Field gradient imaging of nanoparticle systems: analysis of geometry and surface coating effects
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work we compare the standard imaging of various types of nanoparticles deposited on surfaces by atomic force microscopy (AFM) with a complementary analysis of the same samples by either electrostatic force microscopy (EFM) or magnetic force microscopy (MFM). Experiments were carried out on gold nanoparticles (decahedrons and stars) and two different iron oxide systems: goethite (alpha-FeOOH) and hematite (alpha-Fe(2)O(3)). Regardless of the particular geometry, the EFM signal appears to be stronger on edges or tips of pure gold nanoparticles. Both EFM and MFM experiments were also carried out on iron oxide particles. Apart from the structural analysis, we analyzed the influence of a shell layer deposited on the gold and iron oxide particles, the shell being amorphous SiO(2). Although the silica layer was found to have an insulating effect around the particles, in all cases EFM/MFM measurements could still be performed by the proper choice of the scan lift height (with an eventual slight increase of the sample bias, where applicable).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Near-Field Optical Microscopy
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1143/JJAP.47.612810.1143/JJAP.47.6128 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.01.13410.1016/j.apsusc.2007.01.134 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20030574710.1002/adma.200305747 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0039-6028(98)00349-510.1016/S0039-6028(98)00349-5 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.115002110.1063/1.1150021 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.175310010.1063/1.1753100 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.193513310.1063/1.1935133 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.06410.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.064 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2007.04.00210.1016/j.ultramic.2007.04.002 ↗
10. Yun F · Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. · 2001 · 680E · E 4.8.1-6
11. Mancinia M W · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 100 · 104501
12. 10.1063/1.192578210.1063/1.1925782 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.01.08210.1016/j.electacta.2007.01.082 ↗
14. 10.1002/smll.20070011610.1002/smll.200700116 ↗
15. 10.1021/jp982684r10.1021/jp982684r ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.05.04410.1016/j.jmmm.2008.05.044 ↗
17. Sharma S K · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2008 · 20 · 28521110.1088/0953-8984/20/28/285211 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.04.04110.1016/j.ultramic.2008.04.041 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.12.06810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.12.068 ↗
20. 10.1002/mame.20080003310.1002/mame.200800033 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.msec.2006.07.02710.1016/j.msec.2006.07.027 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.09.03210.1016/j.jmmm.2006.09.032 ↗
23. Changa J · J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 100
24. 10.1021/la001211k10.1021/la001211k ↗
25. 10.1002/smll.20070011610.1002/smll.200700116 ↗
26. 10.1109/TMAG.2007.90330010.1109/TMAG.2007.903300 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20060047510.1002/adma.200600475 ↗
28. 10.1002/adfm.20060107110.1002/adfm.200601071 ↗
29. Kumar P S · Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 01560610.1088/0957-4484/19/01/015606 ↗
30. 10.1140/epje/i2003-10078-610.1140/epje/i2003-10078-6 ↗
31. 10.1006/jcis.1993.139810.1006/jcis.1993.1398 ↗
32. 10.1021/la052484o10.1021/la052484o ↗
33. 10.1039/b711490g10.1039/b711490g ↗
34. 10.1021/nl062969c10.1021/nl062969c ↗
35. 10.1021/la800130610.1021/la8001306 ↗