journal article·2024-01-12

Whey Protein Isolate-Based Aerogels with Improved Hydration Properties for Food Packaging Applications

Eleni Effraimopoulou, József Kalmár, Geo Paul, Leonardo Marchese, Dimosthenis Ioannou, Patrina Paraskevopoulou, Pavel Gurikov

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 7· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

In the present work, tannin-modified whey protein isolate (WPI/tannin) aerogels were synthesized, and their hydration properties were evaluated. The materials were prepared by introducing two different tannins (one hydrolyzable and one condensed) in the protein matrix via thermal-induced gelation of neutral or alkaline aqueous solutions (pH 7, 9, or 11) at 80 °C. WPI and WPI/tannin aerogels are nanostructured porous materials with high BET surface areas (216–353 m 2 g –1 ). Subsequently, WPI and WPI/tannin aerogels were hydrophobized via silanization (with bis(trimethylsilyl)amine) in the gas phase (HWPI and HWPI/tannin aerogels). As a result of silanization, BET surface areas were reduced to 87–242 m 2 g –1 . The hydration properties of all aerogels were studied by measuring the water uptake and water contact angles. Pristine WPI aerogels absorbed high amounts of water (up to 4794% w/w in 24 h), swelled, and eventually disintegrated. WPI/tannin aerogels prepared with the condensed tannin absorbed more water (219–559% w/w) than those prepared with the hydrolyzable tannin (81–88% w/w). In any case, the water uptake was significantly lower compared with that of pristine WPI aerogels. After silanization, all aerogels absorbed much smaller amounts of water (39–84% w/w). The reduced water uptake was in agreement with the water contact angles, which were in the ranges 35–55° for WPI aerogels, 40–60° for WPI/tannin aerogels, 80–86° for HWPI aerogels, and 100–116° for HWPI/tannin aerogels. These results clearly indicate that both the introduction of tannin in the protein matrix and the silanization of the solid network are necessary to obtain water-stable WPI-based aerogels. There is an immense need for replacing the existing plastic-based food packaging with biobased and biodegradable materials. In this context, our results address the major disadvantage of most biobased materials (i.e., poor stability in aqueous environments) and render these new aerogels good candidates for food packaging applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aerogels and thermal insulation · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Inorganic Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Zografou, 15771 Athens, Greece

ELKH-DE Mechanisms of Complex Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Chemical Reactions Research Group, Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary

Department of Science and Technological Innovation, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Viale T. Michel 11, 15121 Alessandria, Italy

Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Patr. Gregoriou E′ and 27 Neapoleos str., 15341 Aghia Paraskevi, Attiki, Greece

Laboratory for Development and Modelling of Novel Nanoporous Materials, Hamburg University of Technology, Eißendorfer Straße 38, 21073 Hamburg, Germany

Funding

Erasmus+ · General Secretariat for Research and Technology · European Cooperation in Science and Technology · National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.09.01610.1016/j.micromeso.2017.09.016 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11813010.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118130 ↗
3. 10.1021/cm903662a10.1021/cm903662a ↗
4. 10.1038/127741a010.1038/127741a0 ↗
5. 10.3390/polym1006062310.3390/polym10060623 ↗
6. 10.1039/D0RA07337G10.1039/D0RA07337G ↗
7. 10.1002/anie.20200305310.1002/anie.202003053 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.08.04810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.08.048 ↗
9. 10.1021/bm700972k10.1021/bm700972k ↗
10. 10.1021/bm500345u10.1021/bm500345u ↗
11. 10.1007/s10570-018-2189-110.1007/s10570-018-2189-1 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.supflu.2012.08.01910.1016/j.supflu.2012.08.019 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10853-019-04330-w10.1007/s10853-019-04330-w ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.9b0428310.1021/acsami.9b04283 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0266110.1021/acs.iecr.9b02661 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsanm.9b0190310.1021/acsanm.9b01903 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14723210.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147232 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsapm.0c0016210.1021/acsapm.0c00162 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.10711710.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107117 ↗
20. 10.3390/polym1317300010.3390/polym13173000 ↗
21. Foegeding E. A. · 2011 · 87310.1016/B978-0-12-374407-4.00350-2 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.foodres.2007.07.00510.1016/j.foodres.2007.07.005 ↗
23. Brodkorb A. · 2016 · 15510.1007/978-1-4939-2800-2_6 ↗
24. 10.1002/mame.20090016710.1002/mame.200900167 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0268-005X(01)00042-X10.1016/S0268-005X(01)00042-X ↗
26. 10.1039/D0MA01025A10.1039/D0MA01025A ↗
27. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0207210.1021/acsanm.1c02072 ↗
28. Fricke, M.; Paraskevopoulou, P.; Gurikov, P.; Chriti, D.; Papastergiou, M.; Raptopoulos, G.; Athamneh, T.; Smirnova, I.; Movahed, S.; Weinrich, D.; Loesberg, W. Polyurea/Polyurethane-Crosslinked Alginate Aerogels. EP 3848409 A1, 2021.10.1021/acsapm.0c01298 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.10603310.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106033 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0522610.1021/acs.chemmater.7b05226 ↗
31. 10.3390/gels811069110.3390/gels8110691 ↗
32. 10.1039/b101061l10.1039/b101061l ↗
33. 10.3390/ma1418523110.3390/ma14185231 ↗
34. 10.3390/polym1010110210.3390/polym10101102 ↗
35. 10.1088/1468-6996/14/1/01500110.1088/1468-6996/14/1/015001 ↗
36. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c0538610.1021/acssuschemeng.2c05386 ↗
37. 10.1039/D3GC02948D10.1039/D3GC02948D ↗
38. 10.3390/ma603092710.3390/ma6030927 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.10.01410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.10.014 ↗
40. 10.3390/ma608325410.3390/ma6083254 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.08.03010.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.08.030 ↗
42. 10.3390/polym1502038710.3390/polym15020387 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2021.10076510.1016/j.fpsl.2021.100765 ↗
44. Pizzi A. · 2008 · 17910.1016/B978-0-08-045316-3.00008-9 ↗
45. 10.1039/C7CS00358G10.1039/C7CS00358G ↗
46. 10.3390/polym1304058810.3390/polym13040588 ↗
47. 10.5897/AJFS.900014610.5897/AJFS.9000146 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.fbio.2019.01.01110.1016/j.fbio.2019.01.011 ↗
49. Colthup N. B. · 1990 · 1
50. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.09.01610.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.09.016 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.09.02010.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.09.020 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.10535610.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105356 ↗
53. 10.1515/pac-2014-111710.1515/pac-2014-1117 ↗