journal article·2020-03-27

Activated Carbon–Metal Organic Framework Composite for the Adsorption of Contaminants of Emerging Concern from Water

Juan C. Muñoz-Senmache, Sewoon Kim, Rodinson R. Arrieta-Pérez, Chang Min Park, Yeomin Yoon, Arturo J. Hernández-Maldonado

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 3· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

A composite adsorbent (CMOF) based on in situ growth of MIL-100Fe (MOF) within the macro- and mesopores of a Darco-KB-G activated carbon (AC) was prepared for the efficient adsorption of a set of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs), namely, caffeine (CFN), carbamazepine (CBZ), clofibric acid (CA), 10,11-epoxycarbamazepine (Ep-CBZ), naproxen (NPX), o-desmethylnaproxen (o-DMN), paraxanthine (PXN), and salicylic acid (SA), from water. The properties of the composite and that of the parent materials were evaluated via X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, nitrogen porosimetry, thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), and X-ray photoelectron microscopy. Mass balances indicate that the composite contains about 46 wt % MOF, while a comparison of pore size distributions and TGA corroborated that the vast majority of the crystalline material resides within the macro/mesopores of the AC. Zeta potential measurements revealed that the acid media used during the in situ growth of the MOF resulted in a CMOF surface charge profile (isoelectric point (IEP) = ∼3.2) that is generally more negative than that of the MIL-100(Fe) (IEP = ∼4.2) and the nonacid treated AC (IEP = ∼5.5). Single and multicomponent CEC equilibrium adsorption tests were performed at room temperature, neutral pH conditions, and low CEC concentrations (∼μg L–1). Single component adsorption data show that the composite adsorbs 10-fold more CEC molecules compared to the MOF alone, with a selectivity that increases as follows: CA < SA < o-DMN < PXN < NPX < CFN < Ep-CBZ < CBZ. The effect of competition among the CECs on the adsorption capacity of CMOF was not as significant, only about 9% smaller compared to single component adsorption data. Uptake improvements seen in the CMOF appear to be the result of interactions based on a combination of hydrophobicity (from the AC core) and enhanced electrostatic level forces as well as π-complexation and π–π stacking interactions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Campus, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico 00681-9000

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, United States

Department of Environmental Engineering, Kyungpook National University, 80 Daehak-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea

Funding

Office of Integrative Activities

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.00310.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.003 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.wace.2018.10.00210.1016/j.wace.2018.10.002 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.crm.2018.01.00210.1016/j.crm.2018.01.002 ↗
4. Drewes, J. E.; Anderson, P.; Denslow, N.; Jakubowski, W.; Olivieri, A.; Schlenk, D.; Snyder, S. Monitoring Strategies for Constituents of Emerging Concern (CECs) in Recycled Water: Recommendations of a Science Advisory Panel; Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Technical Report 1032, 2018.
5. 10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.05310.1016/j.watres.2014.08.053 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.00410.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.004 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.28610.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.286 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.10210.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.102 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.emcon.2018.02.00110.1016/j.emcon.2018.02.001 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.02910.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.029 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.29710.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.297 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.37510.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.375 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.02710.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.027 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.envint.2014.11.02010.1016/j.envint.2014.11.020 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.12110.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.121 ↗
16. 10.1021/es500907n10.1021/es500907n ↗
17. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.26510.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.265 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0029910.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00299 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.03.01210.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.03.012 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.04410.1016/j.cej.2017.11.044 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.10.02410.1016/j.jwpe.2018.10.024 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.04.02110.1016/j.molliq.2018.04.021 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.03.01510.1016/j.ccr.2018.03.015 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.17310.1016/j.cej.2019.03.173 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.07310.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.073 ↗
26. 10.1080/01496395.2018.151898610.1080/01496395.2018.1518986 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.01.09310.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.01.093 ↗
28. 10.1002/jctb.586410.1002/jctb.5864 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.08.05510.1016/j.micromeso.2014.08.055 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.08510.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.085 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.01710.1016/j.watres.2018.07.017 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.13810.1016/j.cej.2019.04.138 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0373410.1021/acs.iecr.8b03734 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0516810.1021/acs.iecr.7b05168 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.01.01210.1016/j.micromeso.2019.01.012 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.9b0184510.1021/acsami.9b01845 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.03.04710.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.03.047 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.08710.1016/j.cej.2015.08.087 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.04.00110.1016/j.jcis.2017.04.001 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.04910.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.049 ↗
41. 10.1038/nature0165010.1038/nature01650 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.cej.2013.01.00210.1016/j.cej.2013.01.002 ↗
43. 10.1039/c2jm16513a10.1039/c2jm16513a ↗
44. 10.1039/C8QM00002F10.1039/C8QM00002F ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1124710.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11247 ↗
46. 10.1039/C9DT00813F10.1039/C9DT00813F ↗
47. 10.1016/j.envres.2018.11.01310.1016/j.envres.2018.11.013 ↗
48. 10.1039/B704325B10.1039/B704325B ↗
49. 10.1002/anie.20100123010.1002/anie.201001230 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.02.02710.1016/j.micromeso.2012.02.027 ↗
51. 10.1002/adma.20110408410.1002/adma.201104084 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2010.03.02910.1016/j.micromeso.2010.03.029 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.cej.2014.11.06810.1016/j.cej.2014.11.068 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.07.03710.1016/j.micromeso.2015.07.037 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.09.02010.1016/j.micromeso.2016.09.020 ↗
56. 10.1021/ja01269a02310.1021/ja01269a023 ↗
57. 10.1021/ja01145a12610.1021/ja01145a126 ↗
58. 10.1002/aic.69046040810.1002/aic.690460408 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.watres.2005.09.01810.1016/j.watres.2005.09.018 ↗
60. 10.1039/C7RA01091E10.1039/C7RA01091E ↗
61. 10.1039/C5TB01412C10.1039/C5TB01412C ↗
62. 10.1021/acsomega.9b0033010.1021/acsomega.9b00330 ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0052810.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00528 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.molcata.2015.02.00710.1016/j.molcata.2015.02.007 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.03.03110.1016/j.molliq.2016.03.031 ↗
66. 10.1021/jp212514a10.1021/jp212514a ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.09.04610.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.09.046 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.11.07010.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.11.070 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.00510.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.005 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.24710.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.247 ↗