Reply to ‘Comment on “Electron–phonon scattering in Sn-doped In₂O₃FET nanowires probed by temperature-dependent measurements”’

Olivia M Berengue; Adenilson J Chiquito; Livia P Pozzi; Alexandre J C Lanfredi; Edson R Leite

doi:10.1088/0957-4484/20/46/468002

journal article·2009-11-18

Reply to ‘Comment on “Electron–phonon scattering in Sn-doped In₂O₃FET nanowires probed by temperature-dependent measurements”’

Olivia M Berengue, Adenilson J Chiquito, Livia P Pozzi, Alexandre J C Lanfredi, Edson R Leite

Nanotechnology· Volume 20· Issue 46

Publisher page

Source abstract

Abstract

In this reply we discuss the use of two and four-probe methods in the resistivity measurements of ITO nanowires. We pointed out that the results obtained by using two or four probe methods are indistinguishable in our case. Additionally we present the correct values for resistivity and consequently for the density of electrons.

Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

Nanomaterials

OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · ZnO doping and properties · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (6)

Show source-provided references

1. Berengue O M · Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 24570610.1088/0957-4484/20/24/245706 ↗

2. 10.1021/nl062213d10.1021/nl062213d ↗

3. 10.1063/1.180115310.1063/1.1801153 ↗

4. Chiu S P · Nanotechnology · 2004 · 20 · 10520310.1088/0957-4484/20/10/105203 ↗

5. 10.1021/nl070178k10.1021/nl070178k ↗

6. Orlandi M O · Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 23 · 80