Machine Learning Prediction of Antibacterial Activity of Block Copolymers
Source abstract
Abstract
As the problem of antibiotic resistance continues to escalate, there is an immediate need for fresh antimicrobial strategies. Traditional antibiotic development processes are time consuming and can require many years, from hit identification to drug approval. While machine learning (ML) has proven useful in predicting the properties of nanomaterials, current techniques often rely on extensive data sets and identifying structural similarities to existing antibiotics. This presents a challenge for alternative classes of antimicrobial agents such as polymers. To tackle this issue, we created an ML classification model to forecast the antibacterial activity of polymers. We evaluated several models on an imbalanced data set consisting of 157 polymers, of which 27 were antibacterial active polymers (positive cases). The decision tree model achieved the highest performance, with an accuracy of 0.91 and a recall of 1, properly identifying all positive cases. In the course of the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis, we discovered that the calculated partition coefficient ( c log P ) is the most significant feature in forecasting antibacterial activity, followed by the composition of the cationic and hydrophobic monomers. Our analysis indicates that controlling the values of these features could help design better antimicrobial polymers. For instance, the high antibacterial activity necessitates the c log P values of polymers that are neither too high nor too low, aligning with the previous findings (P. T. Phuong et al., Biomacromolecules, 2020, 21, 5241–5255).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Antimicrobial agents and applications · Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities · Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemical Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales 2052, Australia
Schrödinger, Inc., New York, New York 10036, United States
Amazon Alexa, Sunnyvale, California 94085-94090, United States
eHealth NSW, Chatswood, New South Wales 2067, Australia
Funding
Australian Research Council · University of New South Wales
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. WHO No Time to Wait: Securing the Future from Drug-Resistant Infections, 2019.
2. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01250.x10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01250.x ↗
3. 10.1038/s41579-019-0288-010.1038/s41579-019-0288-0 ↗
4. 10.1007/978-1-4939-6737-7_110.1007/978-1-4939-6737-7_1 ↗
5. 10.1038/nbt126710.1038/nbt1267 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.plipres.2011.12.00510.1016/j.plipres.2011.12.005 ↗
7. 10.1002/bip.2091110.1002/bip.20911 ↗
8. 10.1074/jbc.M41340620010.1074/jbc.M413406200 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.10.01310.1016/j.copbio.2008.10.013 ↗
10. 10.1021/ma981472p10.1021/ma981472p ↗
11. 10.1021/ar800075n10.1021/ar800075n ↗
12. 10.1039/C6PY01849A10.1039/C6PY01849A ↗
13. 10.1021/cr030449l10.1021/cr030449l ↗
14. 10.1007/s00018-011-0717-310.1007/s00018-011-0717-3 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.6b1140210.1021/acsami.6b11402 ↗
16. 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.16210.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.162 ↗
17. 10.1002/chem.20090004910.1002/chem.200900049 ↗
18. 10.1021/ja077288d10.1021/ja077288d ↗
19. 10.1039/C7PY01069A10.1039/C7PY01069A ↗
20. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.6b0020310.1021/acsinfecdis.6b00203 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.02010.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.020 ↗
22. 10.1002/ange.20140927010.1002/ange.201409270 ↗
23. 10.1039/C4CS00229F10.1039/C4CS00229F ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b0176610.1021/acs.biomac.5b01766 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0291310.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02913 ↗
26. 10.59720/19-09710.59720/19-097 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.patter.2021.10022510.1016/j.patter.2021.100225 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c0103110.1021/acs.jcim.1c01031 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.patter.2021.10023810.1016/j.patter.2021.100238 ↗
30. 10.3390/polym1311189810.3390/polym13111898 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41524-019-0203-210.1038/s41524-019-0203-2 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41524-020-0333-610.1038/s41524-020-0333-6 ↗
33. 10.1038/nmat471710.1038/nmat4717 ↗
34. 10.1126/sciadv.aay427510.1126/sciadv.aay4275 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c0154710.1021/acs.macromol.0c01547 ↗
36. 10.1039/D0TA07607D10.1039/D0TA07607D ↗
37. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz430110.1126/sciadv.aaz4301 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.11920710.1016/j.memsci.2021.119207 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.est.1c0437310.1021/acs.est.1c04373 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsanm.3c0365110.1021/acsanm.3c03651 ↗
41. 10.3390/nano1107177410.3390/nano11071774 ↗
42. 10.1155/2022/498682610.1155/2022/4986826 ↗
43. 10.1021/jacs.1c0505510.1021/jacs.1c05055 ↗
44. McKinney, W. Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python. Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, 2010; pp 56–61.10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a ↗
45. The Pandas Development Team · 2020
46. 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-210.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 ↗
47. 10.21105/joss.0302110.21105/joss.03021 ↗
48. Pedregosa F. · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2011 · 12 · 2825
49. Chen, T.; Guestrin, C. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd Acm Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016; pp 785–794.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
50. Lundberg, S. M.; Lee, S.I. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30; Guyon, I., Luxburg, U. V., Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S., Garnett, R., Eds. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017; pp 4765–4774.
51. 10.1002/anie.20171303610.1002/anie.201713036 ↗
52. 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b0029010.1021/acs.macromol.9b00290 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b0220710.1021/acs.macromol.9b02207 ↗
54. Bergstra J. · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2012 · 13 · 281
55. 10.48550/arXiv.2003.0568910.48550/arXiv.2003.05689 ↗
56. Lundberg S. · Adv. Neural Inf. Process. · 2017 · 30 · 4765
57. 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c0132010.1021/acs.biomac.0c01320 ↗