journal article·2023-04-28

Ternary Copper Iron Sulfide Microflowers Anchored on Reduced Graphene Oxide for Water Splitting

Srinivasan Swathi, Rathinam Yuvakkumar, Ganesan Ravi, Mariyappan Thambidurai, Hung D. Nguyen, Dhayalan Velauthapillai

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 6· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Transition metal sulfides are widely employed as bifunctional electrocatalysts owing to their unique structural features, well-off active sites, and modifiable electronic and mechanical properties. Herein, we have synthesized highly efficient ternary copper iron sulfide (CuFeS 2 )/reduced graphene oxide (rGO) composites via a hydrothermal approach for an overall water splitting process. The tetragonal structure of CuFeS 2 microflowers anchored on rGO sheets is identified by using X-ray analysis and compared with standard Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) #35-752. In Raman spectra, the existence of two bands D (defects) and G (graphitic) confirms the presence of the rGO composite with CuFeS 2, and the ratio of D and G band ( I D / I G ) is observed to be 1.18. The morphological analysis using scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy substantiates the formation of microflowers with rGO sheets. The elemental composition of CuFeS 2 /rGO was analyzed by energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, which demonstrated a weight percentage of various compositions of Cu (18.07%), Fe (11.32%), S (13.88%), and C (56.74%). Moreover, the CuFeS 2 /rGO composites exhibited a high surface area, pore volume, and diameter of 50.352 m 2 /g, 0.162 cc/g, and 2.471 nm, respectively. The fabricated electrodes were examined by using electrochemical characterization. The obtained results clearly showed low overpotential and low Tafel slope values in both the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) (176 mV and 216 mV/dec) and hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) (153 mV and 150 mV/dec) processes. In addition, the fabricated composite exhibited low 1.59 V cell voltages for an overall water splitting process with more excellent stability, and it showed a faradaic efficiency of 97.8% for H 2 and 95.5% for O 2 . Therefore, the composite of rGO in ternary metal sulfide plays a predominant role in improving the electrocatalytic activity of the material, and the CuFeS 2 /rGO composite emerges as a promising electrode for the water splitting process.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu 630 003, India

Department of Physics, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab 140 413, India

School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore

Faculty of Engineering and Science, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen 5063, Norway

Funding

University Grants Commission · Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India · Ministry of Human Resource Development

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c0135010.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c01350 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0850610.1021/acsnano.1c08506 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.23051410.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230514 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0070710.1021/acsomega.2c00707 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsanm.2c0023310.1021/acsanm.2c00233 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c0266610.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c02666 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0407910.1021/acsaem.1c04079 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c0109510.1021/acs.langmuir.2c01095 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.23059610.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230596 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.22994110.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229941 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22892510.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228925 ↗
12. 10.1039/D2RA03860A10.1039/D2RA03860A ↗
13. 10.1007/s13399-022-03258-710.1007/s13399-022-03258-7 ↗
14. 10.1039/D1RA09139E10.1039/D1RA09139E ↗
15. 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.12038010.1016/j.seppur.2021.120380 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c0899310.1021/acs.jpcc.1c08993 ↗
17. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0757610.1021/acssuschemeng.1c07576 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.15156710.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151567 ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20220576710.1002/adfm.202205767 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13168710.1016/j.cej.2021.131687 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.02.01110.1016/j.carbon.2022.02.011 ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20210077510.1002/aenm.202100775 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.06.06510.1016/j.jmst.2021.06.065 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsanm.2c0172010.1021/acsanm.2c01720 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10854-022-09172-y10.1007/s10854-022-09172-y ↗
26. 10.1016/j.apsadv.2022.10023110.1016/j.apsadv.2022.100231 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.09.07210.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.09.072 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.11810.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.118 ↗
29. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0488210.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04882 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c0345510.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03455 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matre.2021.10005910.1016/j.matre.2021.100059 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matre.2021.10006010.1016/j.matre.2021.100060 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.08.23310.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.08.233 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.inoche.2022.10966110.1016/j.inoche.2022.109661 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.physe.2022.11540710.1016/j.physe.2022.115407 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.09.01810.1016/j.ceramint.2022.09.018 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.12576510.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.125765 ↗
38. 10.1039/D2RA00953F10.1039/D2RA00953F ↗
39. 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.14132010.1016/j.electacta.2022.141320 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.mssp.2021.10643310.1016/j.mssp.2021.106433 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12670110.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126701 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.gca.2022.06.00510.1016/j.gca.2022.06.005 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.diamond.2022.10918310.1016/j.diamond.2022.109183 ↗
44. 10.1039/D2YA00050D10.1039/D2YA00050D ↗
45. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13585110.1016/j.electacta.2020.135851 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.12172910.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121729 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.19610.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.196 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.13975210.1016/j.electacta.2021.139752 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16204010.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162040 ↗
50. 10.1002/slct.20200002610.1002/slct.202000026 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12506910.1016/j.cej.2020.125069 ↗
52. 10.1039/C7TA08518D10.1039/C7TA08518D ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.01210.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.012 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.04.07210.1016/j.apcatb.2019.04.072 ↗
55. 10.1002/admi.20170139610.1002/admi.201701396 ↗
56. 10.1039/C7TA04438K10.1039/C7TA04438K ↗
57. 10.1007/s40843-022-2216-410.1007/s40843-022-2216-4 ↗
58. 10.1021/acsami.6b0073110.1021/acsami.6b00731 ↗
59. 10.1002/adsu.20210043610.1002/adsu.202100436 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15681010.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156810 ↗