Sonochemical Synthesis of Ag-Functionalized Fe2O3 Nanocomposites for the Highly Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of Ractopamine and H2O2
Source abstract
Abstract
Herein, we report an electrochemical sensor for the detection of ractopamine (RA) and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ), based on a silver (Ag)-functionalized Fe 2 O 3 -modified glassy carbon electrode (AFO-GCE). This environment friendly nanosensor is synthesized by a simple and cost-effective ultrasonic technique and characterized by FT-IR, P-XRD, XPS, EIS, HR-SEM and HR-TEM. The obtained results suggest that the average size of the nanoparticles is between 14 and 22 nm. EIS is also performed to prove the fabricated electrode has faster electron transfer and permits a diffusion-controlled process. The fabricated sensor exhibits superior electrocatalytic activity in RA detection with good linearity of 1.0 nM–5.847 μM, sensitivity of 2.28 μA mM –1 cm –2, limit of detection (LOD) of 1.35 nM and H 2 O 2 detection with high linearity from 10 μM to 6.85 mM, sensitivity of 27.2 μA mM –1 cm –2, and LOD of 1.98 μM with respectable selectivity, excellent reproducibility, and long-term stability. Further, the sensor is effectively employed for the detection of RA in chicken and pork samples and detection of H 2 O 2 in milk samples with an extensive recovery range of 95–98%.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Pharmacological Effects and Assays · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
PG and Research Department of Chemistry, Government Arts College (Affiliated to Bharathidasan University), Tiruchirappalli 620 022, Tamil Nadu, India
Department of Chemistry, Velammal College of Engineering and Technology, Madurai 625 009, Tamil Nadu, India
Centre for Nanoscience and Technology, Anna University, Chennai 600 025, Tamil Nadu, India
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.11.17510.1016/j.electacta.2013.11.175 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.04.04810.1016/j.talanta.2013.04.048 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.08.06010.1016/j.talanta.2014.08.060 ↗
4. UN Food Safety Body Sets Limits on Veterinary Growth Promoting Drug. Codex Alimentarius Commission Adopts Maximum Residue Levels. 2012. http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/150953/icode. accessed April 29, 2020.
5. Residue Valuation of Certain Veterinary Drugs, Meeting 2010: Evaluation of Data on Ractopamine Residues in Pig Tissues; Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives: Rome, Italy, 2010; Vol. 52.
6. 10.1039/an994190267510.1039/an9941902675 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60776-X10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60776-X ↗
8. 10.1007/s10800-010-0191-x10.1007/s10800-010-0191-x ↗
9. 10.1007/s00604-012-0904-410.1007/s00604-012-0904-4 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.11.04210.1016/j.msec.2014.11.042 ↗
11. 10.2165/00139709-200423010-0000610.2165/00139709-200423010-00006 ↗
12. 10.1021/ac60086a01610.1021/ac60086a016 ↗
13. 10.3390/s15102571610.3390/s151025716 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)01181-810.1016/S0003-2670(00)01181-8 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.08.03410.1016/j.apsusc.2013.08.034 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.13941210.1016/j.electacta.2021.139412 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.04.00510.1016/j.snb.2017.04.005 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.13786810.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137868 ↗
19. 10.1039/d2an00452f10.1039/d2an00452f ↗
20. 10.1039/C9AY00230H10.1039/C9AY00230H ↗
21. 10.1039/C9NR09148C10.1039/C9NR09148C ↗
22. 10.1039/d2nr03755f10.1039/d2nr03755f ↗
23. 10.1016/j.bios.2018.04.03510.1016/j.bios.2018.04.035 ↗
24. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.61490610.3389/fbioe.2020.614906 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.12.12110.1016/j.snb.2018.12.121 ↗
26. 10.1080/02772248.2013.84037910.1080/02772248.2013.840379 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.05.02810.1016/j.msec.2015.05.028 ↗
28. 10.1021/ie901173h10.1021/ie901173h ↗
29. 10.1039/d2ra08140g10.1039/d2ra08140g ↗
30. 10.1021/jp001803b10.1021/jp001803b ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.11601510.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116015 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.13141510.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131415 ↗
33. 10.1039/d3nj02177g10.1039/d3nj02177g ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0495210.1021/acs.iecr.0c04952 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10200510.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.102005 ↗
36. 10.1039/c6cp01285j10.1039/c6cp01285j ↗
37. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0017210.1021/acsanm.1c00172 ↗
38. 10.1007/s11051-016-3336-y10.1007/s11051-016-3336-y ↗
39. 10.1021/acsabm.0c0131410.1021/acsabm.0c01314 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jssc.2015.06.03110.1016/j.jssc.2015.06.031 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16268810.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162688 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.12784110.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127841 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11297810.1016/j.measurement.2023.112978 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.microc.2022.10742510.1016/j.microc.2022.107425 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.04110.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.041 ↗
46. 10.1007/s11356-022-24372-z10.1007/s11356-022-24372-z ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.11.31810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.11.318 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.01.07710.1016/j.electacta.2013.01.077 ↗