journal article·2025-07-25Open access

A Paper-Based Colorimetric Sensor for Tumor Marker CA-125 Using Aptamer-Enhanced Ni–MnFe Layered Double Hydroxide Nanozymes

Akarapong Prakobkij, Nattasa Kitchawengkul, Wipark Anutrasakda, Tirayut Vilaivan, Surasak Wanram, Maliwan Amatatongchai, Daniel Citterio, Purim Jarujamrus

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 8· Issue 29

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) is a glycoprotein associated with cholangiocarcinoma, making it a valuable biomarker for diagnosis. However, conventional detection methods have limitations due to their reliance on antibodies for specificity and natural enzymes as labels for signal amplification. Both are costly and unstable under extreme pH conditions, and enzymes exhibit a low catalytic efficiency. Addressing these limitations could enhance the diagnostic accuracy of CA-125 detection in cholangiocarcinoma diagnosis. In this work, Ni-MnFe-layered double hydroxides (Ni-MnFe-LDHs) conjugated with an aptamer (Ni-MnFe-LDHs@aptamer) are demonstrated as a superior peroxidase mimic to enhance the sensitivity for the colorimetric detection of CA-125 on a paper-based analytical device (PAD) platform. Ni-MnFe-LDHs exhibited efficient peroxidase-like activity, catalyzing the oxidation of colorless 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) into an intense blue product in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ). Upon modification with a CA 125-specific aptamer, Ni-MnFe-LDHs became more dispersed due to electrostatic repulsion, exposing more active sites and generating more hydroxyl radicals ( · OH). Moreover, π–π stacking and hydrogen bond interactions between the aptamer and TMB increased the substrate affinity of Ni-MnFe-LDHs, thereby enhancing their catalytic performance. This resulted in a darker blue signal in the absence of CA-125. When CA-125 was present in the sample, it was captured by the aptamer on Ni-MnFe-LDHs, resulting in a decreased blue color signal. Using CA-125 as the target analyte, a linear relationship between the scanner-recorded signal intensity and analyte concentration was observed in the range of 10–25 U/mL. The results obtained from real human sample application using the developed method were consistent with those from a clinical laboratory. This method can be easily implemented and holds great potential as a prototype for various diagnostic applications, especially for detecting biomarkers in serum or plasma samples. It offers significant benefits for point-of-care testing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Center of Excellence for Innovation in Chemistry, Faculty of Science

Ubon Ratchathani University

Nanomaterials Science, Sensors & Catalysis for Problem-Based Projects, Faculty of Science

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science

Chulalongkorn University

Green Chemistry for Fine Chemical Production and Environmental Remediation Research Unit, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science

Biomedical Science Research Unit, College of Medicine and Public Health

Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University,3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku,Yokohama 223-8522,Japan

Department of Imaging and Printing Technology, Faculty of Science

Funding

National Research Council of Thailand · Intelligence Community Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Program · Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research and Innovation or PMU-B · National Science, Research, and Innovation Fund

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.2217/bmm-2017-045210.2217/bmm-2017-0452 ↗
2. 10.1006/gyno.2002.660310.1006/gyno.2002.6603 ↗
3. 10.1245/ASO.2003.05.01510.1245/ASO.2003.05.015 ↗
4. Shiau C.-S. · Chang Gung Med. J. · 2003 · 26 · 695
5. 10.1016/S0304-3835(02)00691-210.1016/S0304-3835(02)00691-2 ↗
6. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-200710.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2007 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.06.08610.1016/j.talanta.2015.06.086 ↗
8. 10.1039/c1cc11943e10.1039/c1cc11943e ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20171246910.1002/anie.201712469 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.03.15310.1016/j.snb.2018.03.153 ↗
11. 10.1039/c3cs35486e10.1039/c3cs35486e ↗
12. 10.1038/nnano.2007.26010.1038/nnano.2007.260 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.7b0750110.1021/acsami.7b07501 ↗
14. 10.1346/CCMN.1983.031040910.1346/CCMN.1983.0310409 ↗
15. 10.1016/0920-5861(91)80068-K10.1016/0920-5861(91)80068-K ↗
16. 10.1016/j.snb.2025.13767110.1016/j.snb.2025.137671 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.microc.2024.11206110.1016/j.microc.2024.112061 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.3c0141210.1021/acsami.3c01412 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsanm.4c0668310.1021/acsanm.4c06683 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12202410.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122024 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.8b1607510.1021/acsami.8b16075 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.11236810.1016/j.bios.2020.112368 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00604-023-06046-w10.1007/s00604-023-06046-w ↗
24. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.10576110.1016/j.microc.2020.105761 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.bios.2016.10.09310.1016/j.bios.2016.10.093 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.01.15510.1016/j.snb.2017.01.155 ↗
27. 10.1002/anie.20060381710.1002/anie.200603817 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.06.03410.1016/j.talanta.2018.06.034 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.snr.2024.10020910.1016/j.snr.2024.100209 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c0238910.1021/acs.analchem.4c02389 ↗
31. 10.1039/C5NR04176G10.1039/C5NR04176G ↗
32. 10.1371/journal.pone.001377010.1371/journal.pone.0013770 ↗
33. 10.1007/s00604-022-05173-010.1007/s00604-022-05173-0 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.12419910.1016/j.talanta.2022.124199 ↗
35. 10.1021/ac901071p10.1021/ac901071p ↗
36. 10.1039/c3nr03031h10.1039/c3nr03031h ↗
37. 10.1021/acsanm.4c0033610.1021/acsanm.4c00336 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.snb.2014.05.02010.1016/j.snb.2014.05.020 ↗
39. 10.1039/D0NA00002G10.1039/D0NA00002G ↗
40. Berg J. M. · 2006
41. 10.3390/polym1303043510.3390/polym13030435 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.11060110.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.110601 ↗
43. International, A. Appendix F: guidelines for standard method performance requirements. https://www.aoac.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/app_f.pdf (accessed 20 May, 2024).
44. 10.1186/s13048-019-0503-710.1186/s13048-019-0503-7 ↗
45. 10.18632/oncotarget.681910.18632/oncotarget.6819 ↗