Surface disinfection with silver loaded pencil graphite prepared with green UV photoreduction technique
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Carbon-based materials have been studied for their antimicrobial properties. Previously, most antimicrobial studies are investigated with suspended nanoparticles in a liquid medium. Most works are often carried out with highly ordered pyrolytic graphite. These materials are expensive and are not viable for mass use on high-touch surfaces. Additionally, highly antimicrobial silver nanoparticles are often incorporated onto substrates by chemical reduction. At times, harmful chemicals are used. In this work, low-cost graphite pencils are mechanically exfoliated and transferred onto Si substrates. The sparsely-covered graphite flakes are treated by either plasma O 2 or UV irradiation. Subsequently, Ag is photo reduced in the presence of UV onto selected graphite flake samples. It is found that graphite flake surface topography and defects are dependent on the treatment process. High surface roughness and (defects density, I D / I G ) are induced by plasma O 2 follows by UV and pristine graphite flake as follows: 6.45 nm (0.62), 4.96 nm (0.5), 3.79 nm (0.47). Antimicrobial tests with E. coli reveal high killing efficiency by photoreduced Ag-on-graphite flake. The reversible effect of Ag leaching can be compensated by repeating the photoreduction process. This work proposes that UV treatment is a promising technique over that of plasma O 2 in view that the latter treated surface could repel bacteria resulting in lower bacteria-killing efficiency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Tura · Antimicrobial Resistance Infection Control · 2017 · 6 · 7610.1186/s13756-017-0236-6 ↗
2. Aboualizadeh · PLOS ONE · 2017 · 12 · e018637510.1371/journal.pone.0186375 ↗
3. Hutchings · Curr. Opin. Microbiol. · 2019 · 51 · 7210.1016/j.mib.2019.10.008 ↗
4. Ali · Chem. Res. Toxicol. · 2020 · 33 · 108210.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00519 ↗
5. Booshehri · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2014 · 2 · 620910.1039/C3TA15392D ↗
6. León-Buitimea · Frontiers Microbiol. · 2020 · 1110.3389/fmicb.2020.01669 ↗
7. Mahlapuu · Frontiers Cell. Infection Microbiol. · 2016 · 610.3389/fcimb.2016.00194 ↗
8. Yildirimer · Nano Today · 2011 · 6 · 58510.1016/j.nantod.2011.10.001 ↗
9. Lu · Antimicrobial Resistance Infection Control · 2020 · 9 · 17810.1186/s13756-020-00834-2 ↗
10. Schuts · Lancet Infectious Dis. · 2016 · 16 · 84710.1016/S1473-3099(16)00065-7 ↗
11. Kour · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 167 · 03755510.1149/1945-7111/ab6bc4 ↗
12. Bhong · SN Appl. Sci. · 2018 · 1 · 7610.1007/s42452-018-0082-z ↗
13. Tang · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 510210.1021/nn300760g ↗
14. Azizi-Lalabadi · Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2020 · 284 · 10225010.1016/j.cis.2020.102250 ↗
15. Kang · Langmuir · 2007 · 23 · 867010.1021/la701067r ↗
16. Zeng · Environ. Sci.: Nano · 2017 · 4 · 224810.1039/C7EN00583K ↗
17. Li · Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 435910.1038/srep04359 ↗
18. Akhavan · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 573110.1021/nn101390x ↗
19. Liu · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 697110.1021/nn202451x ↗
20. Ruiz · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 810010.1021/nn202699t ↗
21. Chen · Carbon · 2015 · 81 · 82610.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.033 ↗
22. Liu · Chem. Eng. J. · 2019 · 355 · 18110.1016/j.cej.2018.08.146 ↗
23. Bhuyan · Int. Nano Lett. · 2016 · 6 · 6510.1007/s40089-015-0176-1 ↗
24. Lee · Curr. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 15 · 563
25. Yu · RSC Adv. · 2020 · 10 · 1532810.1039/D0RA01068E ↗
26. Zhang · Nanoscale Res. Lett. · 2018 · 13 · 5410.1186/s11671-018-2450-4 ↗
27. Khatoon · 2011 · 97
28. Ahmed · J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. · 2016 · 9 · 110.1016/j.jrras.2015.06.006 ↗
29. Dakal · Frontiers Microbiol. · 2016 · 710.3389/fmicb.2016.01831 ↗
30. Abbaszadegan · J/ Nanomater. · 2015 · 2015 · 72065410.1155/2015/720654 ↗
31. Habash · Antimicrobial Agents Chemother. · 2014 · 58 · 581810.1128/AAC.03170-14 ↗
32. Hwan · Korean Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · 2010 · 39
33. Shrivastava · Nanotechnology · 2007 · 18 · 22510310.1088/0957-4484/18/22/225103 ↗
34. Yin · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2020 · 15 · 255510.2147/IJN.S246764 ↗
35. Janowska · Carbon · 2012 · 50 · 310610.1016/j.carbon.2012.02.064 ↗
36. Pirzado · Chem. Eng. · 2019 · 3 · 37
37. Alam · J. Micromech. Microeng. · 2014 · 24 · 03501010.1088/0960-1317/24/3/035010 ↗
38. Suni · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2002 · 149 · G34810.1149/1.1477209 ↗
39. Lukose · Sci. Rep. · 2021 · 11 · 1311110.1038/s41598-021-92432-4 ↗
40. Uran · AIP Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 03532310.1063/1.4979607 ↗
41. Gengler · Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 256010.1038/ncomms3560 ↗
42. Blanksby · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2003 · 36 · 25510.1021/ar020230d ↗
43. Zólyomi · Phys. status solidi b · 2011 · 248 · 243510.1002/pssb.201100295 ↗
44. Shiau · AIP Adv. · 2020 · 10 · 04501610.1063/1.5142310 ↗
45. Shiau · IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. · 2019 · 18 · 111410.1109/TNANO.2019.2948077 ↗
46. Ferrari · Solid State Commun. · 2007 · 143 · 4710.1016/j.ssc.2007.03.052 ↗
47. Graf · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 23810.1021/nl061702a ↗
48. Moreira · Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. · 2020 · 27 · 3451310.1007/s11356-020-09656-6 ↗
49. Haubner · Chem. Phys. Chem. · 2010 · 11 · 213110.1002/cphc.201000132 ↗
50. Barbolina · 2D Mater. · 2016 · 3 · 02502510.1088/2053-1583/3/2/025025 ↗
51. Hou · Appl. Sci. · 2017 · 7 · 85210.3390/app7080852 ↗
52. Keshvardoostchokami · JOM · 2020 · 72 · 447710.1007/s11837-020-04243-z ↗
53. Zhao · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 1761710.1021/acsami.8b03185 ↗
54. Chavez-Esquivel · Mater. Sci. Eng. C · 2021 · 123 · 11193410.1016/j.msec.2021.111934 ↗
55. Ahmad · Sci. Rep. · 2021 · 11 · 19610.1038/s41598-020-80013-w ↗
56. Jang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2020 · 12 · 3582610.1021/acsami.0c06054 ↗