Fast and versatile thermo-osmotic flows with a pinch of salt
Source abstract
Abstract
Thermo-osmotic flows - flows generated in micro and nanofluidic systems by thermal gradients - could provide an alternative approach to harvest waste heat. However, such use would require massive thermo-osmotic flows, which are up to now only predicted for special and expensive materials. Thus, there is an urgent need to design affordable nanofluidic systems displaying large thermo-osmotic coefficients. In this paper, we propose a general model for thermo-osmosis of aqueous electrolytes in charged nanofluidic channels, taking into account hydrodynamic slip, together with the different solvent and solute contributions to the thermo-osmotic response. We apply this model to a wide range of systems by studying the effects of wetting, salt type and concentration, and surface charge. We show that intense thermo-osmotic flows can be generated using slipping charged surfaces. We also predict for intermediate wettings a transition from a thermophobic to a thermophilic behavior depending on the surface charge and salt concentration. Overall, this theoretical framework opens an avenue for controlling and manipulating thermally induced flows with common charged surfaces and a pinch of salt.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Univ Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Institut Lumière Matière, F-69622, Villeurbanne, France
Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), 1 rue Descartes, 75005 Paris, France
Funding
Institut Universitaire de France · Agence Nationale de la Recherche
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Straub · Nat. Energy · 2016 · 1 · 110.1038/nenergy.2016.90 ↗
2. Kristiansen · Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2019 · 11 · 04403710.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.044037 ↗
3. Straub · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2017 · 51 · 1292510.1021/acs.est.7b02213 ↗
4. Zhao · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 366410.1021/nl504236g ↗
5. Oyarzua · ACS Nano · 2017 · 11 · 999710.1021/acsnano.7b04177 ↗
6. Dietzel · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 116 · 22590110.1103/PhysRevLett.116.225901 ↗
7. Fu · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2019 · 123 · 1
8. T.Markovich , D.Andelman and R.Podgornik , arXiv preprint arXiv :1603.09451, 2016
9. Lippmann · Compt. Rend. · 1907 · 145 · 104
10. Derjaguin · C. R. Acad. Sci. · 1941 · 32 · 622
11. Dariel · J. Phys. Chem. · 1975 · 79 · 33610.1021/j100571a010 ↗
12. Mengual · J. Membr. Sci. · 1978 · 4 · 20910.1016/S0376-7388(00)83296-2 ↗
13. Piazza · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2004 · 16 · S4195
14. Barragán · J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn. · 2017 · 42 · 21710.1515/jnet-2016-0088 ↗
15. Ganti · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2017 · 119 · 110.1103/PhysRevLett.119.038002 ↗
16. Fu · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2017 · 119 · 21450110.1103/PhysRevLett.119.214501 ↗
17. Rajegowda · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 20 · 3032110.1039/C8CP05521A ↗
18. Ganti · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2018 · 121 · 6800210.1103/PhysRevLett.121.068002 ↗
19. Prakash · Nanotechnology · 2020 · 31 · 42540310.1088/1361-6528/ab8fe4 ↗
20. Derjaguin · Pure Appl. Chem. · 1980 · 52 · 116310.1351/pac198052051163 ↗
21. Rusconi · J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 2004 · 21 · 60510.1364/JOSAB.21.000605 ↗
22. Nedev · ACS Photonics · 2015 · 2 · 49110.1021/ph500371z ↗
23. Bregulla · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 116 · 110.1103/PhysRevLett.116.188303 ↗
24. Villaluenga · J. Membr. Sci. · 2006 · 274 · 11610.1016/j.memsci.2005.08.010 ↗
25. Kim · J. Membr. Sci. · 2009 · 328 · 11310.1016/j.memsci.2008.11.043 ↗
26. Anderson · Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. · 1989 · 21 · 6110.1146/annurev.fl.21.010189.000425 ↗
27. B. V.Derjaguin , N. V.Churaev and V. M.Muller , Surface Forces , Springer , 198710.1007/978-1-4757-6639-4 ↗
28. Ruckenstein · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 1981 · 83 · 7710.1016/0021-9797(81)90011-4 ↗
29. Maheedhara · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 20 · 2430010.1039/C8CP04089C ↗
30. Fu · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2018 · 9 · 208610.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00703 ↗
31. C.Navier , Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences de l'Institut de France , 1823 , vol. 6 , pp. 389–440
32. Cross · Phys. Rev. Fluids · 2018 · 3 · 110.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.062001 ↗
33. Herrero · J. Chem. Phys. · 2019 · 151 · 04110310.1063/1.5111966 ↗
34. Bocquet · Soft Matter · 2007 · 3 · 68510.1039/b616490k ↗
35. Wang · Nano Lett. · 2020 · 20 · 896510.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04331 ↗
36. C.Herrero and L.Joly , arXiv preprint arXiv :2105.00720, 2021
37. Plimpton · J. Comput. Phys. · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
38. Berendsen · J. Phys. Chem. · 1987 · 91 · 626910.1021/j100308a038 ↗
39. Huang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 1
40. Xie · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2020 · 125 · 01450110.1103/PhysRevLett.125.014501 ↗
41. Gaeta · J. Phys. Chem. · 1982 · 86 · 296710.1021/j100212a032 ↗
42. Putnam · Langmuir · 2005 · 21 · 531710.1021/la047056h ↗
43. Würger · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 10830210.1103/PhysRevLett.101.108302 ↗
44. Würger · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2010 · 73 · 12660110.1088/0034-4885/73/12/126601 ↗
45. Secchi · Nature · 2016 · 537 · 21010.1038/nature19315 ↗
46. Radha · Nature · 2016 · 538 · 22210.1038/nature19363 ↗
47. Hoang · Phys. Rev. E: Stat., Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. · 2012 · 86 · 02120210.1103/PhysRevE.86.021202 ↗
48. Bonthuis · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2013 · 117 · 1139710.1021/jp402482q ↗
49. Rezaei · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2021 · 125 · 476710.1021/acs.jpcb.0c11280 ↗
50. Huang · Langmuir · 2008 · 24 · 144210.1021/la7021787 ↗
51. Wang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 103 · 13780110.1103/PhysRevLett.103.137801 ↗
52. Kim · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2012 · 116 · 1200710.1021/jp306847t ↗
53. Härtel · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2015 · 8 · 239610.1039/C5EE01192B ↗
54. Jin · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2021 · 12 · 114410.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03558 ↗
55. Di Lecce · Nanoscale · 2020 · 12 · 2362610.1039/D0NR04912C ↗
56. Dietzel · J. Fluid Mech. · 2017 · 813 · 106010.1017/jfm.2016.844 ↗