journal article·2011-01-28

Optimizing flurbiprofen-loaded NLC by central composite factorial design for ocular delivery

E Gonzalez-Mira, M A Egea, E B Souto, A C Calpena, M L García

Nanotechnology· Volume 22· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to design and optimize a new topical delivery system for ocular administration of flurbiprofen (FB), based on lipid nanoparticles. These particles, called nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC), were composed of a fatty acid (stearic acid (SA)) as the solid lipid and a mixture of Miglyol(®) 812 and castor oil (CO) as the liquid lipids, prepared by the hot high pressure homogenization method. After selecting the critical variables influencing the physicochemical characteristics of the NLC (the liquid lipid (i.e. oil) concentration with respect to the total lipid (cOil/L (wt%)), the surfactant and the flurbiprofen concentration, on particle size, polydispersity index and encapsulation efficiency), a three-factor five-level central rotatable composite design was employed to plan and perform the experiments. Morphological examination, crystallinity and stability studies were also performed to accomplish the optimization study. The results showed that increasing cOil/L (wt%) was followed by an enhanced tendency to produce smaller particles, but the liquid to solid lipid proportion should not exceed 30 wt% due to destabilization problems. Therefore, a 70:30 ratio of SA to oil (miglyol + CO) was selected to develop an optimal NLC formulation. The smaller particles obtained when increasing surfactant concentration led to the selection of 3.2 wt% of Tween(®) 80 (non-ionic surfactant). The positive effect of the increase in FB concentration on the encapsulation efficiency (EE) and its total solubilization in the lipid matrix led to the selection of 0.25 wt% of FB in the formulation. The optimal NLC showed an appropriate average size for ophthalmic administration (228.3 nm) with a narrow size distribution (0.156), negatively charged surface (-33.3 mV) and high EE (∼90%). The in vitro experiments proved that sustained release FB was achieved using NLC as drug carriers. Optimal NLC formulation did not show toxicity on ocular tissues.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery · Advanced Drug Delivery Systems · Ocular Surface and Contact Lens

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Müller R H Lucks J S · 1996
2. 10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00105-310.1016/S0169-409X(01)00105-3 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.09.00310.1016/j.ejpb.2008.09.003 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.addr.2007.04.01210.1016/j.addr.2007.04.012 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00118-710.1016/S0169-409X(02)00118-7 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00223-010.1016/S0168-3659(99)00223-0 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.nano.2009.02.00310.1016/j.nano.2009.02.003 ↗
8. 10.1002/chir.1031410.1002/chir.10314 ↗
9. 10.1186/1476-511X-8-610.1186/1476-511X-8-6 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00137-810.1016/S0886-3350(03)00137-8 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.04.02110.1016/j.jconrel.2009.04.021 ↗
12. 10.2174/18722110878453408110.2174/187221108784534081 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.03.03410.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.03.034 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.aca.2009.06.01510.1016/j.aca.2009.06.015 ↗
15. 10.1021/jf801392610.1021/jf8013926 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00396005021810.1007/s003960050218 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0168-3659(97)00046-110.1016/S0168-3659(97)00046-1 ↗
18. Gamisans F · 1999
19. 10.1002/jps.2138310.1002/jps.21383 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.03.02810.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.03.028 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0039-9140(99)00129-010.1016/S0039-9140(99)00129-0 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.03.00910.1016/j.foodres.2009.03.009 ↗
23. 10.1208/pt06022410.1208/pt060224 ↗
24. Garcia X · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2010
25. 10.1007/BF0111745010.1007/BF01117450 ↗
26. Duprat P · Eur. J. Toxicol. Environ. Hyg. · 1976 · 9 · 171
27. Kay J H · J. Soc. Cosm. Chem. · 1962 · 13 · 281
28. Passantino A · Annu. Rev. Biomed. Sci. · 2008 · 10 · T2710.5016/1806-8774.2008.v10pT27 ↗
29. Gasco M R · 2006
30. 10.1080/0193269810894392410.1080/01932698108943924 ↗
31. 10.1023/B:PHAM.0000016235.32639.2310.1023/B:PHAM.0000016235.32639.23 ↗
32. Saupe A · Biomed. Mater. Eng. · 2005 · 15 · 393
33. 10.1016/S0378-5173(99)00417-210.1016/S0378-5173(99)00417-2 ↗
34. APV Homogenizer Group · 1996
35. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.07.02910.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.07.029 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2005.08.00510.1016/j.colsurfb.2005.08.005 ↗
37. 10.3109/1071754090343158610.3109/10717540903431586 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.08.00510.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.08.005 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.11.00610.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.11.006 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.cis.2006.05.01410.1016/j.cis.2006.05.014 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.12.01810.1016/j.jconrel.2008.12.018 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00331-410.1016/S0142-9612(03)00331-4 ↗
43. 10.1016/S0939-6411(98)00074-510.1016/S0939-6411(98)00074-5 ↗
44. 10.1007/s11746-008-1219-910.1007/s11746-008-1219-9 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.03.00710.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.03.007 ↗
46. 10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00687-710.1016/S0378-5173(02)00687-7 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.foodres.2007.09.00610.1016/j.foodres.2007.09.006 ↗
48. 10.1080/0265204050043529510.1080/02652040500435295 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.02.01110.1016/j.jconrel.2008.02.011 ↗
50. 10.1016/S0378-5173(00)00378-110.1016/S0378-5173(00)00378-1 ↗
51. Shen J · Nanotechnology · 2010 · 21 · 02510110.1088/0957-4484/21/2/025101 ↗
52. Zimmermann E · Pharmazie · 2005 · 60 · 508
53. 10.1023/B:PHAM.0000019291.36636.c110.1023/B:PHAM.0000019291.36636.c1 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.addr.2007.04.00610.1016/j.addr.2007.04.006 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.09.00710.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.09.007 ↗
56. 10.1080/0265204080237990210.1080/02652040802379902 ↗
57. 10.3109/0271368100376016810.3109/02713681003760168 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.addr.2008.09.00210.1016/j.addr.2008.09.002 ↗
59. 10.1002/jps.260069040710.1002/jps.2600690407 ↗