Atomically resolved 3D structural reconstruction of small quantum dots
Source abstract
Abstract
Semiconducting quantum dots (QDs) have potential applications in light-emitting diodes, single-photon sources and quantum computing due to shape-dependent (opto) electronic properties. Atomic resolution 3D-structure determination is important in understanding growth kinetics and improving device performance. 3D-reconstruction of large QDs was reported using characterization techniques like atomic force microscopy, atom probe tomography and tilt series electron tomography, but, still, atomic resolution tomography of QDs, especially those sized below 10 nm, is a challenge. Inline-3D-holography is an emerging and promising technique to perform atomic resolution tomography at low electron doses. In the present study, atomically resolved 3D structures of QDs were reconstructed using inline-3D-holography, implemented on InN QDs (<10 nm) grown on a Si substrate. The residual amorphous glue distorts the exit surface geometry; hence an error correction method was proposed. This is the first experimental evidence of pre-pyramid shaped 3D structure of QDs sized below 10 nm that supports theoretical predictions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
Chennai 600036
India
IMEYMAT: Institute of Research on Electron Microscopy and Materials
University of Cádiz
Spain
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgic Engineering
and Inorganic Chemistry
Funding
Science and Engineering Research Board · Universidad de Cádiz
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Huffaker · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 73 · 256410.1063/1.122534 ↗
2. Lodahl · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2015 · 87 · 34710.1103/RevModPhys.87.347 ↗
3. Loss · Phys. Rev. A · 1998 · 57 · 12010.1103/PhysRevA.57.120 ↗
4. Stier · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 1999 · 59 · 568810.1103/PhysRevB.59.5688 ↗
5. Bera · Materials · 2010 · 3 · 226010.3390/ma3042260 ↗
6. Bietti · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2015 · 92 · 07542510.1103/PhysRevB.92.075425 ↗
7. Heyn · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 20310510.1063/1.2737123 ↗
8. Aseev · J. Cryst. Growth · 2018 · 493 · 6510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2018.04.027 ↗
9. Gurioli · Nat. Mater. · 2019 · 18 · 79910.1038/s41563-019-0355-y ↗
10. Medeiros-Ribeiro · Science · 1998 · 279 · 35310.1126/science.279.5349.353 ↗
11. Vailionis · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 85 · 367210.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3672 ↗
12. Park · Sci. Rep. · 2019 · 9 · 1002910.1038/s41598-019-46574-1 ↗
13. Bonef · Appl. Phys. Express · 2020 · 13 · 06500510.35848/1882-0786/ab9167 ↗
14. Perea · Nat. Commun. · 2015 · 6 · 758910.1038/ncomms8589 ↗
15. Cerezo · Mater. Today · 2007 · 10 · 3610.1016/S1369-7021(07)70306-1 ↗
16. Levin · Sci. Data · 2016 · 3 · 16004110.1038/sdata.2016.41 ↗
17. Chen · Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 7 · 462
18. Van Dyck · Nature · 2012 · 486 · 24310.1038/nature11074 ↗
19. Inoue · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 03190210.1063/1.2837453 ↗
20. Egerton · Micron · 2004 · 35 · 39910.1016/j.micron.2004.02.003 ↗
21. Rajak · Nanoscale · 2019 · 11 · 1363210.1039/C9NR04146J ↗
22. Van Dyck · Ultramicroscopy · 1996 · 64 · 9910.1016/0304-3991(96)00008-3 ↗
23. Wang · Ultramicroscopy · 2010 · 110 · 52710.1016/j.ultramic.2009.11.024 ↗
24. Wang · Ultramicroscopy · 2012 · 116 · 7710.1016/j.ultramic.2012.03.011 ↗
25. Allen · Ultramicroscopy · 2004 · 100 · 9110.1016/j.ultramic.2004.01.012 ↗
26. Bhattacharyya · Ultramicroscopy · 2006 · 106 · 52510.1016/j.ultramic.2006.01.007 ↗
27. Banerjee · Ultramicroscopy · 2021 · 221 · 11317710.1016/j.ultramic.2020.113177 ↗
28. Polyakov · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 03210110.1063/1.2166195 ↗
29. Jia · Microsc. Microanal. · 2004 · 10 · 17410.1017/S1431927604040425 ↗
30. Chen · Micron · 2015 · 68 · 5910.1016/j.micron.2014.08.009 ↗
31. Van Dyck · Micron · 2015 · 68 · 15810.1016/j.micron.2014.09.003 ↗
32. Jiménez · J. Alloys Compd. · 2019 · 783 · 69710.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.319 ↗
33. Nemcsics · Microelectron. Reliab. · 2016 · 56 · 7310.1016/j.microrel.2015.11.010 ↗
34. Li · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2014 · 64 · 12110.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.03.002 ↗
35. Samsonov · Colloids Surf., A · 1999 · 160 · 11710.1016/S0927-7757(99)00350-7 ↗
36. Gambaryan · Adv. Nano Res. · 2014 · 2 · 21110.12989/anr.2014.2.4.211 ↗
37. K. Scheerschmidt and P.Werner , Characterization of Structure and Composition of Quantum Dots by Transmission Electron Microscopy , Nano-Optoelectronics , 2002 , pp. 67–98 , 10.1007/978-3-642-56149-8_310.1007/978-3-642-56149-8_3 ↗
38. Brehm · Nanotechnology · 2017 · 28 · 39200110.1088/1361-6528/aa8143 ↗
39. Spencer · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 20610110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.206101 ↗
40. Smeeton · J. Mater. Sci. · 2006 · 41 · 272910.1007/s10853-006-7876-x ↗
41. Mkhoyan · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 82 · 85910.1063/1.1543642 ↗
42. Koch · Ultramicroscopy · 2008 · 108 · 14110.1016/j.ultramic.2007.03.007 ↗