A unified quantum correction model for nanoscale single- and double-gate MOSFETs under inversion conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper a unified quantum correction charge model for nanoscale single- and double-gate MOS structures is presented. Based on the numerical solution of Schrödinger–Poisson equations, the developed quantum correction charge model is mainly optimized with respect to (i) the left and right positions of the charge concentration peak, (ii) the maximum of the charge concentration, (iii) the total inversion charge sheet density, and (iv) the average inversion charge depth, respectively. For nanoscale single- and double-gate MOS structures, this model predicts inversion layer electron density for various oxide thicknesses, silicon film thicknesses, and applied voltages. Compared to the Schrödinger–Poisson results, our model prediction is within 2.5% of accuracy for both the single- and double gate MOS structures on average. This quantum correction model has continuous derivatives and is therefore amenable to a device simulator.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TNANO.2002.100542710.1109/TNANO.2002.1005427 ↗
2. Masahara M Matsukawa T Ishii K Liu Y Tanoue H Sakamoto K Sekigawa T Yamauchi H Kanemaru S Suzuki E · Tech. Dig. of Int. Electron Devices Mtg. (IEDM?02) · 2002 · pp 949
3. Yu B · Tech. Dig. of Int. Electron Devices Mtg. (IEDM?02) · 2002 · pp 25110.1109/IEDM.2002.1175825 ↗
4. Laux S E Kumar A Fischetti M V · Tech. Dig. of Int. Electron Devices Mtg. (IEDM?02) · 2002 · pp 715
5. 10.1109/TED.2002.80126310.1109/TED.2002.801263 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0038-1101(02)00031-X10.1016/S0038-1101(02)00031-X ↗
7. Tang S H Xuan P Bokor J Hu C · Proc. IEEE Int. SOI Conf. · 2002 · pp 120
8. 10.1109/16.99858810.1109/16.998588 ↗
9. Song S Kim H Yoo J Y Yi J H Kim W S Lee N I Fujihara K Kang H-K Moon J T · Tech. Dig. of Int. Electron Devices Mtg. (IEDM?01) · 2001 · pp 3.2.1
10. Mouis M Genin F-N Poncet A · Proc. Device Res. Conf. · 2001 · pp 195
11. 10.1016/S0167-9317(01)00633-510.1016/S0167-9317(01)00633-5 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRev.163.81610.1103/PhysRev.163.816 ↗
13. Fiegna C Abramo A · Proc. Tech. Dig. of Int. Conf. on Simul. of Semicond. Proc. and Devices SISPAD · 1997 · pp 93
14. 10.1016/S0010-4655(02)00248-510.1016/S0010-4655(02)00248-5 ↗
15. Li Y · Int. J. Modelling Simul. · 2003 · 23 · 9410.1080/02286203.2003.11442259 ↗
16. 10.1109/TNANO.2002.80738910.1109/TNANO.2002.807389 ↗
17. 10.1016/0038-1101(89)90060-910.1016/0038-1101(89)90060-9 ↗
18. Paasch G · Phys. Status Solidi · 1982 · 113 · 16510.1002/pssb.2221130116 ↗
19. Ancona M G · Phys. Rev. · 1987 · 35 · 795910.1103/PhysRevB.35.7959 ↗
20. 10.1109/16.88701310.1109/16.887013 ↗
21. 10.1023/A:102076371090610.1023/A:1020763710906 ↗
22. 10.1109/TNANO.2002.80738610.1109/TNANO.2002.807386 ↗
23. Taur Y · Fundamentals of Modern VLSI Devices · 1998
24. Ando T · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1982 · 54 · 43710.1103/RevModPhys.54.437 ↗
25. Li Y · Japan. J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 42 · 237110.1143/JJAP.42.2371 ↗
26. 10.1023/A:102070641496610.1023/A:1020706414966 ↗
27. 10.1109/16.62261110.1109/16.622611 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00366020001110.1007/s003660200011 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0010-4655(02)00368-510.1016/S0010-4655(02)00368-5 ↗
30. Ogawa M · IEICE Trans. Electron. · 2003 · 86-C · 363
31. 10.1023/A:102290550803210.1023/A:1022905508032 ↗
32. 10.1143/JJAP.42.207310.1143/JJAP.42.2073 ↗