Modification of charge transport in nanostructured TiO 2− x Schottky diodes via post fabrication annealing
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract An ordered, crack-free array of anatase TiO 2 nanotubes were prepared via anodization and annealing at 550 °C. Oxygen vacancies are known to improve photocatalytic activity in TiO 2 and were introduced using a facile low vacuum annealing. Stoichiometric and nonstoichiometric films were followed by a conformal Pt deposition at 250 °C using atomic layer deposition resulting in a current rectifying device, or Schottky diode. Here, we investigated the current–voltage effects of a post thermal treatment using 350 °C and 400 °C. This paper presents reproducible improvements in the charge transport behavior after a 350 °C post-fabrication annealing process. Oxygen vacancies resulted in the formation of a shunt resistance behavior of 10 5 Ω and no overall performance improvements compared to stoichiometric films. Additionally, thermal treatments offered trap-based shifts from multiple trap distributions to a single trap distribution. This work hereby provides valuable experimental observations into understanding the effects of oxygen vacancies and effectively modifying the electronic properties of a conformal Pt/TiO 2− x nanostructured junction using a facile post-thermal treatment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Abdullah · J. Power Sources · 2015 · 278 · 10910.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.014 ↗
2. Fujishima · Nature · 1972 · 238 · 3810.1038/238037a0 ↗
3. Guo · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 252010.1021/nl3007159 ↗
4. Wang · Inorg. Chem. · 2006 · 45 · 694410.1021/ic060477x ↗
5. Kim · Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 1248710.1038/s41598-018-30668-3 ↗
6. Acevedo-Peña · J. Solid State Electrochem. · 2013 · 17 · 293910.1007/s10008-013-2212-2 ↗
7. Raja · Electrochem. Commun. · 2007 · 9 · 106910.1016/j.elecom.2006.12.024 ↗
8. Chen · 2018 · 94710.1007/978-981-13-0110-0_102 ↗
9. Wajid Shah · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1580410.1038/srep15804 ↗
10. Valeeva · Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 110.1038/s41598-018-28045-1 ↗
11. Tang · Nano Lett. · 2017 · 17 · 439010.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01460 ↗
12. Xu · J. Power Sources · 2019 · 414 · 24210.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.12.083 ↗
13. Pan · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 360110.1039/c3nr00476g ↗
14. Bi · Chem. Eng. Sci. · 2021 · 234 · 11644010.1016/j.ces.2021.116440 ↗
15. Wang · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2021 · 540 · 14835710.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148357 ↗
16. Zhang · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2019 · 476 · 94810.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.159 ↗
17. Tang · Electrochem. Commun. · 2003 · 5 · 49710.1016/S1388-2481(03)00108-5 ↗
18. Xue · 2008 · 10810.1109/NEMS.2008.4484297 ↗
19. Chen · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 928510.1021/jp8011393 ↗
20. Klaus · Thin Solid Films · 2000 · 360 · 14510.1016/S0040-6090(99)01076-7 ↗
21. Mantri · Org. Electron. · 2013 · 14 · 203410.1016/j.orgel.2013.04.030 ↗
22. Rizvi · J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 24450210.1063/1.4884838 ↗
23. Langhammer · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2019 · 123 · 2454910.1021/acs.jpcc.9b05805 ↗
24. Ozer · ChemCatChem · 2018 · 10 · 294910.1002/cctc.201800097 ↗
25. Rogala · Sci. Rep. · 2019 · 9 · 110.1038/s41598-019-48837-3 ↗
26. Rajaraman · Chem. Eng. J. · 2020 · 389 · 12391810.1016/j.cej.2019.123918 ↗
27. Chen · Science · 2011 · 331 · 74610.1126/science.1200448 ↗
28. Sulka · Electrochim. Acta · 2010 · 55 · 435910.1016/j.electacta.2009.12.053 ↗
29. Zaraska · Thin Solid Films · 2013 · 534 · 15510.1016/j.tsf.2013.02.056 ↗
30. Knoops · 2015 · 1101
31. Elam · Chem. Mater. · 2003 · 15 · 350710.1021/cm0303080 ↗
32. Tupala · Nanotechnology · 2012 · 23 · 12570710.1088/0957-4484/23/12/125707 ↗
33. Yoo · Electrochem. Commun. · 2018 · 86 · 610.1016/j.elecom.2017.10.017 ↗
34. Rhoderick · 1988
35. Rawat · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2017 · 38 · 63310.1109/LED.2017.2687820 ↗
36. Wahyuningsih · 2017 · vol 7510.1088/1755-1315/75/1/012002 ↗
37. Hengerer · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2000 · 147 · 146710.1149/1.1393379 ↗
38. Gottesman · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2013 · 4 · 282210.1021/jz401549e ↗
39. Deskins · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 110.1103/PhysRevB.75.195212 ↗
40. Hao · J. Chem. Phys. · 2019 · 150 · 22470210.1063/1.5108595 ↗
41. Ha · J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2016 · 12 · 288910.1021/acs.jctc.6b00095 ↗
42. Scheiber · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 109 · 110.1103/PhysRevLett.109.136103 ↗
43. He · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 10610510.1103/PhysRevLett.102.106105 ↗
44. Cheung · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1986 · 49 · 8510.1063/1.97359 ↗
45. Park · Nanotechnology · 2010 · 21 · 19520110.1088/0957-4484/21/19/195201 ↗
46. Jain · J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 102 · 09450510.1063/1.2802553 ↗
47. Rizvi · 2014 · 110.1109/ICEmElec.2014.7151136 ↗
48. Jung · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110 · 04372110.1063/1.3626071 ↗