On the importance of quantum mechanics for nanotechnology
Source abstract
Abstract
In this article it is argued that classical molecular dynamics studies of nanomachines may not give an accurate representation of their performance. Fortunately a new method, internal coordinate quantum Monte Carlo, an improved technique for computing quantum mechanical ground-state energies and wavefunctions, has the potential capability to model these systems. Some relevant examples demonstrate that the quantum ground state for many-body systems similar to those of interest in nanotechnology has a qualitatively different structure than that obtained from a molecular dynamics calculation which exhibited chaos and gross instabilities at energies of only a fraction of the ground-state energy. This result casts uncertainty on the reliability of using the molecular dynamics method to calculate the structure or any other dynamical quantity relevant to nanotechnology.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Fullerene Chemistry and Applications · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Drexler K E · 1992
2. Merkle R C · Nanotechnology · 1993 · 4 · 8610.1088/0957-4484/4/2/004 ↗
3. Tuzun R E · Nanotechnology · 1995 · 6 · 5210.1088/0957-4484/6/2/004 ↗
4. Tuzun R E · Nanotechnology · 1995 · 6 · 6410.1088/0957-4484/6/2/005 ↗
5. Tuzun R E · Nanotechnology · 1996 · 7 · 24110.1088/0957-4484/7/3/012 ↗
6. Tuzun R E · Nanotechnology
7. Han J · 1996
8. Jaffe R · 1996
9. Burkert U · 1982
10. Noid D W · Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 1981 · 32 · 26710.1146/annurev.pc.32.100181.001411 ↗
11. Child M S · 1991
12. Tabor M · 1989
13. Gutzwiller M C · 1990
14. Wozny C E · Trends Polymer Sci. · 1994 · 2 · 375
15. Newman D E · Macromol. Theor. Simul. · 6 · 557
16. 10.1063/1.47240510.1063/1.472405 ↗
17. Ceperly D · J. Comput. Phys. · 1983 · 51 · 40410.1016/0021-9991(83)90161-4 ↗
18. 10.1146/annurev.physchem.36.1.52510.1146/annurev.physchem.36.1.525 ↗
19. Hoover W G · Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 1983 · 34 · 10310.1146/annurev.pc.34.100183.000535 ↗
20. Guo Y · Nature · 351 · 464
21. Allen M P · 1987
22. 10.1063/1.46752310.1063/1.467523 ↗
23. Noid D W · J. Comput. Chem. · 1990 · 11 · 23610.1002/jcc.540110209 ↗
24. Tuzun R E · Macromol. Theor. Simul. · 1996 · 5 · 77110.1002/mats.1996.040050410 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.46937810.1063/1.469378 ↗
26. Kreitmeier S K · Macromol. Theor. Simul. · 1996 · 5 · 110.1002/mats.1996.040050301 ↗
27. Tuzun R E
28. Ebbesen T W · Nature · 1992 · 358 · 22010.1038/358220a0 ↗
29. Bethune D S · Nature · 1993 · 363 · 60510.1038/363605a0 ↗
30. Iijima S · Nature · 1991 · 354 · 5610.1038/354056a0 ↗
31. 10.1016/0009-2614(93)E1414-C10.1016/0009-2614(93)E1414-C ↗
32. Barnes J · J. Phys. Ref. Data · 1978 · 7 · 130910.1063/1.555586 ↗
33. Liam W B · Macromolecules · 1988 · 21 · 19410.1021/ma00179a038 ↗
34. Mayo S L · J. Phys. Chem. · 1990 · 94 · 889710.1021/j100389a010 ↗
35. Karasawa N · J. Phys. Chem. · 1991 · 95 · 226010.1021/j100159a031 ↗