ferromagnetic resonance in magnetic oxide nanoparticules: a short review of theory and experiment10.3390/magnetochemistry9080191 ↗
15. Strong spin-orbit induced Gilbert damping and g-shift in iron-platinum nanoparticles10.1103/PhysRevB.76.104404 ↗
16. Magnetic simulations of core–shell ferromagnetic bi-magnetic nanoparticles: the influence of antiferromagnetic interfacial exchange10.3390/nano11061381 ↗
17. Triangular array of iron oxide nanoparticles: simulation study of intraparticle and interparticle magnetism10.1103/PhysRevB.100.094416 ↗
18. Effects of excitation field amplitude on magnetic particle imaging performance: a modeling study10.1088/1361-6463/adeea2 ↗
19. Non-linear magnetization dynamics in nanodevices induced by a spin-polarized current: micromagnetic simulation10.1088/0022-3727/41/16/164013 ↗
20. Physics-informed Gaussian process for tool wear prediction10.1016/j.isatra.2023.09.007 ↗
21. Physics-informed CoKriging: a Gaussian-process-regression-based multifidelity method for data-model convergence10.1016/j.jcp.2019.06.041 ↗
22. Physics-informed Gaussian process regression for states estimation and forecasting in power grids10.1016/j.ijforecast.2022.03.007 ↗
23. Combined Néel and Brown rotational Langevin dynamics in magnetic particle imaging, sensing, and therapy10.1063/1.4936930 ↗
24. Nonequilibrium dynamics of magnetic nanoparticles with applications in biomedicine10.1002/adma.201904131 ↗
25. Mixed Brownian alignment and Néel rotations in superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle suspensions driven by an ac field10.1103/PhysRevB.92.094438 ↗
26. Applying stochastic Langevin function with coupled Brownian–Néel relaxations to study the dynamic magnetizations of nanoparticle tracers in magnetic particle imaging10.1088/1361-6463/adafbd ↗
27. Dynamics of magnetic nanoparticle in a viscous liquid: application to magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia10.1063/1.4737126 ↗
28. A mechanism of magnetic hysteresis in heterogeneous alloys10.1109/TMAG.1991.1183750 ↗
29. Magnetic nanoparticles as MRI contrast agents10.1007/s41061-020-00302-w ↗
30. Use of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) via multiple imaging modalities and modifications to reduce cytotoxicity: an educational review10.3390/jnt1010008 ↗
31. Iron oxide nanoparticle-based ferro-nanofluids for advanced technological applications10.3390/molecules27227931 ↗
32. Ocean NanoTech, LLC · n.d.
33. Effect of tracer size distribution on magnetic particle imaging performance10.1088/1402-4896/adab46 ↗
34. One-step, wash-free, nanoparticle clustering-based magnetic particle spectroscopy bioassay method for detection of SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid proteins in the liquid phase10.1021/acsami.1c14657 ↗
35. Magnetic particle spectroscopy-based handheld device for wash-free, easy-to-use, and solution-phase immunoassay applications10.1115/DMD2020-9054 ↗
36. A portable magnetic particle spectrometer for future rapid and wash-free bioassays10.1021/acsami.0c21040 ↗
37. Magnetic particle spectroscopy with one-stage lock-in implementation for magnetic bioassays with improved sensitivities10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c05126 ↗
38. Frequency and amplitude optimizations for magnetic particle spectroscopy applications10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c07534 ↗
39. Magnetic nanoparticles in nanomedicine: a review of recent advances10.1088/1361-6528/ab4241 ↗
40. Nonharmonic driving fields for enhancement of nanoparticle heating efficiency in magnetic hyperthermia10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.034041 ↗
41. Magnetic heating of interacting nanoparticles under different driving field waveforms10.1063/5.0197879 ↗
42. Deconvolution of ferromagnetic resonance spectrum of magnetic nanoparticle assembly using genetic algorithm10.1038/s41598-022-07105-7 ↗
43. Self-consistent magnetic properties of magnetite tracers optimized for magnetic particle imaging measured by ac susceptometry, magnetorelaxometry and magnetic particle spectroscopy10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.02.020 ↗
44. Multicore magnetic nanoparticles for magnetic particle imaging10.1109/TMAG.2012.2226438 ↗
45. Rasmussen · 2005
46. Student-t processes as alternatives to Gaussian processes