Nanocapillary confinement of imidazolium based ionic liquids
Source abstract
Abstract
Room temperature ionic liquids are salts which are molten at or around room temperature without any added solvent or solution. In bulk they exhibit glass like dependence of conductivity with temperature as well as coupling of structural and transport properties. Interfaces of ionic liquids have been found to induce structural changes with evidence of long range structural ordering on solid-liquid interfaces spanning length scales of 10-100 nm. Our aim is to characterize the influence of confinement on the structural properties of ionic liquids. We present the first conductivity measurements on ionic liquids of the imidazolium type in single conical glass nanopores with confinements as low as tens of nanometers. We probe glassy dynamics of ionic liquids in a large range of temperatures (-20 to 70 °C) and nanopore opening sizes (20-600 nm) in silica glass nanocapillaries. Our results indicate no long range freezing effects due to confinement in nanopores with diameters as low as 20 nm. The studied ionic liquids are found to behave as glass like liquids across the whole accessible confinement size and temperature range.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Dynamics and Properties · Theoretical and Computational Physics · Ionic liquids properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory of Nanoscale Biology
Institute of Bioengineering
School of Engineering
EPFL
1015 Lausanne
State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Nanjing University
Nanjing
China
Funding
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung · China Scholarship Council · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Galiński · Electrochim. Acta · 2006 · 51 · 556710.1016/j.electacta.2006.03.016 ↗
2. Armand · Nat. Mater. · 2009 · 8 · 62110.1038/nmat2448 ↗
3. Fedorov · Chem. Rev. · 2014 · 114 · 297810.1021/cr400374x ↗
4. Zhou · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2009 · 38 · 259010.1039/b817899m ↗
5. Chiappe · J. Phys. Org. Chem. · 2005 · 18 · 27510.1002/poc.863 ↗
6. Keskin · J. Supercrit. Fluids · 2007 · 43 · 15010.1016/j.supflu.2007.05.013 ↗
7. Kobrak · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 12 · 192210.1039/b920080k ↗
8. Kjellander · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2016 · 18 · 1898510.1039/C6CP02418A ↗
9. Gebbie · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2015 · 112 · 743210.1073/pnas.1508366112 ↗
10. Goossens · Chem. Rev. · 2016 · 116 · 464310.1021/cr400334b ↗
11. Bazant · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 04610210.1103/PhysRevLett.106.046102 ↗
12. Smith · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2016 · 7 · 215710.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00867 ↗
13. Lee · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2017 · 119 · 02600210.1103/PhysRevLett.119.026002 ↗
14. Araque · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2015 · 119 · 701510.1021/acs.jpcb.5b01093 ↗
15. Araque · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2015 · 119 · 1272710.1021/acs.jpcb.5b05506 ↗
16. Feng · Phys. Rev. X · 2019 · 9 · 021024
17. Iacob · Soft Matter · 2012 · 8 · 28910.1039/C1SM06581E ↗
18. Breitsprecher · J. Chem. Phys. · 2017 · 147 · 10470810.1063/1.4986346 ↗
19. Futamura · Nat. Mater. · 2017 · 16 · 122510.1038/nmat4974 ↗
20. Zuo · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2019 · 21 · 2210.1039/C8CP06479B ↗
21. Anaredy · Langmuir · 2016 · 32 · 514710.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00304 ↗
22. Ma · Langmuir · 2016 · 32 · 950710.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02639 ↗
23. Pontoni · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2019 · 123 · 305810.1021/acs.jpcc.9b00286 ↗
24. Kamysbayev · ACS Nano · 2019 · 13 · 576010.1021/acsnano.9b01292 ↗
25. Comtet · Nat. Mater. · 2017 · 16 · 63410.1038/nmat4880 ↗
26. Lhermerout · Phys. Rev. Fluids · 2018 · 3 · 01420110.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.014201 ↗
27. Garcia · Faraday Discuss. · 2018 · 206 · 44310.1039/C7FD00149E ↗
28. Davenport · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 212510.1021/nl900630z ↗
29. S. Marion , M.Macha , S. J.Davis , A.Chernev and A.Radenovic , Nanobubbles at nanopores probed with pressure , arXiv:1911.05229, 2019
30. Fujie · Chem. Sci. · 2015 · 6 · 430610.1039/C5SC01398D ↗
31. Alba-Simionesco · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2006 · 18 · R15
32. Fuller · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1997 · 144 · 388110.1149/1.1838106 ↗
33. Vila · Port. Electrochim. Acta · 2007 · 25 · 16310.4152/pea.200701163 ↗
34. Zech · J. Chem. Eng. Data · 2010 · 55 · 177410.1021/je900793r ↗
35. Stoppa · J. Chem. Eng. Data · 2010 · 55 · 176810.1021/je900789j ↗
36. Schreiner · J. Chem. Eng. Data · 2010 · 55 · 178410.1021/je900878j ↗
37. Angell · Science · 1995 · 267 · 192410.1126/science.267.5206.1924 ↗
38. Steinbock · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 1125510.1021/nn405029j ↗
39. Laohakunakorn · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 69510.1021/nl504237k ↗
40. Jiang · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2016 · 120 · 462910.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11522 ↗
41. Zech · J. Chem. Eng. Data · 2010 · 55 · 177410.1021/je900793r ↗
42. Widegren · Chem. Commun. · 2005 · 161010.1039/b417348a ↗
43. Widegren · J. Chem. Thermodyn. · 2005 · 37 · 56910.1016/j.jct.2005.04.009 ↗
44. Ma · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2018 · 47 · 868510.1039/C8CS00325D ↗
45. Liu · Mol. Phys. · 2017 · 115 · 45410.1080/00268976.2016.1271154 ↗
46. Seddon · Pure Appl. Chem. · 2009 · 72 · 227510.1351/pac200072122275 ↗
47. An · ACS Nano · 2015 · 9 · 759610.1021/acsnano.5b02915 ↗
48. Taylor · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2017 · 19 · 1430610.1039/C7CP01725A ↗
49. Lin · Chem. – Eur. J. · 2018 · 24 · 1306410.1002/chem.201800669 ↗
50. Bulushev · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 711810.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03264 ↗
51. Willmott · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 09430710.1063/1.3580283 ↗
52. Kowalczyk · Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 31510110.1088/0957-4484/22/31/315101 ↗