Iron Oxide Quantum Dots and Graphene Nanoplatelets Integrated in a Dual-Polymer Conductive Fiber for Electromagnetic Interference-Shielding Thin Films
Source abstract
Abstract
A facile fabrication approach has been developed to construct an integrated conductive thin film. Specifically, by integrating 1 wt % of iron oxide quantum dots (FeQDs) and 10 wt % of graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) into a bifurcated conductive/nonconductive polymer matrix, the fabricated composite thin films achieve a nominal thickness of ∼50 μm, with a density of 1–1.2 g/cm 3, and an electrical conductivity of ∼350,000 S/m. Their shielding effectiveness reaches ∼54 dB against magnetic waves of 0–1 MHz, which is 2.5-fold higher than that of aluminum (Al) and copper (Cu) under equivalent thickness. These composites also demonstrate high shielding effectiveness within the high-frequency X-band spectrum of 8–12 GHz, with effectiveness levels reaching up to 170 dB. This capability is significantly beyond the Al and Cu range of ∼140 to 150 dB. The predominant shielding mechanisms are absorption, multireflection, reflection, hysteresis loss, and polarization loss. In summary, our work introduces QD/2D nanomaterial-integrated thin films demonstrating not only excellent capabilities within X-band frequencies but also highlighting their superior performance within the low-frequency ranges, an area where existing research is markedly sparse.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
NanoBio Mechanics & Manufacturing Laboratory (NBM), Department of Mechanical Engineering
Clemson University
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Florida International University
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, College of Engineering and Computing
Funding
Division of Engineering Education and Centers
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/smll.20210195110.1002/smll.202101951 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10337310.1016/j.addma.2022.103373 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20221164210.1002/adma.202211642 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.02.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.02.003 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10720710.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107207 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13713510.1016/j.cej.2022.137135 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0442510.1021/acsanm.1c04425 ↗
8. 10.1007/s42765-024-00387-810.1007/s42765-024-00387-8 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e3111810.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31118 ↗
10. 10.3390/jcs702007710.3390/jcs7020077 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10568510.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105685 ↗
12. Hu, Y.; S, Y.; Gu, H.; Xiong, Y.; Zhao, T.; Sun, R. Light high-conductivity shielding material and preparation method thereof. CN110540729B, 2019.
13. 10.1016/j.coco.2022.10109410.1016/j.coco.2022.101094 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41427-018-0070-110.1038/s41427-018-0070-1 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2021.11147710.1016/j.materresbull.2021.111477 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbon.2023.01.05510.1016/j.carbon.2023.01.055 ↗
17. 10.1039/D3NR01553J10.1039/D3NR01553J ↗
18. Ott H. W. · 2011
19. 10.1021/acsami.2c0966510.1021/acsami.2c09665 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41467-018-07243-510.1038/s41467-018-07243-5 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.02.02610.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.02.026 ↗
22. 10.1002/smll.20231107310.1002/smll.202311073 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.06.04010.1016/j.cej.2017.06.040 ↗
24. 10.1002/app.5461210.1002/app.54612 ↗
25. 10.1039/C5RA03464G10.1039/C5RA03464G ↗
26. 10.1002/app.4124210.1002/app.41242 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0144-8617(03)00158-910.1016/S0144-8617(03)00158-9 ↗
28. 10.1039/C3RA44709J10.1039/C3RA44709J ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10690610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106906 ↗
30. Dhawan S. · 2011
31. 10.1021/acsami.2c1901610.1021/acsami.2c19016 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0706610.1021/acs.iecr.9b07066 ↗
33. 10.1021/am502103u10.1021/am502103u ↗