journal article·2024-03-08

(CoFeMnCuNiCr)3O4 High-Entropy Oxide Nanoparticles Immobilized on Reduced Graphene Oxide as Heterogeneous Catalysts for Solvent-Free Aerobic Oxidation of Benzyl Alcohol

Seyedsaeed Mehrabi-Kalajahi, Ahmad Ostovari Moghaddam, Fahimeh Hadavimoghaddam, Rana Salari, Mikhail A. Varfolomeev, Almaz L. Zinnatullin, Kamil R. Minnebaev, Dmitrii A. Emelianov, Daniil A. Uchaev, Rahele Fereidonnejad, Olga Zaitseva, Gulgena R. Khasanova, Evgeny A. Trofimov, Alexei Rozhenko, Andreu Cabot, Farit G. Vagizov

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 7· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

The development of noble metal-free heterogeneous catalysts holds promise for the solvent-free and selective aerobic oxidation of organic compounds. However, the moderate activity of these catalysts under atmospheric conditions limits their industrial use. In this work, the synthesis of noble metal-free (CoFeMnCuNiCr) 3 O 4 high-entropy oxide (HEO) nanoparticles and their grafting on reduced graphene oxide (rGO) to produce a HEO–rGO nanocomposite is detailed. X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Raman and Mössbauer spectroscopy analyses confirm the formation of the spinel HEO phase. HEO–rGO nanocomposites are used for aerobic and solvent-free oxidation of benzyl alcohol, displaying excellent catalytic performance. Up to 10.36% conversion and 78.5% selectivity of benzaldehyde can be achieved in only 4 h. An extensive analytical study shows that the excellent performance of HEO–rGO nanocomposites is attributed to the synergistic effect between the rGO active sites and the abundant oxygen vacancies within the HEO nanoparticles. Moreover, four robust machine learning models including Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), Random Forest (RF), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) are applied to predict the selectivity of the oxidation reactions. The XGBoost is demonstrated as the best-fitting model for all data with an error of less than 2.5%. Overall, both experimental and numerical data suggest the potential application of the HEO–rGO nanocomposites in chemical industries for the selective oxidation of alcohols to added-value products.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Petroleum Engineering, Kazan Federal University, Kazan 420008, Russia

Department of Physical Chemistry, Kazan Federal University, Kazan 420008, Russia

Department of Materials Science, Physical and Chemical Properties of Materials, South Ural State University, 76 Lenin Ave, Chelyabinsk 454080, Russia

Institute of Unconventional Oil & Gas, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, Heilongjiang, China

Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran

Institute of Physics, Kazan Federal University, Kazan 420008, Russia

Institute of Geology and Petroleum Technologies, Kazan Federal University, Kazan 420008, Russia

Laboratory of Sorption and Catalytic Processes, Kazan Federal University, Kazan 420008, Russia

Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow 117997, Russia

Catalonia Institute for Energy Research─IREC, Sant Adrià de Besòs 08930, Spain

ICREA, Pg. Lluís Companys 23, Barcelona 08010, Spain

Funding

Russian Science Foundation

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/am302074p10.1021/am302074p ↗
2. 10.1007/s13738-016-0821-210.1007/s13738-016-0821-2 ↗
3. 10.1002/ange.20181206810.1002/ange.201812068 ↗
4. 10.1039/D1GC04676D10.1039/D1GC04676D ↗
5. 10.1002/adsc.20200153510.1002/adsc.202001535 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b0363810.1021/acs.orglett.9b03638 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14761210.1016/j.cej.2023.147612 ↗
8. 10.4236/gsc.2018.8201210.4236/gsc.2018.82012 ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20200489210.1002/anie.202004892 ↗
10. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0365510.1021/acscatal.7b03655 ↗
11. 10.1039/c1cy00068c10.1039/c1cy00068c ↗
12. 10.1016/j.mcat.2022.11254510.1016/j.mcat.2022.112545 ↗
13. 10.1039/C5CY00630A10.1039/C5CY00630A ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.12.02410.1016/j.cej.2016.12.024 ↗
15. 10.1039/C8CY02248H10.1039/C8CY02248H ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.16510.1016/j.cej.2017.11.165 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41578-022-00429-w10.1038/s41578-022-00429-w ↗
18. 10.1038/s41578-019-0121-410.1038/s41578-019-0121-4 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.17080210.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170802 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.3c1523510.1021/acsami.3c15235 ↗
21. 10.1002/eem2.1221510.1002/eem2.12215 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20230371910.1002/adma.202303719 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.2c1162710.1021/acsami.2c11627 ↗
24. 10.1039/D2TA02027K10.1039/D2TA02027K ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13865910.1016/j.cej.2022.138659 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15683810.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156838 ↗
27. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0208910.1021/acscatal.0c02089 ↗
28. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0389310.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03893 ↗
29. 10.1126/science.112056010.1126/science.1120560 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15266810.1016/j.apsusc.2022.152668 ↗
31. 10.1039/b509003b10.1039/b509003b ↗
32. 10.1039/b900151b10.1039/b900151b ↗
33. 10.1016/j.molcata.2016.09.03010.1016/j.molcata.2016.09.030 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.molcata.2004.01.00910.1016/j.molcata.2004.01.009 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jcat.2022.06.01610.1016/j.jcat.2022.06.016 ↗
36. Shahriary L. · Int. J. Renewable Energy Environ. Eng. · 2014 · 2 · 58
37. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.11027810.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110278 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.saa.2014.02.09010.1016/j.saa.2014.02.090 ↗
39. 10.1007/s10948-018-4765-x10.1007/s10948-018-4765-x ↗
40. 10.1080/00958972.2016.117081710.1080/00958972.2016.1170817 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.12.14810.1016/j.matlet.2017.12.148 ↗
42. 10.1002/adfm.20120141810.1002/adfm.201201418 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.11660010.1016/j.actamat.2020.116600 ↗
44. Goldanskii V. I. · 1968
45. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.12725110.1016/j.snb.2019.127251 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.09.06310.1016/j.apsusc.2007.09.063 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10873610.1016/j.matdes.2020.108736 ↗
48. Chastain, J.; King, R. C. Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy; Perkin-Elmer Corporation, 1992; Vol. 40, p 221.
49. 10.1016/j.solener.2022.03.01110.1016/j.solener.2022.03.011 ↗
50. 10.1021/acsami.7b1820810.1021/acsami.7b18208 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.17610.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.176 ↗
52. 10.1007/s11705-018-1705-z10.1007/s11705-018-1705-z ↗
53. 10.1039/C9RA00275H10.1039/C9RA00275H ↗
54. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0527310.1021/acscatal.9b05273 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.06.06210.1016/j.carbon.2021.06.062 ↗
56. 10.1021/jp020729p10.1021/jp020729p ↗
57. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13580210.1016/j.cej.2022.135802 ↗
58. 10.3762/bjoc.13.17410.3762/bjoc.13.174 ↗
59. 10.1021/ja402063v10.1021/ja402063v ↗
60. 10.1126/science.756992210.1126/science.7569922 ↗
61. 10.1021/es051330s10.1021/es051330s ↗
62. 10.1016/j.mcat.2021.11185810.1016/j.mcat.2021.111858 ↗
63. 10.1039/C8GC00123E10.1039/C8GC00123E ↗
64. 10.1021/ja501866r10.1021/ja501866r ↗
65. 10.1002/ange.20130686310.1002/ange.201306863 ↗
66. 10.1039/c2jm34290a10.1039/c2jm34290a ↗
67. 10.1016/j.apcata.2022.11853710.1016/j.apcata.2022.118537 ↗