Detecting and classifying the mechanics of cancer and non-cancer cells by machine learning algorithm
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The global burden of cancer has increased in recent years, posing a major public health challenge. Generally, cancer cells are mutate from normal cells and have distinctive mechanical specifications. Despite significant progress in precision medicine, accurately distinguishing cancer cells remains challenging due to the inherent complexities in characterizing single-cell surface properties. In this study, we utilized atomic force microscopy (AFM) to obtain the mechanical properties of hepatic cells, hepatoma cells, gastric cells, and gastric cancer cells. Then, machine learning techniques were used to identify and classify the cancer and non-cancer cells through AFM-based mechanical characteristics. After computational training, the accuracy of classification and screening of four kinds of cells reached 98%, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 97.98%. Consequently, we successfully identified digestive system cancer cells and highlighted the valuable role of digital pathology in tumor cell diagnosis. This study provides an objective basis and a new research method for the diagnosis of hepatic cancer and gastric cancer, enriching the tumor cell detection scheme.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cell Image Analysis Techniques · Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases · AI in cancer detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: an overview10.1002/ijc.33588 ↗
2. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment10.1200/JCO.2007.12.3141 ↗
3. Gamma knife surgery for brain metastases: indications for and limitations of a local treatment protocol10.1007/s00701-005-0540-4 ↗
4. Different strategies of sequential and combination chemotherapy for patients with poor prognosis advanced colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS): a randomised controlled trial10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61087-3 ↗
5. Neoadjuvant cisplatinum based combination chemotherapy in patients with invasive bladder cancer: a combined analysis of two nordic studies10.1016/j.eururo.2003.09.019 ↗
6. Outcome of primary tumor in patients with synchronous stage IV colorectal cancer receiving combination chemotherapy without surgery as initial treatment10.1200/JCO.2008.20.9817 ↗
7. Mechanical properties of human tumour tissues and their implications for cancer development10.1038/s42254-024-00707-2 ↗
8. Probing the stochastic, motor-driven properties of the cytoplasm using force spectrum microscopy10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.051 ↗
9. AFM membrane roughness as a probe to identify oxidative stress-induced cellular apoptosis10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.08.021 ↗
10. Cytoskeletal stiffness, friction, and fluidity of cancer cell lines with different metastatic potential10.1007/s10585-012-9531-z ↗
11. Mechanical stiffness grades metastatic potential in patient tumor cells and in cancer cell lines10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0247 ↗
12. Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence10.1529/biophysj.104.045476 ↗
13. Directly observing alterations of morphology and mechanical properties of living cancer cells with atomic force microscopy10.1016/j.talanta.2018.09.008 ↗
14. Measurement of elastic properties of prostate cancer cells using AFM10.1039/b803355b ↗
15. Cellular traction forces: a useful parameter in cancer research10.1039/C7NR06284B ↗
16. Force microscopy of nonadherent cells: a comparison of leukemia cell deformability10.1529/biophysj.105.067496 ↗
17. Mechanical properties of hepatocellular carcinoma cells10.3748/wjg.v8.i2.243 ↗
18. Cancer cell recognition–mechanical phenotype10.1016/j.micron.2012.01.019 ↗
19. Determination of work of adhesion of biological cell under AFM bead indentation10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.11.034 ↗
20. Investigation of work of adhesion of biological cell (human hepatocellular carcinoma) by AFM nanoindentation10.1007/s12213-016-0089-8 ↗
21. Discrimination of bladder cancer cells from normal urothelial cells with high specificity and sensitivity: combined application of atomic force microscopy and modulated Raman spectroscopy10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.057 ↗
22. Investigation of effect of fullerenol on viscoelasticity properties of human hepatocellular carcinoma by AFM-based creep tests10.1557/jmr.2017.229 ↗
23. Indentation and adhesive probing of a cell membrane with AFM: theoretical model and experiments10.1529/biophysj.105.063826 ↗
24. Practical implementation of dynamic methods for measuring atomic force microscope cantilever spring constants10.1088/0957-4484/17/9/010 ↗
25. Elastic properties of cells in the context of confluent cell monolayers: impact of tension and surface area regulation10.1039/c3sm51610e ↗
26. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks10.1038/nature21056 ↗
27. Atomic force microscopy detects the difference in cancer cells of different neoplastic aggressiveness via machine learning10.1002/anbr.202000116 ↗
28. Identification of leukemia subtypes from microscopic images using convolutional neural network10.3390/diagnostics9030104 ↗
29. Deep learning of circulating tumour cells10.1038/s42256-020-0153-x ↗
30. Noninvasive diagnostic imaging using machine-learning analysis of nanoresolution images of cell surfaces: detection of bladder cancer10.1073/pnas.1816459115 ↗
31. Mechanomics biomarker for cancer cells unidentifiable through morphology and elastic modulus10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00003 ↗
32. Size matters: rethinking hertz model interpretation for cell mechanics using AFM10.3390/ijms25137186 ↗
33. Adhesion response of filopodia to an AFM lateral detachment force and functional changes after centrifugation of cells grown on nanoporous titanium10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100250 ↗
34. Nuclear morphology and the biology of cancer cells10.1159/000508780 ↗
35. Dissecting the cell to nucleus, perinucleus and cytosol10.1038/srep04923 ↗
36. Real-time patient-specific ECG classification by 1-D convolutional neural networks10.1109/TBME.2015.2468589 ↗
37. Deep learning for time series classification: a review10.1007/s10618-019-00619-1 ↗
38. Why is everyone training very deep neural network with skip connections?10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3131813 ↗
39. Weighted feature fusion of convolutional neural network and graph attention network for hyperspectral image classification10.1109/TIP.2022.3144017 ↗
40. Efficient skip connections-based residual network (ESRNet) for brain tumor classification10.3390/diagnostics13203234 ↗
41. A improved pooling method for convolutional neural networks10.1038/s41598-024-51258-6 ↗
42. An efficient convolutional neural network for coronary heart disease prediction10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113408 ↗
43. Of puzzles and pavements: a quantitative exploration of leaf epidermal cell shape10.1111/nph.15461 ↗
44. Oral epithelial dysplasia: recognition, grading and clinical significance10.1111/odi.13993 ↗
45. Evaluation metrics and statistical tests for machine learning10.1038/s41598-024-56706-x ↗
46. Auto-detection of epileptic seizure events using deep neural network with different feature scaling techniques10.1016/j.patrec.2019.10.029 ↗
47. How deep learning extracts and learns leaf features for plant classification10.1016/j.patcog.2017.05.015 ↗
48. RanNet: learning residual-attention structure in CNNs for automatic modulation classification10.1109/LWC.2022.3162422 ↗
49. Focal adhesions contain three specialized actin nanoscale layers10.1038/s41467-024-46868-7 ↗
50. Long-term health outcomes associated with hydration status10.1038/s41581-024-00817-1 ↗
51. Cell adhesion strength and tractions are mechano-diagnostic features of cellular invasiveness10.1039/D2SM00015F ↗