journal article·2021-03-26Open access

Engineering Shape Anisotropy of Fe3O4-γ-Fe2O3 Hollow Nanoparticles for Magnetic Hyperthermia

Gopal Niraula, Jose A. H. Coaquira, Giorgio Zoppellaro, Bianca M. G. Villar, Flavio Garcia, Andris F. Bakuzis, João P. F. Longo, Mosar C. Rodrigues, Diego Muraca, Ahmad I. Ayesh, Francisco Sávio M. Sinfrônio, Alan S. de Menezes, Gerardo F. Goya, Surender K. Sharma

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 4· Issue 3

Abstract

The use of microwave-assisted synthesis (in water) of -Fe 2 O 3 nanomaterials followed by their transformation onto iron oxide Fe 3 O 4 --Fe 2 O 3 hollow nanoparticles encoding well-defined sizes and shapes [nanorings (NRs) and nanotubes (NTs)] is henceforth described. The impact of experimental variables such as concentration of reactants, volume of solvent employed, and reaction times/temperatures during the shape-controlled synthesis revealed that the key factor that gated generation of morphologically diverse nanoparticles was associated to the initial concentration of phosphate anions employed in the reactant mixture. All the nanomaterials presented were fully characterized by powder X-ray diffraction, field emission scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared, Mossbauer spectroscopy, and superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID). The hollow nanoparticles that expressed the most promising magnetic responses, NTs and NRs, were further tested in terms of efficiencies in controlling the magnetic hyperthermia, in view of their possible use for biomedical applications, supported by their excellent viability as screened by in vitro cytotoxicity tests. These systems NTs and NRs expressed very good magneto-hyperthermia properties, results that were further validated by micromagnetic simulations. The observed specific absorption rate (SAR) and intrinsic loss power of the NRs and NTs peaked the values of 340 W/g and 2.45 nH m 2 kg -1 (NRs) and 465 W/g and 3.3 nH m 2 kg -1 (NTs), respectively, at the maximum clinical field 450 Oe and under a frequency of 107 kHz and are the highest values among those reported so far in the hollow iron-oxide family. The higher SAR in NTs accounts the importance of magnetic shape anisotropy, which is well-predicted by the modified dynamic hysteresis (-MDH) theoretical model.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Magnetic properties of thin films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, Federal University of Maranhao, Sao Luis, 65080-805, Brazil

Laboratory of Magnetic Materials, NFA, Institute of Physics, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900 Brazil

Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Faculty of Science, Palacky University in Olomouc, Slechtitelu 27, Olomouc 78371, Czech Republic

Brazilian Center for Research in Physics−CBPF, Rio de Janeiro, 22290-180, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Institute of Physics, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, 74690-900, Goiás, Brazil

Department of Genetics & Morphology, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, 70910-900, Brazil

Institute of Physics “Gleb Wataghin” (IFGW), University of Campinas, Campinas, 13083-970, Brazil

Center for Sustainable Development, Qatar University, P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar

Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Physics, Qatar University, P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar

Department of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Maranhao, Sao Luis, 65080-805, Brazil

Instituto de Nanociencia y Materiales de Aragón (INMA), Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, 50018, Spain

Department of Physics, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda 151401, India

Funding

European Regional Development Fund · Funda??o de Amparo ? Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico do Maranh?o · Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico · Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1006/jcis.1998.605310.1006/jcis.1998.6053 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11671-008-9174-910.1007/s11671-008-9174-9 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b0086610.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00866 ↗
4. 10.1038/srep3487410.1038/srep34874 ↗
5. 10.1039/c9tb00998a10.1039/c9tb00998a ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.02410.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.024 ↗
7. 10.1038/nnano.2011.9510.1038/nnano.2011.95 ↗
8. 10.1186/1743-8977-10-3210.1186/1743-8977-10-32 ↗
9. 10.1002/nbm.93110.1002/nbm.931 ↗
10. 10.1038/nmat259110.1038/nmat2591 ↗
11. 10.1088/2043-6262/7/4/04501010.1088/2043-6262/7/4/045010 ↗
12. 10.1155/2016/861250510.1155/2016/8612505 ↗
13. 10.1021/am300469r10.1021/am300469r ↗
14. 10.1007/s10854-018-0134-610.1007/s10854-018-0134-6 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.110210.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1102 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20140503610.1002/adma.201405036 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0537110.1021/acs.jpcc.9b05371 ↗
18. 10.1098/rsta.1948.000710.1098/rsta.1948.0007 ↗
19. Cullity B. D. · 2009
20. 10.1063/1.497916510.1063/1.4979165 ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20140276410.1002/adfm.201402764 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.368496310.1063/1.3684963 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.02442410.1103/PhysRevB.74.024424 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.05441110.1103/PhysRevB.73.054411 ↗
25. 10.1039/c6ra27539g10.1039/c6ra27539g ↗
26. 10.1021/ja805152t10.1021/ja805152t ↗
27. 10.1021/ja063528y10.1021/ja063528y ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20060217610.1002/adma.200602176 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0022-3093(99)00601-810.1016/S0022-3093(99)00601-8 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b0862210.1021/acs.jpcb.8b08622 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0925-8388(00)01207-X10.1016/S0925-8388(00)01207-X ↗
32. 10.1021/jp207626910.1021/jp2076269 ↗
33. 10.1002/anie.20046303810.1002/anie.200463038 ↗
34. 10.1021/jp101015410.1021/jp1010154 ↗
35. 10.1021/cr200175610.1021/cr2001756 ↗
36. 10.1021/cr400544s10.1021/cr400544s ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0251010.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02510 ↗
38. 10.1021/nn900679710.1021/nn9006797 ↗
39. 10.1107/s002188987701294110.1107/s0021889877012941 ↗
40. 10.1107/s002188987901248610.1107/s0021889879012486 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.04.00310.1016/j.apcata.2010.04.003 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2014.10.00510.1016/j.jwpe.2014.10.005 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.12.06110.1016/j.jcis.2006.12.061 ↗
44. Cullity B. D. · 200810.1002/9780470386323 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.1119310.1103/PhysRevB.60.11193 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.846110.1103/PhysRevB.43.8461 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.01240210.1103/PhysRevB.64.012402 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.mee.2013.02.04510.1016/j.mee.2013.02.045 ↗
49. 10.3109/02656736.2013.82299310.3109/02656736.2013.822993 ↗
50. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0176210.1021/acsnano.7b01762 ↗
51. 10.1038/s41598-017-18162-810.1038/s41598-017-18162-8 ↗
52. 10.1063/1.355158210.1063/1.3551582 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0779610.1021/acs.jpcc.5b07796 ↗
54. 10.1038/srep3838210.1038/srep38382 ↗
55. 10.1039/c7nr02356a10.1039/c7nr02356a ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0200610.1021/acs.jpcc.6b02006 ↗