journal article·1997-09-01

On the importance of quantum mechanics for nanotechnology

Donald W Noid, Robert E Tuzun, Bobby G Sumpter

Nanotechnology· Volume 8· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

In this article it is argued that classical molecular dynamics studies of nanomachines may not give an accurate representation of their performance. Fortunately a new method, internal coordinate quantum Monte Carlo, an improved technique for computing quantum mechanical ground-state energies and wavefunctions, has the potential capability to model these systems. Some relevant examples demonstrate that the quantum ground state for many-body systems similar to those of interest in nanotechnology has a qualitatively different structure than that obtained from a molecular dynamics calculation which exhibited chaos and gross instabilities at energies of only a fraction of the ground-state energy. This result casts uncertainty on the reliability of using the molecular dynamics method to calculate the structure or any other dynamical quantity relevant to nanotechnology.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Fullerene Chemistry and Applications · Graphene research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Drexler K E · 1992
2. Merkle R C · Nanotechnology · 1993 · 4 · 8610.1088/0957-4484/4/2/004 ↗
3. Tuzun R E · Nanotechnology · 1995 · 6 · 5210.1088/0957-4484/6/2/004 ↗
4. Tuzun R E · Nanotechnology · 1995 · 6 · 6410.1088/0957-4484/6/2/005 ↗
5. Tuzun R E · Nanotechnology · 1996 · 7 · 24110.1088/0957-4484/7/3/012 ↗
6. Tuzun R E · Nanotechnology
7. Han J · 1996
8. Jaffe R · 1996
9. Burkert U · 1982
10. Noid D W · Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 1981 · 32 · 26710.1146/annurev.pc.32.100181.001411 ↗
11. Child M S · 1991
12. Tabor M · 1989
13. Gutzwiller M C · 1990
14. Wozny C E · Trends Polymer Sci. · 1994 · 2 · 375
15. Newman D E · Macromol. Theor. Simul. · 6 · 557
16. 10.1063/1.47240510.1063/1.472405 ↗
17. Ceperly D · J. Comput. Phys. · 1983 · 51 · 40410.1016/0021-9991(83)90161-4 ↗
18. 10.1146/annurev.physchem.36.1.52510.1146/annurev.physchem.36.1.525 ↗
19. Hoover W G · Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 1983 · 34 · 10310.1146/annurev.pc.34.100183.000535 ↗
20. Guo Y · Nature · 351 · 464
21. Allen M P · 1987
22. 10.1063/1.46752310.1063/1.467523 ↗
23. Noid D W · J. Comput. Chem. · 1990 · 11 · 23610.1002/jcc.540110209 ↗
24. Tuzun R E · Macromol. Theor. Simul. · 1996 · 5 · 77110.1002/mats.1996.040050410 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.46937810.1063/1.469378 ↗
26. Kreitmeier S K · Macromol. Theor. Simul. · 1996 · 5 · 110.1002/mats.1996.040050301 ↗
27. Tuzun R E
28. Ebbesen T W · Nature · 1992 · 358 · 22010.1038/358220a0 ↗
29. Bethune D S · Nature · 1993 · 363 · 60510.1038/363605a0 ↗
30. Iijima S · Nature · 1991 · 354 · 5610.1038/354056a0 ↗
31. 10.1016/0009-2614(93)E1414-C10.1016/0009-2614(93)E1414-C ↗
32. Barnes J · J. Phys. Ref. Data · 1978 · 7 · 130910.1063/1.555586 ↗
33. Liam W B · Macromolecules · 1988 · 21 · 19410.1021/ma00179a038 ↗
34. Mayo S L · J. Phys. Chem. · 1990 · 94 · 889710.1021/j100389a010 ↗
35. Karasawa N · J. Phys. Chem. · 1991 · 95 · 226010.1021/j100159a031 ↗