journal article·2025-05-16Open access

Photocatalytic Disinfection of Selected Waterborne Pathogens by Visible Light-Active Nano Iron-Doped TiO2 Obtained by a Sol–Gel Method

Najeebullah Channa, Tanveer A. Gadhi, Francesca Stefania Freyria, Alessandro Chiadò, Nicola Blangetti, Nicoletta Ditaranto, Barbara Bonelli

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 8· Issue 19

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Bacterial contamination in drinking water systems poses a serious health risk due to poor hygiene, human activities, and cross-contamination within the water supply. This study examines the potential of iron-doped titanium oxide nanometric powder (Fe-TiO 2 ) for the photocatalytic disinfection of Gram-negative E. coli and Gram-positive S. aureus under visible light. The Fe-TiO 2 photocatalyst, with an optimal nominal content of 2.5 wt % Fe, was synthesized using a surfactant-assisted sol–gel method, resulting in a mesoporous nanomaterial composed of anatase nanoparticles with a specific surface area of 123 m 2 /g. A sample of undoped anatase TiO 2, obtained using the same sol–gel method and exhibiting a specific surface area of 116 m 2 /g, was utilized to confirm the role of Fe-doping in disinfection. The nanopowders were characterized using X-ray diffraction, N 2 sorption at −196 °C, diffuse reflectance UV–vis spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, electrophoretic mobility measurements, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy combined with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and field emission scanning electron microscopy. Photocatalytic disinfection tests were conducted using 1 and 0.5 g/L Fe-TiO 2 with varying initial bacterial concentrations, with 1 g/L yielding the most promising results under the experimental conditions employed. After 240 min of treatment with 1 g/L Fe-TiO 2, a 99.9% removal of both E. coli and S. aureus was achieved starting from a bacterial concentration of 1 × 10 6 CFU/mL. A 99.9% removal of E. coli and a 99.8% removal of S. aureus were achieved starting from 1 × 10 4 CFU/mL. The Fe-TiO 2 nanomaterial was effective against high concentrations of both bacteria under visible light. Reusability was studied by recovering the Fe-TiO 2 nanoparticles and assessing their performance over three cycles. The photocatalytic disinfection effectiveness of Fe-TiO 2 nanoparticles under visible light was validated using an actual tap water sample containing 167 CFU/mL total coliforms and 8 CFU/mL E. coli . The bacteria were photocatalytically inactivated within 30 min.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Water Treatment and Disinfection · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy

US Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in Water (USPCASW)

Mehran University of Engineering and Technology

INSTM-Unit of Torino Politecnico, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy

PolitoBIOMed Laboratory, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy

Chemistry Department, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Via Orabona 4, Bari 70126, Italy

Funding

Ministero dell'Universit? e della Ricerca · NextGenerationEU

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/21553769.2014.93371610.1080/21553769.2014.933716 ↗
2. 10.1007/s13201-016-0455-710.1007/s13201-016-0455-7 ↗
3. 10.1371/journal.pmed.100261410.1371/journal.pmed.1002614 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsestwater.2c0026510.1021/acsestwater.2c00265 ↗
5. 10.5812/hepatmon.9841210.5812/hepatmon.98412 ↗
6. 10.3390/w1212338210.3390/w12123382 ↗
7. 10.1080/10807039.2022.209283510.1080/10807039.2022.2092835 ↗
8. 10.3390/ijerph1708277410.3390/ijerph17082774 ↗
9. 10.3390/tropicalmed806032110.3390/tropicalmed8060321 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12433510.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124335 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41545-018-0024-810.1038/s41545-018-0024-8 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.efmat.2024.07.00310.1016/j.efmat.2024.07.003 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.09.04010.1016/j.memsci.2013.09.040 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.est.7b0544010.1021/acs.est.7b05440 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.watres.2022.11820210.1016/j.watres.2022.118202 ↗
16. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.0290310.3389/fmicb.2018.02903 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.12187510.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121875 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.05210.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.052 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.12343310.1016/j.seppur.2023.123433 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ceja.2022.10026210.1016/j.ceja.2022.100262 ↗
21. 10.1007/s00253-011-3213-710.1007/s00253-011-3213-7 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.05610.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.056 ↗
23. 10.3390/catal1302043410.3390/catal13020434 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.06.05910.1016/j.cattod.2007.06.059 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jece.2021.10632210.1016/j.jece.2021.106322 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.10.08210.1016/j.vacuum.2018.10.082 ↗
27. 10.1016/S1001-8042(07)60020-710.1016/S1001-8042(07)60020-7 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.04310.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.043 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c0062810.1021/acs.iecr.1c00628 ↗
30. 10.2113/gselements.7.2.8310.2113/gselements.7.2.83 ↗
31. 10.3390/ma1411310510.3390/ma14113105 ↗
32. 10.3390/catal707021310.3390/catal7070213 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.11.01310.1016/j.cattod.2013.11.013 ↗
34. 10.3390/nano1102043610.3390/nano11020436 ↗
35. 10.1155/2019/581980510.1155/2019/5819805 ↗
36. 10.1128/JB.00006-0810.1128/JB.00006-08 ↗
37. 10.1128/CMR.17.1.218-234.200410.1128/CMR.17.1.218-234.2004 ↗
38. 10.1007/s10856-016-5675-810.1007/s10856-016-5675-8 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsanm.3c0310710.1021/acsanm.3c03107 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.28210.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.282 ↗
41. 10.1007/s10856-016-5788-010.1007/s10856-016-5788-0 ↗
42. 10.1007/s11814-021-0830-410.1007/s11814-021-0830-4 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.inoche.2023.11058710.1016/j.inoche.2023.110587 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.01.02610.1016/j.msec.2014.01.026 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.12.03410.1016/j.apcatb.2014.12.034 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2011.05.01610.1016/j.jphotochem.2011.05.016 ↗
47. 10.1039/C8CY00078F10.1039/C8CY00078F ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.05.04810.1016/j.ijleo.2017.05.048 ↗
49. 10.1557/JMR.2010.023710.1557/JMR.2010.0237 ↗
50. 10.1039/D1RA09057G10.1039/D1RA09057G ↗
51. 10.1016/j.watres.2023.11962610.1016/j.watres.2023.119626 ↗
52. 10.1038/sj.embor.740014510.1038/sj.embor.7400145 ↗
53. 10.3390/w1319278510.3390/w13192785 ↗
54. 10.1177/2050312123119423910.1177/20503121231194239 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.11897910.1016/j.seppur.2021.118979 ↗
56. 10.2166/wst.1997.075510.2166/wst.1997.0755 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.watres.2020.11620410.1016/j.watres.2020.116204 ↗
58. 10.1186/1471-2180-12-259/FIGURES/310.1186/1471-2180-12-259/FIGURES/3 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13438610.1016/j.cej.2021.134386 ↗
60. 10.1039/D2CY01543A10.1039/D2CY01543A ↗
61. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.12621410.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126214 ↗
62. 10.3390/ijerph1407074710.3390/ijerph14070747 ↗
63. Walter W. G. · 1961 · 51 · 940
64. 10.1093/jaoac/90.5.128410.1093/jaoac/90.5.1284 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.cattod.2008.05.00210.1016/j.cattod.2008.05.002 ↗
66. 10.1063/1.3624775/97759910.1063/1.3624775/977599 ↗
67. 10.1002/sia.198410.1002/sia.1984 ↗
68. 10.1089/ars.2013.544710.1089/ars.2013.5447 ↗
69. 10.1002/jsfa.353810.1002/jsfa.3538 ↗
70. 10.1080/10934529.2021.191565310.1080/10934529.2021.1915653 ↗