Dynamic band alignment modulation of ultrathin WO x /ZnO stack for high on/off ratio field-effect switching applications
Source abstract
Abstract
A two-dimensional (2D) WOx/ZnO stack reveals a unique carrier transport behavior, which can be utilized as a novel device element to achieve a very high on/off ratio (>106) and an off current density lower than 1 nA cm-2. These unique behaviors are explained by a dynamic band alignment between WOx and ZnO, which can be actively modulated by a gate bias. The performance of FET utilizing the WOx/ZnO stack is comparable to those of other 2D heterojunction devices; however, it has a unique benefit in terms of process integration because of very low temperature process capability (T < 110 °C). The high on/off switching with extremely low off current density utilizing the dynamic band alignment modulation at the WOx/ZnO stack can be a very useful element for future device applications, especially in monolithic 3D integration or flexible electronics.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Ga2O3 and related materials · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Emerging Electronic Devices and Systems
School of Materials Science and Engineering
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology
Gwangju 61005
South Korea
Department of Chemistry
Hanyang University
Seongdong-gu
Department of Physics Education
Chonnam National University
Gwangju
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
University of Texas at Dallas
Richardson
USA
Funding
Global Frontier Hybrid Interface Materials · Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Lin · 2D Mater. · 2016 · 3 · 04200110.1088/2053-1583/3/4/042001 ↗
2. Zhu · RSC Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 1738710.1039/C6RA27674A ↗
3. Long · Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 225410.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04538 ↗
4. Chang · Small · 2018 · 14 · 180118210.1002/smll.201801182 ↗
5. Britnell · Science · 2013 · 340 · 131110.1126/science.1235547 ↗
6. Zhang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2017 · 9 · 539210.1021/acsami.6b14483 ↗
7. Shim · Carbon · 2018 · 133 · 7810.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.104 ↗
8. Roy · ACS Nano · 2015 · 9 · 207110.1021/nn507278b ↗
9. Yan · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 579110.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01792 ↗
10. Nourbakhsh · Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 135910.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04791 ↗
11. Huang · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2017 · 12 · 114810.1038/nnano.2017.208 ↗
12. Moriya · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 08311910.1063/1.4894256 ↗
13. Shih · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 579010.1021/nn500676t ↗
14. Kang · Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 258010.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00144 ↗
15. Shim · Adv. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 529310.1002/adma.201506004 ↗
16. Kwak · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 451110.1021/nl5015316 ↗
17. Kim · ACS Nano · 2015 · 9 · 452710.1021/acsnano.5b01114 ↗
18. Yu · Nat. Mater. · 2013 · 12 · 24610.1038/nmat3518 ↗
19. Sata · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 54 · 04DJ0410.7567/JJAP.54.04DJ04 ↗
20. Shin · Adv. Mater. · 2018 · 30 · 170443510.1002/adma.201704435 ↗
21. Hwang · Nanoscale · 2017 · 9 · 244210.1039/C6NR08829E ↗
22. Hwang · AIP Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 01502210.1063/1.5017249 ↗
23. Heo · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 596710.1021/nl403142v ↗
24. N. Oliva , E. A.Casu , C.Yan , A.Krammer , A.Magrez , A.Schueler , O. J. F.Martin and A. M.Ionescu , 2017 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) , 2017 , 36–36
25. Oliva · Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 1425010.1038/s41598-017-12950-y ↗
26. Lin · 2D Mater. · 2016 · 3 · 04200110.1088/2053-1583/3/4/042001 ↗
27. Hersam · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2015 · 6 · 273810.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01218 ↗
28. Lee · Carbon · 2015 · 93 · 28610.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.038 ↗
29. Moriya · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 08311910.1063/1.4894256 ↗
30. Liu · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2016 · 120 · 2079810.1021/acs.jpcc.6b02073 ↗
31. Liu · ACS Nano · 2016 · 10 · 106710.1021/acsnano.5b06398 ↗
32. Sun · Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 381310.1038/ncomms4813 ↗
33. Lee · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 20 · 1693210.1039/C8CP00158H ↗
34. Marin · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A · 2016 · 35 · 02140310.1116/1.4972513 ↗
35. Greczynski · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2020 · 107 · 10059110.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100591 ↗
36. Nam · J. Soc. Inf. Disp. · 2009 · 17 · 73510.1889/JSID17.9.735 ↗
37. Gillet · Surf. Sci. · 2003 · 532–535 · 51910.1016/S0039-6028(03)00477-1 ↗
38. Hutchins · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2006 · 18 · 9987
39. S. Heo , Y. J.Kim , C. H.Kim , S. K.Lee , H. J.Lee , H. J.Hwang , J.Noh and B. H.Lee , 2017 IEEE SNW , 2017 , pp. 131–132
40. Heo · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2018 · 39 · 194810.1109/LED.2018.2874055 ↗
41. Hwang · J. Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 123 · 15430110.1063/1.5024200 ↗
42. González-Borrero · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 06190910.1063/1.3313945 ↗
43. Liu · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2014 · 39 · 1031310.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.155 ↗
44. Nikolaou · Nanotechnology · 2015 · 26 · 13400410.1088/0957-4484/26/13/134004 ↗