journal article·2026-01-09Open access

Effect of activation temperature on quantum efficiency and lifetime of NEA truncated nanocone array GaAs photocathode

Md Aziz Ar Rahman, Md Abdullah Mamun, Shukui Zhang, Hani E Elsayed-Ali

Nanotechnology· Volume 37· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the quantum efficiency (QE) and operational lifetime of a negative electron affinity GaAs truncated nanocone array (TNCA) photocathode benchmarked against a conventional flat GaAs photocathode under varying activation temperatures. The TNCA structure demonstrated a QE of up to 13.6% at 590 nm with room temperature (RT) activation—approximately 1.5 times higher than its flat counterpart. This enhancement is due to Mie resonance effects within the nanostructure, as confirmed by finite-difference time-domain simulations. Moreover, the TNCA photocathode exhibits significantly extended charge lifetime, with enhancement factors of ∼6.1 and ∼19.8 under RT and 50 °C activations, respectively. These gains are primarily attributed to increased effective surface area and optimized dipole layer formation at elevated temperatures. In addition, shorter excitation wavelengths further contribute to lifetime improvements. These findings underscore the TNCA GaAs photocathode’s potential as a high QE, long lifetime electron source for many large-scale electron accelerators.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Photocathodes and Microchannel Plates · Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry · Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Chrzanowski · Opto-Electron. Rev. · 2013 · 21 · 15310.2478/s11772-013-0089-3 ↗
2. Conti · Astrophys. Space Sci. · 2018 · 363 · 6310.1007/s10509-018-3283-4 ↗
3. Schneider · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 1998 · 16 · 319210.1116/1.590349 ↗
4. Liao · Mater. Today Phys. · 2017 · 2 · 4610.1016/j.mtphys.2017.07.003 ↗
5. (PEPPo Collaboration) · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 11610.1103/PhysRevLett.116.214801 ↗
6. Schaber · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2023 · 11 · 316210.1039/D2TC03729G ↗
7. Kong · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A · 1995 · 358 · 27210.1016/0168-9002(94)01425-6 ↗
8. Liu · Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams · 2016 · 1910.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.19.103402 ↗
9. Yamamoto · J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 10210.1063/1.2756376 ↗
10. Wang · Mater. Today Phys. · 2025 · 5210.1016/j.mtphys.2025.101680 ↗
11. Liu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 10910.1063/1.4972180 ↗
12. Wang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2024 · 12410.1063/5.0216694 ↗
13. Rahman · 2019 · p 215710.18429/JACoW-IPAC2019-TUPTS102 ↗
14. Bae · AIP Adv. · 2022 · 1210.1063/5.0100794 ↗
15. Cultrera · Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams · 2020 · 2310.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.23.023401 ↗
16. Zhang · Nano Lett. · 2022 · 22 · 762810.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02739 ↗
17. Yang · Photonics Res. · 2019 · 7 · 29410.1364/PRJ.7.000294 ↗
18. Zhang · Chin. Opt. Lett. · 2023 · 2110.3788/COL202321.033603 ↗
19. Zhang · Opt. Express · 2021 · 2910.1364/OE.435046 ↗
20. Peng · Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2019 · 1210.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.064002 ↗
21. Peng · Opt. Express · 2020 · 28 · 86010.1364/OE.378194) ↗
22. Diao · Int. J. Energy Res. · 2019 · 43 · 747710.1002/er.4780) ↗
23. Akinlami · J. Semicond. · 2013 · 3410.1088/1674-4926/34/3/032002 ↗
24. Zhang · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2021 · 53510.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147691 ↗
25. Karkare · Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 9110.1103/PhysRevB.91.035408 ↗
26. Sun · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 9510.1063/1.3257730 ↗