journal article·2020-05-15

Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition in an Al superconducting nanofilm grown on GaAs by molecular beam epitaxy

Guan-Ming Su, Bi-Yi Wu, Yen-Ting Fan, Ankit Kumar, Chau-Shing Chang, Ching-Chen Yeh, Dinesh K Patel, Sheng-Di Lin, Lee Chow, Chi-Te Liang

Nanotechnology· Volume 31· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract We have performed extensive transport experiments on a 4 nm thick aluminum (Al) superconducting film grown on a GaAs substrate by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). Nonlinear current–voltage ( I – V ) measurements on such a MBE-grown superconducting nanofilm show that V ∼ I 3 , which is evidence for the Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless (BKT) transition, both in the low-voltage ( T BKT ≈ 1.97 K) and high-voltage regions ( T BKT ≈ 2.17 K). In order to further study the two regions where the I – V curves are BKT-like, our experimental data are fitted to the temperature-induced vortices/antivortices unbinding model as well as the dynamical scaling theory. It is found that the transition temperature obtained in the high-voltage region is the correct T BKT as confirmed by fitting the data to the aforementioned models. Our experimental results unequivocally show that I – V measurements alone may not allow one to determine T BKT for superconducting transition. Therefore, one should try to fit one’s results to the temperature-induced vortices/antivortices unbinding model and the dynamical scaling theory to accurately determine T BKT in a two-dimensional superconductor.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Mermin · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1966 · 7 · 113310.1103/PhysRevLett.17.1133 ↗
2. Berezinskii · Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. · 1970 · 59 · 907
3. Kosterlitz · J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. · 1973 · 6 · 118110.1088/0022-3719/6/7/010 ↗
4. Epstein · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1981 · 47 · 53410.1103/PhysRevLett.47.534 ↗
5. Zhao · Solid State Commun. · 2013 · 165 · 5910.1016/j.ssc.2013.04.025 ↗
6. Xing · Science · 2015 · 350 · 54210.1126/science.aaa7154 ↗
7. Wang · Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 39410.1038/s41467-017-00427-5 ↗
8. Matetskiy · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2015 · 11510.1103/PhysRevLett.115.147003 ↗
9. Lay · Nanoscale · 2018 · 10 · 57510.1039/C7NR07793A ↗
10. Lee · ACS Nano · 2015 · 9 · 620610.1021/acsnano.5b01541 ↗
11. Zhou · Nat. Photon. · 2016 · 10 · 39310.1038/nphoton.2016.75 ↗
12. Bauch · Plasmonics · 2014 · 9 · 78110.1007/s11468-013-9660-5 ↗
13. Chou · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 1988710.1038/srep19887 ↗
14. Cheng · ACS Photonics · 2018 · 5 · 262410.1021/acsphotonics.7b01366 ↗
15. Lee · Nanotechnology · 2019 · 3010.1088/1361-6528/aaed98 ↗
16. Janisch · 2D Mater. · 2016 · 310.1088/2053-1583/3/2/025017 ↗
17. Liu · Small · 2017 · 1310.1002/smll.201701112 ↗
18. Zai · Nano-Micro Lett. · 2017 · 9 · 2110.1007/s40820-016-0121-5 ↗
19. Lin · Nanoscale Res. Lett. · 2015 · 10 · 7110.1186/s11671-015-0782-x ↗
20. Fan · AIP Adv. · 2017 · 710.1063/1.4991435 ↗
21. Gorter · Physika Z · 1934 · 35 · 963
22. Bardeen · Phys. Rev. · 1957 · 108 · 117510.1103/PhysRev.108.1175 ↗
23. Mwema · Mater. Today: Proc. · 2018 · 5 · 2046410.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.423 ↗
24. Her · Indian J. Eng. Mater. Sci. · 2015 · 22 · 268
25. Zhang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2015 · 11410.1103/PhysRevLett.114.107003 ↗
26. Ge · Nat. Mater. · 2015 · 14 · 28510.1038/nmat4153 ↗
27. Ding · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 11710.1103/PhysRevLett.117.067001 ↗
28. Eich · Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 9410.1103/PhysRevB.94.125437 ↗
29. Halperin · J. Low Temp. Phys. · 1979 · 36 · 59910.1007/BF00116988 ↗
30. Fisher · Phys. Rev. B · 1981 · 43 · 13010.1103/PhysRevB.43.130 ↗
31. Holzer · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 6310.1103/PhysRevB.63.184508 ↗